Partisipasi Publik Berbasis Nilai Budaya Masyarakat Adat Baduy: Upaya Pelestarian Lingkungan
Abstract
The increasing number of visits to Baduy customary areas poses a threat to their customary environment. This paper aims to provide an overview of the form of public participation based on the cultural values of the Baduy indigenous people in efforts to preserve the environment in their area. As it is known that the cultural values of the Baduy indigenous people are ancestral values that make the Baduy indigenous people live in harmony with nature and the environment. The application of cultural values is a form of public participation by the Baduy indigenous people, so that they can assist the government in the decision-making process. This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach by conducting interviews with 40 informants who are indigenous peoples and Baduy customary institutions, informants have also met the requirements to become resource persons for this research. The values of the Baduy people are grouped into four, namely, the values of life, the values of traditions and beliefs, the values of maintaining the balance of nature, and the values of togetherness/mutual cooperation. The cultural value in maintaining the balance of nature that has been carried out by the Baduy indigenous people is about how they carry out their daily lives, work side by side with nature, and the architecture of buildings in their area which is still natural without using chemicals. These cultural values are still carried out by the Baduy indigenous people as a form of public participation that runs optimally. This is a recommendation for the government in formulating policies related to nature conservation.
Abstrak
Peningkatan jumlah kunjungan kawasan adat Baduy memberikan ancaman terhadap lingkungan adat mereka. Makalah ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran tentang bagaimana bentuk partisipasi publik berbasis nilai budaya masyarakat adat Baduy dalam upaya pelestarian lingkungan kawasan mereka. Seperti diketahui bahwa nilai budaya masyarakat adat Baduy merupakan nilai leluhur yang menjadikan masyarakat adat Baduy hidup selaras dengan alam dan lingkungan. Penerapan nilai budaya merupakan bentuk partisipasi publik yang dilakukan masyarakat adat Baduy, sehingga dapat membantu pemerintah dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif dengan melakukan wawancara kepada 40 informan yang merupakan masyarakat adat dan lembaga adat Baduy, informan juga telah memenuhi syarat untuk menjadi narasumber penelitian ini. Nilai masyarakat Baduy dikelompokan menjadi empat yaitu, nilai kehidupan, nilai tradisi dan kepercayaan, nilai menjaga keseimbangan alam, dan nilai tentang kebersamaan/gotong royong. Nilai budaya dalam menjaga keseimbangan alam yang telah dijalankan masyarakat adat baduy yaitu tentang bagaimana mereka menjalankan kehidupan sehari-hari, bekerja dengan tetap berdampingan dengan alam, serta arsitektur bangunan dikawasan mereka yang masih alami tanpa menggunakan bahan kimia. Nilai budaya tersebut masih tetap dijalankan oleh masyarakat adat Baduy sebagai bentuk partisipasi publik yang berjalan optimal. Hal ini menjadi rekomendasi bagi pemerintah dalam perumusan kebijakan yang berkaitan dengan pelestarian alam.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, W. M., & Hulme, D. (2001). If community conservation is the answer, what is the question? Oryx—The International Journal of Conservation, 35, 193–200.
Adler, J.H. (2001). Free & Green: a new approach to environmental protection. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 24, 653–694.
Barton, B. (2002). Underlying concepts and theoretical issues in public participation in resources development. In D. Zillman, A. Lucas, & G. Pring (Eds.). Human Rights in Natural Resources Development: Public Participation in the Sustainable Development of Mining and Energ. Oxford University Press.
Bergh¨ofer, U., Rozzi, R., Jax, K. (2008). Local versus global knowledge: diverse perspectives on nature in the Cape Horn biosphere reserve. Environmental Ethics, 30(3), 273–294.
Berkes, F. (2009). Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters, 2, 19–24. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008. 00040.x.
Bieling, C., Eser, U., Plieninger, T. (2020). Towards a better understanding of values in sustainability transformations: ethical perspectives on landscape stewardship. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 188–196.
Bond, A., Palerm, J., Haigh, P. (2004). Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects: a case study analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 617–641.
Carreira, V., Machado, J.R., Vasconcelos, L. (2016). Legal citizen knowledge and public participation on environmental and spatial planning policies: a case study in Portugal. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2, 22–33.
Chan, K.M.A., Balvanera, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Díaz, S., G´omezBaggethun, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G.W., MartínL´opez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascual, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., T. (2016). Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United, 113(6), 1462–1465.
Charnley, S., Engelbert, B. (2005). Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA’s superfund community involvement program. Journal of Environmental Management, 77, 165–182.
Ciaran, O. ’. F. (2010). Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(10), 11–27.
Creighton, J. L. (2005). The public participation handbook: making better decisions through citizen involvement. John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W. & J. D. C. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
Cullen, D., McGee, G.J., Gunton, T.I., Day, J.C. (2010). Collaborative planning in complex stakeholder environments: an evaluation of a two-tiered collaborative planning model. Society and Natural Resources, 23(4), 332–350.
Daley, D.M. (2013). Public Participation, Citizen Engagement, and Environmental Decision Making. Oxford University Press.
Daniels, S.E. (1996). Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: applying the Vroom-Yetton Model to public participation strategy. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 13–30.
Devlin JF, Y. N. (2008). Contentious politics in environmental assessment: blocked projects and winning coalitions. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(1), 17–27.
Doody, D.G., Kearney, P., Barry, J., Moles, R., O’ Regan, B. (2009). Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9, 1129–1137.
Farley, J.U., Lehmann, D.R. (1994). Cross-national “laws” and differences in market response. Management Science, 40(1), 111–122.
Fries, S., Schmid, S., & Hofer, M. (2007). On the relationship between value orientation, valences, and academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 201–216.
Garna, J. (1988). Nyi Pohaci Sanghyang Asri, dalam Nurhadi Rangkuti (peny.) Orang Baduy dari Inti Jagat (E. Bantara Budaya, Kompas Prosindo (ed.)). Yayasan Budhi Dharma Pradesha.
Garnett, S., Burgess, N., Fa, J., Fern´andez-Llamazares, A., Moln´ar, Z., Robinson, C., Watson, J., Zander, K., Austin, B., Brondizio, E., Collier, N., Duncan, T., Ellis, E., Geyle, H., Jackson, M., Jonas, H., Malmer, P., McGowan, B., Sivongxay, A., Leipe. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1, 369–374.
Garnett, S. T., Sayer, J., & du Toit, J. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: A conceptual framework. Ecology and Society, 12(2).
Hackel, J. D. (1999). Community conservation and the future of Africa’s wildlife. Conservation Biology, 13, 726–734.
Hasan, M.A., Nahiduzzaman, K.M., Aldosary, A.S. (2018). Public participation in EIA: a comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72, 12–24.
Hindess, B. (2002). Deficit by design. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), 30–38.
Hofer, M., Schmid, S., Fries, S., Dietz, F., Marten, C., & Reinders, H. (2007). Individual values, motivational confficts, and learning for school. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 17–28.
Hofstede, G. (1989). Organising for cultural diversity. European Management Journal, 7(4), 390–397.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton,. Princeton University Press.
IPBES. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES.
Jones, M.L., Alony, A. (2007). The cultural impact of information systems - through the eyes of Hofstede - a critical journey. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 4(63), 407–419.
Klamer, A. (2004). Cultural goods are good for more than their economic value. In V. Rao, & M. Walton (Eds.). Culture and public action (The Intern). Stanford University Press.
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: an exploration M. Kim International Journal of Hospitality Management 89 (2020) 102572 13 in definition and classification. In: Parsons, T., Shils, E. (Eds.), Toward a General Theory of Action. Harvard University Press.
Kluckhohn, F.R., Strodtbeck, F.L. (1961). Variations in Value Orientations.
Klyza, C., Sousa, D. (2013). American Environmental Policy: beyond Gridlock. MIT Press.
Kopnina, H. et al. (2018). The ‘future of conservation’ debate: defending ecocentrism and the Nature Needs Half movement. Biological Conservation, 217, 140–148.
Li, J.S., Chen, G.Q., Chen, B., Yang, Q., Wei, W.D., Wang, P., Dong, K.Q., Chen, H.P. (2016). The impact of trade on fuel-related mercury emissions in beijing evidence from three-scale input-output analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1–11.
Liu, Y., Segev, S. (2017). Cultural orientations and environmental sustainability in households: a comparative analysis of Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites in the United States. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(6), 587–596.
McShane, T. O., & Wells, M. P. (2004). Getting biodiversity projects to work: Towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press.
Mistry, J., Berardi, A. (2016). Bridging indigenous and scientific knowledge. Science, 352, 1274–1275.
Mooij, M. (2015). Cross-cultural research in international marketing: clearing up some of the confusion. International Marketing Review, 32(6), 646–662.
Park, H., Russell, C., Lee, J. (2007). National culture and environmental sustainability: a crossnational analysis. Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(1), 104–121.
Park, S.H., Hsieh, C.-M., Miller, J.C. (2015). Investigating tourists’ casino retention: cross-cultural comparison with Chinese and Westerners. International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 15((1–2)), 30–43.
Patricia Leavy. (2017). Research Design Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
Pring, G., Noe, S.Y. (2002). The emerging international law of public participation affecting global mining, energy and resources development. In: Zillman, D.N., Lucas, A.R., Pring, G. (Eds.), Human Rights in Natural Resource Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ringov, D., Zollo, M. (2007). The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 476–485.
Rokeach, M. (1968). A theory of organization and change within value-attitude systems. J. Soc, 24(1), 13–33.
Runhaar HAC, D. P. (2007). What makes strategic environmental assessment success-ful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25(1), 2–14.
Sample, V.A. (1993). A framework for public participation in natural resource decision making. Journal of Forestry Research, 91, 22-27.
Schwartz, S. . (1992). Universals in the content and structures of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: In: Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Psychology. Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137–182.
Segev, S. (2015). Modelling household conservation behaviour among ethnic consumers: the path from values to behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39, 193–202.
ShalomH. Schwartz. (2006). A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3).
Thomas J. (1995). Public involvement in public management: adapting and testing a borrowed theory. Public Administration Review, 50(4), 435–451.
Wang, Y., Shen, H., Ye, S., & zhou, L. (2020). Being rational and emotional: An integrated model of residents’ support of ethnic tourism development. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44(June), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.05.008
Webler, T., Tuler, S. (2000). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: theoretical reffections from a case study. Administration & Society, 32, 566-595.
Weisner, T.S., García Coll, C., Chatman-Nelson, C. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on the macrosystem. In: Kreider, H., Lopez, M.E., Weiss, H.B., Chatman-Nelson, C. (Eds.), Preparing Educators to Engage Families: Case Studies Using an Ecocultural Systems.
Zhang, G.Q., Deng, N.N., Mou, H.Z., Zhang, Z.G., Chen, X.F. (2019). The impact of the policy and behavior of public on environmental governance performance: empirical analysis based on provincial panel data in China. Energy Policy, 129(7), 1347-1354.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
