Event Abstract

Does perceptual load influence auditory distraction processing in older adults?

  • 1 The HEARing CRC, Australia
  • 2 Western Sydney University, The MARCS Institute for Brain Behaviour and Development, Australia

Aim: To efficiently process target sounds in an environment of targets and non-targets requires that the irrelevant non-target sounds be ignored. Irrelevant sounds can however interfere with task performance because they capture attention (auditory distraction). Our previous work using a cross-modal distraction task showed that older adults can off-set the effects of distraction when the task requires involved top-down executive control, i.e., working memory (WM). The current experiment aimed to determine whether older adults could counter-act distraction effects by increased bottom-up attention in a unimodal distraction task. The degree of bottom-up attention was varied by manipulating the perceptual difficulty of the task, and distraction was measured electrophysiologically by examining ERPs. Method: We recorded ERPs from 24 older (62-76years) and 24 younger adults (21-35years) while they completed a tone duration classification task in an auditory oddball paradigm with novel auditory distractors. Listeners performed a duration classification task that required an easy or difficult discrimination (with the degree of difficulty individual tailored based on a pre-test). Results: ANOVA results revealed a main effect of task difficulty (more errors on the harder discrimination) and a main effect of age (older adults were slower and made more errors). There was a task difficulty effect on P3a (a neural indicator of attention switch to distractor) and RON (an index of switching back to task after distraction) with both older and younger adults exhibiting larger P3a and attenuated RON for difficult discrimination trials. There was no age effect or interaction (between task and age) for these ERPs. Conclusions: Increasing perceptual task load in a unimodal distraction paradigm had a similar effect on auditory distractor processing for younger and older adults. This contrasts with the effect of increasing WM load on crossmodal distraction where older adults showed a larger effect, and points to the importance of modality and type of load in understanding distraction processing in older adults.

References

Mahajan Y, Kim J and Davis C (2015). Do top-down processes influence involuntary attention in the elderly?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: ASP2015 - 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Psychophysiology.

Muller-Gass, A., & Schröger, E. (2007). Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Brain research, 1136, 169-177.

Keywords: auditory distraction, P3a, Reorienting Negativity (RON), ERPs (Event-Related Potentials), Ageing and cognitive function

Conference: ASP2017: 27th Annual Meeting for the Australasian Society for Psychophysiology, Parramatta, Australia, 29 Nov - 1 Dec, 2017.

Presentation Type: Oral Presentation

Topic: Abstract (General)

Citation: Mahajan Y, Borg S, Kim J and Davis C (2019). Does perceptual load influence auditory distraction processing in older adults?. Conference Abstract: ASP2017: 27th Annual Meeting for the Australasian Society for Psychophysiology. doi: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2017.224.00038

Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters.

The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated.

Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed.

For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions.

Received: 13 Oct 2017; Published Online: 25 Jan 2019.

* Correspondence: Dr. Yatin Mahajan, The HEARing CRC, Melbourne, Australia, y.mahajan@uws.edu.au