Elsevier

Poultry Science

Volume 66, Issue 4, 1 April 1987, Pages 694-699
Poultry Science

Metabolism and Nutrition
Effects of Different Methods and Severity of Growing Period Feed Restriction on Growth and Laying Performance of White Leghorns1

https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660694Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to study the effects of different methods of feed restriction and severity of feed restriction during the growing period on pullet growth and laying performance of White Leghorns. In Experiment 1, ad libitum feeding of the low protein diet (supplemented with amino acids) was the only treatment among four feed restriction treatments that did not significantly (P>.05) influence growing period feed consumption and body weight gain. The smallest body weight gain was obtained among birds subjected to the daily restrictive feeding (DRF) treatment. Ad libitum feeding of the low energy diet resulted in a significantly (P<.05) poorer growing period feed efficiency than any other treatment. Both energy and protein utilization efficiencies for body weight gain were significantly (P<.05) hindered by the skip feeding treatment. Although DRF birds consistently had higher egg production from 36 to 76 weeks of age than birds in any other group, overall average percent hen-day egg production from 20 to 76 weeks of age was not significantly (P>.05) improved by the DRF treatment. Also, in Experiment 2, various levels of DRF during the growing period did not significantly (P>.05) improve average percent hen-day egg production. Laying house mortality, feed efficiency, and egg weight were not significantly (P>.05) different among treatments (Experiments 1 and 2). Results of these experiments indicate that DRF was the most effective method of controlling growth rate and that neither method of feed restriction nor severity of feed restriction during the growing period significantly (P>.05) improved laying performance.

restricted feeding
energy
protein
growth rate
layer performance

Cited by (0)

1

Research supported by CSRS Evans-Allen PL 95-113, Section 1445, AR. X.-0957.