Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:11:32.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ambrose's Contemporaries and the Christianization of Northern Italy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Rita Lizzi
Rita Lizzi
Affiliation:
University of Florence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The question of the Christianization of Italy in the late fourth century has been much discussed in the recent past, but it has rarely been approached at local level, despite the fact that focusing upon local situations, where a wealth of material is available, makes it easier to follow the interplay between paganism and Christianity.

The geographical area broadly corresponding to Northern Italy offers a vast body of material, especially from the second half of the fourth to the first half of the fifth century. There are enough archaeological and epigraphic sources for us to get an idea of the changes in urban organization brought about by Christianity. In terms of literary sources, the North of Italy is a privileged region (as are Cappadocia at the time of Basil and the two Gregories and Syria at the time of John Chrysostom and Theodoret of Cyrrhus) in that we have the sermons of a number of bishops who were very close to Ambrose, Bishop of Milan. These texts have been used to study the economy of the region but they are also basic for elucidating Christian doctrine and practice at the time of Ambrose.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 80 , November 1990 , pp. 156 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Rita Lizzi 1990. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ruggini, L. Cracco, Economia e società nell'Italia Annonaria. Rapporti fra agricoltura e commercio dal IV al VI secolo D.C. (1961).Google Scholar

2 cf. Padovese, L., L'originalità cristiana. II pensiero etico sociale di alcuni vescovi norditaliani del IV secolo (1983)Google Scholar; Truzzi, C., Zeno, Gaudenzio, Cromazio. Testi e contenuti della predicazione cristiana per le Chiese di Verona, Brescia e Aquileia (360–410) (1985)Google Scholar.

3 Markus, R. A., ‘Paganism, Christianity and the Latin Classics in the Fourth Century’, in Binns, J. W. (Ed.), Latin Literature of the Fourth Century (1974), 1–21Google Scholar.

4 It is, however, appropriate to underline the need for a political rather than a totally religious interpretation of the last twenty years of the fourth century: see recently, Marcone, A., ‘La fine del paganesimo a Roma: per un'interpretazione politica’, in Studi offerti a Q. M. Quartiroli e D. Magnino (1987), 53–9Google Scholar.

5 Ambr., Ep. 19, PL 16. 982–94. The date of his election is uncertain: cf. Ciccolini, G., ‘Problemi paleocristiani della Chiesa tridentia’, Studi Trentini di Scienze Storiche 31 (1952), 160—9.Google Scholar

6 Lizzi, R., ‘Codicilli imperiali e insignia episcopali: un'affinità significativa’, RIL 122 (1988), 3–13.Google Scholar

7 Lemarié, J. (Ed.), Chromace d'Aquilée. Sermons 1, SC 154, (1969), 46Google Scholar.

8 Ruggini, L. Cracco, ‘Ambrogio e le opposizioni anticattoliche fra il 383 e il 390’, Augustinianum 14 (1974), 409–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Gaud. Brix., Tr. 16, PL 20, CSEL 68 (ed. A. Glueck, 1936), 139. A number of factors have led scholars to move the traditional date of his accession to 396–7: cf. Boehrer, S., Gaudentius of Brescia: Sermons and Letters (1965), 1–6Google Scholar.

10 The eighteenth-century editors of Zeno's sermons set the duration of Zeno's episcopate between 362 and 380 (cf. PL 11, 81) and, in spite of many alternative datings proposed by other scholars, a number of elements in the sermons suggest that these dates are the most plausible.

11 Chaffin, E., ‘The Application of Nicaea Canon 6 and the date of the Synod of Turin’, Rivista di Storia e letteratura Religiosa 16, 2 (1980), 257–72.Google Scholar

12 Sabinus of Placentia attended the Council at Aquileia in 381 and Milan in 390. He can probably be identified as the deacon from Milan named in four letters by Basil. Thus he was the same person who had brought to Athanasius the conciliar letter from Rome: cf. Lanzoni, F., Le diocesi d'Italia dalle origini al principio del sec. VII Studi e Testi 35 (1927), 446–8Google Scholar. The anti-Arian letter also expressed the hostility of the West against Auxentius of Milan. Sabinus' election followed his mission to the East in 370: M. Richard, ‘Saint Basile et la missiona du diacre Sabinus’, AB 67 (1949), 132–9.

13 For Constantius, cf. Ambr., Ep. 2, PL 16, 879 and for Ambrose's role in Felix ‘election, see Ambr., Ep. 4, 889.

14 Caretta, A., S. Bassiano di Lodi. Storia e leggenda (1966), 7–18Google Scholar, has moved the date of Bassianus' consecration to 377–8. Ambrose's role in the election of Gaudentius of Novara is described in the Vita Gaudentii. The accession took place during Ambrose's stay at Novara on his way to Vercelli, where he settled the controversial succession to Limenius: cf. Palanque, J. R., Saint Ambroise et l'Empire romain (1933), 555Google Scholar.

15 cf. Monachino, V., ‘Communio e primato nella controversia ariana’ in Comunione Interecclesiale. Acta Conventus Internationalis (Roma 1967) (1972), 319–76Google Scholar; Lizzi, R., Vescovi e strutture ecclesiastiche nella città tardoantica. L'ltalia Annonaria nel IV–V secolo D.C. (1989), 15–28Google Scholar.

16 .Aug., Conf. 8, 1, 1; 2, 3, 4; 5, 10; Retract. 2, 1.

17 Ambr., Epp. 37, 38, 65, 67 to Simplicianus; Ambr., Epp. 32, 45–9 to Sabinus.

18 In his letter Ambrose asked Constantius to take over Forum Cornelii's seat temporarily (Ep 2, 27). Since Forum Cornelii has been identified with Imula, some scholars have believed that Bononia or Faventia was Constantius' bishopric. During the fourth century, however, another town, Claterna, now vanished, still existed. It was closer to Imula than Bononia. Thus Claterna might have been Constantius' seat. See F. De Ruggiero, Dizionario Epigrafico 11, 1, 280.

19 Ambr., Ep. 2, 30.

20 Ep. 2, 12; 31.

21 Ruggini, , Economia e società, 56–84Google Scholar.

22 Concerning Ambrose's social ideas in his other works, cf. Vasey, V. R., The Social Ideas in the Works of St. Ambrose. A Study on ‘De Nabuthe’ (1982)Google Scholar.

23 De Ruggiero, F., Dizionario Epigrafico IV, 1205 ff.Google Scholar

24 Ambr., Ep. 19, 6; PL 16, 984.

25 Symm. 11, 52; VI, 72; IX, 48.

26 Many authorities had to provide for quarterings in the towns: curiales could choose the quarters, but the magister officiorum and the mensores had executive functions: see S. Roda, ‘Militaris impressio e proprietà senatoria nel tardo Impero’ in Studi in onore di S.Calderone (forthcoming).

27 Ambr., Ep. 19, 2; 7–34.

28 Below, III, 2.

29 Lepelley, Cl., ‘Les limites de la christianisation de l'État romain sous Constantin et ses successeurs’, in Christianisme et pouvoirs politiques (1973), 25–41Google Scholar; Thébert, Y., ‘L'evolution urbaine dans les provinces orientales de l'Afrique romaine tardive’, Opus 2 (1983), 99–130.Google Scholar

30 In general, see Février, P. A., ‘Permanences et héritages de l'Antiquité dans la topographie des villes de l'Occident durant le haut Moyen Age’, in XXI Settimana di Spoleto (1974), 41–138Google Scholar. As for Gaul in particular, a good summary in Pietri, Ch., ‘Remarques sur la topographie chrétienne des cités de la Gaul entre Loire et Rhin (des origines au VIIe siècle)’, Revue d'Hist. de l'Église de France 62 (1975), 189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar and idem, ‘L'éspace chrétien de la cité. Le vicus christianorum et l'éspace chrétien de la cité arverne (Clermont)’, Revue d'Hist. de l'Église de France 66 (1980), 177–208.

31 Following Ambrose's example, new churches were erected in Aquileia and in Concordia (see supra), in Comum (cf. Barelli, V., ‘Il san Carpoforo’, Rivista archeologica di Como 1 (1972), 16–32)Google Scholar, in Laus Pompeia (cf. Ambr., Ep. 4, 1–2; see Frova, A., ‘Rapporto preliminare su saggi di scavi a Lodi Vecchio’, Archivio storico di Lodi (1955), 16–29Google Scholar), in Brixia (cf. Gaud. Brix., Tr. 17. 971; CSEL 37. 150; see Cattaneo, E., ‘La chiesa bresciana delle origini’, in Storia di Brescia (1963), 343–59Google Scholar)

32 For Eusebius of Vercellae, see CC IX (ed. V. Bulhart, 1972), 3–110 and Levine, Ph., ‘Historical Evidence for Calligraphic Activity in Vercelli from St. Eusebius to Atto’, Speculum 30 (1955), 561–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the other authors, see Pietri, Ch., Roma Christiana 1 (1977), 730–48Google Scholar.

33 Zeno 11, 7, 14–16, CC22 (ed. B. Loefstedt, 1971), 174–5

34 Zeno 1, 25, 11, p. 75, 90–4.

35 Zeno 1, 25, 11, p. 75, 95–6.

36 Zeno 1, 25, 11, p. 75, 95

37 Zeno 1, 25, 10, p. 75, 85–9

38 PL11, 335 n. 21.

39 Zeno I, 14, 8, p. 59, 74–7.

40 Ruggini, L. Cracco, ‘Milano nella circolazione monetaria del tardo impero: esigenze politiche e risposte socioeconomiche’, in La zecca di Milano, Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Milano 9–14 maggio 1983) (1984), 49Google Scholar.

41 Ruggini, L. Cracco, ‘Uomini senza terra e terra senza uomini nell'Italia antica’, Quaderni di Società rurale 3 (1963), 33Google Scholar.

42 Zeno 1, 14, 3, p. 57, 24–33; cf. 1. 14, 5, P 58, 41–6.

43 Zeno I, 5, 18, pp. 41–2; 134–42.

44 Zeno I, 5, 3, p. 38, 18–23; ibid. 7. P. 39. 52–6.

45 Zeno 1, 5, 17, p. 41, 120–1; 1, 14, 8, p. 59, 72–4.

46 Max. Taur., Sermones 17and18, Corpus Christiariorum Series Latina (CCSL) 23 (ed. A. Mutzenbecher, 1962), pp. 62–9.

47 For the date, see O. Maenchen-Helfen, ‘The Date of Maximus of Turin's sermo XVIII’, VC 18, 2 (1964), 114–15.

48 Max. Taur. 18, p. 69, 59–60.

49 Max. Taur. 18, p. 69, 61–6.

50 CTh v, 7, 2 (Dec. 409) = Brev v, 5, 2 (408).

51 Zeno 11, 6, 1, p. 168, 4–9.

52 Zeno II, 6, 2, p. 168, 9–11. For the African situation, see Lepelley, Les cités, 348–52.

53 Compare Zeno 1, 5, 17–18, p. 41, 125–32 and 11, 6, 5–7, P 169, 39–57.

54 La cattedrale di Verona (1987), 6–55Google Scholar.

55 ibid., 39. The identification of Zeno's church with the remains under the actual basilica (see Zovatto, P., ‘Arte paleocristiana a Verona’, in Verona e il suo territorio. (1960), 555–74Google Scholar) is now known to be wrong.

56 ibid. 33, 54 where a good analysis of the remains of the mosaic floor can be found.

57 Tramontin, S., ‘Origini cristiane’, in Storia della cultura veneta dalle origini al Trecento I (1976), 102–23Google Scholar.

58 Brusin, G., Zovatto, P. L., Monumenti paleocristiani di Aquileia e Grado (1957), 52, fig. 21.Google Scholar

59 ibid., 87; Zovatto, P. L., ‘I ritratti musivi della basilica in Aquileia e una nuova proposta di ldentificazione’, Aquileia Nostra 37 (1966), 106–7Google Scholar. Kaehler, H. (Die Stiftermosaiken in der Kostantinishen Sudkirche von Aquileia (1962))Google Scholar and Gerke, F. (Le sorgenti dell'arte cristiana (1969))Google Scholar suggest that these were the portraits of Constantine and his family. The same idea is repeated in Da Aquileia a Venezia (1980), 202–3Google Scholar.

60 contra Veyne, P., Le pain et le cirque, sociologie historique d'un pluralisme politique (1976), 44–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Thanks to the examination of ceramics under the floor, Bertacchi, L. dated this enlargement of the first aulae to the mid-fourth century: ‘Nuovi elementi ed ipotesi circa la basilica del Fondo Tullio’, Aquileia Nostra 32–3 (1960–1961), 47–80.Google Scholar

62 Chrom., S. 26, 1 (SC 174, ed. J. Lemarié (1971), 92–3, 2–25).

63 It is possible to date at the beginning of the fifth century the basilicas built in Iulium Carnicum and in Gradum: cf. Lizzi, op. cit. (n. 15), 157.

64 cf. Brusin, G.–Zovatto, P. L., Monumenti romani e cristiani di Iulia Concordia (1960), 143, 239, 271, 301 ff.Google Scholar; Bertacchi, L., ‘Un decennio di scavi e scoperte d'interesse paleocristiano a Aquileia’, Antichità Altoadriatiche 6 (1974), 63–91Google Scholar.

65 There is an inscription written by Ambrose for the consecration of the Basilica Apostolorum in Milan (CIL v, 2, p. 617), from which we can understand the twofold meaning of the cross for Ambrose: see Patrucco, M. Forlin, ‘Il tema politico della vittoria e della croce in Ambrogio e nella tradizione ambrosiana’, in Paradoxos Politeia. Studi patristici in onore di G. Laz-zati (1979), 410–13Google Scholar; Consolino, F. Ela, ‘Il significato dell'inventio crucis nel De obitu Theodosii’ Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia di Siena 5 (1984), 161–80Google Scholar. For churches built beyond the Alps with a crossshaped plan, cf. Pietri, ‘L'espace chrétien’, op. cit. (n. 30), 182–4.

66 Panciera, S., ‘Strade e commerci tra Aquileia e le regioni alpine’, Antichita Altoadriatiche 9 (1976), 153–72Google Scholar; L. Cracco Ruggini, ‘Aquileia e Concordia: il duplice volto di una società urbana nel V sec. D. C.’, AAAd 29 (1987), 57–97; G. Uggeri, ‘La navigazione interna della Cisalpina in eta romana’, AAAd 29 (1987), 305–55.

67 Ruggini, op. cit. (n. 40), 13–58.

68 Ambr., Ep. 2, 3–4, PL 16, 880; cf. De Off. i, 101.

69 Ambr. Ep. 2, 5, 880. As for the linkage sertno purus et dilucidus, reminiscent of the typical terminology of classical rhetorical treatises, cf. Consolino, F. E., Ascesi e mondanità nella Gallia tardoantica (1979), 24, n. 2.Google Scholar

70 Ambr., Ep. 2, 6, 7, 880–1.

71 Ambr., Ep. 4, 7, 891.

72 Duncan-Jones, R. P., The Economy of the Roman Empire. Quantitative Studies (1974), 266–7Google Scholar; Francois, J., Le privilège de liberté (1984), 266–7Google Scholar.

73 Hatt, J. J., ‘Les divinités indigènes dans des districts alpins à l'époque romaine (Alpes Grees et Pennines, Alpes Cottiennes, Alpes Maritimes)’, in Atti del Centra Studi e Documentazione sull'Italia romana vii (1975–1976) 353–62Google Scholar; I. Chirassi Colombo, ‘Acculturazione e morfologia di culti alpini’, in ibid., 157–91; Pascal, G. B., The Cults of Cisalpine Gaul, Collection Latomus 75 (1964).Google Scholar

74 cf. Boehrer, S., Gaudentius of Brescia: Sermons and Letters (1965)Google Scholar and Matthews, J. F., Western Aristocracies and Imperial Court A.D. 364–425 (1975), 185–6Google Scholar.

75 Gaud. Brix., Tr. xvi, PL 20, 955–9.

76 Gaud. Brix., Praef. 831–2, CSEL 68, 9, 10, p. 4.

77 Ruf., HE 11, 16, ‘(Benivolus) tune memoriae scriniis praesidens’.

78 Gaud. Brix., Praef. 828–9, CSEL 2, p. 1: ‘nam sicut honoratorum nostrae urbis, ita etiam dominicae plebis, Domino annuente, dignissimum caput es.’

79 Gaud. Brix., Tr. 13, 939, CSEL 23, pp. 120–1.

80 Gaud. Brix., Praef. 834, CSEL 21, p. 7.

81 Gaud. Brix., Praef. 835, CSEL 22, p. 7.

82 Max. Taur. 61, 23–32, p. 244; 17, 70, p. 65; 36, 91, p. 143, 61a, 17, p. 249; 72, 23, p. 301; 81, 19, p. 332; 93, 23, p- 374; 22, 1–10, p. 83; 22a, 67–79, p. 89: ‘indulgentior est elemosina quam lavacrum. Lavacrum enim semel datur et semel veniam pollicitur, elemosinam autem quotiens feceris, totiens veniam promereris’.

83 Max: Taur., 71, 44–54, p. 298; 56–74, p. 299.

84 Max. Taur., 26, p. 101–3 esp., 40–54.

85 Max. Taur., 30, 22–5, p. 117.

86 Max. Taur., 61c, 64–75, pp. 258–9.

87 Max. Taur., 63, 30–5, pp. 266–7.

88 Max. Taur., 98, 51–62, pp. 391–2.

89 Max. Taur., 91, 23–38, p. 369.

90 Max. Taur., 107, 23–30, p. 420; cf. 91, 33–6, p. 369.

91 Pascal, op. cit. (n. 73), 47, 150–4; Chirassi Colombo, op. cit. (n. 73), 157–91.

92 Roda, S., ‘Religiosità popolare nell'Italia nord-occidentale attraverso le epigrafi cristiane nei secoli IV–VI’, Augustinianum 21 (1981), 246–8, nn. 5, 9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

93 The preCeltic deity became two deities in the Celtic pantheon: Cathubodua, the god of war, and Cantismerta, the god of sovereignty: Hatt, op. cit. (n. 73), 356–7.

94 Max. Taur., 107, 32–40, p. 420. The term dianaticus could refer to the cult of Diana connected with farming rituals: Dölger, J., ‘Christiche Grundbesitzer und heidnische Landarbeiter. Ein Ausschnitt aus der religiösen Auseinandersetzung des vierten und fünften Jahrhunderts’, Antike und Christentum 6 (1950), 313–19.Google Scholar

95 Max. Taur., 107, 14–21, p. 420.

96 Max. Taur., 108, 7–8, p. 423.

97 CTh 16, 10, 12, 11, 18–21.

98 Max. Taur., 106, 13–18, p. 417.

99 CTh 16, 10, 12, 11, 21–3; S. 106, 24–5, p. 417.

100 CTh 16, 2, 29; 30; 11, 16, 21 and 16, 22; 16, 2, 31.

101 Max. Taur., 106–7 esp. 106, 2, pp. 417–18. For the authenticity of these sermons, cf. A. Mutzenbecher, ‘Einleitung’, CCSL 23, xxxm ff.

102 Max. Taur., 106, 22–35, p. 417.

103 Vig., Epp. I–II, PL 13, 549–58.

104 Vig., Epp. 1, 550D; 11, 553B-C.

105 Vig., Epp. 11, 553C; 1, 551C.

106 Vig., Epp. 11, 554D; 1, 551D.

107 Vig., Epp. 11, 554B–555D; 1, 552A.

108 cf. Tabula Clesiana = CIL v, 5050 = ILS 206. The inscription was published by Mommsen, Th., ‘Edikt der Kaisers Claudius über das röm. Bürgerrecht der Anauner vom J. 46 n. Chr.’, Hermes 4 (1870), 99–120.Google Scholar Cf. U. Laffi, “Adtributio” e Contributio”. Problemi del sistema politico-amministrativo della Stato romano (1966), 32 n. 63.

109 Buchi, E., ‘Nuove testimonianze degli Anauni’, Studi Trentini di Scienze Storiche 1 (1980), 85–97.Google Scholar

110 Chisté, P., Epigrafi trentine dell'età romana (1971), 102–3Google Scholar.

111 CIL v, 1 p. 339; Sartori, F., ‘Verona romana’ in Verona e il suo territorio (1960), 183, 245Google Scholar; Levi, M. A., ‘Brescia romana: l'età imperiale’, in Storia di Brescia, Brescia 1 (1963), 105–49Google Scholar.

112 Among twenty five deities, as registered in inscriptions, only five indicate Celtic cults (e.g. Bergimus, Cavavius, Aponus): Chisté, op. cit. (n. no), 245–7.

113 ibid., 66–8; 72–80.

114 ibid., 69–70.

115 Cumont, F., Textes et monuments figurés relatifs aux mystères de Mythra (1894), 1, 348; Pascal, op. cit. (n. 73), 66.Google Scholar

116 Vig., Ep. II, 556B.

117 Ep. 11, 554B: ‘ibique levitis aliquantis in ecclesia deprehensis…’

118 Sisinnius was diaconus (554C); Martyrius lector (551A); Alexander was hostarius (551D).

119 Vig., Ep. II, 553C; cf. 1, 551C.

120 Aug., Ep. 139, CSEL 44, pp. 151–2.

121 Aug., Ep. 50, CSEL 34, 143 ff. That event has been dated c. 399 after the legislation concerning the closure of pagan temples: Lepelley, op. cit. (n. 29), 355–8.

122 Aug., Epp. 90 and 103 by Nectarius to Augustine and Epp. 91–104 to Nectarius. cf. Kotula, T., ‘Deux pages relatives à la reaction paienne: les troubles à Sufes et à Calame’, in Acta Universitatis Wratislawiensis 205 (1974), 69–74Google Scholar (in Polish with a French summary).

123 Aug., Ep. 91, 433, 3–11.

124 Ep. 103, 580, 9–11; 91, 434, 10–5.

125 Ep. 91, 435, 11–5; 104, 594, 28 ff.

126 CTh 16, 2, 31 (25 April 398).

127 Aug., Epp. 97 and 100.

128 Ep. 139.

129 The constitution was addressed to Manlius Theodoras, a person closely linked with the ecclesiastical milieu of Milan, and especially with Simplicianus, to whom Vigilius sent the first letter.

130 The sites of the churches were planned strategically in order to assimilate a part of ‘folkloric’ culture within the ecclesiastical culture: see Goff, J. Le, ‘Cultura ecclesiastica e tradizione folcloristiche nella civiltà merovingia’, in Agiografia medievale (1976), 215–26Google Scholar.

131 Ruggini, L. Cracco, ‘Il paganesimo romano tra religione e politica (384–394 D.C): per una reinterpretazione del “Carmen contra paganos”’, Atti dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei s. viii, vol. xxiii, 1 (1979), 124–30Google Scholar.

132 M. Simonetti, in CCSL 20, x.

133 Max. Goth., Contra paganos, CCSL 20, 323–8.

134 P. Courcelle, ‘Un nouveau traité d'Eutrope, prêtre aquitain vers l'an 400’, REA 56 (1954), 377–90; Fontaine, J., ‘Société et culture chrétiennes sur l'aire circumpyrénéenne au siècle de Théodose’, Bull, de Litterature ecclésiatique 75 (1974), 241–86.Google Scholar