Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Brief Report
Case Letter
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Images
Images in Neurology
Images in Neuroscience
Images in Neurosciences
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letters to Editor
Letters to the Editor
Media and News
None
Notice of Retraction
Obituary
Original Article
Point of View
Position Paper
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review
Systematic Review Article
Technical Note
Techniques in Neurosurgery
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
14 (
4
); 703-709
doi:
10.25259/JNRP_76_2023

A comprehensive analysis of stroke admissions at a rural Nigerian tertiary health facility: Insights from a single-center study

Department of Internal Medicine, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria
Corresponding author: Airenakho Emorinken, Department of Internal Medicine, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria. emosairen@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Erameh CO, Emorinken A, Akpasubi BO. A comprehensive analysis of stroke admissions at a rural Nigerian tertiary health facility: Insights from a single-center study. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2023;14:703-9.

Abstract

Objectives:

This research intended to examine the demographic and clinical attributes of stroke admissions in a rural Nigerian hospital.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective analysis of stroke admissions was conducted over 1 year. All necessary data were obtained from patients’ records and SPSS was employed for data analysis. P < 0.05 was deemed significant.

Results:

There were 52 stroke cases, accounting for 5.9% of medical admissions. The patients’ mean age was 62.81 ± 12.71 years, while females constituted 51.9% of cases. Common risk factors included hypertension (76.9%), hyperlipidemia (38.5%), alcohol (26.9%), and diabetes mellitus (26.9%). Clinical manifestations included hemiparesis/plegia (84.6%), altered consciousness (63.5%), slurred speech (61.5%), cranial nerve deficit (61.5%), aphasia (42.3%), and headache (34.6%). Ischemic stroke (71.2%) predominated over hemorrhagic stroke (28.8%). The average hospitalization duration was 17.62 ± 8.91 days, and the mean onset to arrival time was 121.31 ± 136.06 h. Discharge and mortality rates were 82.7% and 13.5%, respectively. The association between stroke subtypes and mortality was significant (P = 0.001).

Conclusion:

Stroke constitutes a significant portion of medical admissions in Nigeria, with ischemic stroke being more prevalent. High mortality rates underscore the urgent need to manage risk factors to prevent stroke.

Keywords

Risk factor
Stroke
Morbidity
Mortality
Nigeria
Treatment outcome

INTRODUCTION

Stroke poses a significant health challenge with notable economic implications. It ranks as the second most common cause of death after ischemic heart disease.[1] The annual death toll from stroke amounts to 6.5 million worldwide, with 80–86% of these deaths concentrated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).[1,2] The prevalence of stroke in LMICs rises by 6% each year.[3] Globally, there has been a consistent rise in the incidence and impact of stroke, particularly due to the rising rates of hypertension.[1]

Stroke accounts for a substantial percentage of admissions and mortality in neurology in Africa, including Nigeria, where it constitutes 5.7–26.2% of admissions to the emergency room and 4–17% of medical mortalities.[4,5] Fatality rates ranging from 21% to 45% have been documented by earlier studies.[6-10] Limited health-care funding and access to quality medical care in rural areas exacerbate the negative impact of stroke outcomes.[11]

Despite the burden of stroke, data on stroke epidemiology in rural areas of Nigeria are sparse. Understanding stroke statistics, including incidence and mortality, in rural areas is crucial for improving health-care delivery and meeting patient and community expectations.[1,4] This study intended to evaluate the demographic and clinical attributes of stroke cases in a rural tertiary health facility in South-South Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design, setting, and population

This was a retrospective review of stroke cases admitted to the neurology unit of a rural teaching facility in South-South Nigeria from January to December 2021. The study included adults aged 18 years and above who were diagnosed with stroke and admitted to the medical wards during the specified period. Excluded from the study were patients with stroke mimics and incomplete data. The institutional ethics committee approved the study and informed consent requirements were waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Data collection

This study involved the review of case files of individuals admitted with a stroke diagnosis over a given period. Information extracted from these files included sociodemographic data, timing of symptom onset to presentation, risk factors, clinical characteristics, comorbidity, duration of hospital stay, type of stroke, and treatment outcomes. Stroke diagnosis and classification were determined either by neuroimaging or the World Health Organization criteria[12] if imaging was unavailable. Key physiological variables were also recorded. Treatment outcomes were categorized into discharge, discharge against medical advice (DAMA), referred, or death.

Statistical analysis

The study used SPSS version 25 for data analysis. Continuous variables were reported as mean values and standard deviations, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Associations between variables were assessed using Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, with P-value below 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were 52 stroke cases, accounting for 5.9% of all medical admissions, with an average age of about 63 years. Stroke occurrence significantly increased with age (P = 0.044) and was slightly more common in females (51.9%) [Table 1].

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of stroke patients.
Characteristics Total (N=52) n(%) Stroke types P-value
Hemorrhagic (N=15) n(%) Ischemic (N=37) n(%)
Age groups (years)
<45 5 (9.6) 2 (13.3) 3 (8.1) 0.045a
45–64 26 (50.0) 11 (73.3) 15 (40.5)
≥65 21 (40.4) 2 (13.3) 19 (51.4)
Mean±SD 62.81±12.71 57.13±9.08 65.11±13.34 0.178b
Gender
Male 25 (48.1) 8 (53.3) 17 (45.9) 0.629c
Female 27 (51.9) 7 (46.7) 20 (54.1)
Occupation
Farming 7 (13.5) 3 (20.0) 4 (10.8) 0.254a
Trading 20 (38.5) 6 (40.0) 14 (37.8)
Civil servant 4 (7.7) 1 (6.7) 3 (8.1)
Pensioner 11 (21.2) 1 (6.7) 10 (27.0)
Housewife 3 (5.8) 0 (0.0) 3 (8.1)
Priest 1 (1.9) 1 (6.7) 0 (0.0)
Artisans 6 (11.5) 3 (20.0) 3 (8.1)
Level of education
Informal 5 (9.6) 0 (0.0) 5 (13.5) 0.037a
Primary 16 (30.8) 7 (46.7) 9 (24.3)
Secondary 18 (34.6) 2 (13.3) 16 (43.2)
Tertiary 13 (25.0) 6 (40.0) 7 (18.9)
Marital status
Single 3 (5.8) 1 (6.7) 2 (5.4) 0.604a
Married 47 (90.4) 13 (86.7) 34 (91.9)
Separated 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.7)
Widowed 1 (1.9) 1 (6.7) 0 (0.0)
Body mass index (kg/m2)
Normal (18.5–24.9) 28 (53.8) 10 (66.7) 18 (48.6) 0.287a
Overweight (25–29.9) 15 (28.8) 2 (3.8) 13 (25.0)
Obesity (≥30) 9 (17.3) 3 (20.0) 6 (16.2)
Mean±SD 26.23±4.56 25.77±5.40 26.42±4.24 0.397b

Bold indicates statistically significant P-value. aFisher’s exact test, bt-test, cChi-square test. N: Number, n: Frequency, SD: Standard deviation. All values are stated in numbers (percentages) unless otherwise stated

The most common risk factors were hypertension (76.4%), dyslipidemia (38.5%), diabetes mellitus (DM) (26.9%), alcohol (26.9%), and a history of previous stroke (11.5%). A majority (75%) of patients had two or more risk factors [Table 2].

Table 2: Identified risk factors of stroke.
Risk factors Total (N=52) n(%) Stroke types P-valueb
Hemorrhagic (N=15) n(%) Ischemic (N=37) n(%)
Hypertension 40 (76.9) 11 (73.3) 29 (78.4) 0.726
Diabetes mellitus 14 (26.9) 3 (20.0) 11 (29.7) 0.520
Heart disease 2 (3.8) 1 (6.7) 1 (2.7) 1.000
Previous stroke 6 (11.5) 2 (13.3) 4 (10.8) 1.000
Smoking 1 (1.9) 1 (6.7) 0 (0.0) 0.288
Alcohol 14 (26.9) 7 (46.7) 7 (18.9) 0.081
OCP 4 (7.7) 1 (6.7) 3 (8.1) 1.000
Hyperlipidaemia 20 (38.5) 7 (46.7) 13 (35.1) 0.439c
Obesity 9 (17.3) 3 (20.0) 6 (16.2) 1.000
Family history of stroke 7 (13.5) 1 (6.7) 6 (16.2) 0.433
Atrial fibrillation 5 (9.6) 1 (6.7) 4 (10.8) 1.000
Number of risk factors
1 risk factor 13 (25.0) 3 (20.0) 10 (27.0) 0.596
≥2 risk factors 39 (75.0) 12 (80.0) 27 (73.0)
Fisher’s exact test, cChi-square test. OCP: Oral contraceptive pills, N: Number, n: Frequency. All values are stated in numbers (percentages) unless otherwise state

Typical symptoms included hemiparesis/plegia (84.6%), altered consciousness (63.5%), and slurred speech (61.5%). Seizures occurred significantly more frequently in hemorrhagic strokes (40%) compared to ischemic strokes (8.1%) (P = 0.012) [Table 3].

Table 3: Clinical features of stroke in the study population.
Clinical features Total (N=52) n(%) Stroke types P-valueb
Hemorrhagic (N=15) n(%) Ischemic (N=37) n(%)
Hemiparesis 44 (84.6) 14 (93.3) 30 (81.1) 0.412
Headache 18 (34.6) 3 (20.0) 15 (40.5) 0.158c
Vomiting 5 (9.6) 1 (6.7) 4 (10.8) 1.000
Altered sensorium 33 (63.5) 11 (73.3) 22 (59.5) 0.347
Seizures 9 (17.3) 6 (40.0) 3 (8.1) 0.012
Fever 7 (13.5) 0 (0.0) 7 (18.9) 0.093
Aphasia 22 (42.3) 6 (40.0) 16 (43.2) 0.830c
Dysarthria 15 (28.8) 5 (33.3) 10 (27.0) 0.740
Dizziness 3 (5.8) 1 (6.7) 2 (5.4) 1.000
Slurred speech 32 (61.5) 8 (53.3) 24 (69.4) 0.439c
Ataxia 9 (17.3) 2 (13.3) 7 (18.9) 0.712
Blurred vision 3 (5,8) 1 (6.7) 2 (5.4) 1.000
Restlessness 2 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 2 (5.4) 0.581
Dysphagia 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.7) 1.000
CN VII palsy 32 (61.5) 8 (53.3) 24 (69.4) 0.439c

Bold indicates statistically significant P-value, bFisher’s exact test, cChi-square test. CN: Cranial nerve, N: Number, n: Frequency. All values are stated in numbers (percentages) unless otherwise stated

Most cases were ischemic stroke (71.2%), with the rest being hemorrhagic stroke (28.8%). The majority (88.5%) of patients experienced their first stroke, while 11.5% had a repeat stroke. Neuroimaging was not conducted in 17 (32.7%) patients. Patients stayed in the hospital for an average of about 18 days, and the average time from symptom onset to hospital arrival was about 121 h. Almost half (46.2%) of the patients arrived at the hospital more than 72 h after stroke onset, while only one (1.9%) arrived within 4.5 h. Forty-three (87.2%) patients were discharged and 7 (13.5%) died. Most deaths (85.7%) occurred in hemorrhagic stroke patients, indicating a significant association between stroke type and mortality (P = 0.001) [Table 4].

Table 4: Clinical characteristics of stroke patients.
Characteristics Total (N=52) n(%) Stroke types P-value
Hemorrhagic (N=15) n(%) Ischemic (N=37) n(%)
Pulse rate (bpm)
<60 2 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 2 (5.4) 0.291a
60–100 38 (73.1) 13 (86.7) 25 (67.6)
>100 12 (23.1) 2 (13.3) 10 (27.0)
Mean±SD 90.33±19.15 92.20±19.84 89.57±19.10 0.951b
Respiratory rate (cpm)
12–20 20 (38.5) 6 (40.0) 14 (37.8) 0.885c
>20 32 (61.5) 9 (60.0) 23 (62.2)
Mean±SD 23.58±5.68 23.20±5.441 23.73±5.83 0.734b
Systolic BP (mmHg)
<90 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.7) 0.705a
90–120 4 (7.7) 0 (0.0) 4 (10.8)
120–139 4 (7.7 1 (2.7) 3 (8.1)
≥140 43 (82.7) 14 (93.3) 29 (78.4)
Mean±SD 160.23±34.74 164.67±22.00 158.43±38.85 0.204t
Diastolic BP (mmHg)
<60 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.7) 0.788a
60–80 10 (19.2) 2 (13.3) 8 (21.6)
≥90 41 (78.8) 13 (86.7) 28 (75.7)
Mean±SD 99.81±21.55 106.67±18.39 97.03±22.34 0.743b
GCS scores
≤8 (severe/poor) 16 (30.8) 7 (46.7) 9 (24.3) 0.207a
9–12 (Moderate) 13 (25.0) 4 (26.7) 9 (24.3)
13–15 (mild/good 23 (44.2) 4 (26.7) 19 (51.4)
Mean±SD 11.44±3.84 11.20±3.41 11.54±4.05 0.468b
Time to presentation (hours)
≤4.5 1 (1.9) 0 0.0) 1 (2.7) 0.720a
4.6–12 5 (9.6) 1 (6.7) 4 (10.8)
13–24 12 (23.1) 2 (13.3) 10 (27.0)
25–72 10 (19.2) 3 (20.0) 7 (18.9)
>72 24 (46.2 9 (60.0) 15 (14.5)
Mean±SD 121.31±136.06 135.00±122.30 115.76±142.48 0.673b
Random plasma glucose (mg/dL)
70–140 32 (61.5) 9 (60.0) 23 (62.2) 0.307a
141–199 8 (15.4) 4 (26.7) 4 (10.8)
≥200 12 (23.1) 2 (13.3) 10 (27.0)
Mean±SD 152.15±66.51 146.20±72.10 154.57±64.99 0.994b
Duration of admission (days)
≤14 22 (42.3) 7 (46.7) 15 (40.5) 1.000a
15–28 28 (53.8) 8 (53.3) 20 (51.4)
29–42 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.7)
43–56 1 (1.9) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.70
Mean±SD 17.62±8.91 17.00±7.19 17.86±9.59 0.547b
Outcome of care
Discharged 43 (87.2) 8 (53.3) 35 (94.6) 0.001a
DAMA 2 (3.8) 1 (6.7) 1 (2.7)
Death 7 (13.5) 6 (40.0) 1 (2.7)
Diagnosis of stroke
Imaging (CT scan) 35 (67.3) 10 (66.7) 25 (67.6) 1.000a
Clinical (no scan) 17 (32.7) 5 (33.3) 12 (32.4)

Bold indicates statistically significant P-value. aFisher’s exact test, bt-test, cChi-square test. BP: Blood pressure, DAMA: Discharge against medical advice. CT: Computerized tomography, GCS: Glasgow coma scale, SD: Standard deviation, N: Number, n: Frequency. All values are stated in numbers (percentages) unless otherwise stated

DISCUSSION

This research aimed to investigate the demographics and clinical trends of stroke in a rural teaching hospital in South-South Nigeria, a region with limited epidemiological data on stroke.

The study included 52 stroke cases, which made up 5.9% of medical ward admissions. This rate was slightly higher but comparable to previous studies in rural and urban Nigeria, with stroke accounting for 4.5% and 4.25% of medical admissions, respectively.[9,13] In contrast, a SouthWestern Nigerian urban hospital reported that 26.2% of its medical ward admissions were stroke patients,[5] a potential consequence of increased urbanization, and associated risk factors.

Gender is an important factor in early stroke risk assessment, with the incidence in females historically underreported.[12] Recent United States data revealed a growing concern for strokes in women, surpassing men in annual estimates.[14] In this study, stroke prevalence was slightly higher in women (51.9%) than men (48.1%), though not statistically significant, a trend observed in some earlier Nigerian studies.[7,15,16] This may be due to factors such as increased life expectancy, use of birth control pills, hormone therapy, and pregnancy-related complications.[7] Conversely, some studies report higher stroke prevalence in males, possibly due to the absence of vascular protection from endogenous estrogen.[4] Previous studies showed that stroke typically affects individuals between 50 and 70 years of age, corroborating the average age of 63 years in our patients.[4,13,17] This supports findings correlating age with stroke prevalence,[6,13] despite some contradictory reports.[11,15]

Ischemic stroke is conventionally considered to have a higher incidence than hemorrhagic stroke.[5,18] The study reaffirms that ischemic stroke is more prevalent than hemorrhagic stroke, consistent with the previous research.[5,7] However, some studies indicate a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke,[6,15] potentially because such patients are more inclined to seek care medical care due to the severity of their symptoms.

Neuroimaging plays a crucial role in diagnosing and classifying stroke subtypes for guiding acute treatment.[19] In this study, 67.3% of the patients had a cranial computerized tomography (CT) scan done, which far exceeds the 5.8% reported by Ekeh et al.[20] However, Arabambi et al.[5] observed a higher access rate (81%) to neuroimaging in Lagos compared to our study, potentially due to travel and cost challenges experienced by our patients. The absence of neuroimaging in some of our patients hinders their effective targeted treatment. The inconsistency in sensitivity results from validation studies of the Siriraj stroke score in Nigerians also challenges the reliable clinical identification of stroke types.[11]

Hypertension (76.9%) emerged as the predominant risk factor, consistent with the previous reports.[7,13,17,21] Controlling hypertension plays a crucial role in preventing strokes, potentially reducing the risk by up to 40%.[22] Sustained increases in blood pressure substantially increase stroke risk.[7,22] Hyperlipidemia was the second leading risk factor for stroke in this study, with a prevalence of 38.5%. Other studies by Ojo and Onyegiri,[13] Okokhere et al.,[17] Lisk et al.,[23] reported lower rates of hyperlipidemia (11.9–18.4%), but Karaye et al.[24] in Kano, Nigeria found a higher rate of 70% among stroke patients. These variations may be due to differences in the definition of hyperlipidemia.

Consistent with earlier research, DM was observed in 26.9% of stroke cases, reaffirming its role as a prevalent risk factor for stroke.[7,16,17,21] Patients with DM have a nearly fourfold increased risk of stroke compared to the general population, attributed to its contribution to atherosclerosis formation.[25] Ensuring optimal blood glucose control is crucial in preventing stroke in individuals with DM. The rising alcohol use observed reflects changing lifestyle patterns, with alcohol ranking as the second risk factor (25.0%) in a study conducted in Abuja.[13] Regular alcohol consumption is associated with hypertension, cerebral infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and an increased likelihood of stroke-related mortality.[26]

In this study, 11.5% of patients had a prior history of stroke, consistent with similar research.[4,7] Recurrent strokes are common due to uncontrolled risk factors and limited stroke awareness. Smoking contributed to 1.9% of stroke risk factors, primarily among men, aligning with rural smoking patterns. The previous research has reported much higher rates of smoking.[7,13,27] Cessation of smoking can decrease the doubled risk of developing an ischemic stroke associated with smoking.[28] Most stroke patients (75%) in this study had multiple risk factors, emphasizing their cumulative impact in amplifying stroke occurrence. This finding is consistent with earlier studies.[7,24] Comprehensive management, particularly addressing cardiovascular risk factors, is crucial for stroke prevention.[12,24]

The clinical presentation of individuals with stroke in the study population aligns with the report of the previous research in Africa.[4,21,29] The time from symptom onset to hospital presentation varied based on the type of stroke. On average, patients arrived at the hospital 121 h after experiencing symptoms, longer than in the previous studies.[4,29] The duration of admission was also longer compared to prior findings.[13,30] Patients with ischemic stroke sought medical care earlier than those with hemorrhagic stroke, contradicting previous research.[4] Prompt presentation within 4.5 h is crucial for positive outcomes in managing ischemic stroke, but only one patient in the study arrived within this timeframe. Delays in seeking medical care among Nigerians are due to inadequate knowledge of stroke warning signs, as well as limited road access, lack of transportation, ignorance, poverty, and cultural/religious beliefs.[31] Addressing these factors is necessary to improve the timely presentation and outcomes for stroke patients.

This study had positive treatment outcomes, with 87.2% of patients effectively managed and discharged. Similar results were found in other studies.[4,32] The DAMA rates (3.8%) in this study were lower compared to the previous studies.[4,33] Financial constraints, cultural/religious beliefs, and lengthy recovery periods may contribute to DAMA. Health education, effective communication, and inclusion in the National Health Insurance Scheme can promote early health-care-seeking and reduce DAMA rates.

The in-hospital mortality rate was 13.5%, similar to previous studies,[4,13] with higher rates of 23.8–41.2% reported in other studies.[6,7,21] The correlation between older age, hemorrhagic stroke, and higher mortality rates supports previous evidence.[4,7,15] Developed nations have seen a decline in stroke-related mortality, attributed to well-organized stroke care.[34] The higher male death rate observed in this study is comparable to the previous reports,[7,35] but studies in Sierra Leone[23] showed poorer outcomes in women.

Limitations of this study include limited access to brain CT scans, retrospective design, and small sample size. There is a possibility that this study does not provide an accurate depiction of stroke-related morbidity and mortality in the community, and there could be potential errors or missing data.

CONCLUSION

Stroke has a tremendous impact on health-care systems in LMICs like Nigeria. This study provides valuable data for planning, resource allocation, and policy formulation. Advancing age and hypertension plays a crucial role in increasing the risk. Early detection and management of hypertension and other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors are important. Health education is vital for raising awareness about risk factor management, lifestyle changes, and recognizing stroke warning signs.

Declaration of patient consent

Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission obtained for the study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795-820.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Risk factors, clinical outcomes and predictors of stroke mortality in Sierra Leoneans: A retrospective hospital cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;60:293-300.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Estimating morbidity due to stroke in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2019;402:136-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Five-year analysis of clinical presentations and predictors of stroke mortality in rural Southwestern Nigeria: A retrospective observational study. Afr J Emerg Med. 2022;12:12-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Pattern, risk factors, and outcome of acute stroke in a Nigerian university teaching hospital: A 1-year review. Niger J Med. 2021;30:252-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Stroke in Sokoto, Nigeria: A five year retrospective study. Ann Afr Med. 2004;3:73-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. A review of stroke admissions at a tertiary hospital in rural Southwestern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2011;10:80-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Stroke mortality in a teaching hospital in South Western Nigeria. Trop Doct. 2007;37:186-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Acute stroke mortality at Lagos university teaching hospital: A five-year review. Niger Q J Hosp Med. 2000;10:8-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Predictors of short-term intra-hospital case fatality following first-ever acute ischaemic stroke in Nigerians. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18:755-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Comparison of Siriraj Stroke Score and the WHO criteria in the clinical classification of stroke subtypes. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002;31:13-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Cerebrovascular disease in the community: Results of a WHO Collaborative Study. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58:113-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Stroke admissions in Kubwa General Hospital: A 30-month review. Sahel Med J. 2017;20:155-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117:e25-146.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Stroke in south west Nigeria: A 10-year review. Stroke. 2005;36:1120-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Stroke at the university of Port Harcourt teaching hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria. Trop Doct. 2009;39:150-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Characteristics, risk factors and case fatality rate of stroke in hospitalized patients in semi-urban South-South Nigeria. SAGE Open Med. 2013;1:2050312113516112.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: Stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. Stroke. 2009;40:2068-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: A prospective comparison. Lancet. 2007;369:293-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Stroke risk factors among patients in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Med Trop. 2015;15:33-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , . A seven-year retrospective review of stroke admissions in Benin-city, Southern Nigeria. Ann Health Res. 2019;5:11-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk reduction. Hippokratia. 2007;11:114-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Stroke in Sierra Leonean Africans: Perspectives from a private health facility. West Afr J Med. 2020;37:418-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors among Nigerians with stroke. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2007;18:290-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Frequency of known risk factors of stroke and its outcome in patients admitted in Sindh Government Qatar Hospital Karachi. Pak J Med Sci. 2007;23:634-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. . Alcohol and stroke. Stroke. 1987;18:268-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Stroke presentation and outcome in developing countries: A prospective study in the Gambia. Stroke. 2005;36:1388-93.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Meta-analysis of relation between cigarette smoking and stroke. BMJ. 1989;298:789-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Stroke event factors among adult patients admitted to stroke unit of Jimma university medical center: Prospective observational study. Stroke Res Treat. 2019;2019:4650104.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , . Predictors of acute, rehabilitation and total length of stay in acute stroke: A prospective cohort study. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2016;45:394-403.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , . Awareness of warning signs among suburban Nigerians at high risk for stroke is poor: A cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2008;8:18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , . Stroke subtypes, risk factors and treatment outcomes at a tertiary hospital situated in rural Southwestern Nigeria: A five-year retrospective observational study. Cardiol Vasc Res. 2021;5:1-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. , . Types, risk profiles, and outcomes of stroke patients in a tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Ethiopia. eNeurologicalSci. 2016;3:41-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , . The global burden of stroke. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45:143-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , . Prognosis and outcome of acute stroke in the University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14:359-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections