Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T10:36:33.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tolstoy Connection in Bakhtin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Caryl Emerson
Caryl Emerson*
Affiliation:
Cornell University Ithaca, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mikhail Bakhtin's work on Dostoevsky is well known. Less familiar, perhaps, is Bakhtin's attitude toward the other great Russian nineteenth-century novelist, Leo Tolstoy. This essay explores that “Tolstoy connection,” both as a means for interrogating Bakhtin's analytic categories and as a focus for evaluating the larger tradition of “Tolstoy versus Dostoevsky.” Bakhtin is not a particularly good reader of Tolstoy. But he does make provocative use of the familiar binary model to pursue his most insistent concerns: monologism versus dialogism, the relationship of authors to their characters, the role of death in literature and life, and the concept of the self. Bakhtin's comments on these two novelists serve as a good starting point for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the Bakhtinian model in general and suggest ways one might recast the dialogue between Tolstoy and Dostoevsky on somewhat different, more productive ground.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 100 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 68 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Bakhtin, M. M. “Avtor i geroi v esteticheskoi deiatel'nosti” (Author and Protagonist in Aesthetic Activity). In his Estetika 7–180.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Ed. Caryl Emerson, Michael Holquist. Trans. and Holquist, Michael. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Discourse in the Novel.” In his Dialogic Imagination 259–422.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva (The Aesthetics of Verbal Art). Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1979.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Forms of Time and Chronotope in the Novel” (1937–38). In his Dialogic Imagination 84–258.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (published under the name V. N. Voloshinov). Freidizm, Kriticheskii ocherk (Freudianism: A Critical Sketch). Moscow: Gosizdat, 1927; Trans. as V. N. Vološinov. Freudianism: A Marxist Critique. Trans. Titunik, I. R. New York: Academic, 1976.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Iskusstvo i otvetstvennost'” (Art and Responsibility). In his Estetika 5–6.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Iz zapisei 1970–1971 godov” (From Notes of 1970–71). In his Estetika 336–73.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Predisloviia (Prefaces). In Polnoe sobranie khudozhestvennykh proizvedenii (Complete Collected Literary Works). By L. Tolstoi. Ed. Khalabaev and Eikhenbaum. Leningrad: Pechatnyi dvor, 1929, 11: iii–x, 13:iii–xx.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Problema soderzhaniia, materiala i forma v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve” (The Problem of Content, Material, and Form in Fictional Literature). In M. Bakhtin, Voprosy literatury i estetiki (Questions of Literature and Aesthetics). Moskva: Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 1975, 6–71.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo (Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics). 2nd ed. Moskva: Sovetskii pisatel', 1963.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo (Problems of Dostoevsky's Art). Leningrad: Priboi, 1929.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. “Toward a Reworking of the Dostoevsky Book.” In his Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics 283–302.Google Scholar
Carden, Patricia. “The Expressive Self in War and Peace.” Canadian-American Slavic Studies 12 (1978): 519–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Tolstoi in the Sixties. Trans. White, Duffield. Ann Arbor: Ardis, 1982.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. “Dostoevskii i roman-tragediia” (Dostoevsky and the Novel-Tragedy). In his Borozdy i mezhi (Furrows and Boundaries). Moskva: Musaget, 1916, 5–60.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vyacheslav. Freedom and the Tragic Life: A Study in Dostoevsky. Trans. Cameron, Norman. New York: Noonday, 1952.Google Scholar
Maimin, E. A. Pushkin: Zhizn' i tvorchestvo (Pushkin: Life and Works). Moskva: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar
Mirkina, R. M. “Konspekty lektsii M. M. Bakhtina” (Notes from Lectures by M. M. Bakhtin). Prometei: Istoriko-biograficheskii almanakh 12 (1980): 257–68.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. “Socialist Realism and Literary Theory.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (1979): 121–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. “Structures of Self in Dostoevsky and Tolstoy.” Paper delivered at the Midwest Slavic Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 4–5 May 1984.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul. “Tolstoy's Absolute Language.” Critical Inquiry 7 (1981): 667–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlina, Nina. “Bakhtin and Buber: The Concept of Dialogic Discourse.” Studies in Twentieth Century Literature 9 (1984): 13–28.Google Scholar
Seduro, Vladimir. Dostoevski in Russian Literary Criticism, 1846–1956. New York: Octagon, 1969.Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann. “Redialoguizing Bakhtin: A Reading of the Tolstoy Prefaces.” Unpublished essay, 1982.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. War and Peace. Ed. Gibian, George. New York: Norton, 1966.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, Leo. What Is Art? Trans. Maude, Almyer. New York: Bobbs, 1960.Google Scholar