Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 02 June 2022
Sec. Ophthalmology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.856800

One-Year Outcomes of Modified Technique for Scleral Fixation of a Three-Piece Intraocular Lens Without Conjunctival Opening

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 2Department of Ophthalmology, Zhenjiang Ruikang Hospital, Zhenjiang, China

Purpose: This study aimed to present the 1-year follow-up of a modified technique for scleral fixation of three-piece intraocular lens (IOLs) without conjunctival incision.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of a consecutive series of 10 eyes of nine patients who underwent scleral IOL fixation using the modified technique was performed. Data were collected 1 year after surgery for all patients.

Results: The range of follow-up time was between 1 year and 31 months. At the last follow-up point, the IOL was well-positioned and the visual acuity was good (as limited by primary diseases). Short-term complications included pupillary IOL capture (n = 1) and decreased intraocular pressure (n = 1), and no long-term complications were observed.

Conclusion: Outcome data support this technique as a viable option for the management of secondary IOL fixation with flexible usage of more designs of IOLs.

Introduction

Scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOLs) is a widely accepted way to restore aphakic eyes without enough capsule, such as congenital and acquired zonular weakness, posttraumatic subluxation, and post lensectomy. Although several sutureless scleral fixation methods have been reported in recent years, such as the flanged haptic technique (1) and the scleral tunnel approach (2, 3), the scleral suture fixation of PCIOL is still one of the most effective methods and offers relatively easy management of potential surgical complications (4).

CZ70BD IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, United States) is a commonly used scleral-sutured IOL that is made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and has an optic diameter of 7 mm. While such a sizable rigid IOL requires a large incision and risks intraoperative damage and postoperative complications (5), the use of foldable IOL refines this surgery into a small incision; however, most of the IOLs reported for scleral fixation in previous studies were specially designed with closed-loop haptics, such as Akreos AO IOL (Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Rochester, United States) (6, 7) with four eyelet haptics and C-flex IOL (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd., East Sussex, United Kingdom) with two closed-loop haptics (8). The options of foldable IOLs for scleral fixation are still limited. Therefore, developing novel fixation techniques for flexible usage of various designs of IOLs represents a general trend and fits in with different conditions.

In this study, we propose a modified technique for the scleral fixation of a secondary foldable three-piece PCIOL, which demonstrates surgical success in ten eyes. The long-term outcomes are presented to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of this novel technique.

Subjects and Methods

Institutional Review Board approval and Ethical Review Board approval were obtained from Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. A retrospective chart review consisting of 10 eyes of nine patients who underwent modified transscleral suture fixation of a 3-piece pre-loaded PIOL (PY60AD, HOYA Medicals, Tokyo, Japan) between December 2018 and July 2020 was performed. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year after surgery.

Data collected included surgical indications, primary surgery (if applicable), the time interval between the present and primary surgery, and relevant ocular and systemic history. Complete ophthalmic examination was conducted for all the patients, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated fundus examination, axial length, and corneal endothelial density (ECD) preoperatively and at 1 month and the last visit postoperatively. The presence of postoperative complications was also recorded. IOL tilt and decentration were measured and calculated automatically with swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (SS-ASOCT, CASIA2; Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan) under the mode of a 3-dimensional (3D) scan at the last visit under mydriatic conditions using a mixture of 0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride (Mydrin-P, Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) according to the method previously described (9, 10). Briefly, CASIA2 uses a swept-source laser with a 1,310-nm wavelength at a frequency of 0.3 s and provides higher resolution images of IOLs. Using the IOL scan mode, 8 distinct ASOCT images from 8 different angles (namely 0–180, 90–270, 23–203, 113–293, 45–225, 135–315, 68–248, and 158–338) are obtained and a 3D image is created (9). IOL tilt and decentration are directly generated by the built-in software (Version SS2000) relative to the visual line, and the detailed extent and azimuth (the orientation of IOL tilt and decentration in degree) are present beside the image.

Surgical Technique

The step-by-step surgical procedure was demonstrated in Figure 1. After the external incision of the superior scleral tunnel is made 2 mm posterior to the limbus at 11 o’clock, an ophthalmic marker is placed and pressed on the cornea, making two location imprints at 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock. Using a crescent blade, two partial-thickness grooves (300 μm-depth, 3.0 mm-long) are made on the corneal limbus at the two imprints, followed by dissection of two scleral pockets posteriorly from these limbal grooves. The pockets are extended perpendicular to the limbus and continued for 3.0 mm, maintaining a uniform depth in the sclera. Then, a paracentesis is made at 8 o’clock by a 15-degree lance tip blade for 20-G infusion, and another paracentesis is made using a 3.0 mm sharp-tip keratome to complete the superior sclerocorneal incision.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Surgical steps. (A) Two location imprints at 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock are made by an ophthalmic marker. (B) Two scleral pockets are dissected by a crescent blade posteriorly from the limbus, achieving a thickness of 300 μm and a length of 3.0 mm. (C) After anterior chamber infusion, puncture points are marked at the middle line of the pocket beds 2.0–2.5 mm posterior to the limbus on both sides. (D) The straight needle of a double-armed 9-0 polypropylene suture (with two curved needles) is introduced at one puncture point at 9 o’clock through the conjunctiva and full thickness of the Hoffman pocket, passing through the anterior chamber to the opposite side, then docked into the opening of a 27-G needle, which is introduced at the other puncture point at 3 o’clock, then removed externally. (E) The straight needle is again passed backward through the conjunctiva and the full thickness of the scleral pocket 1.0–2.0 mm adjacent to the first pass of the needle, threading through the anterior chamber and docked again with the 27-G needle, and guided out in the same way 1.0–2.0 mm adjacent to the puncture point at 9 o’clock. (F) The pairs of sutures are retrieved externally through the superior incision and cut into two halves. The star symbol demonstrates one end of the double sutures to tie on the leading haptic. (G) The leading haptic of the pre-loaded PIOL is pushed out of the cartridge and tied with one of the double sutures at the junction of the enlarged haptic end. (H) After the leading haptic and the folded IOL optic is injected into the anterior chamber, the trailing haptic left externally is tied with the other double sutures. (I) The two pairs of suture ends are retrieved through the scleral pocket opening pulled out by the Sinskey hook and knotted via tension adjustable knot to center the optic of the IOL.

Afterward, a double-armed 9-0 polypropylene suture (Mani Inc., Tochigi, Japan) with two straight needles (or one straight needle and one curved needle) is used for IOL fixation. Two puncture points are marked by calipers at the middle line of the pocket beds 2.0–2.5 mm posterior to the limbus on both sides. The straight needle is introduced at one puncture point at 9 o’clock through the conjunctiva and full thickness of the Hoffman pocket, passing through the anterior chamber to the opposite side, then docked into the opening of a 27-G needle, which is introduced at the other puncture point at 3 o’clock and then removed externally. Afterward, the straight needle is again passed backward through the conjunctiva and the full thickness of the scleral pocket 1.0–2.0 mm adjacent to the first pass of the needle, threading through the anterior chamber and docked again with the 27-G needle, and guided out in the same way 1.0–2.0 mm adjacent to the puncture point at 9 o’clock. When visualized in the pupillary area, the pairs of sutures are retrieved externally through the superior incision by a Sinskey hook (or forceps) and cut into two halves, leaving two double-sutured ends for IOL fixation.

Next, the leading haptic of the preloaded PIOL is pushed out of the cartridge and tied with one end of the double sutures at the junction of the enlarged haptic end. After the leading haptic and the folded IOL optic are injected into the anterior chamber, the trailing haptic left externally is tied with the other end double sutures and then pushed subsequently into the eye by the Sinskey hook. By removing the two needles linked to the suture ends passed at 3 o’clock and cutting the suture-loop at 9 o’clock into two single suture ends, each suture end is retrieved through the scleral pocket opening by placing the Sinskey hook into the pocket and pulling and externalizing the trailing suture end. After the PCIOL is placed at the exact position behind the iris, the pairs of sutures at each pocket are knotted via a tension adjustable knot to center the optic of the IOL. Each knot is tied into the scleral pocket, and the suture ends were laid flat into each pocket. Finally, the superior incision is sutured, and the 20-G infusion tip is removed with this incision watertight.

The video demonstrates the procedures (Supplementary Video 1). All surgeries were performed by one experienced surgeon (PZ) under general anesthesia for patients under 13 years old or retrobulbar anesthesia for the others. For cases with lens subluxation, lensectomy and complete pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) were performed prior to IOL fixation.

Results

Ten eyes of nine patients who underwent the procedure were enrolled. All the eyes met the criteria for scleral fixation of PIOL with obviously better preoperative BCVA. The mean patient age was 23.4 ± 22.89 years at the time of the surgery. Four patients had subluxation lens because of Marfan Syndrome (MFS) and received lensectomy and complete PPV before IOL fixation (5 eyes, 50%). The lens in four patients (4 eyes, 40%) were extracted in previous surgeries. One patient (1 eye, 10%) suffered aphakia secondary to ocular rupture. The average axial length was 24.43 ± 1.05 mm. The mean follow-up time was 19.6 ± 7.04 months. Detailed individual patient data are provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Individual patient characteristics.

As Table 2 demonstrates, the patients’ BCVA ranged from counting fingers to 20/25 preoperatively and 20/125 to 20/20 at the last postoperative follow-up time. The IOP and ECD remained in the normal range before and after surgery. Throughout the follow-up period, one child patient with MFS experienced pupillary capture of IOL optic on the first day after surgery, which was repositioned after pupillary dilation and supine positioning. Another child patient suffered decreased IOP caused by suspected incision leakage on the first day after surgery and was successfully treated with pressure bandaging for 2 days. No other intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The IOL was well-positioned at the last follow-up time (see Table 3).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Comparison of clinical data before and after surgery.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Parameters of intraocular lens position at the last follow-up time.

Discussion

Scleral suture fixation of PCIOL is the most widely accepted method and plays an important role in the visual restoration of eyes with inadequate capsule support. In our present study, we for the first time described a modified approach of the scleral Hoffman pocket fixation technique (11), combined with HOYA PCIOL. The clinical observation for at least 1 year demonstrated improved BCVA and a low rate of complication. No patient presented suture knot exposure, suture breakage, or severe IOL tilting or decentration. There were no severe intraoperative or postoperative adverse events during the follow-up period.

The application of the Hoffman pocket technique provides several advantages. Dissection of this pocket starts from a clear corneal incision, avoiding the need for scleral cautery and preserving the integrity of the conjunctiva. This surgical procedure creates a larger surface area for suture passes than traditional triangular scleral flaps (12), allowing the needles to exit inside the dissected pocket as long as they are at a proper distance from the limbus (13). Most remarkably, burying the suture knot in the pocket prevents erosion of the overlying conjunctiva with the potential risk for endophthalmitis and avoids suture breakage and the ensuing IOL malposition or dislocation. In addition, using this technique, the conjunctiva can be preserved at maximum, which is particularly desirable for the patients who previously received or who needed to receive glaucoma infiltration surgery (14). Postoperative complications, such as surgical induced astigmatism (SIA) and corneal edema, are also less likely to happen, and the patients’ comforts are largely improved.

Scleral fixation with the Hoffman pocket technique has been applied for various types of IOLs, while most of the IOLs are used with closed-loop haptics or designed eyelets on the haptics, through which sutures can easily be passed for IOL fixation (1517). On the other hand, seldom had the 3-piece IOLs been reported to be fixated with this technique, except that Domingues et al. (18) described a cupid technique to perforate and knot at the body of the 3-piece subluxated IOL with 10-0 polypropylene suture. In this study, we for the first-time used Hoffman’s technique in the fixation of a 3-piece pre-loaded IOL, which provides several significant improvements: first, the pre-loaded foldable design of the IOL allows the implantation through a smaller incision, associating with better intraoperative IOP control and less postoperative SIA. Next, the haptics of this IOL, namely HOYA PY60AD, are made of PMMA. The rigid material as well as the C-loop posteriorly angulated thin configuration of its two haptics largely minimize iris chafing, reducing the risk for uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome, pigment dispersion syndrome, and increased IOP. Most distinctively, the end of haptics is designed as an enlarged cone shape, which enables the suture to fixate directly on the haptics by knotting at the junction of haptic ends and at the same time avoid suture slippage (19). Our method provides an effective, simple, safe, and a minimally invasive way for scleral suture fixation with more IOL options.

Concerning complications, pupillary IOL capture was observed in one patient with MFS 1 day postoperatively, and the IOL was reposited followed by pilocarpine therapy without repeated captures. The pupillary capture rate was reported much higher in the pseudophakic eyes of patients with MFS (2022) because the myopathy of pupil constrictors and dilators in this population gives rise to pliable iris and reverse pupillary block (23, 24). To deal with this situation, preventative intraoperative surgical iridectomy (preferably with small gauge vitrectomy) or postoperative laser iridectomy are recommended (25). We also modified the technique, retreating the fixation plane from 2.0 to 2.5 mm posterior to the limbus for patients with MFS, which noticeably decreased the rate of pupillary IOL capture (not mentioned in this study). Another child patient also suffered from decreased IOP 1 day postoperatively. The Seidel test was done to exclude leakage of the incision, and the IOP returned to normal after pressure bandaging for 2 days. Significantly, the tilt azimuth quite differed in Case 10 compared with other cases, as demonstrated in Table 3. This patient suffered from ocular rupture, resulting in superior temporal traumatic aniridia. The inadequate anterior support of the iris might be the reason for his unique azimuth.

Conclusion

This surgical technique offers an alternative approach to the management of secondary IOL fixation with flexible usage of more designs of IOLs for patients with insufficient capsular support, achieving a reliable and reproducible procedure with improved anatomical and visual outcomes, reduced complications, and decreased surgical times. However, the limitations of this study include its small sample size and relatively short follow-up period. Future studies with longer follow-up observation are needed to determine its standing among other documented techniques.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board approval and Ethical Review Board approval were obtained from Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Author Contributions

HY conceived and designed the analysis and wrote the manuscript. HY, SZ, and WM collected the data and performed the analysis. HY, SZ, PF, and PZ contributed to data collection. PZ carried out final editing and approval. All authors agreed to be accountable for the content of the work.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82171069 and 81770963) and Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (No. YG2021QN52).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.856800/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Video 1 | The surgical procedures of the technique.

References

1. Yamane S, Sato S, Maruyama-Inoue M, Kadonosono K. Flanged intrascleral intraocular lens fixation with double-needle technique. Ophthalmology. (2017) 124:1136–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Prasad S. Transconjunctival sutureless haptic fixation of posterior chamber IOL: a minimally traumatic approach for IOL rescue or secondary implantation. Retina. (2013) 33:657–60. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31827b6499

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Takayama K, Akimoto M, Taguchi H, Nakagawa S, Hiroi K. Transconjunctival sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens fixation using intrascleral tunnels guided with catheter and 30-gauge needles. Br J Ophthalmol. (2015) 99:1457–9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Patel LG, Starr MR, Ammar MJ, Yonekawa Y. Scleral fixated secondary intraocular lenses: a review of recent literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. (2020) 31:161–6. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lyu J, Zhao PQ. Simplified ab externo fixation technique to treat late dislocation of scleral-sutured polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses. Eye (Lond). (2016) 30:668–72. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhang J, Tian J, Sun X, Yuan G. Closed continuous-loop suture: a novel surgical technique for transscleral fixation of intraocular lenses. Retina. (2019): [Online ahead of print], doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Fan KC, Smiddy WE. Rescuing an Akreos 4-Point haptic intraocular lens: a novel surgical technique. Retina. (2021): [Online ahead of print], doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Kim SJ, Lee SJ, Park CH, Jung GY, Park SH. Long-term stability and visual outcomes of a single-piece, foldable, acrylic intraocular lens for scleral fixation. Retina. (2009) 29:91–7. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318188c7fc

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Chen X, Gu X, Wang W, Xiao W, Jin G, Wang L, et al. Characteristics and factors associated with intraocular lens tilt and decentration after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2020) 46:1126–31. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chen X, Gu X, Wang W, Jin G, Wang L, Zhang E, et al. Distributions of crystalline lens tilt and decentration and associated factors in age-related cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2021) 47:1296–301. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000631

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. Scleral fixation without conjunctival dissection. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2006) 32:1907–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.05.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Grigorian R, Chang J, Zarbin M, Del Priore L. A new technique for suture fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses that eliminates intraocular knots. Ophthalmology. (2003) 110:1349–56. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00467-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Duffey RJ, Holland EJ, Agapitos PJ, Lindstrom RL. Anatomic study of transsclerally sutured intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. (1989) 108:300–9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90121-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Long C, Wei Y, Yuan Z, Zhang Z, Lin X, Liu B. Modified technique for transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol. (2015) 15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0118-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Fass ON, Herman WK. Four-point suture scleral fixation of a hydrophilic acrylic IOL in aphakic eyes with insufficient capsule support. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2010) 36:991–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Das S, Nicholson M, Deshpande K, Kummelil MK, Nagappa S, Shetty BK. Scleral fixation of a foldable intraocular lens with polytetrafluoroethylene sutures through a Hoffman pocket. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2016) 42:955–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ni S, Wang W, Chen X, Wu X, He S, Ma Y, et al. Clinical observation of a novel technique: transscleral suture fixation of a foldable 3-looped haptics one-piece posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation through scleral pockets with intact conjunctiva. BMC Ophthalmol. (2019) 19:105. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1113-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Domingues M, Brito P, Falcao M, Monteiro T, Falcao-Reis F. Cupid fixation for repositioning subluxated intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2011) 37:1571–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Chandrasekar R, Priyanka V. Long-term assessment of tilt of glued intraocular lenses: an optical coherence tomography analysis 5 years after surgery. Ophthalmology. (2015) 122:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Choi SR, Jeon JH, Kang JW, Heo JW. Risk factors for and management of pupillary intraocular lens capture after intraocular lens transscleral fixation. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2017) 43:1557–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Sen P, Attiku Y, Bhende P, Rishi E, Ratra D, Sreelakshmi K. Outcome of sutured scleral fixated intraocular lens in Marfan syndrome in pediatric eyes. Int Ophthalmol. (2020) 40:1531–8. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01322-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kim WS. Transscleral intraocular lens fixation with preservation of the anterior vitreous face in patients with marfan syndrome and ectopia lentis. Cornea. (2010) 29(Suppl 1):S20–4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ea48de

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Shah SS, Kurup SP, Ralay Ranaivo H, Mets-Halgrimson RB, Mets MB. Pupillary manifestations of Marfan syndrome: from the Marfan eye consortium of Chicago. Ophthalmic Genet. (2018) 39:297–9. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2018.1424207

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Behan WM, Longman C, Petty RK, Comeglio P, Child AH, Boxer M, et al. Muscle fibrillin deficiency in Marfan’s syndrome myopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2003) 74:633–8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.5.633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Scharioth GB. Iris capture and reverse pupillary block in eyes with scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. (2018) 44:673. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.04.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: intraocular lens, three-piece, scleral fixation, Hoffman pockets, outcomes, modified technique

Citation: Ye H, Zhang S, Mi W, Fei P and Zhao P (2022) One-Year Outcomes of Modified Technique for Scleral Fixation of a Three-Piece Intraocular Lens Without Conjunctival Opening. Front. Med. 9:856800. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.856800

Received: 17 January 2022; Accepted: 03 May 2022;
Published: 02 June 2022.

Edited by:

Paris Tranos, Ophthalmica Eye Institute, Greece

Reviewed by:

Aristeidis Konstantinidis, General University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece
Peng Zhou, Parkway Health, China
Xu Chen, Shanghai Aier Eye Hospital, China
Xialin Liu, Sun Yat-sen University, China

Copyright © 2022 Ye, Zhang, Mi, Fei and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Peiquan Zhao, zhaopeiquan@xinhuamed.com.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Download