J Korean Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(11):1573-1580. English.
Published online Oct 31, 2013.
© 2013 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.
Review

Trends of Breastfeeding Rate in Korea (1994-2012): Comparison with OECD and Other Countries

Sung-Hoon Chung,1 Hye-Ryun Kim,2 Yong-Sung Choi,3 and Chong-Woo Bae3
    • 1Department of Neonatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • 2Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Seoul, Korea.
    • 3Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Received July 07, 2013; Accepted September 05, 2013.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Breastfeeding has numerous benefits both for infants and mothers. WHO, UNICEF, and OECD report the breastfeeding rate (BR) and exclusive breastfeeding rate (EBR) at 3, 4, and 6 months of age for the international comparison. This article investigates the nationwide changes in BR and EBR in Korea from 1994 to 2012. EBR declined from 1994 to 2000, however progressively increased untill 2012. The latest data in 2012 revealed EBRs at 3, 4, and 6 months were 50.0%, 40.5%, and 11.4% respectively. The exclusive formula feeding rate (EFR) was highest in 2000 and gradually declined thereafter. In 2012, the EFRs at 3, 4 and 6 months were 21.7%, 26.5%, and 10.1%. In 2009, the EBRs at 3 and 6 months in the United States were 36.0% and 16.3% compared to 50.0% and 11.4% in Korea. In England, the EBRs were 17% and 12% in 2010. Amongst OECD countries, Hungary ranked highest EBRwith 95%, and Iceland, Norway, Slovak Republic, Australia, New Zealand followed. In conclusion, BRs were lowest in 2000, and there have been remarkable increases in BRs over the past 10 yr in Korea. Although BRs have been increasing, further efforts to increase BRs should be made continuously.

Keywords
Breast Feeding; Exclusive Breastfeeding; Trends; Korea

INTRODUCTION

Breastfeeding has numerous benefits both for infants and mothers. It provides all the nutrients that infants need for healthy development and protects children from common childhood illnesses such as diarrhea, asthma, lower respiratory infections, and ear infections. Furthermore, it is positively associated with children's cognitive development. Breastfeeding also benefits mothers by lowering the risks of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and obesity, as well as by cutting back on household expenses (1, 2).

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) recommendations on breastfeeding are as follow: initiation of breastfeeding within the first hour after the birth; exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months; and continued breastfeeding for two years or more, together with safe, nutritionally adequate, age appropriate, responsive complementary feeding starting in the sixth month (3-5). The American Academy of Pediatrics reaffirms this recommendation in its 2012 executive summary: exclusive breastfeeding for first six months, followed by continued breastfeeding as complementary foods are introduced, with continuation of breastfeeding for 1 yr or longer as mutually desired by mother and infants (6-9).

The definitions used here are as follows: "ever breastfed" refers to those infants who have been put to the breast, even if only once; and "exclusive breastfeeding" is defined as giving no other food or drink (not even water) except breast milk (4). WHO, UNICEF, and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report the breastfeeding rates (BRs) and the exclusive breastfeeding rates (EBRs) at 3, 4, and 6 months of age by countries. In particular, at 3 and 6 months post-birth are used for international comparison.

In Korea, several studies of BRs have been performed in the past, although none of these was a nationwide survey. Lee et al. (10) reported recent BRs from 2007 to 2012 in Korea using data of young infants whose mothers were registered in the childcare database of Mail Dairies Co., Ltd. Nationwide surveys on BR have been performed by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (KIHSA), one of which is the "Survey of Breastfeeding in Korea" in 1994 (11) and the other is the "National Survey on Fertility and, Family Health and Welfare in Korea" in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 (12-16). Additionally, the Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare (KMOHW) and Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) reported BRs in a study entitled "Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey" in 1998, 2001, 2005, 2007-2009, and 2010-2012 (17). Among these reports, all KIHSA data were officially reported to WHO, UNICEF, and OECD.

This article investigates changes in BRs and EBRs until the infants reach 12 months of age from 1994 to 2012. We analyzed EBR, mixed feeding rate (BR+formula feeding rate), exclusive formula feeding rate, ever breastfed (EBR+mixed feeding) rate using nationwide annual data from KIHSA (11-16) and KMOHW and KCDC (17). We also compared BRs between those of USA (18, 19), England (20), OECD (1, 2), Asia and Pacific countries (21), and Korea. Our purpose is to investigate the status of Korean EBR and to promote breastfeeding by providing basic nationwide data.

DATA COLLECTION

Korean data were extracted from KIHSA's "Survey of Breastfeeding in Korea" in 1994 (11) and "National Survey on Fertility and Family Health and Welfare in Korea" in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 (12-16). Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study subjects from KIHSA's "National Survey on Fertility and, Family Health and Welfare in Korea". The "Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey", done by KMOHW and KCDC (17). We then analyzed BRs in infants until they reached 12 months of age. OECD and USA data were extracted from "BR in family database OECD" (1, 2) and from "Breastfeeding Report Card - United States", which was performed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention USA (18, 19). England's data were from "UK National Statistics", and the "Infant Feeding Survey - UK 2010: Incidence, Prevalence and Duration of Breastfeeding" performed by the Information Center for Health and Social Care (20). Data regarding countries in the Asia and Pacific areas came from "Health at a Glance: Asia/Pacific 2012 (OECD)" (21). All the KIHSA data, which were used in the comparison with other countries, were officially reported to WHO, UNICEF, and OECD. By comparing Korean data with data from other countries, we assessed the relative status of EBR in Korea. All the data exclude weaning foods in dietary patterns.

Table 1
Number of enrolled cases in the study by KIHSA*

CHANGES IN BREASTFEEDING RATES IN KOREA AS REPORTED BY KIHSA (1994-2012)

Exclusive breastfeeding rates (1994-2012)

Fig. 1 shows the changing pattern of EBR at 1 week of life and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months of age in 1994, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012. EBR decreased from 1994 to 2000, but then progressively increased until 2012. EBR peaked in 2009 and decreased slightly in 2012 compared to 2009.

Fig. 1
Exclusive breastfeeding rates in Korea in 1994-2012. Data from survey of breastfeeding in Korea in 1994 and national surveys on fertility and, family health and welfare in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012 in Korea reported by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (*2 weeks in 2012).

The latest data from 2012 revealed EMRs at one week and, at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months as 26.7%, 56.7%, 55.0%, 50.0%, 40.5%, 32.3%, and 11.4% respectively. The 1 week data in 2012 was exceptionally lower than previous years, but the EBR in weeks 2 and 3 in 2010 were 53.0% and 59.1% respectively. EBR at 3 and 6 months, which are used as the international standard, is summarized in Fig. 2A; the Korean rates of 2012 are 50.0% and 11.4%, respectively.

Fig. 2
Exclusive breastfeeding rates (A) and sum of exclusive breastfeeding and mixed feeding rates (B) at 3 and 6 months of age in Korea in 2000-2012. Data from national surveys on fertility and, family health and welfare in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012 in Korea reported by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

Mixed feeding rates (2000-2012)

Fig. 3 shows the mixed feeding (breastfeeding together with formula feeding) rate patterns in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 at the ages of 1 week, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months. In general, there were comparable mixed feeding rate between 2000 and 2009. However, there was an increase in 2012, showing mixed feeding rates of 66.8%, 29.8%, 26.8%, 25.9%, 26.1%, 22.2%, 9.7% at the ages of 1 week, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively.

Fig. 3
Mixed feeding (breastfeeding+formula milk feeding) rates in 2000-2012. Data from national surveys on fertility and, family health and welfare in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012 in Korea reported by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

Exclusive formula feeding rates (2000-2012)

Fig. 4 summarizes the changing patterns in exclusive formula feeding rates (EFRs) at the age of 1 week, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months in 2000, 2006, 2009, and 2012 in Korea. EFR was highest in 2000 and gradually declined thereafter. In 2012, the EFR at the age of 1 week, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months were 6.6%, 13.2%, 17.8%, 21.7%, 26.6%, 22.9%, and 10.1%, respectively.

Fig. 4
Exclusive formula milk feeding rates in Korea in 2000-2012. Data from National surveys on fertility and, family health and welfare in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012 in Korea reported by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

Ever breastfed rates (1994-2012)

Fig. 5 shows the changing patterns of the ever breastfed rate in Korea at the ages of 1 week, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months of life in 1994, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012. As the increase gradually started from 2000, it peaked in 2012. Ever breastfed rates in 2012 were 93.5%, 86.5%, 81.8%, 75.9%, 66.6%, 54.5%, and 21.1% at the age of 1 week, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months of life, respectively (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 5
Sum of exclusive breastfeeding and mixed feeding rates in Korea in 2000-2012. Data from survey of breastfeeding in Korea in 1994 and national surveys on fertility and, family health and welfare in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012 in Korea reported by the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.

CHANGES IN BREASTFEEDING RATES IN KOREA AS REPORTED BY KOREA NATIONAL HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY (1998-2011)

The changing pattern of EBR, mixed feeding rate, EFR, and ever breastfed rates, as investigated by Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1998 to 2011, are shown in Table 2. There was no monthly data of the research in 1998. From 2001 to 2005, there were data at the age of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, however, there was no 3 month data from 2007, 2008, or between 2009 and 2011. Hence, it is not possible to compare those feeding rates by the year and month using Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey results, Fig. 6 summarizes the distributions of feeding rate at the age of 1, 6, and 12 months between 2009 and 2011.

Fig. 6
Exclusive breastfeeding, mixed feeding, exclusive formula milk feeding, and ever breastfed rates in Korea in 2009-2011. Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in Korea reported by the Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Table 2
Breast feeding rates in Korea by KMOHW and KCDC*

COMPARISON OF KOREAN DATA OF BREASTFEEDING RATES WITH THOSE OF OTHER COUNTRIES

USA

EBR and ever breastfed rates in the USA between 2003 to 2009, according to the US CDC reports, are shown in Fig. 7A, B. There was a gradual increasing trend in EBR to 36.0% and 16.3% at the ages of 3 and 6 months, respectively, by 2009. In the same year in Korea, EBRs were 50.0% and 11.4% at the age of 3 and 6 months, respectively, so EBR was higher in Korea at 3 months, but lower at 6 months compared to the US data. As Fig. 7B shows, ever breastfed rates of the early postpartum, 6 and 12 months in 2009 in the US data were 76.9%, 47.2%, and 25.5%, respectively. Breastfeeding rates continued to rise, with increases of about 2 percentage points in breastfeeding initiation during early postpartum, and breastfeeding at 6 and 12 months. Breastfeeding initiation increased from 74.6% in 2008 to 76.9% in 2009. This increase represents the largest annual increase over the previous decade. Breastfeeding at 6 months increased from 44.3% to 47.2%; breastfeeding at 12 months increased from 23.8% to 25.5% in 2009.

Fig. 7
Exclusive breastfeeding rates (A) and ever breastfed rates (B) in 2000-2009 in the USA. Data from breastfeeding rates reported by USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

England

According to data from Englnad, EBRs at 3 and 6 months were 17% and 12%. These EBRs were lower than Korea rates.

OECD countries

EBRs at 3, 4, and 6 months in 2005 in OECD contries are shown Fig. 8. Hungary ranked highest with 95%, followed by Iceland, Norway, Slovak Republic, Australia, New Zealand and Portugal. USA and England had lower EBRs. Korea ranked in the middle with an EBR of 50%. Although subject to considerable cross-national variation, the proportion of children being breastfed declines with age everywhere. On average, almost half of all infants of 3 months of age are being exclusively breastfed. However, by the time infants are 6 months old, less than 25% are exclusively breastfed. Fig. 9 shows ever breastfed rates of OECD countries around 2005. Around 2005, the proportion of children who were ever breastfed varied widely across OECD countries, ranging from less than 70% in Ireland and France, to almost 100% in Denmark, Sweden and Norway.

Fig. 8
Exclusive breastfeeding rates in OECD countries around 2005. Data of breastfeeding rates in family database reported by OECD refrence.

Fig. 9
Ever breastfed rates in OECD countries around 2005. Data from breastfeeding rates in family database reported by OECD reference.

Countries in Asia and Pacific

EBRs in Asia and Pacific countries at 6 months are summarized in Fig. 10. Globally, less than 40% of infants under 6 months of age are exclusively breastfed (UNICEF, 2009). In this region, around half of the countries with available data have EBRs greater than 40%. Three quarters or more of infants are exclusively breastfed in DPR Korea, Sri Lanka, Cambodia and the Solomon Islands, around half in India, and around one third in the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia were exclusively breastfed. EBRs are low, at less than 20%, in Thailand and Vietnam.

Fig. 10
Exclusive breastfeeding rates in Asia Pacific countries. Data from Health at a Glance: Asia Pacific 2012 reported by OECD reference.

BENEFITS OF BREASTFEEDING TO INFANTS AND MOTHERS

The benefits of breastfeeding for infants are associated with the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding. In other words, the more mothers who breastfeed and the longer they do, the more benefits will gain. There is evidence to show that breastfeeding has many advantages. The percent reduction in risk of diasease according to breastfeeding duration are shown in Table 3 (6-8).

Table 3
Dose-response benefits of breastfeeding to infants and mothers

Breastfeeding also improves cognitive development in infants and children. Intelligence scores and teacher's ratings of breastfeeding children are significantly greater than those fed artificial milk. Similar results are observed when children are exclusively breastfed for 3 months or longer. There are significant positive effects for preterm infants who are brestfed, so breastfeedng is encouraged especially for high-risk very low birth weight (<1,500 g) preterm infants. In the data from preterm infants, breastfeeding was associated with reduction in frequency and severity of necrotizing enterocolitis and the improvement of long-term neurodevelopment (6-8).

POLICIES FOR BREASTFEEDING PRACTICE IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES

The US CDC provides five indicators for measuring and comparing the rates of breastfeeding between regions: ever breastfed, breastfeeding at 6 months, breastfeeding at 12 months, exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months, and exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (18). It is required that all data be collected according to these indicators. The five recommendations from the "Healhy People 2020 Objective" of US CDC are as outlined in Table 4 (18). These are goals of breastfeeding that should be met by the year 2020.

Table 4
Healthy people 2020 objectives in the USA

There are WHO- and UNICEF- centered campaigns that are working against decreasing breastfeeding rates. Each member country is developing policies and educational resources for breastfeeding practice and calling for the restriction of sales and advertisement of substitutional foods in order to protect breastfeeding. WHO and UNICEF proposed the clinical guidelines, "Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding" in 1989, and also stated the "Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI)" and the "Innocenti Declaration Adoption for Encouraging and Support of Breastfeeding" from 1992 by WHO and UNICEF. Some of the details are as follows: 1) recommendation to organize a committee for breastfeeding all countries of the world, 2) BFHI business development, 3) recommendation to legalize the restriction of sales and advertisement of substitutional foods like artificial milk, and 4) demand for improvement of working conditions for breastfeeding mothers (22).

Each country's policies and promotion of breastfeeding encompass the following three goals: 1) to provide comprehensive and acceptable use policies and services to mothers, children and their family members and to make it known that breastfeeding is the most important diet for babies, 2) to provide and support an law, rule or institutional strategy for recognition of the importance of practice breastfeeding, and 3) to support breastfeeding mothers by protection in the workplace (22).

POLICIES AND PERSPECTIVES FOR BREASTFEEDING PRACTICE IN KOREA

Every year since the first appointment of Ilsin Christian hospital in Busan in 1993, several new hospitals have been appointed a BFHI by WHO and UNICEF. A total of 68 hospitals was appointed as BFHI, however, the appointment of 29 hospitals was revoked after regular reassessment. In total, 39 hospitals in Korea have been appointed as BFHIs as of May 2013. The UNICEF Korea committee set a standard for "Mother-Friendly Workplaces" considering previous breastfeeding business experience, experiences overseas, and current attitudes in Korean society. These criteria included enterprise policies, education and financial support for breastfeeding. If the companies ensured that their employees knew that their work environment supports breastfeeding and expert-assessors issue a certificate, then the UNICEF Korea committee appoints the business as a mother-friendly and breastfeeding-supportive workplace. The UNICEF Korea committee of breastfeeding experts provides training and sponsorship during World Breastfeeding Week every August. The topic of this ceremony in 2013 was "Breastfeeding Support-Close to Mothers".

The KMOHW added the content supporting the necessity of installing and supporting breastfeeding facilities in the Mother and Child Health Law, emended in 2008. Some of the details are as follows: 1) a state agency and a local government can support the installation of breastfeeding facilities for children's health care, 2) a state agency and a local government have to carry forward data investigation, public reactions, and education for breastfeeding, and 3) a medical institution and a postpartum care center have to recommend breastfeeding to pregnant women and provide education about breastfeeding. And KMOHW also have to do their best to install facilities like lactation rooms for breastfeeding. "MotherSafe Program and MotherSafe Counseling Centers" (http://www.mothersafe.or.kr/) is operated by one of the "Korean Motherisk Program". It provides online and offline services about drug counseling during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Planned Population Federation of Korea (http://www.ppfk.or.kr/) runs web site for encouragement, education, counseling and public reactions for breastfeeding. Additionally, there are other websites including, "Baby-Loving Site" (http://agasarang.org/), "Number One Breastfeeding Site" (http://www.mom-baby.org/), and "Mom-Mom-Mom Cafe". Planned Population Federation of Korea also runs "Happy House with Mom and Children" advertisement in the subway, expressway service areas, workplaces and other public facilities in an effort to encourage breastfeeding.

The committee on Nutrition of the Korean Pediatric Society (http://www.pediatrics.or.kr/) has stressed the importance of breastfeeding and proposed an improvement plan. This committee began in the 1960s and every 10 yr thereafter has surveyed the proportion of mothers who understand the importance of breastfeeding, which has therefore contributed to the improvement in BRs in Korea. Since the 2000s, this survey has progressed into a public education campaign aimed at pregnant women and pediatricians. The large-scale activities of this committee have included in publication of a book called "Nutrition for Infants and Children" in 2000, production of video education tool, "Promotional Video about Breastfeeding" in 2007, sponsorship of the "Photo Exhibition about Breastfeeding" in 2007, promotion of the "Essay Contest about Breastfeeding", providing an online "Q&A System", and collaboration with UNICEF. Based on the activity of the Committee on Nutrition of the Korean Pediatric Society, the Korean Society of Breastfeeding Medicine (http://breastfeedingmedicine.org/) was recently founded, and has played a leading role in academic activity since 2006. This Society has put forth many efforts to advance in academic conferences, organization of the public relationship between mothers and pediatricians, collaboration with KMOHW and UNICEF, public education program, and research on breastfeeding. The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine in Korea (http://www.bfmed.co.kr/) supervises the "International Board of Lactation Consultant Examiners" and "Trains International Board Certified Lactation Consultant Passing the Test". They are working as specialists counseling for breastfeeding in many clinics, hospitals and other related facilities.

There are active policies and programs for encouraging breastfeeding in developed countries like the USA and England. However, in Korea, there are may barriers for breastfeeding women. More and more Korean women are entering the workforce, and thus, we have to promote a safe breastfeeding environment for well-educated working women. We also have to support plan for health professions so that there are effective guidelines for promoting breastfeeding. To be effective, education will have to take place at the level of the health professional and at the level of the individual pregnent or post-partum women (22).

The national plans to encourage breastfeeding by Kim (22) are as follows: 1) establish national policies about breastfeeding because of the present passive health care enterprise through country health clinics, set up a road map for practice, and determine the roles of different health offices in promoting breastfeeding, supporting incentive systems for medical institutions and postnatal care centers to encourage breastfeeding, providing educational programs for health professionals, 2) install rooming-in system in hospitals via insurance coverage, counsel public reactions to breastfeeding, and making community hospitals' presence and thier support for breastfeeding known, 3) train health professionals like doctors, nurses or hospital dietitians, 4) train managers in postnatal care centers, nurses, and mothers by offering regular educational programs about breastfeeding considering the circumstances of low rooming-in rate in postnatal care centers, 5) create "Baby-Friendly Office" by the promotion of a safe breastfeeding environment in the workplace. create "Baby-Friendly Office" logo to companies having breastfeeding facilities, and for systemic support of the best follow-up service, and 6) create public awareness campaingn about benefits of breastfeeding for preventing obesity, allergy, sudden infant death syndrome, and adult chronic disease in later life (22).

CONCLUSION

According to Korean data, breast-feeding rates were high between the 1980s and 1990s. Although breast-feeding rates were lowest in 2000 as a result of industrialization, lack of awareness of importance in breastfeeding and absence of breastfeeding support policies, there were remarkable advances in breast-feeding rates since the last 10 yr (22). This increase was identified as an increase in incidence but decrease in duration of breast feeding based on the fact that exclusive breast-feeding rates decreased dramatically at 6 months. Thus, continued efforts are needed for advancement of national education and public relations. Korea will continue to review policy and improve breastfeeding education and support in a global scale. The present review contains speculation on breastfeeding practices and trends from 1994 to 2012 in Korea. We anticipate that this work will contribute to further improvement in the future.

Notes

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Family databse, child outcome(CO)1.5 breastfeeding rates. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Breastfeeding rate, family database OECD. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. World Health Organization. Breastfeeding health topic. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. World Health Organization. Programs and projects, nutrition topics, exclusive breastfeeding. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. United Nations Children's Fund. Nutrition, breastfeeding, recommendations for optimal breastfeeding. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Section on breastfeeding: policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2012;129:e827–e841.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Executive summary, 2012 breastfeeding and the use of human milk. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. Eidelman AI. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk: an analysis of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Breastfeeding Policy Statement. Breastfeed Med 2012;7:323–324.
    1. Feldman-Winter L. The AAP updates its policy on breastfeeding and reaches consensus on recommended duration of exclusive breastfeeding. J Hum Lact 2012;28:116–117.
    1. Lee WS, Cho J, Choi YS, Chung SH, Bae CW, Jung JA. Breastfeeding rate in below 6 months infants during recent 6-year in Korea based on childcare database. Neonatal Med 2013;20:221–227.
    1. Park IH, Whang NM. In: Survey of breastfeeding and strategic policy for improving breastfeeing in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 1994. pp. 41-72.
    1. Kim SK, Cho AJ, Lee SS, Kim CK, Song IS. In: The 2000 national survey on fertility and, family health and welfare in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2000. pp. 239-247.
    1. Kim SK, Cho AJ, Kim YK, Park SK, Lee KW. In: The 2003 national survey on fertility and, family health and welfare in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2004. pp. 299-305.
    1. Kim SK, Cho AJ, Kim YK, Doh SR, Lee KW. In: The 2006 national survey on fertility and, family health and welfare in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2006. pp. 310-321.
    1. Kim SK, Kim YK, Cho AJ, Kim HR, Lim SE. In: The 2009 national survey on fertility and, family health and welfare in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2009. pp. 282-294.
    1. Kim SK, Kim YK, Kim HR, Park CS, Shon SK, Choi YJ, Kim YW, Lee GE, Yoon AR. In: The 2012 national survey on fertility and, family health and welfare in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2012. pp. 415-441.
    1. Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare and Korea Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention. Korea national health and nutrition examination survey in 1998, 2001, 2005, 2007-2009, and 2010-2012. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention USA. Breastfeeding, breastfeeding report card - United States 2012. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention USA. Breastfeeding. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. UK National Statistics, Information Center for Health and Social Care. Infant feeding Survey-UK, 2010, incidence, prevalence and duration of breastfeeding. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. OECD/WHO. Breastfeeding in Health at a Glance: Asia/Pacific 2012, OECD Publishing. [accessed on 15 June 2013].
    1. Kim HR. Trends of breastfeeding in Korea and other nations: strategic policy for improving breastfeeing in Korea. Issue Focus 2011;86:1–8.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 10

Tables

1 / 4

ORCID IDs
PERMALINK