Survival of endodontically treated teeth in public dental service in Northern Finland: a practise-based register study

Authors

  • Anne Laajala Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center and Oulu University Hospital, City of Oulu, Finland
  • Matti Nuutinen Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finland
  • Atso Luttinen Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finland
  • Hannu Vähänikkilä Northern Finland Birth Cohorts, Arctic Biobank, Infrastructure for Population Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
  • Tarja Tanner Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finland; The Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Oulu, Finland
  • Marja-Liisa Laitala Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center and Oulu University Hospital, City of Oulu, Finland
  • Saujanya Karki Cariology, Endodontology and Paediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Population Health, University of Oulu, City of Oulu, Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.40491

Keywords:

Endodontic, root canal therapy, survival rate, tooth extraction

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the factors associated with the survival of root canal treated teeth in a practise-based study setting in a 5-year period.

Material and methods: This retrospective study used data from the electronic patient registration system of the public dental services of the City of Oulu, Finland. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients aged ≥ 20 years who had root canal treatment (RCT) that was initiated in 2014. One RCT per patient was included in the study. A total of 713 patients met the inclusion criteria. The outcome variable for this study was the extraction of the RCT tooth during the 5-year period. Explanatory variables included age, diagnosis, tooth type (incisive, canine, premolar, molar), RCT technique (manual, motorized), time from RCT initiation to final restoration and type of final restoration (composite, glass ionomer, fixed dental prosthesis). To evaluate the association between the outcome variable and explanatory variables, Cox regression analyses were performed.

Results: The overall survival rate was 91%. The middle-aged (40–59-years-old) and the oldest (60 and older) patients had a two-fold risk of extraction compared to younger (20–40-years-old) patients. Similarly, a short length of time from RCT initiation to final restoration (0–14 days) resulted in a nearly three times higher risk of extraction compared to a longer period (≥ 90 days).

Conclusions: The 5-year survival rate of RCTs seems high. Extractions were more common among patients over 40 years of age and if the RCT was completed shortly after its initiation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodon-tology. Int Endod J. 2006;39(12):921–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x

Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2010;43(3):171–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01671.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01671.x

Thyvalikakath T, LaPradd M, Siddiqui Z, et al. Root canal treatment survival analysis in national dental PBRN practices. J Dent Res. 2022;101(11):1328–1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221093936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221093936

Setzer FC, Kim S. Comparison of long-term survival of implants and endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res. 2014;93(1):19–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513504782

Chatzopoulos GS, Koidou VP, Lunos S, et al. Implant and root canal treatment: survival rates and factors associated with treatment out-come. J Dent. 2018;71:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.02.005

Burry JC, Stover S, Eichmiller F, et al. Outcomes of primary endodontic therapy provided by endodontic specialists compared with other providers. J Endod. 2016;42(5):702–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.008

Strindberg L. The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors. Acta Odontol Scand. 1956;14(Suppl 21):1–175.

Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Dental Traumatol. 1986;2(1):20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x

Doyle SL, Hodges JS, Pesun IJ, et al. Retrospective cross sectional comparison of initial nonsurgical endodontic treatment and single-tooth implants. J Endod. 2006;32(9):822–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.002

Karamifar K. Endodontic periapical lesion: an overview on etiology, diagnosis and current treatment modalities. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(2):54–67. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.42714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2020.42714

García CC, Sempere FV, Diago MP, et al. The post-endodontic periapical lesion: histologic and etiopathogenic aspects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(8):E585–E590. Available from: http://www.medicinaoral.com/pubmed/medoralv12_i8_pE585.pdf [cited 13-07-2023]

Siqueira JF. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J. 2001;34(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00396.x

Tabassum S, Khan FR. Failure of endodontic treatment: the usual suspects. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(01):144–147. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.175682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.175682

Holland R, Gomes Filho JE, Cintra LTA, et al. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(5):465–476. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464

Segura‐Egea JJ, Cabanillas‐Balsera D, Martín‐González J, et al. Impact of systemic health on treatment outcomes in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2023;56(S2):219–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13789

Cheung GSP, Liu CSY. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between Nickel-Titanium Rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod. 2009;35(7):938–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.016

Lee CB, Chang YH, Wen PC, et al. Association of failed root canal treatment with dentist and institutional volumes: a population-based Cohort study in Taiwan. J Endod. 2017;43(10):1628–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.016

Fernández R, Cardona JA, Cadavid D, et al. Survival of endodontically treated roots/teeth based on periapical health and retention: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. J Endod. 2017;43(12):2001–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.003

Kwak Y, Choi J, Kim K, et al. The 5-year survival rate of nonsurgical endodontic treatment: a population-based cohort study in Korea. J Endod. 2019;45(10):1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.004

Fransson H, Bjørndal L, Frisk F, et al. Factors associated with extraction following root canal filling in adults. J Dent Res. 2021;100(6):608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520982962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520982962

Makanjuola JO, Oderinu OH, Umesi DC. Treatment outcome and root canal preparation techniques: 5-year follow-up. Int Dent J. 2022;72(6):811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.08.008

Koskinen S, Lundqvist A, Ristiluoma N, eds. Health, functional capacity and welfare in Finland in 2011. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Report 68/2012. Helsinki. 2012 [cited 06-08-2023]; [290 p.] Finnish. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-245-769-1

Suun terveydenhuollon käynnit terveyskeskuksissa yhteensä 18 - 64-vuotiailla / 1 000 vastaavan ikäistä vuonna 2019 Oulussa [Oral health care visits at health centres in total for those aged 18-64 per 1000 persons of same age in the city of Oulu in 2019]. Finnish insti-tute for health and welfare, Sotkanet, 2023. [cited 2023 Jan 13]. url: https://sotkanet.fi/sotkanet/en/index? DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.denabs.2018.09.004

Suominen-Taipale L, Nordblad A, Vehkalahti M, et al. Oral health in the Finnish adult population: Health 2000 survey. 2008 [cited 06-08-2023]; [98 p.]. Available from: https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/103030/2008b25.pdf

Linden J, Widström E, Sinkkonen J. Adults’ dental treatment in 2001–2013 in Finnish public dental service. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01091-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01091-w

Laukkanen E, Vehkalahti MM, Kotiranta AK. Impact of type of tooth on outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(11):4011–4018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02832-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02832-0

Laukkanen E, Vehkalahti MM, Kotiranta AK. Radiographic outcome of root canal treatment in general dental practice: tooth type and quality of root filling as prognostic factors. Acta Odontol Scand. 2021;79(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1773531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2020.1773531

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Suun terveydenhuollon toimenpideluokitus 2022. [Register codes for oral healthcare 2022]. 2022 [cited 12-12-2022]; [70 p.]. Finnish. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022050232123

Kebke S, Fransson H, Brundin M, et al. Tooth survival following root canal treatment by general dental practitioners in a Swedish county – a 10‐year follow‐up study of a historical cohort. Int Endod J. 2021;54(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13392

Mareschi P, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Long-term follow-up of nonsurgical endodontic treatments performed by one specialist: a retrospective cohort study about tooth survival and treatment success. Int J Dent. 2020;2020:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8855612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8855612

Yu VSH, Messer HH, Yee R, et al. Incidence and impact of painful exacerbations in a cohort with post-treatment persistent endodontic lesions. J Endod. 2012;38(1):41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.006

Nair PNR. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J. 2006;39(4):249–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01099.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01099.x

Fransson H, Dawson VS, Frisk F, et al. Survival of root-filled teeth in the Swedish adult population. J Endod. 2016;42(2):216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.008

Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, et al. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(3):427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13332

Shakiba B, Hamedy R, Pak JG, et al. Influence of increased patient age on longitudinal outcomes of root canal treatment: a systematic review. Gerodontology. 2017;34(1):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12231

Working group set up by the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Dental Society Apollonia. Hampaan juurihoito. Käypä Hoito suositus. [Endodontic treatment: Current Care Guidelines]. 2022 [cited 06-12-2022]. Finnish. Available from: www.käypähoito.fi

Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spångberg L, et al. The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal dressing. Int Endod J. 1991;24(3):119–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00117.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00117.x

Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G. Single-visit or multiple-visit root canal treatment: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013115. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013115

Finnish institute for health and welfare. Hoitoonpääsy suun terveydenhuollossa. [Access to dental services]. 2022 [cited 13-01-2023]. Finnish. Available from: https://thl.fi/fi/tilastot-ja-data/tilastot-aiheittain/terveyspalvelut/hoitoonpaasy-perusterveydenhuollossa

Published

2024-04-25