Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol., 20 March 2024
Sec. Reproduction

Lifestyle and fertility-specific quality of life affect reproductive outcomes in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization

Yoko UrataYoko Urata1Miyuki Harada*Miyuki Harada1*Shinnosuke Komiya,Shinnosuke Komiya2,3Ikumi AkiyamaIkumi Akiyama4Chihiro TuchidaChihiro Tuchida1Yoshiharu NakaokaYoshiharu Nakaoka5Aisaku FukudaAisaku Fukuda6Yoshiharu Morimoto,,Yoshiharu Morimoto2,5,6Takuya KawaharaTakuya Kawahara7Yusuke IshikawaYusuke Ishikawa8Yutaka OsugaYutaka Osuga1
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2HORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic, Osaka, Japan
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Medical University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 5IVF Namba Clinic, Osaka, Japan
  • 6IVF Osaka Clinic, Osaka, Japan
  • 7Clinical Research Promotion Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 8FamiOne, Inc., Tokyo, Japan

Objective: A Mediterranean dietary pattern, sleeping habits, physical activity, and lifestyle appear to affect reproductive health. There are few reports about whether fertility-specific quality of life (QOL) is linked to infertility treatment outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate when lifestyle factors and fertility-specific QOL are comprehensively considered, which factors influence assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes.

Methods: This prospective cohort includes 291 women undergoing a first ART treatment at multiple centers in Japan and was designed to evaluate the influence of diet, physical activity, sleeping pattern, computer use duration, and fertility-specific quality of life tool (FertiQoL) score on ART treatment outcomes using a questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval and the secondary endpoints were a positive pregnancy test and gestational sac (GS) detection.

Results: The good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval tended to be negatively associated with frequent fish consumption. After all embryo transfer (ET) cycles, a positive pregnancy test tended to be positively associated with longer sleep and longer computer use (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.9–2.7 and OR = 1.7, CI = 1.0–2.8, respectively) and negatively associated with a smoking partner (OR = 0.6, CI = 0.3–1.0). GS detection was positively and significantly associated with frequent olive oil intake and longer computer use (OR = 1.7, CI = 1.0–3.0 and OR = 1.7, CI = 1.0–3.0, respectively). After ET cycles with a single blastocyst, a positive pregnancy test was positively and significantly associated with longer computer use (OR = 2.0, CI = 1.1–3.7), while GS detection was significantly more likely in women with longer computer use (OR = 2.1, CI = 1.1–3.8) and tended to be more likely in women with a higher FertiQoL Total scaled treatment score (OR = 1.8, CI = 1.0–3.3). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and 0.05 ≤ p <0.01 as tendency.

Conclusions: Olive oil may be an important factor in dietary habits. Fertility-specific QOL and smoking cessation guidance for partners are important for infertile couples.

Introduction

Infertility is defined as the failure to achieve a successful pregnancy after 12 months or longer of regular unprotected intercourse and is reported to affect approximately 48.5 million couples in the world (1). The number of infertile patients is increasing (2). According to the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies, the number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment cycles is gradually increasing (3) and is reported to be about 2.5–3 million cycles per year worldwide (https://www.icmartivf.org/wp-content/uploads/ICMART-ESHRE-WR2018-Preliminary-Report.pdf) (4). In Japan, 449,900 ART cycles are performed annually (https://www.jsog.or.jp/activity/art/2020data_202208.pdf) and approximately 1 in 13.9 babies is born as a result of ART. In Japan, infertility treatment, including ART, has been covered by public health insurance since April 2022. The number of couples undergoing infertility treatment is increasing due to aging of the population who wish to have children owing to later marriages, the expansion of women’s participation in society and diversification of their life plans, and the growing need for more planned pregnancies and deliveries.

Some factors affect infertility treatment results, including age and ovarian reserve, which can be evaluated by the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level, and antral follicle count. In addition, lifestyle factors are reportedly associated with fecundity and infertility treatment results, including dietary habits such as consumption of seafood (5), a Mediterranean diet (6, 7), and intake of alcohol (8, 9) and caffeine (10); smoking (11, 12); exercise habits (13, 14); and the quality and duration of sleep (15, 16). However, it has not been fully elucidated whether lifestyle factors are associated with infertility.

Quality of life (QOL) was defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as ‘‘individuals’ perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns’’ (17). QOL must be assessed from both general and disease-specific perspectives (18). Scales used for infertility-specific QOL assessment include the Fertility Quality of Life tool (FertiQoL) and Fertility Problem Inventory (18, 19). FertiQoL contains a Core module and an additional module for assessment of treatment satisfaction (19), is available in 40 or more languages including Japanese (20, 21), and is an easy tool to use around the world. In this study, we downloaded the Japanese version from the FertiQoL homepage (https://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/fertiqol/). FertiQoL has been used to objectively assess patient satisfaction (22, 23) and to assess QOL of patients undergoing infertility treatment (24, 25) and patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (26). However, there are few reports about whether patients’ QOL evaluated by FertiQoL is linked to infertility treatment outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the impact of lifestyle, including dietary habits and physical activity, and fertility-specific QOL on ART outcomes by performing a comprehensive analysis.

Materials and methods

Recruitment of patients and inclusion and exclusion criteria

Infertile couples seeking their first IVF treatment at three clinics of the IVF Japan Group in Osaka, Japan, and the University of Tokyo Hospital in Tokyo, Japan, were recruited to participate in this prospective cohort study. Female partners aged 20–45 years who had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 and < 30 kg/m2, had an AMH level ≥ 1 ng/mL, and who used their own oocytes and male partners who used their own sperm were eligible. Women are of Eastern Asian ethnicity living in Japan; with endometrioma ≥ 3 cm; who had a history of neoplasm, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension; who were treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) at a dosage ≥ 450 IU/day; or who were psychiatric outpatients were excluded.

Frequencies of food consumption and social habits and FertiQoL questionnaire

At their first visit to the IVF unit, we recruited patients to this prospective cohort study and gave them the questionnaire. The food categories investigated were principally based on the Mediterranean diet score (27), which was modified for adjustment to Japanese dietary habits, and included refined cereals (white rice, bread, and pasta), non-refined cereals (brown and cereal rice), potatoes, fruits, vegetables, legumes (natto and tofu), fish, red meat and products, poultry, full-fat dairy products (e.g., cheese, yoghurt, and milk), olive oil in cooking, alcoholic beverages, caffeine-containing drinks (coffee, black tea, green tea, etc.), and breakfast. The lifestyle categories investigated were sleep duration, work duration, night shift or not, computer use duration (computer, smartphone, and tablet), and smoking habits of the patient and her partner. The degree of smoking was evaluated using the Brinkman Index, which multiplies the duration of smoking (in years) by the number of cigarettes smoked per day (28). Exercise habits were investigated based on the WHO’s definition of exercise intensity using a table of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) according to physical activity: sedentary behavior (1.5 METs or lower), light-intensity physical activity (1.5–3 METs), moderate-intensity physical activity (between 3 and <6 METs), and vigorous-intensity physical activity (6.0 or more METs) (29, 30). The FertiQoL questionnaire in Japanese was downloaded from the FertiQoL homepage (https://sites.cardiff.ac.uk/fertiqol/).

Controlled ovarian stimulation, laboratory procedures, and embryo transfer

For the long protocol regimen, nasal administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (buserelin acetate, Suprecur; Clinigen, Tokyo, Japan) was started in the middle of the luteal phase prior to ovarian stimulation. Controlled ovarian stimulation was started on cycle day 2 or 3 with oral Clomifene citrate (Clomid; Fuji Pharma, Toyama, Japan), an aromatase inhibitor (Letrozole, Femara; Novartis, Tokyo, Japan), rFSH (follitropin alfa, Gonal-F; Merck, Tokyo, Japan), and hMG (HMG; ASKA Pharma, Tokyo, Japan). An individual starting drug at an individual dosage was administered based on the AMH level, age, and basal FSH level. The allowed maximum dosages of rFSH and hMG were 300 IU/day. The dosage could be adjusted according to the general practice of the participating clinics and hospital. For the GnRH antagonist protocol regimen, a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix acetate, GANIREST; Organon, Tokyo, Japan) at a dosage of 0.25 mg/day was added on the day when the leading follicle had a mean diameter larger than 14 mm and was continued throughout the remaining stimulation. Final oocyte maturation was induced by administering 0.5 mg of a GnRH agonist (nafarelin acetate hydrate, Nasanyl; Pfizer, Tokyo, Japan) or 10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (HCG; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Oocyte retrieval was performed 34 hours after GnRH agonist or hCG administration. Fertilized oocytes were cultured to the cleavage or blastocyst stage, which was assessed according to the classification system of Veeck or the Gardner classification, respectively, and vitrificated. Blastocysts with a Gardner score of 3BB or greater were considered to be good quality. Blastocysts were ranked based on morphological evaluation so that the blastocyst with the highest implantation potential was used first.

A wash-out period of at least one completed menstrual cycle was required between stimulation and ET. Endometrial preparation was performed in a hormone replacement cycle. Transdermal administration of estradiol (ESTRANA; Hisamitsu Pharma, Saga, Japan) began on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle. When endometrial thickness reached at least 8 mm, a vaginal progesterone tablet (LUTINUS; Ferring Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) at a dosage of 300 mg/day was added. Cleavage- or blastocyst-stage embryos were thawed and transferred on day 3 or 5, respectively, after commencement of progesterone. For two-step ET, cleavage- and blastocyst-stage embryos were thawed and transferred on day 3 and 5, respectively, after commencement of progesterone during a single ET cycle. The number of embryos transferred was decided based on the general practice of the participating clinics and hospital.

A serum hCG test was conducted generally between 3 weeks 6 days and 4 weeks 1 day of gestation. Providing the test was positive, transvaginal ultrasound was performed 1 or 2 weeks later to detect an intrauterine gestational sac (GS).

Reproductive outcomes

Serum levels of hormones, including FSH, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, and AMH, before the ART cycle were determined. The outcomes of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were recorded, including the number of follicles larger than 15 mm and the estradiol level when oocytes were picked up, the number of retrieved oocytes, the fertilization rate, and the numbers of cleavage-stage embryos, blastocysts, and good-quality blastocysts. A good-quality blastocyst was defined as a blastocyst with a score of 3BB or greater based on the Gardner classification. The result of the first ET cycle after oocyte retrieval was assessed. A positive pregnancy test was defined as a serum hCG level ≥10 mIU/mL, generally measured between 3 weeks 6 days and 4 weeks 1 day of gestation. The fertilization rate was calculated as the number of two-pronuclear embryos relative to the number of retrieved oocytes, the achievement rate of the cleavage stage was calculated as the number of cleavage-stage embryos relative to the number of retrieved oocytes, and the good-quality blastocyst rate was calculated as the number of good-quality blastocysts relative to the number of retrieved oocytes.

Statistics

We aimed to recruit 286 patients in order to detect a 5% difference in the good-quality blastocyst rate, which we considered a clinically relevant difference, between two groups defined by independent variables, with a two-sided alpha error of 5% and power of 80%. As independent variables, analysis was conducted to determine if background, dietary habits, exercise habits, and FertiQoL were related to IVF outcomes. For continuous variables, women were divided into two groups (higher and lower than the median value) and the two groups were compared. The primary outcome was the good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval. Secondary outcomes were a positive pregnancy test (hCG level ≥ 10 mIU/mL) and detection of a GS. We screened variables associated with each of these outcomes using the two-sample t-test with a threshold of p < 0.01 (univariate selection (31)) to reduce the number of independent variables). The associated variables were included in the multivariable model. A multivariable linear model was used for the good-quality blastocyst rate and multivariable logistic models were used for a positive pregnancy test and detection of a GS. In the resulting model, independent variables with p < 0.05 were considered to be significantly associated with the outcome. Missing data were not imputed. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study patients

From May 2019 to March 2022, 291 women met the eligibility criteria and provided informed consent. Of these women, three discontinued fertility treatment, two spontaneously became pregnant before controlled ovarian stimulation, and five met the exclusion criteria. Therefore, 281 women underwent controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval. Of these women, three did not achieve fertilization, seven did not produce any good-quality embryos, two underwent preimplantation genetic testing, five postponed their ET, two spontaneously became pregnant before ET, and two were lost following treatment. Therefore, 260 women underwent ET including 200 single blastocyst embryo transfers (blast-SETs), 139 women showed hCG positivity (hCG level ≥ 10 mIU/mL), and a single GS was detected in 121 women. No multiple GSs were observed (Figure 1). The characteristics, dietary habits, lifestyle characteristics, and FertiQoL scores of patients at baseline are provided in Table 1. The clinical characteristics of patients upon IVF treatment are provided in Table 2.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Flowchart of in vitro fertilization treatment of the study population.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Patients demographic, clinical and lifestyle characteristics, dietary habits and FertiQoL score.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Clinical characteristics.

The good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval

Women aged 36 years or older had a significantly lower good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval than those younger than 36 years (p = 0.007), and women with Hashimoto’s disease had a significantly lower good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval than those without it (p = 0.004) (Table 3). Women who consumed fish twice/week or more tended to have a lower good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval than those who consumed fish less often (p = 0.065).

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 The good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval (n = 270).

Positive pregnancy test after all ET cycles

We analyzed factors associated with a positive pregnancy test after all ET cycles, including single embryo transfer (SET) (blastocyst or cleavage stage), double embryo transfer (DET) (blastocyst or cleavage stage), and two-step ET (one blastocyst and one cleavage-stage embryo) (Table 4). Women aged 36 years or older were significantly less likely to have a positive pregnancy test than those younger than 36 years (odds ratio (OR) = 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.3–0.8, p = 0.003). Women who slept for 7 hours/day or longer and used a computer for 4 hours/day or longer tended to be more likely to have a positive pregnancy test (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.9–2.7, p = 0.088; and OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0–2.8, p = 0.059, respectively). Women whose partners were smokers tended to be less likely to have a positive pregnancy test than women whose partners were non-smokers (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.3–1.0, p = 0.063).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 Positive pregnancy test after all embryo transfer cycles (n = 254).

GS detection after all ET cycles

We analyzed factors associated with GS detection after all ET cycles (Table 5). A GS was significantly more likely to be detected in women who took olive oil three times/week or more, used a computer for 4 hours/day or longer, and whose BMI was 20.8 kg/m2 or higher (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0–3.0, p = 0.041; OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0–3.0, p = 0.039; and OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1–3.1, p = 0.031, respectively). A GS was significantly less likely to be detected in women aged 36 years or older than in those younger than 36 years (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2–0.5, p < 0.001).

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5 Gestational sac detection after all embryo transfer cycles (n = 254).

Positive pregnancy test after single blastocyst embryo transfer cycles

To remove the influence of the number and type of embryos transferred, we evaluated factors associated with a positive pregnancy test after blast-SET cycles only (Table 6). Women who used a computer for 4 hours/day or longer were significantly more likely to have a positive pregnancy test (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.1–3.7, p = 0.017). Women aged 36 years or older tended to be less likely to have a positive pregnancy test (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.3–1.0, p = 0.055).

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6 Positive pregnancy test after single blastocyst embryo transfer cycles (n = 199).

GS detection after blast-SET cycles

We analyzed factors associated with GS detection after blast-SET cycles only (Table 7). A GS was significantly more likely to be detected in women who used a computer for 4 hours/day or longer (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1–3.8, p = 0.016). A GS was significantly less likely to be detected in women aged 36 years or older (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2–0.8, p = 0.005). GS detection tended to be more likely in women with a higher FertiQoL Total scaled treatment score and a BMI of 20.8 kg/m2 or higher (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0–3.3, p = 0.059; and OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.9–3.1, p = 0.080, respectively).

Table 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7 Gestational sac detection after single blastocyst embryo transfer cycles (n = 196).

Discussion

This study comprehensively examined whether background factors, lifestyle, dietary habits, and fertility-specific QOL are related to ART outcomes in female partners of Eastern Asian ethnicity using a questionnaire before the first cycle of ART. Advanced age and Hashimoto's disease were negatively and significantly associated with the good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval, while greater fish consumption tended to be negatively associated with this rate. When all ET cycles were evaluated, longer sleep and longer computer use were positively associated with a positive pregnancy test, advanced age was negatively and significantly associated with a positive pregnancy test, and a partner who was a smoker was negatively associated with a positive pregnancy test. GS detection was positively and significantly associated with more frequent olive oil intake, longer computer use, and a higher BMI, but negatively and significantly associated with advanced age. When only blast-SET cycles were evaluated to exclude the effects of the number and type of embryos, longer computer use was positively and significantly associated with a positive pregnancy test, while advanced age tended to be negatively associated with a positive pregnancy test. Longer computer use was positively and significantly associated with GS detection, a higher FertiQoL Total scaled treatment score and higher BMI tended to be positively associated with GS detection, and advanced age was negatively and significantly associated with GS detection.

Advanced age negatively affects ovarian reserve (32) and implantation (33). Furthermore, autoimmune diseases including thyroid disorders cause primary ovarian insufficiency (34), and Hashimoto’s disease adversely affects ovarian function. Consistently, in the current study, older age had a significant negative impact on the good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval, a positive pregnancy test after all ET cycles, and GS detection after all ET and blast-SET cycles. Women with Hashimoto’s disease had a significantly lower good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval.

It has been reported that female obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) may adversely affect IVF outcomes. In a report comparing four groups (obese, overweight, normal weight, and underweight), the numbers of oocytes retrieved and blastocysts did not differ among the groups. However, the rates of implantation and pregnancy were decreased in the obese group, while the implantation rate was decreased and the pregnancy rate was unchanged in the underweight group (BMI < 20 kg/m2) (35). Hu et al. reported that the cumulative number of live births after IVF/ICSI was significantly higher in the normal BMI group (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) than in the high BMI group (≥ 25 kg/m2) (36). However, in that study, the inclusion criteria were 18 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2, which means that the high and low BMI groups were defined as 20.8 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2 and 18 ≤ BMI < 20.8 kg/m2, respectively, which is inconsistent with the WHO’s criteria for obesity and underweight. Therefore, it is difficult to compare our results with those of previous reports. This study suggests that a lower BMI (18 ≤ BMI < 20.8 kg/m2), even if an individual is not underweight, may negatively impact ART results.

Although there are a relatively large number of reports about dietary habits including consumption of seafood and fish, there are no consistent reports about whether seafood consumption positively affects fertility (5, 3739). The reason for these inconsistent results may be that seafood contains both fertility-enhancing and -damaging substances. Seafood is an important source of omega-3 fatty acids, which are important for steroidogenesis (40, 41) and have anti-inflammatory effects (42). Additionally, among 235 women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment, omega-3 intake improved embryo morphology (43). However, seafood also contains persistent organic pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (44, 45) and mercury (46).

A Mediterranean diet, which includes olive oil, was reported to increase the rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live births in a prospective study (7). In addition, intake of olive oil, vitamin D, and marine omega-3 fatty acids for 6 weeks improved embryo quality (47). Neither of these reports evaluated the influence of olive oil alone. The present study demonstrated that olive oil intake alone increased GS detection after all ET cycles. The most important component of a Mediterranean diet for improvement of fertility was unclear in previous reports. This study suggested that olive oil may be the most important contributor.

The quality and duration of sleep have been reported to affect infertility treatment outcomes (48), and Goldstein et al. reported that there tended to be a correlation between sleep duration and the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF treatment (49). In addition, Yao et al. divided sleep duration into five groups: less than 7 hours, 7–8 hours, 8-9 hours, and 9-10 hours and 10 hours or more. They reported that the numbers of eggs retrieved and metaphase II oocytes were 11.5% and 11.9% lower, respectively, among women who slept for less than 7 hours compared with those who slept for 7–8 hours. The clinical pregnancy rate was lower among women who slept for 9–10 hours than among those who slept for 7–8 hours (OR = 0.65). In a cohort of general women who wanted to have children, women who slept for 9 or more hours showed longer time to pregnancy than those who slept for 8 hours (15). In this study, the median sleeping duration was 7 hours and only 2.1% of women (6 of 281 women) slept for 9 hours or longer, perhaps because Japanese women sleep for shorter durations than women from other countries. Our study analyzed data using only a two-group comparison, and the results are consistent with previous reports because women who slept for 7 hours or longer tended to have a higher possibility of a positive pregnancy test after all ET cycles than those who slept for less than 7 hours.

There are reports that evening use of light-emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep (50) and that the quality and duration of sleep affect IVF outcomes (16, 48). There are no reports about the relationship between use of computers and light-emitting eReaders and IVF outcomes. In this study, prolonged computer use was positively associated with a positive pregnancy test and GS detection, was significantly correlated with intake of non-refined cereals once per week or more (correlation coefficient = 0.128, p = 0.0313), working longer (correlation coefficient = 0.16232, p = 0.0069), and sitting longer (correlation coefficient 0.26595, p < 0.0001), and tended to be positively correlated with a higher BMI (correlation coefficient = 0.10367, p = 0.0828). Based on the correlation with intake of non-refined cereals, long computer users may be more health-conscious. The correlations with longer working and sitting suggest that long computer users are long-time workers who use computers in a sitting position, and sitting for a long time may increase BMI. GS detection after all ET cycles significantly correlated with a higher BMI in this study; therefore, the higher possibility of GS detection among long computer users may be due to BMI.

The effects of male smoking on fertility have been previously examined, with worse semen findings (volume, concentration, and total sperm number) among smokers (51). Male smokers had a 2.4% lower possibility of achieving a 12-week pregnancy with every 1-year increase in age (52). However, there are inconsistent results about the effects of male smoking on assisted reproduction. Borges et al. reported that male smokers had lower fertilization and blastocyst formation rates and unchanged implantation rates (51). Hoek et al. demonstrated that among 490 ICSI embryos from 113 women and 41 men, embryo morphology assessed using a time-lapse morphokinetic selection algorithm (KIDScore) was significantly and negatively affected by male smoking (53). On the other hand, Frappier et al. reported no difference in IVF outcomes in 252 couples undergoing IVF with a male smoking history (54). Although semen findings were not examined in the current study, the positive pregnancy test rate after all ET cycles tended to be lower among women whose partners were smokers. This suggests that male smoking negatively impacts ART outcomes.

Some meta-analyses assessed the relationship between stress and distress and reproductive outcomes of ART (55, 56). However, few reports demonstrate the correlation between infertility treatment outcomes and fertility-specific QOL such as FertiQoL. Santoro et al. reported that among women undergoing infertility treatment without ART, the Emotional FertiQoL score was positively related to pregnancy and a singleton live birth in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, while the Mind/Body FertiQoL score was negatively associated with a singleton live birth in women with unexplained infertility. The results were inconsistent between these two groups of women. Therefore, Santoro concluded that FertiQoL scores were not significant factors to estimate pregnancy outcomes (26). In disagreement with previous reports, in the current study, women with a higher FertiQoL Total scaled treatment score tended to have a higher possibility of GS detection after blast-SET. The FertiQoL score consists of Core subscales containing four factors (emotional, mind-body, relational, and social) and Treatment subscales containing two factors (environment and treatment tolerability) (20, 21). The FertiQoL Total scaled treatment score indicates impacts related to treatment environment (e.g., access, quality, and interactions with staff) and impacts due to consequences of treatment (e.g., physical and mode effects, and daily disruptions). A higher treatment score indicates more comfortable treatment. This study implies that a GS tended to be detected in women with more comfortable treatment after blast-SET. In addition, a meta-analysis including 39 reports (n = 2746) demonstrated that psychosocial interventions improved psychological distress and increased clinical pregnancy; however, it did not evaluate the psychological condition using a fertility-specific QOL scale such as FertiQoL or identify which type of distress is a contributor (57). Domar et al. reported that among women undergoing IVF treatment, brief self-administered cognitive coping and relaxation intervention improved Core and Treatment FertiQoL scores, but not the clinical pregnancy rate (58). In the current study, FertiQoL was only assessed prior to treatment; therefore, further investigations are needed to determine whether interventions to improve Treatment FertiQoL scores improve infertility treatment outcomes.

A strength of this study is that a detailed and comprehensive questionnaire including detailed dietary habits with reference to the Mediterranean diet score and fertility-specific QOL using FertiQoL was completed before the first cycle of ART treatment, and its results were compared with subsequent ART outcomes, namely, the first cycle of oocyte retrieval and ET. Consequently, we studied a homogeneous population with little bias. The weaknesses of the study are the small number of cases and the lack of detailed evaluation of dietary contents, such as intakes of individual nutrients and results of fetal heart beat positivity and live birth.

Our results have some implications for clinical practice. In accordance with previous reports, longer sleep was associated with better ART outcomes, but it is unclear whether much longer sleep is better. Longer computer use was not necessarily negative for ART outcomes. More frequent fish consumption had a possible negative effect on the good-quality blastocyst rate per oocyte retrieval. While dietary habits including consumption of olive oil have been reported to positively affect fertility treatment, this is the first time that olive oil intake alone has been reported to have a positive effect. For the first time, this study suggests that a partner’s smoking negatively impacts a couple’s infertility treatment outcomes and that smoking cessation guidance for partners is important for infertile couples. Although it is unclear whether interventions to improve fertility-specific QOL affect treatment efficacy, it is important to understand that fertility-specific QOL may influence ART outcomes in clinical practice.

In summary, our findings suggest that long computer use does not necessarily have a negative effect on ART outcomes and that olive oil intake may be the most important dietary habit for improvement of ART outcomes. Further investigation is required to elucidate the influence of fish consumption, a partner’s smoking, and fertility-specific QOL on ART outcomes.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by The institutional ethics committee of the University of Tokyo. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

YU: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration. MH: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision. SK: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. IA: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. CT: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. YN: Writing – review & editing. AF: Writing – review & editing. YM: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. TK: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YI: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. YO: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (grant numbers 21K16808 to YU).

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank all the doctors, nurses, technicians and embryologists in IVF Japan Group in Osaka and the University of Tokyo Hospital and all study participants.

Conflict of interest

Author YI is employed by FamiOne, Inc.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PloS Med. (2012) 9:e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Beaujouan E. Latest-late fertility? Decline and resurgence of late parenthood across the low-fertility countries. Popul Dev Rev. (2020) 46:219–47. doi: 10.1111/padr.12334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wyns C, Bergh C, Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, Motrenko T, et al. Art in europe, 2016: results generated from european registries by eshre. Hum Reprod Open. (2020) 2020:hoaa032. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Fauser BC. Towards the global coverage of a unified registry of ivf outcomes. Reprod BioMed Online. (2019) 38:133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Gaskins AJ, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM, Chavarro JE. Seafood intake, sexual activity, and time to pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 103:2680–8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sun H, Lin Y, Lin D, Zou C, Zou X, Fu L, et al. Mediterranean diet improves embryo yield in ivf: A prospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. (2019) 17:73. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0520-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Karayiannis D, Kontogianni MD, Mendorou C, Mastrominas M, Yiannakouris N. Adherence to the mediterranean diet and ivf success rate among non-obese women attempting fertility. Hum Reprod. (2018) 33:494–502. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Klonoff-Cohen H, Lam-Kruglick P, Gonzalez C. Effects of maternal and paternal alcohol consumption on the success rates of in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. (2003) 79:330–9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04582-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Braga DP, Halpern G, Figueira Rde C, Setti AS, Iaconelli A Jr., Borges E Jr. Food intake and social habits in male patients and its relationship to intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. Fertil Steril. (2012) 97:53–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Al-Saleh I, El-Doush I, Grisellhi B, Coskun S. The effect of caffeine consumption on the success rate of pregnancy as well various performance parameters of in-vitro fertilization treatment. Med Sci Monit. (2010) 16:CR598–605.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

11. Wesselink AK, Hatch EE, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, Aschengrau A, Wise LA. Prospective study of cigarette smoking and fecundability. Hum Reprod. (2019) 34:558–67. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey372

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Freour T, Masson D, Dessolle L, Allaoua D, Dejoie T, Mirallie S, et al. Ovarian reserve and in vitro fertilization cycles outcome according to women smoking status and stimulation regimen. Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2012) 285:1177–82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2172-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Morris SN, Missmer SA, Cramer DW, Powers RD, McShane PM, Hornstein MD. Effects of lifetime exercise on the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. (2006) 108:938–45. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000235704.45652.0b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kakargia E, Mamalakis E, Frountzas M, Anagnostou E, Siristatidis C. The role of maternal physical activity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2022) 207:1667–76. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06606-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Willis SK, Hatch EE, Wesselink AK, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, Wise LA. Female sleep patterns, shift work, and fecundability in a north american preconception cohort study. Fertil Steril. (2019) 111:1201–10 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yao QY, Yuan XQ, Liu C, Du YY, Yao YC, Wu LJ, et al. Associations of sleep characteristics with outcomes of ivf/icsi treatment: A prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. (2022) 37:1297–310. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. The WHOQOL group. The world health organization quality of life assessment (Whoqol): position paper from the world health organization. Soc Sci Med. (1995) 41:1403–9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mousavi SA, Masoumi SZ, Keramat A, Pooralajal J, Shobeiri F. Assessment of questionnaires measuring quality of life in infertile couples: A systematic review. J Reprod Infertil. (2013) 14:110–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Kitchen H, Aldhouse N, Trigg A, Palencia R, Mitchell S. A review of patient-reported outcome measures to assess female infertility-related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2017) 15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0666-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (Fertiqol) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod. (2011) 26:2084–91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der171

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (Fertiqol) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril. (2011) 96:409–15 e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Danis R, Sriprasert I, Petok W, Stone J, Paulson R, Samplaski M. Does male fertility-related quality of life differ when undergoing evaluation by reproductive urologist versus reproductive endocrinologist? Hum Fertil (Camb). (2022) 26:1–8. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2022.2081095

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mori A, Nishii O, Takai Y, Momoeda M, Kamisawa E, Shimizu K, et al. Influence of a patient education and care program on women undergoing non-assisted reproductive technology fertility treatment. Reprod Med Biol. (2021) 20:513–23. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12406

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Hassan SU, Zahra A, Parveen N, Iqbal N, Mumtaz S, Batool A. Quality of infertility care services and emotional health of south asian women. Psychol Res Behav Manag. (2022) 15:1131–46. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Makara-Studzinska M, Limanin A, Anusiewicz A, Janczyk P, Raczkiewicz D, Wdowiak-Filip A, et al. Assessment of quality of life in men treated for infertility in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052950

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Santoro N, Eisenberg E, Trussell JC, Craig LB, Gracia C, Huang H, et al. Fertility-related quality of life from two rct cohorts with infertility: unexplained infertility and polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. (2016) 31:2268–79. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Arvaniti F, Stefanadis C. Adherence to the mediterranean food pattern predicts the prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and obesity, among healthy adults; the accuracy of the meddietscore. Prev Med. (2007) 44:335–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Herath P, Wimalasekera S, Amarasekara T, Fernando M, Turale S. Effect of cigarette smoking on smoking biomarkers, blood pressure and blood lipid levels among Sri Lankan male smokers. Postgrad Med J. (2022) 98:848–54. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54:1451–62. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and met intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2000) 32:S498–504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Heinze G, Wallisch C, Dunkler D. Variable selection - a review and recommendations for the practicing statistician. Biom J. (2018) 60:431–49. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod. (2004) 19:1548–53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Fragouli E, Wells D. Aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. Cytogenet Genome Res. (2011) 133:149–59. doi: 10.1159/000323500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Stuenkel CA, Gompel A. Primary ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:154–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2116488

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Bellver J, Ayllon Y, Ferrando M, Melo M, Goyri E, Pellicer A, et al. Female obesity impairs in vitro fertilization outcome without affecting embryo quality. Fertil Steril. (2010) 93:447–54. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.032

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Hu D, Huang B, Xiong M, Yao J, Yang S, Wu R, et al. Impact of elevated body mass index on cumulative live birth rate and obstetric safety in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:18858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23576-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Braga DP, Halpern G, Setti AS, Figueira RC, Iaconelli A Jr., Borges E Jr. The impact of food intake and social habits on embryo quality and the likelihood of blastocyst formation. Reprod BioMed Online. (2015) 31:30–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Wise LA, Willis SK, Mikkelsen EM, Wesselink AK, Sorensen HT, Rothman KJ, et al. The association between seafood intake and fecundability: analysis from two prospective studies. Nutrients. (2020) 12. doi: 10.3390/nu12082276

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Buck GM, Vena JE, Schisterman EF, Dmochowski J, Mendola P, Sever LE, et al. Parental consumption of contaminated sport fish from lake ontario and predicted fecundability. Epidemiology. (2000) 11:388–93. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200007000-00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wonnacott KE, Kwong WY, Hughes J, Salter AM, Lea RG, Garnsworthy PC, et al. Dietary omega-3 and -6 polyunsaturated fatty acids affect the composition and development of sheep granulosa cells, oocytes and embryos. Reproduction. (2010) 139:57–69. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Wathes DC, Abayasekara DR, Aitken RJ. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in male and female reproduction. Biol Reprod. (2007) 77:190–201. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.060558

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Papathanasiou E, Alreshaid R, Araujo de Godoi M. Anti-inflammatory benefits of food ingredients in periodontal diseases. Pathogens. (2023) 12. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12040520

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Hammiche F, Vujkovic M, Wijburg W, de Vries JH, Macklon NS, Laven JS, et al. Increased preconception omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake improves embryo morphology. Fertil Steril. (2011) 95:1820–3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Schecter A, Colacino J, Haffner D, Patel K, Opel M, Papke O, et al. Perfluorinated compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorine pesticide contamination in composite food samples from dallas, texas, USA. Environ Health Perspect. (2010) 118:796–802. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901347

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Feinberg M, Soler L, Contenot S, Verger P. Assessment of seasonality in exposure to dioxins, furans and dioxin-like pcbs by using long-term food-consumption data. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. (2011) 28:502–12. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2011.553844

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. McDowell MA, Dillon CF, Osterloh J, Bolger PM, Pellizzari E, Fernando R, et al. Hair mercury levels in U.S. Children and women of childbearing age: reference range data from nhanes 1999-2000. Environ Health Perspect. (2004) 112:1165–71. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Kermack AJ, Lowen P, Wellstead SJ, Fisk HL, Montag M, Cheong Y, et al. Effect of a 6-week "Mediterranean" Dietary intervention on in vitro human embryo development: the preconception dietary supplements in assisted reproduction double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. (2020) 113:260–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Reschini M, Buoli M, Facchin F, Limena A, Dallagiovanna C, Bollati V, et al. Women's quality of sleep and in vitro fertilization success. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:17477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22534-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Goldstein CA, Lanham MS, Smith YR, O'Brien LM. Sleep in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A pilot study. Sleep Med. (2017) 32:105–13. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Chang AM, Aeschbach D, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. Evening use of light-emitting ereaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next-morning alertness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. (2015) 112:1232–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418490112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Borges E Jr., Braga D, Provenza RR, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr., Setti AS. Paternal lifestyle factors in relation to semen quality and in vitro reproductive outcomes. Andrologia. (2018) 50:e13090. doi: 10.1111/and.13090

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Joesbury KA, Edirisinghe WR, Phillips MR, Yovich JL. Evidence that male smoking affects the likelihood of a pregnancy following ivf treatment: application of the modified cumulative embryo score. Hum Reprod. (1998) 13:1506–13. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.6.1506

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Hoek J, Schoenmakers S, Baart EB, Koster MPH, Willemsen SP, van Marion ES, et al. Preconceptional maternal vegetable intake and paternal smoking are associated with pre-implantation embryo quality. Reprod Sci. (2020) 27:2018–28. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00220-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Frappier J, Martinaud A, Barberet J, Bruno C, Guilleman M, Amblot C, et al. Effect of paternal smoking on pre-implantation embryonic development: A prospective cohort study. Reprod Fertil Dev. (2022) 34:971–9. doi: 10.1071/RD22093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Matthiesen SM, Frederiksen Y, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (Art): A meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. (2011) 26:2763–76. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der246

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. (2011) 342:d223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgard NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. (2015) 5:e006592. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006592

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K, Boivin J. Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril. (2015) 104:440–51 e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: fertility-specific quality of life tool, FertiQoL, lifestyle, assisted reproductive technology, good-quality blastocyst rate

Citation: Urata Y, Harada M, Komiya S, Akiyama I, Tuchida C, Nakaoka Y, Fukuda A, Morimoto Y, Kawahara T, Ishikawa Y and Osuga Y (2024) Lifestyle and fertility-specific quality of life affect reproductive outcomes in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization. Front. Endocrinol. 15:1346084. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1346084

Received: 28 November 2023; Accepted: 09 February 2024;
Published: 20 March 2024.

Edited by:

Makoto Orisaka, University of Fukui, Japan

Reviewed by:

Sameh A. Abdelnour, Zagazig University, Egypt
Kiyotaka Kawai, Kameda IVF Clinic Makuhari, Japan

Copyright © 2024 Urata, Harada, Komiya, Akiyama, Tuchida, Nakaoka, Fukuda, Morimoto, Kawahara, Ishikawa and Osuga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Miyuki Harada, haradam-tky@umin.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.