Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T13:39:41.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Uses of Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

Pottery is the most common archaeological artefact: indeed sites are often designated as “pottery” or “pre-pottery” on the basis of whether or not sherds have been found. The fabric of pottery is examined to see how it is made and where the various constituents came from. Shapes and any patterns or designs painted, impressed, carved or scratched on the surfaces, are studied. It is used as a chronological and a cultural indicator. But the purpose for which the pot was made is often overlooked. There are few processing activities which do not require the use of a vessel or vessels: oils and dyes are used in weaving, aromatic oils and salves are mixed in perfume-making, food preparation requires containers for a multitude of purposes. Many other activities could be added, for instance, tanning and metal working and religious ritual.

This wide range of uses makes it more difficult to pin down the actual function of a particular pot. The same shape can be used for a number of purposes. More information is required.

The exact provenance of the pot is important. Was it in a shrine, a house, outside a building, inside a building? Was it near an oven, an altar, beside a hoard of metal goods? The position is by no means conclusive. Vessels used in preparing food may have been kept inside a house while the oven was outside in a courtyard. However, the find-spot can be a guide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calmeyer, P., 1977. “Das Grab eines altassyrischen Kaufmanns”, Iraq 39, 8798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., 1980. Cook's Companion (London, Macmillan).Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region (Oriental Institute Publication LXIII. Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Ellison, R., 1981. “Diet in Mesopotamia: the evidence of the barley ration texts (c. 3000–1400 B.C.)”, Iraq 43, 3545.Google Scholar
Haller, A., 1954. Die Gräber und Grüfte von Aššur (Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichung der Deutschen Orient Gesellschaft 65, Berlin, Mann).Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., 1973. Local exchange and early state development in south western Iran (Anthropology Papers no. 51, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCown, D. E. and Haines, R. C., 1967. Nippur I: Temple of Enlil, Scribal Quarters and soundings (Oriental Institute Publication LXXVIII, Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Mackay, E., 1925. Report on excavations of the “A” Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia (Anthropology Memoirs I/1, Chicago, Field Museum of Natural History).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moortgat, A., 1967. Art of Ancient Mesopotamia (London, Phaidon).Google Scholar
Parrot, A., 1959. Le Palais II/3: Documents et Monuments (Mission Archéologique de Mari. Paris, Geuthner).Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., 1983. The West mound surface clearance—Abu Salabikh Excavations, Vol. I (Brit School of Archaeology in Iraq).Google Scholar
Starr, R. F. S., 1939. Nuzi—report on excavations at Yorghan Tepe (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University).Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1934. The Royal Cemetery (Ur Excavations II, London, British Museum).Google Scholar