skip to main content
10.3115/991250.991302dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The correct and efficient implementation of appropriateness specifications for typed feature structures

Published:05 August 1994Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we argue that type inferencing incorrectly implements appropriateness specifications for typed feature structures, promote a combination of type resolution and unfilling as a correct and efficient alternative, and consider the expressive limits of this alternative approach. Throughout, we use feature cooccurence restrictions as illustration and linguistic motivation.

References

  1. Hasam Ait-Kaci. A New Model of Computation Based on a Calculus of Type Subsumption. Ph.D thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bob Carpenter. the Logic of Typed Feature Structures. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science 32. Cambridge University Press, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bob Carpenter. ALE The Attribute Logic Engine, User's Guide, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ann Copestake, Antonio Sanfilippo, Ted Briscoe, and Valeria De Paiva. The ACQUILEX LKB: An introduction. In Ted Briscoe, Valeria De Paiva, and Ann Copestake, editors, Inheritance, Defaults, and the Lexicon, pages 148--163. Cambridge UP, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jochen DÖrre and Andreas Eisele. Feature logic with disjunctive unification. In COLING-90 vol. 2, pages 100--105, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerald Gazdar, Ewan Klein, Geoffrey Pullum, and Ivan Sag. Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dale Gerdemann. Parsing and Generation of Unification Grammars. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, 1991. Published as Beckman Institute Cognitive Science Technical Report CS-91-06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dale Gerdemann. Troll: Type resolution system, user's guide, 1994. Manual for the Troll system implemented by Dale Gerdemann & Thilo Göötz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dale Gerdemann and Paul John King. Typed feature structures for expressing and computationally implementing feature cooccurence restrictions. In Procceedings of 4. Fachtagung der Sektion Computer-linguistik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, pages 33--39, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Thilo Götz. A normal form for typed feature structures. Master's thesis, Universität Tübingen, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. John Griflith. Disjunction and Efficient Processing of Feature Descriptions. PhD thesis, Universität Tübingen, 1994. Tentative Title.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Paul John King. Typed feature structures as descriptions, 1994. In these proceedings. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. John T. Maxwell III and Ronald M Kaplan. An overview of disjunctive constraint satisfaction. In Proccedings of International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 18--27, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Carl Pollard and Ivan Sag. Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes. Chicago University Press, Chicago, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    COLING '94: Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
    August 1994
    661 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 August 1994

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader