Inter-Research > ESR > v52 > p129-147  
ESR
Endangered Species Research

via Mailchimp

ESR 52:129-147 (2023)  -  DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01269

Predicting core areas of flatback turtle hatchlings and potential exposure to threats

Phillipa Wilson1,2,3,*, Charitha Pattiaratchi4, Scott Whiting2, Luciana C. Ferreira1, Sabrina Fossette2, Kellie Pendoley3, Michele Thums1

1Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, The University of Western Australia (M096), 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
2Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 17 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington, Western Australia 6151, Australia
3Pendoley Environmental, 12A Pitt Way, Booragoon, Western Australia 6154, Australia
4Oceans Graduate School and the UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
*Corresponding author:

ABSTRACT: The lack of data on distribution of juvenile marine species can limit conservation efforts. As hatchlings, marine turtles are too small to track using satellite telemetry, so their at-sea distribution remains unknown. This knowledge gap is critical, as hatchlings already experience high mortality in coastal zones. In addition, further risks to their survival may occur beyond these areas, linked to threats associated with in-water artificial infrastructure and/or attraction to artificial lights and thus increased mortality from higher risk of predation or exhaustion from disorientation. To fill this gap, we used particle tracking forced by an ocean circulation model to predict the dispersal of flatback turtle Natator depressus hatchlings from 12 nesting sites off the coast of Western Australia. We used the model outputs to calculate the distribution of these ‘virtual hatchlings’ and infer the core area of hatchling use over 3 dispersal phases (1-4, 10-15 and 25-30 d). We then calculated the overlap between core areas and 2 anthropogenic threats (in-water artificial infrastructure and light pollution). Core areas were predominately located on the continental shelf during all dispersal phases, supporting the hypothesis that flatback turtles remain in neritic areas. Most (70-80%) of the core area during early dispersal (Days 1-4 and 10-15) contained at least one threat. However, less than half of the area used between Day 25 and 30 was exposed to threats. In the absence of empirical data on hatchling distribution, our results have predicted the core areas used by early life stage flatback turtles to assist in conservation management of these threatened species.


KEY WORDS: Flatback turtle · Particle tracking · Ocean circulation model · Artificial light · In-water artificial infrastructure · ozROMS


Full text in pdf format
Supplementary material
Cite this article as: Wilson P, Pattiaratchi C, Whiting S, Ferreira LC, Fossette S, Pendoley K, Thums M (2023) Predicting core areas of flatback turtle hatchlings and potential exposure to threats. Endang Species Res 52:129-147. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01269

Export citation
Share:    Facebook - - linkedIn

 Previous article Next article