Research Article


DOI :10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019   IUP :10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019    Full Text (PDF)

An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay)

Bayram ÇetinMürşide Coşkun

With the purpose of determining formal and functional culture regions for Aba Wrestling, this study is significant in solidifying the role of culture in spatial organization. Data were obtained by using ethnographic methods through participatory observations and interviews with people aged 65 years and older in communities that have adopted wrestling. The characteristics such as its practice, terminology and clothing style can be considered an indication of Hatay Aba Wrestling formal culture region. The region actually continued to exist encompassing Aleppo as the centre during Ottoman period and it was later restructured by the changes in political borders between 1921 - 1939. The present study is aimed at determining the functional and formal culture regions that are the continuation of a preexisting region in Turkey. Formal culture regions caused a spatial organization centered on Yayladağı and Altınözü between 1939 - 1990. The borders of the Hatay formal culture region became indistinct because of the 1990-institutionalization attempts, but these attempts resulted in the formation of the Hatay functional culture region. The Antakya-centred functional culture region overlapped the provincial borders. Today, this culture region is likely to expand its activities at a national and international level. This transformation is regarded as the change of the centre, actors and borders rather than having an evolutionary-progressive trait.

DOI :10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019   IUP :10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019    Full Text (PDF)

Kültürel Miras Unsuru Olan Aba Güreşine Yönelik Şekilsel ve İşlevsel Kültür Bölgesi Belirleme Denemesi (Hatay)

Bayram ÇetinMürşide Coşkun

Aba güreşi şekilsel ve işlevsel kültür bölgelerini belirleme amacındaki bu çalışma, kültürün mekânı örgütlemedeki rolünü somutlaştırması bakımından önem arz eder. Veriler, güreşi benimsemiş topluluklar içerisindeki 65 yaş ve üstü olan kişilerle etnografik yöntemle katılımcı gözlem ve görüşme yapılarak elde edilmiştir. Aba güreşinin uygulanışı, terminolojisi, giyim-kuşamı gibi özellikleri temelinde, Hatay aba güreşi şekilsel kültür bölgesinden söz edilebilir. Bölge, Osmanlı döneminde Halep merkezli olarak varlığını sürdürürken, 1921-1939’da siyasi sınırların değişiminden etkilenerek yeniden şekillenmiştir. Çalışmada, geçmişteki bölgenin Türkiye’deki bakiyesi konumundaki, şekilsel ve işlevsel kültür bölgelerinin tespiti yapılmıştır. Şekilsel kültür bölgesi, 1939-1990 arasında Yayladağı-Altınözü merkezli mekânsal örgütlenmeye meydan vermiştir. 1990 sonrasındaki kurumsallaşma çabaları, Hatay şekilsel kültür bölgesinin silikleşmesine, buna karşın Hatay işlevsel kültür bölgesinin oluşumuna yol açmıştır. Merkezini Antakya’nın oluşturduğu işlevsel kültür bölgesi, il sınırlarıyla örtüşmüştür. Günümüzde faaliyetlerini ulusal ve uluslararası boyuta taşıma eğilimindedir. Dönüşüm, evrimsel-ilerlemeci bir nitelik taşımaktan çok merkez, aktör ve sınırların değişiminden ibarettir. 


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Aba Wrestling, which is both a concrete and a non-concrete element of Turkish cultural heritage, is a lesser known ancestral sport. It is a folk sport that has survived until today in Hatay, Turkey and in various parts of Syria by assuming different functions on a folkloric basis. In this aspect, it organized the space as a formal culture region until the 1990s, and as a functional culture region since then.

This study aims to determine the role of Aba wrestling in organizing the space as an element of Turkish cultural heritage rather than describing its technical characteristics. In other words, it tries to determine what features of it have organized the formal region and how it has changed to be effective in forming the functional region. By focusing on Aba wrestling, this study is significant in terms of solidifying the role of cultural elements in spatial organization.

The research data were collected by using ethnographic methods through participatory observations and interviews. With the objective approach, detailed interviews were conducted with people over a certain age (65 years and older) in the communities where wrestling was an indispensable part of their cultural life. In the sampling process, special attention was given so that the individuals included in the sample were mostly selected from different communities and among those who did wrestling during a certain period of their life or who had a family member engaged in wrestling. Accordingly, a total of 42 people, including 5 women, were interviewed.

Although the research is mainly focused on determining the formal culture region between 1939-1990 and the functional culture region after 1990, it also reveals a formal region that goes beyond today’s political boundaries, especially during the Ottoman period. The Ottoman-period formal culture region, with the central city of Aleppo, ranges approximately from the Bayır-Bucak region to Latakia with the Sanjak of Iskenderun (guard post) in the south of Yayladağı, and it continues covering Cisr-i Şuğur and Aleppo in the southeast and Gaziantep in the north. The region fell apart due to the change in the political borders between 1921 and 1939. Cultural interaction became weaker due to the political boundaries, yet it did not disappear completely and cross-border influence between the remaining parts continued to exist.

The formal region discussed in this study is actually the remaining part of this large region. The formal culture region between 1939 and 1990 covered a total of 100 settlements surrounding Yayladağı and Altınözü. Identified according to the six following criteria, the region can be classified as a centre and periphery in itself given the relationship between the communities and Aba Wrestling. To determine both the formal region and the centre and periphery, several criteria were used such as the existence Aba Wrestling as a tradition among people, frequency of practice on time basis, its effectiveness in social gender roles, the presence of special clothing forms regarding wrestling, the existence of a special terminology, and the existence of trained wrestlers. Whereas Aba Wrestling formal culture region shows homogeneity according to the first five criteria, it differs with respect to the last criterion – the existence of trained wrestlers. In this sense, living spaces of the communities with good, skilled wrestlers constitute the centre of the region. A formal culture region mostly has distinct boundaries and is culturally homogeneous. It has been evidenced that Aba Wrestling and its elements serve multiple functions within the region. In addition to the use of Aba as a uniform and clothing item, these functions can be summarized as follow: symbolizing social identity, uncovering gender roles, and being complementary to recreational activities and rituals.

Folkloric sports activities were restructured on an institutional basis after 1990. In this sense, while the formal region based on ancestral sport of folkloric value has weakened and disappeared, a foundation for a functional region based on professional sports activities has been formed by means of a central, official administrative organization. The new region is now in a position overlapping the provincial borders of Hatay. In fact, the form of organization that has emerged along with the shift of borders and centre is nothing more than the reconstruction of the organizational structure of the space. The national and international organization tendency resulting from the new structure can also be described as the new dynamics of the cultural value change occurred in Aba Wrestling.

Though the transformation from formal to functional region exhibits a positive structure, it is not fully evolutionary-progressive owing to its unidirectional nature. Rather, it can be regarded as a change of centres, actors and borders.


PDF View

References

  • Akalın, Ş. H., Toparlı, R. ve Argunşah, M. (2011). Türkçe sözlük. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları. google scholar
  • Anderson, B. (2007). Hayali cemaatler, milliyetçiliğin kökenleri ve yayılması. (İ. Savaşır, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. google scholar
  • Aşılıoğlu, F. ve Memlük, Y. (2010). Frig vadisi kültür alanlarının belirlenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, 2, 185-197. google scholar
  • Aygün, Ş. (2010). Kültürel mirasın korunması alanındaki yöntem ve teknolojilerin gelişimi bağlamında, yazma eser kütüphanelerinin yeniden yapılandırılması. (Kültür ve Turizm Uzmanlık Tezi), Kütüphaneler ve Yayımlar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. Bilgin, N. (2007). Kimlik inşası. İzmir: Aşina Kitaplar. google scholar
  • Can, M. (2009). Kültürel Miras ve müzecilik. Çalışma Raporu (12 Eylül). Erişim adresi: http://www.kultur.gov.tr. google scholar
  • Cohen, A. P. (1999). Topluluğun simgesel kuruluşu. (M. Küçük, Çev.). Ankara: Dost Kitabevi. Devellioğlu, F. (2015). Osmanlıca-Türkçe ansiklopedik lûgat. Ankara: Aydın Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Donnan, H. ve Wilson, T. M. (2002). Sınırlar ‘Kimlik, Ulus ve Devletin Uçları’. (Z. Yaş, Çev.). Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi. google scholar
  • Geertz, C. (2010). Kültürlerin yorumlanması. (H. Gür, Çev.). İstanbul: Dost Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Güven, Ö. (1992). Türklerde spor kültürü. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu. google scholar
  • Güvenç, B. (1991). İnsan ve kültür. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Haviland, W. A., Prins, H. E. L., Walrath, D. ve Mcbride, B. (2008). Kültürel Antropoloji. (İ. D. E. Sarıoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları. google scholar
  • Hobsbawm, E. ve Ranger, T. (2006). Geleneğin icadı. (M. M., Şahin, çev.). İstanbul: Agora Yayınları. google scholar
  • İmamoğlu, H. (1998). Türklerde geleneksel aba güreşleri üzerine bir araştırma. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Samsun. google scholar
  • Jordan-Bychkov, T. G., & Domosh, B. M. (2003). The human mosaic: A tematic ıntroduction to cultural geography. (9th ed.) New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. google scholar
  • Kümbetoğlu, B. (2015). Sosyolojide ve antropolojide niteliksel yöntem ve araştırma (4.bs). Ankara: Bağlam Yayınları. google scholar
  • Mert, T. (2007). İhsan-ı şahane, hediye kitabı. (Hazırlayan: Emine Gürsoy Naskali, Aylin Koç). Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Araştırmaları Merkezi Kütüphanesi. İstanbul: Kitabevi Yayınları. google scholar
  • Morley, D. ve Robins, K. (2011). Kimlik mekânları: Küresel medya, elektronik ortamlar ve kültürel sınırlar. (E. Zeybekoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. google scholar
  • Oğuz, M. Ö. (2009). Somut olmayan kültürel miras ve kültürel ifade çeşitliliği. Milli Folklor Dergisi. 82, 6-12. google scholar
  • Oğuz, M. Ö. (2013). Terim olarak somut olmayan kültürel miras. Milli Folklor Dergisi, 100, 5-13. google scholar
  • Öztek, İ. (2013). Aba güreşi, uluslar arası organizasyonlar ve yarışma kuralları. Hatay: Antakya Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları. google scholar
  • Punch, K. F. (2014). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş (D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan, Z. Akyüz, Çev.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Sarı, Z. (1992). Hatay’da aba güreşi. Antakya: Hatay Folklor Araştırmaları Derneği, Yayın no: 2, Kültür Ofset Basımevi. google scholar
  • Şahin, K. S. ve Güner, S. (2006). Kültürel miras korunması ve sivil toplum örgütleri arasındaki ilişki. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Sabancı Kültür Merkezi. c:2, s: 548-555. google scholar
  • Şahin, H. M. (2003). Türk spor kültüründe aba güreşi, (2.bs). Gaziantep Kulübü Spor Eğitim Yayınları no:4. Şemseddin Sami, (2011). Kâmûs-ı Türkî. İstanbul: Sahhaflar Kitap Sarayı, c:1-2. google scholar
  • Tomal, N. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda güvenirlik-geçerlilik ve etik. Nurettin Özgen (Ed.) Beşeri Coğrafyada Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Teknikleri içinde (s.454-480). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  • Tümertekin, E. ve Özgüç, N. (2009). Beşeri coğrafya; insan- kültür- mekân. İstanbul: Çantay Kitabevi. google scholar
  • Ünal, Z. G. (2014). Kültürel mirasın korunması. İstanbul: İSMEP Rehber Kitaplar. Williams, R. (2016). Anahtar sözcükler, kültür ve toplumun sözvarlığı. (S. Kılıç, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. google scholar
  • İnternet ICOMOS, (1999). Geleneksel mimari miras tüzüğü http://www.icomos. org.tr 01.03.2019. google scholar
  • ICOMOS, (2013). Türkiye mimari mirası koruma bildirgesi, http:// www.icomos.org.tr 01.03.2019. google scholar
  • UNESCO Sözleşmeler, bildirgeler ve tavsiye kararları http://www. unesco.org.tr 01.03.2019. google scholar
  • UNESCO (2003). Somut olmayan kültürel mirasın (SOKÜM) korunması sözleşmesi, (17 Ekim), http://www.unesco.org.tr 01.03.2019. google scholar
  • UNESCO (1989). Folklorun ve geleneksel kültürün korunması tavsiye kararı, (15 Kasım), http://www.unesco.org.tr/Pages 01.03.2019. google scholar
  • UNESCO (1972). Dünya kültürel ve doğal mirasın korunmasına dair sözleşme, (16 Kasım), http://www.unesco.org.tr/Pages 01.03.2019. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Çetin, B., & Coşkun, M. (2020). An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay). Journal of Geography, 0(40), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


AMA

Çetin B, Coşkun M. An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay). Journal of Geography. 2020;0(40):65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


ABNT

Çetin, B.; Coşkun, M. An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay). Journal of Geography, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 40, p. 65-82, 2020.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Çetin, Bayram, and Mürşide Coşkun. 2020. “An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay).” Journal of Geography 0, no. 40: 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


Chicago: Humanities Style

Çetin, Bayram, and Mürşide Coşkun. An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay).” Journal of Geography 0, no. 40 (Jun. 2024): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


Harvard: Australian Style

Çetin, B & Coşkun, M 2020, 'An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay)', Journal of Geography, vol. 0, no. 40, pp. 65-82, viewed 2 Jun. 2024, https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Çetin, B. and Coşkun, M. (2020) ‘An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay)’, Journal of Geography, 0(40), pp. 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019 (2 Jun. 2024).


MLA

Çetin, Bayram, and Mürşide Coşkun. An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay).” Journal of Geography, vol. 0, no. 40, 2020, pp. 65-82. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


Vancouver

Çetin B, Coşkun M. An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay). Journal of Geography [Internet]. 2 Jun. 2024 [cited 2 Jun. 2024];0(40):65-82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019 doi: 10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019


ISNAD

Çetin, Bayram - Coşkun, Mürşide. An Attempt to Determine Formal and Functional Culture Region for Aba Wrestling as Cultural Heritage (Hatay)”. Journal of Geography 0/40 (Jun. 2024): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.26650/JGEOG2019-0019



TIMELINE


Submitted09.07.2019
Accepted15.03.2020
Published Online30.06.2020

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.


SHARE




Istanbul University Press aims to contribute to the dissemination of ever growing scientific knowledge through publication of high quality scientific journals and books in accordance with the international publishing standards and ethics. Istanbul University Press follows an open access, non-commercial, scholarly publishing.