AN ANALIYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN IDENTIFYING MAIN IDEA IN NARRATIVE PARAGRAPH OF THE FIRST GRADE AT SMA PUTERI SION MEDAN

Deniati Sitohang, Damerita Damanik, Kembar Rosari Capah, Resperdiana Purba

Abstract


This study aims to provide an overview of the analysis of class X SMA Putri Sion Medan in identifying and knowing the difficulties experienced by class X Puteri Sion students in determining the main ideas in the narrative paragraphs. This research uses a qualitative approach,and the tool of data collection was used written test. The sample consisted of 11 students. In conducting the research, the researcher got the result that the students' ability to identify main ideas in narrative paragraphs was in a very bad category. Based on the analyzed data, it was found that 3 students (27.28%) got a score of 81-90 (very good), 1 student (9.09%) got a score of 61-70 (enough), 2 students (18.18%) got a score grades 51-60 (poor), and 5 students (45.44%) scored less than 50 (very bad). Most of the students scored in the very poor category. After analyzing the ability to identify main ideas in narrative paragraphs, it is known that the ability to identify main ideas in class X Puteri Sion Medan is in a very bad category. The difficulties that students face when identifying the main idea in a narrative paragraph are a lack of interest in learning that makes them lazy to read, lack of vocabulary knowledge, their vocabulary is very small, and poor reading strategies.

Keywords: Analysis, students’ ability, narrative Text


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afflerbach, P. 2007. Understanding and Using Reading Assesment K-12. University of Maryland: College Rark.

Arikunto, S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Rieneka Cipta.

Barron’s. 1995. Preparation Guide. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Book Companies.

Broek, V.D, P; Lynch, J S.; Naslund, J; Ievers-Landis, C. E.; Verduin, K.(2003). The development of comprehension of main ideas in narratives: evidence from the selection of titles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 707-718.

Brown, J.D. 2001. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.

Crawley, J, Sharon and Merritt, King. 2000. Remedieting Reading. United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Eskey, D., E. 2002. Reading and the Teaching of L2 Reading. TESOL Journal Vol. 11 No. 1.

Hasani, Aceng. 2005. Ihwal Menulis. UNTIRTA PRESS.

Heaton, J. B. 1998. Writing English Language Test. London: Longman.

Keraf, Gorys. 1991. Argumentasi dan Narasi. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Leopold, C. and Leutner, D. 2012. Science Text Comprehension: Drawing Main Idea Selection and Summarizing as Learning Strategies. Learning and Instruction Vol. 22.

Mc Whorter, Kathleen. T. 1989. College Reading Study Skills. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.

Mc Whorter, Kathleen. T. 1989. Guide to College Reading. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Raygor, L, Alton. 1969. Reading for the Main Idea. United States of America: McGraw- Hill Book Company.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v4i1.1120

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 675 times
PDF - 495 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.