Marcelo Fiszman
ABSTRACT
We explore a semantic abstraction approach to automatic summarization in the biomedical domain. The approach relies on a semantic processor that functions as the source interpreter and produces a list of predications. A transformation stage then generalizes and condenses this list, ultimately generating a conceptual condensate for a disorder input topic. The final condensate is displayed in graphical form. We provide a set of principles for the transformation stage and describe the application of this approach to multidocument input. Finally, we examine the characteristics and quality of the condensates produced.
- Aronson AR. 2001. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap program. Proceedings of the AMIA Symp, pp 17--21.Google Scholar
- Batagelj AM. 2003. Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks. In M. Jünger and P. Mutzel, editors, Graph Drawing Software. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 77--103.Google Scholar
- Barzilay R, McKeown KR, Elhadad M. 1999. Information fusion in the context of multi-document summarization. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp 550--557. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burgun A, Bodenreider O. 2001. Comparing terms, concepts, and semantic classes in WordNet and the Unified Medical Language System. Proceedings of the NAACL Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources: Applications, Extensions and Customizations, pp 77--82.Google Scholar
- Clark P, Harrison P, Thompson J. 2003. A knowledge-driven approach to text meaning processing. Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Workshop on Text Meaning, pp 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cruse DA. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Cutting D, Kupiec J, Pedersen J, Sibun P. 1992. A practical part-of-speech tagger. Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp 133--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel N, Radev D, Allison T. 2003. Sub-event based multi-document summarization. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL Workshop on Text Summarization, pp 9--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fillmore CJ. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach and RT. Harms, editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 1--88.Google Scholar
- Fellbaum C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein J, Mittal V, Carbonell J, Kantrowitz M. 2000. Multi-document summarization by sentence extraction. Proceedings of the ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization, pp 40--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hahn U, Mani I. 2000. The challenges of automatic summarization. Computer, 33(11):29--36. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hahn U, Reimer U. 1999. Knowledge-based text summarization: salience and generalization operators for knowledge base abstraction. In I. Mani and MT. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 215--32.Google Scholar
- Harabagiu S, Moldovan D, Pasca M, Mihalcea R, Surdeanu M, Bunescu R; Girju R, Rus V, Morarescu P. 2001. The role of lexico-semantic feedback in open-domain textual question-answering. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 274--81. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Humphreys BL, Lindberg DA, Schoolman HM, Barnett GO. 1998. The Unified Medical Language System: An informatics research collaboration. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 5(1):1--11.Google Scholar
- Jacquelinet C, Burgun A, Delamarre D, Strang N, Djabbour S, Boutin B, Le Beux P. 2003. Developing the ontological foundations of a terminological system for end-stage diseases, organ failure, dialysis and transplantation. Int J Med Inf, 70(2--3):317--28.Google Scholar
- Kan M, McKeown KR, Klavans JL. 2001. Domain-specific informative and indicative summarization for information retrieval. Workshop on Text Summarization (DUC3).Google Scholar
- Levin B, Rappaport Hovav M. 1996. From lexical semantics to argument realization. unpublished ms.Google Scholar
- Lisse JR, Perlman M, Johansson G, Shoemaker JR, Schechtman J, Skalky CS, Dixon ME, Polis AB, Mollen AJ, Geba GP. 2003. Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib versus naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med, 139(7):539--46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mani I, Gates B, Bloedorn E. 1999. Improving summaries by revising them. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pp 558--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McDonald DD. 1992. Robust partial parsing through incremental, multi-algorithm processing. In PS Jacobs, editor, Text-based Intelligent Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 83--99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McKeown KR, Klavans JL, Hazivassiloglou V, Barzilay R., Eskin E. 1999. Towards multidocument summarization by reformulation: progress and prospects. Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 453--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McKeown HR, Chang, SF, Cimino J, Feiner SK, Friedman C, Gravano L, Hatzivassiloglou V, Johnson S, Jordan DA, Klavans JL, Kushniruk A, Pate V, Teufel S. 2001. PERSIVAL, a system for personalized search and summarization over multimedia healthcare information. JCDL, pp 331--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCray AT. 1993. Representing biomedical knowledge in the UMLS Semantic Network. High-Performance Medical Libraries: Advances in Information Management for the Virtual Era. Meckler Publishing, pp 45--55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCray AT, Srinivasan S, Browne AC. 1994. Lexical methods for managing variation in biomedical terminologies. Proceedings of the Annual Symp Comput Appl Med Care, pp:235--9.Google Scholar
- McCray AT, Burgun A, Bodenreider O. 2001. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Medinfo, 10(Pt 1):216--20.Google Scholar
- Mihalcea R, Moldovan D. 2000. Semantic indexing using WordNet senses. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on IR and NLP. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nirenburg S, Raskin V. 1996. Ten choices for lexical semantics. Memoranda in Computer and Cognitive Science. MCCS-96-304. New Mexico State University.Google Scholar
- Pustejovsky J., Bergler S, Anick P. 1993. Lexical semantic techniques for corpus analysis. Computational Linguistics, 19:331--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raphael B. 1968. SIR: Semantic information retrieval. In Minsky, M. (ed.) Semantic Information Processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 33--145.Google Scholar
- Radev D. 2000. A Common theory of information fusion from multiple text sources, step one: cross-document structure. Proceedings of 1st ACL SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radev D, Teufel S, Saggion H, Lam W, Blitzer J, Qi H, Celebi A, Liu D, Drabek E. 2003. Evaluation challenges in large-scale multi-document summarization: the MEAD project. Proceedings of ACL. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rindflesch TC, Bean CA, Sneiderman CA. 2000. Argument identification for arterial branching predications asserted in cardiac catheterization reports. Proceedings of the AMIA Symp, pp 704--8.Google Scholar
- Rindflesch TC, Fiszman M. 2003. The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Infor, 36:462--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saggion H, Lapalme G. Generating indicative-informative summaries with SumUM. 2002. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):497--526. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Salton G, Wong A, Yang CS. 1975. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, (18):613--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Srinivasan P, Rindflesch T. 2002. Exploring text mining from MEDLINE. Proceedings of the AMIA Symp, pp 722--6.Google Scholar
- Sparck Jones K. 1999. Automatic summarizing: factors and directions In I. Mani and MT. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1--13.Google Scholar
- Schank RC. 1975. Conceptual information processing. Amsterdam. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Teufel S, Moens M. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles - Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):409--445. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tenny C, Pustejovsk J. 2000. A history of events in linguistic theory. In C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky, editors, Events as Grammatical Objects, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp 3--37.Google Scholar
- Viegas E, Mahesh K, Nirenburg S. 1998. Semantics in action. In P. St. Dizier, editor, Predicative Forms in Natural Language and in Lexical Knowledge Bases. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Wilks YA. 1976. Parsing English II. In E. Charniak and Y. Wilks, editors, Computational semantics: An introduction to artificial intelligence and natural language comprehension. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 155--84.Google Scholar
- Abstraction summarization for managing the biomedical research literature
Recommendations
Research on Multi-document Summarization Based on LDA Topic Model
IHMSC '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics - Volume 02Compared with VSM (Vector Space Model) and graph-ranking models, LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) Model can discover latent topics in the corpus and latent topics are beneficial to use sentence-ranking mechanisms to form a good summary. In the paper, ...
Graph-based abstractive biomedical text summarization
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
Highlights- A graph generation and frequent itemset mining approach have been used for the generation of extractive summaries.
AbstractSummarization is the process of compressing a text to obtain its important informative parts. In recent years, various methods have been presented to extract important parts of textual documents to present them in a summarized form. ...
Automatic Summarization Method of Technical Literature Based On Domain Ontonogy
ICMAI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Mathematics and Artificial IntelligenceIn the field of automatic summarization technology, it is hot but difficult to make full use of the semantic information of text. Owing to the semantic reasoning of ontology, we proposed an automatic summarization method based on domain ontology. The ...
Comments