- Copyright © 2021 Marshfield Clinic Health System
STARD Adherence in an Interventional Radiology Guideline for Diagnostic Arteriography
- Bryan Wright, BGS*⇑,
- Benjamin Howard, DO*,
- Cole Wayant, BS* and
- Matt Vassar, PhD*
- *Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Psychology Department, 1111 West 17th Street, Tulsa, OK 74107
- Corresponding Author:
Bryan Wright, BGS, 1111 West 17th Street, Tulsa, OK 74107, Phone: 918-582-1972, Fax: 918-594-8449, Email: bdwrigh{at}okstate.edu
Abstract
Objective: To assess the quality of reporting in diagnostic accuracy studies (DAS) referenced by the Quality Improvement Guidelines for Diagnostic Arteriography and their adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement.
Materials and Methods: Citations specific to the Society of Interventional Radiology’s Quality Improvement Guidelines for Diagnostic Arteriography were collected. Using the 34-item STARD checklist, two authors in a duplicate and blinded fashion documented the number of items reported per diagnostic accuracy study. Authors met, and any discrepancies were resolved in a resolution meeting.
Results: Of the 26 diagnostic accuracy studies included, the mean number of STARD items reported was 17.8 (SD ± 3.1). The median adherence was 18 (IQR, 17-19) items. Ten articles were published prior to 2003, the original date of STARD publication, and 16 articles were published after 2003. The mean number of reported items for the articles published prior to STARD 2003, and after STARD 2003 was 17.4 (SD ± 2.4) and 18.1 (SD ± 3.5), respectively. There were 14 STARD items that demonstrated an adherence of < 25%, and 13 an adherence > 75%.
Conclusion: The dichotomous distribution of adherence to the STARD statement by DAS investigated demonstrates that areas of deficient reporting may be present and require attention to ensure complete and transparent reporting in the future.
