Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T09:07:02.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Study of Fresh-Water Lake Ice using Multiplexed Imaging Radar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

M. Leonard Bryan
Affiliation:
Radar & Optics Division, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, MP.O. Box 618, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48107, U.S.A.
R. W. Larson
Affiliation:
Radar & Optics Division, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, MP.O. Box 618, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48107, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study of ice in the upper Great Lakes, both from the operational and the scientific points of view, is receiving continued attention. Both quantitative and qualitative field work is being conducted to provide the needed background for accurate interpretation of remotely sensed data. The sensor data under discussion in this paper were obtained by a side-looking multiplexed airborne radar (SLAR). These were supplemented with ground-truth data.

Radar, due to its ability to penetrate adverse weather, is an especially important instrument for monitoring ice in the upper Great Lakes. It has been previously shown that imaging radars can provide maps of ice cover in these areas. However, questions concerning both the nature of the surfaces reflecting radar energy and the interpretation of the radar imagery continually arise.

Our analysis office in Whitefish Bay (Lake Superior) indicated that the combination of the ice/water interface with the ice/air interface is the major contributor to the radar backscatter as seen on the imagery. The ice has a very low dielectric constant (<3.0) and a low loss tangent. Thus, this ice is somewhat transparent to the energy used by the imaging SLAR system. The ice types studied include newly formed black ice, pancake ice, and frozen and consolidated pack and brash ice.

Although ice thickness cannot be measured directly from the received signals, it is suspected that by combining the radar backscatter information with both meteorological and sea-state history of the area and with some basic ground truth, better estimates of the ice thickness may be provided. In addition, certain ice features (e.g. ridges, ice foots, areas of brash ice) may be identified with reasonable confidence. There is a continued need for additional ground work to verify the validity of imaging radars for these types of interpretations.

This paper is being published in full in another issue of the Journal of Glaciology.

Type
Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Symposium but Not Published in Full in this Volume
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1975