Welcome to Francis Academic Press

International Journal of New Developments in Education, 2021, 3(7); doi: 10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030701.

Blended Learning Model of University Courses Based on SPOC

Author(s)

Yujuan Liu

Corresponding Author:
Yujuan Liu
Affiliation(s)

Hetian Normal College, Hetian 848000, Xinjiang, China

Abstract

With the gradual development of computer technology, the tide of informatization has also promoted the development of society in various fields, especially having a revolutionary impact on teaching concepts and teaching models. Through blended learning, traditional teaching and online learning are organically integrated. This has formed a very important teaching concept, and is generally recognized by the education circle to cultivate learners' enthusiasm and self-learning ability. The author of the thesis conducted a survey on SPOC's blended learning model of university courses, and then based on the literature understood the relevant theoretical knowledge of the blended learning model of university courses, and then constructed the SPOC-based blended learning model of university courses, and made an evaluation of the learning effect of the constructed model. The result is that more than 49% of learners prefer to adopt the SPOC hybrid teaching method.

Keywords

University Teaching, Blended Learning, Learning Mode, SPOC

Cite This Paper

Yujuan Liu. Blended Learning Model of University Courses Based on SPOC. International Journal of New Developments in Education (2021) Vol. 3, Issue 7: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.25236/IJNDE.2021.030701.

References

[1] Al-Azawei A, Parslow P, Lundqvist K . Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM) [J]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2016, 2017(33(2)): 1-23.

[2] Mohamed, Yeou. An Investigation of Students' Acceptance of Moodle in a Blended Learning Setting Using Technology Acceptance Model [J]. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2016, 44(3):300-318.

[3] Alshehri A F. Student satisfaction and commitment towards a blended learning finance course: A new evidence from using the investment model [J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2017, 41(Oct.):423-433.

[4] Wu Y W, Wen M H, Chen C M, et al. An Integrated BIM and cost estimating blended learning model – acceptance differences between experts and novice [J]. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 2016, 12(5): 1347-1363.

[5] Ho V T, Nakamori Y, Ho T B, et al. Blended learning model on hands-on approach for in-service secondary school teachers: Combination of E-learning and face-to-face discussion[J]. Education & Information Technologies, 2016, 21(1): 185-208.

[6] S Martínez, F Guíez, Zamora R, et al. On the instructional model of a blended learning program for developing mathematical knowledge for teaching [J]. ZDM, 2020, 52(5):877-891.

[7] Wang R. Design and practice of the blended learning model based on an online judge system [J]. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 2017, 27(1-2):45-56.

[8] Manson D K, Amiel J M, Gordon R J. Using a Flipped, Blended Learning Model to Build a Modern Classroom for Senior Medical Students Transitioning to Residency [J]. Medical Science Educator, 2016, 26(4): 1-4.

[9] Butler D, Leahy M, Hallissy M, et al. Different strokes for different folks: scaling a blended model of teacher professional learning [J]. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2017, 14(3):00-00.

[10] Ainscough L, Foulis E, Colthorpe K, et al. Changes in Biology Self-Efficacy during a First-Year University Course [J]. Cbe Life Sciences Education, 2016, 15(2):ar19-ar19.

[11] [1] Phillips A E, Walker C G, Ehrgott M , et al. Integer programming for minimal perturbation problems in university course timetabling[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 252(2):1-22.

[12] D Cesareni, Cacciamani S, Fujita N. Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course [J]. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2016, 11(1):9-39.