Home > Journals > Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology > Past Issues > Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021 February;73(1) > Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021 February;73(1):103-10

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology 2021 February;73(1):103-10

DOI: 10.23736/S2724-606X.20.04740-1

Copyright © 2020 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The complex relationship between female age and embryo euploidy

Antonio LA MARCA 1 , Martina CAPUZZO 1, Maria G. IMBROGNO 1, Valeria DONNO 1, Giorgio A. SPEDICATO 2, Sandro SACCHI 1, Maria G. MINASI 3, Francesca SPINELLA 4, Pierfrancesco GRECO 3, Francesco FIORENTINO 4, Ermanno GRECO 3, 5

1 Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Mother, Children and Adults, Polyclinic of Modena, Modena, Italy; 2 UnipolSai Assicurazioni SpA, Bologna, Italy; 3 Center for Reproductive Medicine, Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy; 4 GENOMA Group, Molecular Genetics Laboratories, Rome, Italy; 5 UniCamillus, Rome, Italy



BACKGROUND: Female age is the strongest predictor of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and has a nonlinear relationship with the blastocyst euploidy rate: with advancing age there is an acceleration in the reduction of blastocyst euploidy. Aneuploidy was found to significantly increase with maternal age from 30% in embryos from young women to 70% in women older than 40 years old. The association seems mainly due to chromosomal abnormalities occurring in the oocyte. We aimed to elaborate a model for the blastocyst euploid rate for patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles using advanced machine learning techniques.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of IVF/ICSI cycles performed from 2014 to 2016. In total, data of 3879 blastocysts were collected for the analysis. Patients underwent PGT-Aneuploidy analysis (PGT-A) at the Center for Reproductive Medicine of European Hospital (Rome, Italy) have been included in the analysis. The method involved whole-genome amplification followed by array comparative genome hybridization. To model the rate of euploid blastocysts, the data were split into a train set (used to fit and calibrate the models) and a test set (used to assess models’ predictive performance). Three different models were calibrated: a classical linear regression; a gradient boosted tree (GBT) machine learning model; a model belonging to the generalized additive models (GAM).
RESULTS: The present study confirms that female age, which is the strongest predictor of embryo chromosomal abnormalities, and blastocyst euploidy rate have a nonlinear relationship, well depicted by the GBT and the GAM models. According to this model, the rate of reduction in the percentage of euploid blastocysts increases with age: the yearly relative variation is -10% at the age of 37 and -30% at the age of 45. Other factors including male age, female and male Body Mass Index, fertilization rate and ovarian reserve may only marginally impact on embryo euploidy rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Female age is the strongest predictor of embryo chromosomal abnormalities and has a non-linear relationship with the blastocyst euploidy rate. Other factors related to both the male and female subjects may only minimally affect this outcome.


KEY WORDS: Female; Embryonic structures; Machine learning; Fertilization in vitro; Preimplantation genetic testing

top of page