Home > Journals > Minerva Dental and Oral Science > Past Issues > Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2024 February;73(1) > Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2024 February;73(1):45-52

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2024 February;73(1):45-52

DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04855-6

Copyright © 2023 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Biomechanical properties of masseter muscle assessed through myotonometry in patients with temporomandibular disorder treated with ultrasound therapy: a randomized comparative study

Sebastian SZAJKOWSKI 1, Jarosław PASEK 2 , Michał DWORNIK 3, Grzegorz CIEŚLAR 4

1 Faculty of Medical and Social Sciences, Warsaw Medical Academy of Applied Sciences, Warszawa, Poland; 2 Collegium Medicum im dr Władysława Biegańskiego, Jan Długosz University, Częstochowa, Poland; 3 Center of Medical Rehabilitation and Osteopathy Reha Punkt, Piastów, Poland; 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Angiology and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Bytom, Poland



BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to make an objective quantitative assessment of effectiveness of procedures with the use of a therapeutic dose of ultrasounds in this nosological entity, in connection with improved biomechanical properties and alleviation of pain experienced in masseter muscles.
METHODS: The study included 40 patients with temporomandibular disorder. In group 1 (N.=20) ultrasound therapy (1.2 W/cm2) was carried out, while in group 2 (N.=20) sham therapy was applied. A total of 10 procedures were performed. Myotonometric measurements and assessment of pain intensity were carried out before treatment and after the completion of procedures.
RESULTS: The analysis revealed a significant difference (P=0.011) between the values of decrement (D) measured on day 0 (2.08±0.45 [log]) and day 4 (1.80±0.55 [log]) in group 1. In group 2 no statistically significant differences were noted between the results obtained on consecutive days of the therapeutic cycle. A statistically significant difference in values of decrement (D) between group 1 (1.80±0.55 [log]) and group 2 (2.23±0.51 [log]) was noted on day 4 of the experiment (P=0.021). Both in group 1 and in group 2, a statistically significant reduction of pain intensity (VAS Scale) was obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: The masseter muscle was more elastic during ultrasound therapy. However, the effect was transient. The analgesic effect was also observed in the control group; therefore, a placebo effect cannot be excluded.


KEY WORDS: Physical therapy modalities; Therapeutics; Ultrasonic therapy; Temporomandibular joint disorder

top of page