Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oligochaeta of the Danube River — a faunistical review

  • Section Zoology
  • Published:
Biologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to discuss the distribution of Oligochaeta (Annelida) in the Danube River using the collections made by the Joint Danube Survey 2007 (JDS2) on more than 2800 km of the river. The basic faunistical features of the oligochaete assemblages were analysed with regard to three main sectors of the Danube (upper, middle and lower reaches, the last with the Danube Delta). A total of 52 oligochaete taxa have been recorded. Most of the observed species are typical of the potamon-type rivers in the region, and are well adapted to moderate-to-high organic load. The highest taxa richness and frequency of occurrence were observed among the Tubificidae family. Naididae, Propappidae, Enchytraeidae and Haplotaxidae had also low frequency. The upper reach of the Danube showed the lowest species richness, while the middle reach is characterised by its highest species richness. Construction of dams and regulation of the riverbed have resulted in an increase of limno(rheo)philic taxa which prefer slow-flowing and lentic zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AQEM 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system: A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Contract No: EVK1-CT1999- 00027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanacković A., Jakovčev-Todorović D., Simić V., Tubić B., Vasiljević B., Gačić Z. & Paunović M. 2011. Oligochaeta community of the main Serbian waterways. Water Research and Management 1: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banu A.C. 1967. Limnologia Sectorului Românesc al Dunării. Studiu Monografic. Edit. Academiei R. S. România, 651 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csányi B. 2002. Joint Danube Survey: Investigation of the Tisza River. Institute for Water Pollution Control, VITUKI Plc., in cooperation with Secretariat of International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Budapest, 135 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csányi B. & Paunović M. 2006. The aquatic macroinvertebrate community of the River Danube between Klostenburg (1942 rkm) and Calafat — Vidin (795 rkm). Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 14: 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousteau Equipe 1993. Concentration of chemical pollutants in sediments and mussels along the Danube, pp. 104–126. In: Final Report, The Danube: for whom and for what? Cousteau Equipe’s, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Đukić N., Miljanović B., Maletin S., Ivanc A. & Zhenjun S. 1996. Evaluation of Danube water quality in Yugoslavia according to Oligochaeta community. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 113(Large Rivers 10): 523–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djukić N., Popović M., Pujin V., Maletin S., Stojanović S., Miljanović B., Malenčić Đ., Nikolić Lj., Stojković S., Lazić D., Teodorović I. & Živković L. 2000. Eutrophication processes in the Danube River Bank region nearby Novi Sad, pp 139–146. In: Gallé L. & Körmöczi L. (eds), Ecology of River Valleys, TISCIA Monograph Series 5, Department of Ecology University of Szeged, 211 pp. ISBN: 9634824323

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumnicka E. 1987. The effect of dam reservoirs on oligochaete communities in the River Dunajec (Southern Poland). Acta Hydrobiol. 29: 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumnicka E. & Poznanska M. 2006. Novel Polish recordings of rare aquatic Oligochaeta species. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 35(2): 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elexová E. 1998. Interaction of the Danube River and its left side tributaries in Slovak stretch from benthic fauna point of view. Biologia 53(5): 621–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 27828:1994, ISO 7828-1985. Water quality. Methods for biological testing. Methods of biological sampling: guidance on handnet sampling of aquatic benthic macro-invertebrates, 16 pp. ISBN: 0580147746

  • Graf W., Csányi B., Leitner P., Paunovic M., Chiriac G., Stubauer I., Ofenböck T. & Wagner F. 2008. Macroinvertebrates, pp. 41–47. In: Liška I., Wagner F. & Slobodnik J. (eds), Joint Danube Survey 2 — Final Scientific Report, ICPDR — International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Vienna. http://www.icpdr.org/jds/files/ICPDR_Technical_Report_for_web_low_corrected.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörner K., Moog O. & Sporka F. 2002. Oligochaeta. Part III, pp. 1–20. In: Moog O. (ed.), Fauna Aquatica Austriaca. A comprehensive species Inventory of Austrian Aquatic Organisms with Ecological Notes, 2nd Edition 2002, Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Wien. ISBN: 3-85 174-044-0

    Google Scholar 

  • ICPDR WFD Roof Report 2004. The Danube River Basin. Part A — Basin-wide overview, pp. 1–191. In: Schmedtje U. (ed.), The Danube River Basin District, International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) in cooperation with the countries of the Danube River Basin District, Wien, 191 pp.

  • Jakovčev-Todorović D., Paunović M., Stojanović B., Simić V., Djikanović V. & Veljković A. 2005. Observation of the quality of the Danube water in the Belgrade Region based on benthic animals during periods of high and low water condition in 2002. Arch. Biol. Sci. 57(3): 237–242. DOI: 10.2298/ABS0503237J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janković D. & Jovičić M. (eds) 1994. The Danube in Yugoslavia — Contamination, Protection and Exploitation. Publ. Institute for Biological Research “S. Stankovic”, Institute for Development of Water Resources “J. Cerni”, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, Belgrade, 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liepolt R. (ed.) 1967. Limnologie der Donau. E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, 591 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liška I., Wagner F. & Slobodnik J. 2008. Joint Danube Survey. Final Scientific Report. ICPDR — International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Viena (Austria), 235 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Literáthy P., Koller-Kreimel V. & Liška I. 2002. Joint Danube Survey. Technical Report of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Vienna, Austria, 261 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinovic-Vitanovic V., Jakovcev-Todorovic D. & Kalafatic V. 2006. Qualitative study of the bottom fauna of the River Danube (river kilometre 1433-845.6), with special emphasis on the oligochaetes. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 158/3 (Large Rivers 16, no. 3): 427–452. DOI: 10.1127/lr/16/2006/427

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog O. 2002. Fauna aquatica austriaca, Part I, Prefaces, directory of authors and introductions, Edition 2002. Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Vienna, 97 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog O., Brunner S., Humpesch U.H. & Schmidt-Kloiber A. 2000. The distribution of benthic invertebrates along the Austrian stretch of the River Danube and its relevance as an indicator of zoogeographical and water quality patterns — Part 2. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 115/4 (Large Rivers 11, no. 4): 473–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy S. & Šporka F. 1990. Makrozoobentos dunajského ramena typu plesiopotamal a jeho zmeny pod vplyvom umelého zarybnenia [Macrozoobenthos of the Danube branch of plesiopotamal type and its changes under the influence of artificial fish introduction] Biológia (Bratisl.) 45(10): 781–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosek J.N. 2002. Macroinvertebrate studies at the Hungarian Danube section. 4. The colonization dynamics of macroinvertebrates of different substrates. Int. Assoc. Danube Res. 34: 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertel N. 2000. Macroinvertebrate studies at the Hungarian Danube section. 1. Fundamental and Methodological Questions of Biomonitoring. Int. Assoc. Danube Res. 33: 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertel N., Nosek J.N. & Andrikovics S. 2005. A Magyar Duna-szakasz litorális zónájának makroszkopikus gerinctelen faunája (1998–2000) [Macroinvertebrate fauna in the littoral zone of the Hungarian Danube section (1998–2000)]. Acta Biol. Debr. Oecol. Hung. 13: 159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunović M., Jakovčev-Todorović D., Simić V., Stojanović B. & Cakić P. 2007. Macroinvertebrates along the Serbian section of the Danube River (stream km 1429-925). Biologia 62(2): 214–221. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-007-0032-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunović M., Kalafatić V., Jakovčev D. & Martinović-Vitanović V. 2003. Oligochaetes (Annelida, Oligochaeta) of the Vlasina River (South-East Serbia): diversity and distribution. Biologia 58(5): 903–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunović M., Simić V., Jakovčev-Todorović D. & Stojanović B. 2005. Results of investigating the macroinvertebrate community of the Danube River on the sector upstream from the Iron Gate (km 1083-1071) Arch. Biol. Sci. 57(1): 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert S., Birk S. & Somenhauser M. 2003. Typology of the Danube River — part 1: Top-down approach, pp. 51–59. In: UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project, Activity 1.1.6, Typology of Surface Waters and Definition of Reference Conditions for the Danube River — Final report, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russev B. 1970. Influence of some ecological factors on changes of the standing crop of zoobenthos of the Danube in the Bulgarian stretch, pp. 813–826. In: Kajak Z. & Hillbricht-Ilkowska A. (eds), Proceedings of the IBP-UNESCO Symposium on productivity problems of freshwaters Kazimierz Dolny, Poland, 918 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russev B. 1998. Das Makrozoobenthos der Donau — Dynamik der Veränderungen durch antropogenen Einflu-364. In: Kuzel-Fetzman E., Naidenow W. & Russev B. (eds), Plankton und Benthos der Donau. Ergebnisse der Donau-Forschung 4, 376 pp. ISBN: 3901531017, 9783901531019

    Google Scholar 

  • SCG ICPDR National Report 2004. National Report of Serbia and Montenegro — ICPDR The Danube River Basin,.Roof Report, Part B, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of the R. of Serbia, Directorate for Waters, Belgrade, 94 pp.

  • Simonović P., Simić V., Simić S. & Paunović M. 2010. The Danube in Serbia. Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water management — Republic Directorate for Water, University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research ”Siniša Stanković”, University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, 339 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerwerk N., Baumgartner C., Bloesch J., Hein T., Ostojić A., Paunović M., Schneider-Jakoby M., Siber R. & Tockner K. 2009. The Danube River Basin, Part 3, pp. 59–113. In: Tockner K., Uehlinger U. & Robinson C.T. (eds), Rivers of Europe, Academic Press, San Diego, 700 pp. ISBN: 9780123694492

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Series: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter V, København, I kommission hos E. Munksgaard, 17 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šporka F. 1998. The typology of floodplain water bodies of the Middle Danube (Slovakia) on the basis of the superficial polychaete and oligochaete fauna. Hydrobiologia 386: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šporka F. & Nagy Š. 1998. The macrozoobenthos of parapotamon-type side arms of the Danube river and its response to flowing conditions. Biologia 53: 633–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teodorović I., Djukić N., Maletin S., Miljanović B., Jugovac N. & Živković L. 2000. Metal pollution index-based water quality assessment of the Danube river basin in Yugoslavia, pp 147–154. In: Gallé L. & Körmöczi L. (eds), Ecology of River Valleys, TISCIA Monograph Series 5, Department of Ecology University of Szeged, 211 pp. ISBN: 9634824323, 9789634824329

  • Timm T. 2009. A guide to the freshwater Oligochaeta and Polychaeta of Northern and Central Europe. Lauterbornia 66: 1–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm T. 2012. About the scientific names of paraphyletic taxa. Turk. J. Zool. 36(1): 139–140. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1002-52

    Google Scholar 

  • Timm T., Seire A. & Pall P. 2001. Half a century of oligochaete research in Estonian running waters. Hydrobiologia 463: 223–234. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013176229631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot P.F.M. 1989. The role of oligochaetes in the management of waters. Hydrobiologia 180: 213–227. DOI: 10.1007/BF00027554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana D. Atanacković.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atanacković, A.D., Šporka, F., Csányi, B. et al. Oligochaeta of the Danube River — a faunistical review. Biologia 68, 269–277 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0155-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0155-9

Key words

Navigation