Yonsei Med J. 2018 Mar;59(2):331-336. English.
Published online Feb 05, 2017.
© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2018
Brief Communication

Improvement in Ovarian Tissue Quality with Supplementation of Antifreeze Protein during Warming of Vitrified Mouse Ovarian Tissue

Hyun Sun Kong,1,2 Eun Jung Kim,1,2 Hye Won Youm,1 Seul Ki Kim,1,2 Jung Ryeol Lee,1,2 Chang Suk Suh,2 and Seok Hyun Kim2
    • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
    • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Received October 11, 2017; Revised October 29, 2017; Accepted November 12, 2017.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Ice easily recrystallizes during warming after vitrification, and antifreeze protein (AFP) can inhibit the re-crystallization. However, no study has evaluated the effect of AFP treatment only thereon during warming. This study sought to compare AFP treatment protocols: a conventional protocol with AFP treatment during vitrification and first-step warming and a new protocol with AFP treatment during the first-step warming only. According to the protocols, 10 mg/mL of LeIBP (a type of AFP) was used. Five-week-old B6D2F1 mouse ovaries were randomly divided into a vitrified-warmed control and two experimental groups, one treated with the conventional AFP treatment protocol (LeIBP-all) and the other with the new AFP treatment protocol (LeIBP-w). For evaluation, ratios of ovarian follicle integrity, apoptosis, and DNA double-strand (DDS) damage/repairing were analyzed. The LeIBP-treated groups showed significantly higher intact follicle ratios than the control, and the results were similar between the LeIBP-treated groups. Apoptotic follicle ratios were significantly lower in both LeIBP-treated groups than the control, and the results were not significantly different between the LeIBP-treated groups. With regard to DDS damage/repairing follicle ratio, significantly lower ratios were recorded in both LeIBP-treated groups, compared to the control, and the results were similar between the LeIBP-treated groups. This study demonstrated that both protocols with LeIBP had a beneficial effect on maintaining follicle integrity and preventing follicle apoptosis and DDS damage. Moreover, the new protocol showed similar results to the conventional protocol. This new protocol could optimize the mouse ovary vitrification-warming procedure using AFP, while minimizing the treatment steps.

Keywords
Antifreeze protein; cryodamage; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; recrystallization; vitrification

Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) are diverse proteins that help the survival of organisms in subzero temperatures. These proteins work in a non-colligative manner and permit the organisms to survive by lowering the freezing point below the melting point, which is known as thermal hysteresis.1 They adsorb to ice surfaces, bind to ice planes, and prevent the growth of ice crystals until temperatures reach the freezing point. With these features, AFPs have been shown to inhibit ice recrystallization (IR).2

Previous studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of AFP on mouse ovaries, and treatment with AFPs has been used during both the vitrification and warming procedures.3, 4 However, previous studies have found that IR inhibition during warming seems more crucial than ice crystallization inhibition during freezing.5, 6 The aim of this study was to compare a new AFP treatment protocol in which AFP treatment is used only during the warming procedure and the conventional AFP treatment protocol in which AFP treatment is used during both the vitrification and warming procedures.

Five-week-old B6D2F1 female mice (Orient Co., Seongnam, Korea) were housed under a 12-h light/dark cycle at 22℃ and provided food and water ad libitum. This study was performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (BA1707-227/061-01). Vitrification-warming for mouse ovaries was performed by optimized protocols, as previously described.7 We added 10 mg/mL of LeIBP into the vitrification and/or warming solutions according to our previous study demonstrating the optimal AFP type and concentration for the vitrification-warming process of the mouse ovary. We designed three groups for this experiment: 1) vitrified-warmed control; 2) LeIBP-all group, LeIBP supplementation was used in two-step vitrification solutions and the first step of the warming solution; and 3) LeIBP-w group, LeIBP was added only to the first step of the warming solution.

A total of 42 ovaries obtained from the B6D2F1 mice (vitrified-warmed: n=12, LeIBP-all: n=14, and LeIBP-w: n=16) were randomly allocated into the three groups. The ovaries embedded in paraffin blocks were serially sectioned at a thickness of 5 µm. For slide staining, five slides at 100-µm intervals (5 slides for each ovary) were chosen and stained with hematoxylin (DAKO, Seoul, Korea) and eosin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) (H&E), terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, or γH2AX/Rad51 immunohistochemistry. The stained slides were read by a single experienced researcher (HSK).

The H&E-stained ovaries were read to evaluate follicle developmental stages and morphological integrity using a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The follicle developmental stages were classified in accordance with the following categories8: 1) primordial follicles, a single layer of flattened pregranulosa cells; 2) primary follicles, a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells; 3) secondary follicles, two or more layers of cuboidal granulosa cells, with the antrum absent; and 4) antral follicles, multiple layers of cuboidal granulosa cells, with the antrum present. The primary, secondary, and antral follicles were categorized as growing follicles. The follicles were considered to not be intact if they had pyknotic bodies within granulosa cells, condensed oocyte nuclei, shrunken oocytes, oocyte cytoplasm vacuolization, or low cellular density.9 Otherwise, the follicles were categorized as morphologically intact follicles.

Follicle apoptosis was evaluated by an In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), as previously described.10 Ovaries were then mounted with VECTASHIELD® Mounting Medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and examined under an inverted Zeiss AX10 fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The cells that had fragmented DNA displayed green fluorescence, while intact normal cells showed blue fluorescence. Follicles with over 30% of apoptosis-positive cells or oocyte nucleus were considered as apoptotic follicles.3, 7, 10, 11

Immunohistochemical analysis for DNA double-strand (DDS) breakdown and repair was performed using γH2AX antibody (1:100; Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and Rad51 antibody (1:100; Bioworld Technology, St. Louis Park, MN, USA), respectively.3 For secondary antibody, Alexa 594 (1:1000; Life Technology, Carlsbad, CA, USA) antibody was used and counterstained with VECTASHIELD® Mounting Medium with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. All slides were examined under an inverted Zeiss AX10 microscope. Follicles which contained at least one nucleus stained with γH2AX were considered as follicles with DDS breakdown. In the same way, follicles containing at least one nucleus stained with Rad51 were regarded as follicles with DNA repair.3

The chi-square test was performed by SPSS software, version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to analyze the effect of each LeIBP supplementation on follicular integrity, apoptosis, and DDS breakdown/repair ratios. Results were considered significant when the probability showed a p-value <0.05.

The representative images of H&E stained-ovaries are shown in Fig. 1. A total of 5558 follicles were evaluated for morphologically intact follicle ratios in accordance with the follicle developmental classification (vitrified-warmed: 1538, LeIBP-all: 1913, and LeIBP-w: 2107). The treatment with LeIBP significantly improved the integrity of primordial and growing follicles in the LeIBP-all and LeIBP-w groups, when compared with the vitrified-warmed group (vitrified-warmed, LeIBP-all, and LeIBP-w groups: 66.6, 73.0, and 74.4% for primordial follicles, and 50.2, 60.3, and 55.3% for growing follicles, respectively). Between the two LeIBP-treated groups, the LeIBP-all group showed a higher intact growing follicle ratio than the LeIBP-w group; however, the intact primordial follicle ratio was similar between the two groups (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin stained ovaries (A, B, and C ×100; D, E, and F ×400). Each panel shows the ovaries from different groups: (A and D) vitrified-warmed control, (B and E) LeIBP-all group, and (C and F) LeIBP-w group. Fields indicated by an arrowhead in (A), (B), and (C) are shown in (D), (E), and (F), respectively. Scale bar: 50 µm.

Fig. 2
Morphologically intact follicle ratio according to developmental stages and groups. *p<0.05 in comparison to control, p<0.05 in comparison to the other experimental group.

Representative images of TUNEL-stained ovaries are shown in Fig. 3. Compared to the vitrified-warmed group, the apoptotic follicle ratios of the two LeIBP treated groups were significantly decreased (vitrified-warmed 17.5%, LeIBP-all 9.2%, LeIBP-w 9.3%). No significant difference was found between the LeIBP-all and LeIBP-w groups (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
Representative images of TUNEL stained ovaries (A, B, and C ×100; D, E, and F ×400). Each panel shows the ovaries from different groups: (A and D) vitrified-warmed control, (B and E) LeIBP-all group, and (C and F) LeIBP-w group. Fields indicated by an arrowhead in (A), (B), and (C) are shown in (D), (E), and (F), respectively. Non-apoptotic cells are stained with blue fluorescence and apoptotic cells with green fluorescence. TUNEL: terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling. Scale bar: 50 µm.

Fig. 4
Apoptotic follicle ratios according to the different groups. *p<0.05 in comparison to control.

Immunohistochemical images of γH2AX and Rad51 stained ovaries are shown in Fig. 5. The percentage of γH2AX-positive follicles were significantly lower in the LeIBP treated groups (vitrified-warmed: 36.9%, LeIBP-all: 31.2%, LeIBP-w: 29.6%). The ratios of Rad51-positive follicles were also significantly lower in the LeIBP-all (31.6%) and LeIBP-w (32.8%) groups in comparison to the vitrified-warmed group (38.4%) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
Representative images of immune-stained ovaries (×200). Each panel indicates (A) γH2AX immune-stained and (B) Rad51 immune-stained ovaries. Counterstained cells are stained with blue and immune-stained cells with red. Red arrowheads: immune-stained follicle, white arrowheads: counterstained follicle. Scale bar: 50 µm.

Fig. 6
Immuno-stained follicle ratios according to the different groups. *p<0.05 in comparison to control.

Ice formation in cells and tissues during cryopreservation is critical to cell/tissue survival as many studies have already emphasized. However, the warming process and rates also have a powerful influence on whether the cell/tissue survives or not.6, 12 During the warming process of ovarian tissue, IR can cause rupture of the cell membrane and cell dehydration inducing lethal damage in the tissue.13 Because AFPs can prevent ice-crystallization during vitrification and recrystallization during warming, AFP treatment is known to increase survival after cryopreservation.3, 14

A previous study demonstrated the cryoprotective effect of three different types of AFPs for mouse ovary vitrification-warming.3 Among the different types of AFPs, 10 mg/mL of LeIBP was the most effective AFP concentration when it was used for treatment during both vitrification and warming. However, there has not been any study in which AFP treatment was used during only the warming procedure, particularly the first step of the warming procedure (this step includes a very large temperature change for the ovary) to inhibit IR and improve the ovary-warming conditions. Thus, the new LeIBP protocol (LeIBP-w group) with 10 mg/mL of LeIBP treatment during the first-step warming procedure was performed in this study, and it was compared with the conventional LeIBP protocol (LeIBP-all group), which added LeIBP to the vitrification and first-step warming procedures, to find the optimal LeIBP treatment protocol in mouse ovary vitrification-warming.

In the present study, intact follicle ratios were significantly increased in LeIBP-treated groups, compared to the vitrified-warmed group, regardless of follicle developmental stage. From the results of the LeIBP-all group, we confirmed the conventional LeIBP treatment protocol was effective to preserve follicle morphology after mouse ovary vitrification-warming, which was consistent with the results of our previous studies showing its reproducibility.3 Additionally, the LeIBP-w group showed not only a significantly higher ratio of intact follicles than the vitrified-warmed group but also similar results to the LeIBP-all group. Between the two LeIBP-treated groups, only the ratio of intact growing follicles in the LeIBP-all group was significantly higher than that in the LeIBP-w group. Growing follicles are more vulnerable to cryodamage than primordial follicles due to their large size. Thus, it seems the LeIBP treatment during vitrification in the LeIBP-all group showed more powerful antifreeze effects on growing follicles than primordial follicles, and made a difference between the LeIBP-treated groups. However, primordial and total follicles showed similar results between the LeIBP-treated groups. Therefore, we suggest the new LeIBP treatment protocol can effectively preserve follicle morphology, even if LeIBP was used during only in the first step of warming. In the previous study, which compared different types of AFPs, it was clearly demonstrated that the AFP with the highest IR activity, which was LeIBP, showed the best result in the vitrification-warming procedure, even though the thermal hysteresis value of the LeIBP was the lowest among the different types of AFPs.3 Therefore, we can suggest that the main cryoprotective mechanism of AFP treatment during vitrification-warming is related to IR inhibition activity.

Follicle apoptosis, which could be induced by cryodamage, was significantly decreased in both LeIBP-treated groups, compared with the vitrified-warmed. Similar to our study, treatment with different types of AFPs has been found to exert antiapoptotic effects on rat hearts and mouse oocyte and ovary preservation at subzero temperatures.3, 4, 14, 15 Between the LeIBP-all and LeIBP-w groups, no significant difference was found in terms of apoptotic follicle ratios. Based on these data, we can speculate that the new AFP treatment protocol using LeIBP during the first step of the warming procedure can reduce follicle apoptosis to the same degree as that achieved with the conventional protocol.

γH2AX is a phosphorylated histone, H2AX on Serine 139, and is found in damaged DNA with DDS.16 Previous studies have reported that mechanical and osmotic stress occurring during the cryopreservation process induced DDS breakdown, followed by severe or lethal mutations of the cells.17, 18 Moreover, γH2AX has been shown to have a correlation with DNA repair, in which the repair protein Rad51 is recruited to nuclear foci after DDS damage.19 To investigate DDS damage and DNA repair in follicles, γH2AX and Rad51, respectively, were immunostained in ovarian follicles. The proportion of γH2AX-positive follicles was significantly decreased in both LeIBP-treated groups, compared to the vitrified-warmed group. Similar to the γH2AX staining result, Rad51 immunostained follicle ratios were also significantly reduced in both LeIBP-treated groups, compared to the vitrified-warmed group. The outcomes of the LeIBP-all group were consistent with those in our previous studies that showed significantly reduced DDS damage/repair when vitrifying and warming mouse oocyte and ovary with the LeIBP treatment.3, 14 Moreover, in the present study, the LeIBP-w group showed similar results to the LeIBP-all group with regard to the γH2AX and Rad51 immuno-stained follicle ratios. Thus, we demonstrated that the new LeIBP treatment protocol has a beneficial effect in terms of ovarian follicle DNA protection, the same as that with the conventional LeIBP treatment protocol.

Compared to the conventional vitrification-warming protocol with LeIBP-treatment (LeIBP is added in both vitrification and warming solutions), we obtained comparable cryoprotective results from the new vitrification-warming protocol with LeIBP treatment in which the LeIBP treatment was used during only the first-step warming protocol. With the new LeIBP treatment protocol, we can minimize not only the amount of AFPs (incurring lower costs), but also the potential side effects of these proteins, such as induced membrane leakage, due to high AFP concentration.20 Therefore, this new protocol that requires less AFP and offers lower costs can be modified and used for future applications, such as cell, tissue, and organ cryopreservation.

This is the first study to highlight the beneficial effects of AFP treatment during only the warming procedure in mouse ovary vitrification-warming. We demonstrated that the new LeIBP treatment protocol is comparable to the conventional protocol in terms of preserving follicle morphology, reducing apoptosis, and DDS damage/repair, compared with the vitrified-warmed. Based on these results, we speculate that inhibition of IR during the warming procedure is critical to the outcomes of the vitrification-warming procedure, thereby the addition of LeIBP into the warming solution only is sufficient to give cryoprotective effects. Since only microscopic evaluations were performed, further studies to investigate the exact IR inhibition mechanism of AFPs in ovarian tissue cryopreservation are required.

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) [grant number NRF-2017R1C1B2003897].

References

    1. DeVries AL. Glycoproteins as biological antifreeze agents in antarctic fishes. Science 1971;172:1152–1155.
    1. Bar Dolev M, Braslavsky I, Davies PL. Ice-binding proteins and their function. Annu Rev Biochem 2016;85:515–542.
    1. Lee J, Kim SK, Youm HW, Kim HJ, Lee JR, Suh CS, et al. Effects of three different types of antifreeze proteins on mouse ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation. PLoS One 2015;10:e0126252
    1. Lee JR, Youm HW, Lee HJ, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Effect of antifreeze protein on mouse ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:778–784.
    1. Morewood T, Getreu N, Fuller B, Morris J, Hardiman P. The effect of thawing protocols on follicle conservation in human ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Cryo Letters 2017;38:137–144.
    1. Seki S, Mazur P. Ultra-rapid warming yields high survival of mouse oocytes cooled to -196°C in dilutions of a standard vitrification solution. PLoS One 2012;7:e36058
    1. Youm HW, Lee JR, Lee J, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Optimal vitrification protocol for mouse ovarian tissue cryopreservation: effect of cryoprotective agents and in vitro culture on vitrified-warmed ovarian tissue survival. Hum Reprod 2014;29:720–730.
    1. Lundy T, Smith P, O'Connell A, Hudson NL, McNatty KP. Populations of granulosa cells in small follicles of the sheep ovary. J Reprod Fertil 1999;115:251–262.
    1. Borges EN, Silva RC, Futino DO, Rocha-Junior CM, Amorim CA, Báo SN, et al. Cryopreservation of swine ovarian tissue: effect of different cryoprotectants on the structural preservation of preantral follicle oocytes. Cryobiology 2009;59:195–200.
    1. Kong HS, Kim SK, Lee J, Youm HW, Lee JR, Suh CS, et al. Effect of exogenous anti-Müllerian hormone treatment on cryopreserved and transplanted mouse ovaries. Reprod Sci 2016;23:51–60.
    1. Lee JR, Youm HW, Kim SK, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Effect of necrostatin on mouse ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;178:16–20.
    1. Seki S, Jin B, Mazur P. Extreme rapid warming yields high functional survivals of vitrified 8-cell mouse embryos even when suspended in a half-strength vitrification solution and cooled at moderate rates to -196°C. Cryobiology 2014;68:71–78.
    1. Knight CA, Hallett J, DeVries AL. Solute effects on ice recrystallization: an assessment technique. Cryobiology 1988;25:55–60.
    1. Lee HH, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Ko Y, Kim SM, et al. Effects of antifreeze proteins on the vitrification of mouse oocytes: comparison of three different antifreeze proteins. Hum Reprod 2015;30:2110–2119.
    1. Amir G, Rubinsky B, Basheer SY, Horowitz L, Jonathan L, Feinberg MS, et al. Improved viability and reduced apoptosis in subzero 21-hour preservation of transplanted rat hearts using antifreeze proteins. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1915–1929.
    1. Peng L, Wang S, Yin S, Li C, Li Z, Wang S, et al. Autophosphorylation of H2AX in a cell-specific frozen dependent way. Cryobiology 2008;57:175–177.
    1. Trapphoff T, El Hajj N, Zechner U, Haaf T, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. DNA integrity, growth pattern, spindle formation, chromosomal constitution and imprinting patterns of mouse oocytes from vitrified pre-antral follicles. Hum Reprod 2010;25:3025–3042.
    1. Kobayashi J, Iwabuchi K, Miyagawa K, Sonoda E, Suzuki K, Takata M, et al. Current topics in DNA double-strand break repair. J Radiat Res 2008;49:93–103.
    1. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol 2000;10:886–895.
    1. Tomczak MM, Hincha DK, Estrada SD, Feeney RE, Crowe JH. Antifreeze proteins differentially affect model membranes during freezing. Biochim Biophys Acta 2001;1511:255–263.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 6

Funding Information
PERMALINK