Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T03:51:50.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Prophecy of Possibility: Metaphorical Explorations of Postmodern Legal Subjectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Extract

Pleasure precedes business. The child at play is practicing for life's responsibilities. Young impalas play at fencing with one another, thrusting and parrying. Art for art's sake was the main avenue … to ancient technological breakthroughs. Such also is the way of metaphor: it flourishes in playful prose and high poetic art, but it is also vital at the growing edges of science and philosophy.

—W. V. Quine (1979)

What is truth? A moving army of metaphors, metonymies and anthropomorphisms, in short a summa of human relationships that are being poetically and rhetorically sublimated, transposed, and beautified until, after long and repeated use, a people considers them as solid, canonical, and unavoidable. Truths are illusions whose illusory nature has been forgotten, metaphors that have been used up and have lost their imprint and that now operate as mere metal, no longer as coins.

—Nietzsche (1956)

Type
Charting a Course for Sociolegal Scholarship: A Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Kristin Bumiller, Tom Dumm, and Stephanie Sandler for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this essay.

References

Austin, John (1995) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. W. Rumble. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Regina (1992) “Left at the Post: One Take on Blacks and Postmodernism,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 751.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. (1994) “Being Just with Deconstruction,” 3 Social & Legal Studies 393.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1992) Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bertens, Hans (1995) The Idea of the Postmodern: A History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boyle, Jamie (1985) “Modernist Social Theory: Roberto Unger's Passion,” 98 Harvard Law Rev. 1066.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1994) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York; Routledge.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty, & Seron, Carol (1992) “Postmodernism and Protest: Recovering the Sociological Imagination,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 765.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla (1990) “From the Lighthouse: The Promise of Redemption and the Possibility of Legal Interpretation,” 11 Cardozo Law Rev. 1687.Google Scholar
de Man, Paul (1979) “The Epistemology of Metaphor,” in Sacks 1979.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1980) “La Loi du Genre,” Glyph, no. 7, 176.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1990) “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority,‘”11 Cardozo Law Rev. 919.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1979) “What Metaphors Mean,” in Sacks 1979.Google Scholar
Douglas, Lawrence (1994) “Constitutional Discourse and Its Discontents: An Essay on the Rhetoric of Judicial Review,” in Sarat & Kearns 1994.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, & Warrington, Ronnie (1994) “The Face of Justice: A Jurisprudence of Alterity,” 3 Social & Legal Studies 405.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas, Warrington, Ronnie, with McVeigh, Shaun (1991) Postmodern Jurisprudence: The Law of Text in the Texts of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dumm, Thomas (1990) “Fear of Law,” 10 Studies in Law, Politics & Society 29.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, Marcia (1989) Aesthetics and the Good Life. Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia (1992) “Postmodern Melancholia,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 755.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan (1992) “Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness,” 26 New England Law Rev. 73.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen (1986) “The Death of Law,” 72 Cornell Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1970) The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Garber, Marjorie (forthcoming) “Cinema Scopes: Evolution, Media and the Law,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., Law and the Domains of Culture. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gerhart, Mary, & Russell, Allan (1984) Metaphoric Processes: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding. Fort Worth: Texas Christian Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Golden, Tim (1992) “Guatemala Indian Wins Nobel Peace Prize,” New York Times, 17 Oct.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson (1979) “Metaphor as Moonlighting,” in Sacks 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter (1995) Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol (1992) “Reading Violence,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., Law's Violence. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1992a) “Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 697.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1992b) “A Reply,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 819.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968) Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Herman, Didi (forthcoming) “Law and Morality Revisited: The Politics of Regulating Sado-Masochistic Porn/Practice,” 15 Studies in Law, Politics & Society.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan (1992) “Doing the Right Thing? Toward a Postmodern Politics,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 733.Google Scholar
Johnson, Barbara (1994) “The Alchemy of Style and Law,” in Sarat & Kearns 1994.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1986) Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1951) Critique of Judgment, ed. & trans. J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Publishers.Google Scholar
Kateb, George (1990) “Hannah Arendt: Alienation and America,” in Raritan Reading. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Tom (1987) “The ‘Paradox’ of Knowledge and Power: Reading Foucault on a Bias,” 15 Political Theory 5.Google Scholar
Kiss, Elizabeth (forthcoming) “Is Nationalism Compatible with Human Rights?” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., Identities, Politics and Rights. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lingis, Alphonso (1983) Excesses: Eros and Culture. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mailer, Norman (1957) “The White Negro: Superficial Reflections on the Hipster,” 4 Dissent 276.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha (1979) “Law Turning Outward,” 73 Telos 79.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, Ryan, Michael, & Sarat, Austin, eds. (1992) Narrative, Violence, and The Law: The Essays of Robert Cover. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Herbert (1970) “Persons and Punishment,” in Meldren, A. I., ed., Human Rights. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1992) “Resistance, Reconstruction, and Romance in Legal Scholarship,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 733.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1956) Werke, ed. Karl Schelecta. Munich: Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1974) The Gay Science, ed. W. Kaufman. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. (1979) “A Postscript on Metaphor,” in Sacks 1979.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1977) The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. Czerny, R.. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian (1994) “Athens and Jerusalem: A Tale of Three Cities,” 3 Social & Legal Studies 333.Google Scholar
Sacks, Sheldon, ed. (1979) On Metaphor. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1993) Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Santos, Santos Boaventura de (1991) “The Postmodern Transition: Law and Politics,” in Sarat & Kearns 1991b.Google Scholar
Santos, Santos Boaventura de (1995) “Three Metaphors for a New Conception of Law: The Frontier, the Baroque, and the South,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 569.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1990) “‘… The Law Is All Over’: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor,” 2 Yale J. of Law & Humanities 343.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Silbey, Susan (1988) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” 10 Law & Policy 97.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, Thomas R. (1991a) “A Journey through Forgetting: Toward a Jurisprudence of Violence,” in Sarat & Kearns 1991b.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, Thomas R. (1991b) The Fate of Law. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, Thomas R. (1994) The Rhetoric of Law. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shiff, Richard (1979) “Art and Life: A Metaphoric Relationship,” in Sacks 1979.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, & Sarat, Austin (1987) “Critical Traditions in Law and Society Research,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 165.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georges (1971) On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William (1988) “Legal Realism Now,” 76 California Law Rev. 467.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto (1975) Knowledge and Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto (1987) False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. Part I of Politics, A Work in Constructive Social Theory. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
White, Lucie (1990) “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.,” 38 Buffalo Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven (1992) “For What It's Worth,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 789.Google Scholar