Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous statistical models: With or without truncation parameters?

  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lifetime data are usually assumed to stem from a continuous distribution supported on [0, b) for some b ≤ ∞. The continuity assumption implies that the support of the distribution does not have atom points, particularly not at 0. Accordingly, it seems reasonable that with an accurate measurement tool all data observations will be positive. This suggests that the true support may be truncated from the left. In this work we investigate the effects of adding a left truncation parameter to a continuous lifetime data statistical model. We consider two main settings: right truncation parametric models with possible left truncation, and exponential family models with possible left truncation. We analyze the performance of some optimal estimators constructed under the assumption of no left truncation when left truncation is present, and vice versa. We investigate both asymptotic and finite-sample behavior of the estimators. We show that when left truncation is not assumed but is, in fact present, the estimators have a constant bias term, and therefore will result in inaccurate and inefficient estimation. We also show that assuming left truncation where actually there is none, typically does not result in substantial inefficiency, and some estimators in this case are asymptotically unbiased and efficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. K. Bar-Lev and B. Boukai, “Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimation for Families of Distributions Involving Two Truncation Parameters”, J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 12, 379–384 (1985).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. S. K. Bar-Lev and B. Boukai, “A Characterization of the Exponential Distribution by Means of Coincidence of Location and Truncated Densities”, Statist. Papers 50(2), 403–405 (2009).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. J. Bickel, “Parametric Robustness: Small Biases can be Worthwhile”, Ann. Statist. 12(3), 864–879 (1984).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Claeskens and N. L. Hjort, Model Selection and Model Averaging (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. T.M. Dubinin and S. B. Vardeman, “Likelihood-Based Inference in Some Continuous Exponential Families with Unknown Threshold Parameters”, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 98(463), (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. C. Elandt-Johnson, Survival Models and Data Analysis (Wiley, 1999).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. F. Lawless, Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data (Wiley, 2003).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R. F. Tate, “Unbiased Estimation: Functions of Location and Scale Parameters”, Ann. Math. Statist. 30(2), 341–366 (1959).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A.W. van der Vaart, Asymptotic Statistics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. White, “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models”, Econometrica 50, 1–25 (1982).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Vancak.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vancak, V., Goldberg, Y., Bar-Lev, S.K. et al. Continuous statistical models: With or without truncation parameters?. Math. Meth. Stat. 24, 55–73 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530715010044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1066530715010044

Keywords

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation