Roger J. Kreuz
ABSTRACT
Speakers and listeners make use of a variety of pragmatic factors to produce and identify sarcastic statements. It is also possible that lexical factors play a role, although this possibility has not been investigated previously. College students were asked to read excerpts from published works that originally contained the phrase said sarcastically, although the word sarcastically was deleted. The participants rated the characters' statements in these excerpts as more likely to be sarcastic than those from similar excerpts that did not originally contain the word sarcastically. The use of interjections, such as gee or gosh, predicted a significant amount of the variance in the participants' ratings of sarcastic intent. This outcome suggests that sarcastic statements may be more formulaic than previously realized. It also suggests that computer software could be written to recognize such lexical factors, greatly increasing the likelihood that non-literal intent could be correctly interpreted by such programs, even if they are unable to identify the pragmatic components of nonliteral language.
- Herbert H. Clark, 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Shelly Dews and Ellen Winner, 1997. Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. In C. Mandell and A. McCabe (Eds.), The Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., 2003. Nonliteral speech acts in text and discourse. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, and S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 357--393). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rachel Giora, 2003. On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Roger J. Kreuz, 1996. The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In J. S. Mio and A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and Applications (pp. 23--38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- Roger J. Kreuz, Megan L. Dress, and Kristen E. Link, 2006, July. Regional Differences in the Spontaneous Use of Sarcasm. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
- Roger J. Kreuz and Sam Glucksberg, 1989. How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118:374--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger J. Kreuz, Max A. Kassler, Lori Coppenrath, and Bonnie McLain Allen, 1999. Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31:1685--1700.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger J. Kreuz and Kristen E. Link, 2002. Asymmetries in the use of verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21:127--143.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger J. Kreuz and Richard M. Roberts, 1995. Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic tone of voice. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10:21--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Geoffrey Nunberg, 2001. The Way we Talk Now: Commentaries on Language and Culture. Boston: Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
- Akira Utsumi, 2000. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32:1777--1806.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Signaling sarcasm
The use of hashtags such as #sarcasm reduces the further use of linguistic markers of sarcasm in tweets.Hashtags such as #sarcasm appear to be the extralinguistic equivalent of non-verbal expressions in live interaction.Sarcastic hashtags are 90% ...
Using Lexical Resources for Irony and Sarcasm Classification
BCI '17: Proceedings of the 8th Balkan Conference in InformaticsThe paper presents a language dependent model for classification of statements into ironic and non-ironic. The model uses various language resources: morphological dictionaries, sentiment lexicon, lexicon of markers and a WordNet based ontology. This ...
The unbearable hurtfulness of sarcasm
AbstractIn the last decade, the need to detect automatically irony to correctly recognize the sentiment and hate speech involved in online texts increased the investigation on humorous figures of speech in NLP. The slight boundaries among ...
Highlights- Hurtful language is consistently found in a corpus of Italian sarcastic language.
Comments