EFFECTS OF UNITY PROSTHETIC ELEVATED VACUUM SUSPENSION SYSTEM ON MINIMUM SWING TOE CLEARANCE

Hossein Gholizadeh; Edward D. Lemaire; Julie Nantel

doi:10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36847

Authors

Hossein Gholizadeh Centre for Rehabilitation Research and Development, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-7985
Edward D. Lemaire 1) Centre for Rehabilitation Research and Development, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. 2) Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-2623
Julie Nantel School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-9222

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36847

Keywords:

Prosthesis, Rehabilitation, Lower Limb Amputation, Gait , Toe Clearance, Transtibial Prosthesis, Mobility, Prosthetic Suspension, Amputation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of tripping in people with amputation is greater than that of able-bodied individuals due to reduced toe clearance during the swing phase. Appropriate prosthetic suspension may increase toe clearance by providing more secured attachment between the residual limb and prosthetic socket. Research is lacking on the Unity suspension system's effect on swing toe clearance.

METHODS: Twelve people with transtibial amputation were fitted with the Unity suspension system. After one month accommodation period, the person walked with active (ON) or inactive vacuum (OFF) in a CAREN-Extended virtual reality system, across multiple simulated real-world scenarios. Prosthetics minimum swing toe clearance, and kinematic data, while the vacuum was ON or OFF, were compared with the intact side and a group of 12 able-bodied individuals.

RESULTS: Minimum swing toe clearance (MSTC) and knee flexion angle were larger on the prosthetic side (active and inactive vacuum) compared to both the intact side and the control group. However, hip flexion angle on the prosthetic side was approximately 17% smaller than the control group. Unlike the control group, MSTC with active and inactive vacuum suspension was not significantly different between level walking and other walking conditions. Finally, among all walking conditions, the lowest swing toe clearance for both control and the amputee groups was recorded when the limb was at the top of a side-slope.

CONCLUSION: An effective suspension system could improve toe clearance; however, significant differences were not found between active and inactive vacuum conditions. The likelihood of inappropriate foot contact on side-slope ground might be greater than other walking conditions for both able-bodied and amputee groups, possibly leading to stumbling or falling.

Layman's Abstract

Walking over non-level surfaces are more challenging than level walking, especially for people with below the knee amputation. Moreover, due to reduced toe clearance during the gait, people with amputation have higher risk of tripping and falling than able-bodied individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a prosthetic suspension system, a critical component that connects the residual limb to the prosthesis, on toe clearance during gait across multiple simulated real-world walking scenarios. Twelve people with below the knee amputation and a group of 12 able-bodied individuals participated in this study. The results of this study showed that an effective suspension system could improve toe clearance during swing phase. The likelihood of inappropriate foot contact on side-slope ground might be greater than other walking conditions for both able-bodied and amputee group, possibly leading to stumbling or falling.

Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/36847/28624

How To Cite: Gholizadeh H, Lemaire E.D, Nantel J. Effects of unity prosthetic elevated vacuum suspension system on minimum swing toe clearance. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 1, No.1. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i1.36847

Corresponding Author: Julie Nantel, PhD
School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, K1N 6N5
E-Mail: jnantel@uottawa.ca
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-9222

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological. 1991.

Mills PM, Barrett RS. Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men. Hum Mov Sci. 2001;20(4–5):427–46. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9457(01)00061-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00061-6

Winter DA. Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. Phys Ther. 1992;72(1):45–53. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/72.1.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/72.1.45

Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE. Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther. 1990;70(6):340–7. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/70.6.340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/70.6.340

Eshraghi A, Osman NAA, Gholizadeh H, Karimi M, Ali S. Pistoning assessment in lower limb prosthetic sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36(1):15–24. DOI: 10.1177/0309364611431625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364611431625

Johnson L, De Asha AR, Munjal R, Kulkarni J, Buckley JG. Toe clearance when walking in people with unilateral transtibial amputation: effects of passive hydraulic ankle. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(3):429-37. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.05.0126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.05.0126

Lechler K, Kristjansson K. The importance of additional mid swing toe clearance for amputees. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2018;1(2). DOI:10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.30813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i2.30813

Gholizadeh H, Osman NA, Kamyab M, Eshraghi A, Abas WW, Azam MN. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: Static evaluation of Seal-In® X5 and Dermo® Liner using motion analysis system. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(1):34–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011. 07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.07.004

Baars ECT, Geertzen JHB. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005;29(1):27–37. DOI: 10.1080/ 17461550500069612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17461550500069612

Gholizadeh H, Lemaire ED, Eshraghi A. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: Literature review and professional feedback. Clin Biomech. 2016;37:108–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.06.005

Xu H, Greenland K, Bloswick D, Zhao J, Merryweather A. Vacuum level effects on gait characteristics for unilateral transtibial amputees with elevated vacuum suspension. Clin Biomech. 2017;43:95–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.02.008

Board WJ, Street GM, Caspers C. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001;25(3):202–9. DOI: 10.1080/03093640108726603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640108726603

Thibault G, Gholizadeh H, Sinitski E, Baddour N, Lemaire ED. Effects of the unity vacuum suspension system on transtibial gait for simulated non-level surfaces. PloS One. 2018;13(6):e0199181. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199181

Gholizadeh H, Lemaire ED, Sinitski EH. Transtibial amputee gait during slope walking with the unity suspension system. Gait Posture. 2018;65:205–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.07.059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.07.059

Gholizadeh H, Lemaire ED, Sinitski EH, Nielen D, Lebel P. Transtibial amputee gait with the unity suspension system. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(3):350-356. DOI: 10.1080/ 17483107.2019.1579000 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1579000

Sinitski EH, Lemaire ED, Baddour N, Besemann M, Dudek NL, Hebert JS. Fixed and self-paced treadmill walking for able-bodied and transtibial amputees in a multi-terrain virtual environment. Gait Posture. 2015;41(2):568–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.016

Gates DH, Dingwell JB, Scott SJ, Sinitski EH, Wilken JM. Gait characteristics of individuals with transtibial amputations walking on a destabilizing rock surface. Gait Posture. 2012;36(1):33–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.019

Young PMM, Wilken JM, Dingwell JB. Dynamic margins of stability during human walking in destabilizing environments. J Biomech. 2012;45(6):1053–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12. 027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.027

Begg R, Best R, Dell’Oro L, Taylor S. Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. Gait Posture. 2007;25(2):191–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006. 03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.008

Sinitski EH, Lemaire ED, Baddour N, Besemann M, Dudek N, Hebert JS. Maintaining stable transtibial amputee gait on level and simulated uneven conditions in a virtual environment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(1):40–8. DOI: 10.1080/ 17483107.2019.1629186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1629186

Rosenblatt NJ, Bauer A, Rotter D, Grabiner MD. Active dorsiflexing prostheses may reduce trip-related fall risk in people with transtibial amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(8). DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.01.0031

Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1031–7. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.24295

Merryweather A, Yoo B, Bloswick D. Gait characteristics associated with trip-induced falls on level and sloped irregular surfaces. Minerals. 2011;1(1):109–21. DOI:10.3390/min1010109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min1010109

Fradet L, Alimusaj M, Braatz F, Wolf SI. Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system. Gait Posture. 2010;32(2):191–8. DOI: 10.1016/ j.gaitpost.2010.04.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.011

Fontes CH da S, Laett CT, Gavilão UF, Campos JC de, Alexandre DJ de A, Cossich VR, et al. Bodyweight distribution between limbs, muscle strength, and proprioception in traumatic transtibial amputees: a cross-sectional study. Clinics. 2021;76. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2486

Isakov E, Burger H, Gregorič M, Marinček C. Isokinetic and isometric strength of the thigh muscles in below-knee amputees. Clin Biomech. 1996;11(4):233–5. DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(95) 00078-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(95)00078-X

Smith DG, Fergason JR. Transtibial amputations. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999;361:108-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199904000-00015

Mills PM, Barrett RS, Morrison S. Toe clearance variability during walking in young and elderly men. Gait Posture. 2008;28(1):101–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.10.006

Sparrow WA, Begg RK, Parker S. Variability in the foot-ground clearance and step timing of young and older men during single-task and dual-task treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2008;28(4):563–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.03.013

Sensinger JW, Intawachirarat N, Gard SA. Contribution of prosthetic knee and ankle mechanisms to swing-phase foot clearance. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;21(1):74–80. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2224885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2224885

Moosabhoy MA, Gard SA. Methodology for determining the sensitivity of swing leg toe clearance and leg length to swing leg joint angles during gait. Gait Posture. 2006;24(4):493–501. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.004

Ferreira AEK, Neves EB. A comparison of vacuum and KBM prosthetic fitting for unilateral transtibial amputees using the Gait Profile Score. Gait Posture. 2015;41(2):683–7. DOI: 10.1016/ j.gaitpost.2015.01.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.026

Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Cho B, Cunniffe B, Licht S, et al. The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(5):613–27. DOI: 10.1053/ampr. 2002.32309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/ampr.2002.32309