skip to main content
10.5555/1705415.1705429dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgemsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Semantic density analysis: comparing word meaning across time and phonetic space

Published:31 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new statistical method for detecting and tracking changes in word meaning, based on Latent Semantic Analysis. By comparing the density of semantic vector clusters this method allows researchers to make statistical inferences on questions such as whether the meaning of a word changed across time or if a phonetic cluster is associated with a specific meaning. Possible applications of this method are then illustrated in tracing the semantic change of 'dog', 'do', and 'deer' in early English and examining and comparing phonaesthemes.

References

  1. Bergen, B. (2004). The Psychological Reality of Phonaesthemes. Language, 80(2), 291--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, M. W. (1992) SVDPACK: A Fortran-77 software library for the sparse singular value decomposition. Tech. Rep. CS-92-159, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Berry, M. W., Do, T., O'Brien, G. Vijay, K. Varadh an, S. (1993) SVDPACKC (Version 1.0) User's Guide, Tech. Rep. UT-CS-93-194, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, L. (2004) Historical linguistics: An introduction 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., and Harshman, R. (1990) Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ellegård, A. (1953) The Auxiliary Do: the Establishment and Regulation of its Use in English. Gothenburg Studies in English, 2. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Firth, J. (1930) Speech. London: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Firth, J. (1957) Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. D. (1995) Comprehending sentence structure. In L. R. Gleitman and M. Liberman, (Eds.), Invitation to Cognitive Science, volume 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 209--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Forston, B. W. (2003) An Approach to Semantic Change. In B. D. Joseph and R. D. Janda (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 648--666.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Grice, H. P. (1989) {1975}. Logic and Conversation. In Studies in the Way of Words.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 22--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hock, H. H., and Joseph, B. D. (1996) Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. London: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchins, S. S. (1998). The psychological reality, variability, and compositionality of English phonesthemes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(08), 4500B. (University Microfilms No. AAT 9901857).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Infomap {Computer Software}. (2007). http://infomap-nlp.sourceforge.net/ Stanford, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaufmann, S. (2000) Second-order cohesion. Computational Intelligence. 16, 511--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Levin, E., Sharifi, M., & Ball, J. (2006) Evaluation of utility of LSA for word sense discrimination. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, New York City. 77--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Marcu, D (2003) Automatic Abstracting, Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, Drake, M. A., ed. 245--256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Otis K., & Sagi E. (2008) Phonaesthemes: A Corpora-based Analysis. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pado, S. & Lapata, M. (2007) Dependency-based Construction of Semantic Space Models. Computational Linguistics, 33, 161--199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Riedel E., Dexter S. L., Scharber C., Doering A. (2006) Experimental Evidence on the Effectiveness of Automated Essay Scoring in Teacher Education Cases. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 267--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rissanen, M. (1994) The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. In Kytö, M., Rissanen, M. and Wright S. (eds), Corpora Across the Centuries: Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Schütze, H. (1996) Ambiguity in language learning: computational and cognitive models. CA: Stanford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Schütze, H. (1998) Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics 24(1):97--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Takayama, Y., Flournoy R., & Kaufmann, S. (1998) Information Mapping: Concept-Based Information Retrieval Based on Word Associations. CSLI Tech Report. CA: Stanford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Takayama, Y., Flournoy, R., Kaufmann, S. & Peters, S. (1999). Information retrieval based on domain-specific word associations. In Cercone, N. and Naruedomkul K. (eds.), Proceedings of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics (PACLING'99), Waterloo, Canada. 155--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Traugott, E. C. (1999) The Role of Pragmatics in Semantic Change. In J. Verschueren (ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. II. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. 93--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Traugott, E. C. (2005) Semantic Change. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Brown K. ed. Oxford: Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Traugott, E. C., and Dasher R. B. (2002) Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Widdows, D. (2003) Unsupervised methods for developing taxonomies by combining syntactic and statistical information. In Proceedings of the joint Human Language Technology Conference and Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Edmonton, Canada: Wiemer-Hastings. 197--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Widdows, D. (2004) Geometry and Meaning. CSLI Publications, CA: Stanford. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Semantic density analysis: comparing word meaning across time and phonetic space

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image DL Hosted proceedings
          GEMS '09: Proceedings of the Workshop on Geometrical Models of Natural Language Semantics
          March 2009
          131 pages

          Publisher

          Association for Computational Linguistics

          United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 March 2009

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader