skip to main content
10.3115/112405.112434dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A template matcher for robust NL interpretation

Published:19 February 1991Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe the Template Matcher, a system built at SRI to provide robust natural-language interpretation in the Air Travel Information System (ATIS) domain. The system appears to be robust to both speech recognition errors and unanticipated or difficult locutions used by speakers. We explain the motivation for the Template Matcher, describe in general terms how it works in comparison with similar systems, and examine its performance. We discuss some limitations of this approach, and sketch a plan for integrating the Template Matcher with an analytic parser, which we believe will combine the advantages of both.

References

  1. Moore, R. C., and Dowding, J., Efficient Bottom-Up Parsing, Proceedings, Fourth DARPA Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, February 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Schank, R. C. and Yale A. I. Project, SAM---A Story Understander, Research Report 43, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ward, W., Understanding Spontaneous Speech, Proceedings, DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, February 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ward, W., The CMU Air Travel Information Service: Understanding Spontaneous Speech, Proceedings, DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, June 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rau, L. F., and Jacobs, P. S., Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies in a Text Processing System, Proceedings, Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Austin, Texas, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Riesbeck, C., and Schank, R. C., Comprehension by Computer: Expectation-Based Analysis of Sentences in Context, Research Report 78, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbonell, J. G. and Hayes, P. J., Recovery Strategies for Parsing Extragrammatical Language, Technical Report CMU-CS-84--107, Carnegie-Mellon University Computer Science Technical Report, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    HLT '91: Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language
    February 1991
    429 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 February 1991

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate240of768submissions,31%