Home > Journals > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences > Past Issues > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 February;64(1) > Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 February;64(1):1-15

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2020 February;64(1):1-15

DOI: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03843-1

Copyright © 2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Cranioplasty in neurosurgery: is there a way to reduce complications?

Nicola ACCIARRI 1 , Giorgio PALANDRI 1, Andrea CUOCI 1, Adelaide VALLUZZI 1, Giuseppe LANZINO 2

1 Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy; 2 Department of Neurological Surgery, Rochester, MN, USA


PDF


BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty (CPL) is a surgical procedure that has still a high rate of complications, although it is commonly considered an easy and routine operation. In the literature, cranioplasty complications may rise up to 41% of cases, and the most frequently reported are infections, autologous bone flap resorption, and hematomas. Although possible, poor cosmetic results are rarely mentioned.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 313 patients who underwent 377 surgical procedures for cranioplasty and reoperations for complications between 2008 and 2014. In other 2 patients we performed a new surgical procedure for the prosthesis fracture. Pediatric patients (aging from 5 to 17 years) have been included in this series in order to compare the complication rate between adult and pediatric populations. The clinical-radiological follow-up of these 313 patients lasted between 1 and 6 years.
RESULTS: Overall complications for cranioplasty were seen in 38 (12.14%) out of the 313 patients. However, complications requiring surgical therapy were seen in 28 patients who underwent 64 new surgical procedures. Adult male patients represented the majority of the group with cranioplasty complications. In the pediatric group we have not observed any complication requiring more than a clinical observation. Infections and autologous bone resorption were the most frequent complications reported in this series; however, we observed a poor cosmetic result as a concomitant but separate complication in more than 26% of our 313 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In this paper we present an overview of all the possible complications of cranioplasty reported in the literature, comparing them with those observed in our series. We also discuss critically the most evident causes of complications, suggesting, when possible, solutions to avoid or limit them.


KEY WORDS: Infection; Bone resorption; Decompressive craniectomy; Complications

top of page