Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:52:25.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ceramic Micro-Seriation: Types or Attributes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew I. Duff
Andrew I. Duff*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287–2402
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Micro-seriation using attributes of decorated ceramics has been shown to accurately refine intrasite and intersite relative dating. Using data from Pueblo de los Muertos, a nucleated town in west-central New Mexico, this presentation demonstrates that micro-seriation of type frequencies produces equally accurate results. Typological analysis also provides substantial time savings when compared to attribute recording. Additionally, using types with established temporal ranges permits linkage of relative seriation with absolute dates. A combination of correspondence analysis and k-means cluster analysis was found to provide sound and easily interpretable results. The results of a typological seriation of Pueblo de los Muertos deposits are examined, and the utility of typological seriation for other contexts is considered.

Resumen

Resumen

La micro-seriación de atributos de decoration cerámica ha sido considerada como la tecnica acertada para refinar las fechas relativas dentro de un sitio y entre varios sitios. Este artículo utiliza datos de Pueblo de los Muertos, un pueblo nucleado localizado en el centro-oeste de Nuevo México, para demostrar que la micro-seriación defrecuencia de tipos cerámicos produce resultados igualmente acertados. El análisis tipológico también representa un ahorro de tiempo substancial en comparación con el tiempo que se necesita para analizar los atributos decorativos. Además, el uso de tipos con rangos temporales establecidos permite enlazar la seriación relativa con fechamientos absolutos. Una combination entre Análisis de Correspondencia y el método de agrupamiento con k-medias produjo resultados confiables y fáciles de interpretar. Aquí se examinan los resultados de una seriación tipológica de los depósitos de Pueblo de los Muertos y se considera la utilidad de la seriación tipológica en otros contextos.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Blankholm, H. P. 1991 Intrasite Spatial Analysis in Theory and Practice. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Belviken, E., Helskog, E., Helskog, K., Marie Holm-Olsen, I., 1982 Correspondence Analysis: An Alternative to Principal Components. World Archaeology 14: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, R. L. 1970 White Mountain Redware: A Pottery Tradition of East-Central Arizona and Western New Mexico. Anthropological Papers No. 19. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Christenson, A. L. 1994 A Test of Mean Ceramic Dating Using Well-Dated Kayenta Anasazi Sites. Kiva 59: 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, H.S. 1953 Potsherds: An Introduction to the Study of Prehistoric Southwestern Ceramics and Their Use in Historic Reconstruction. Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 25. Northern Arizona Society of Science and Art, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Cowgill, G. 1968 Archaeological Applications of Factor, Cluster and Proximity Analysis. American Antiquity 33: 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, G. 1972 Models, Methods, and Techniques for Sedation. In Models in Archaeology, edited by Clarke, D., pp. 381–424. Methuen and Company, London.Google Scholar
Dindjian, F 1985 Seriation and Toposeriation by Correspondence Analysis. In P.A.C.T 11, To Pattern the Past, edited by Voorrips, A. and Loving, S.H. pp. 119–135. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
Dindjian, F 1988 Improvements in Intra-Site Spatial Analysis Techniques. In P.A.C.T. 16, Data Processing and Mathematics Applied to Archaeology, edited by Djindjian, F. and Ducasse, H., pp. 95–106. Council of Europe, Ravello, Italy.Google Scholar
Dindjian, F 1989 Fifteen Years of Contributions of the French School of Data Analysis to Quantitative Archaeology. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1989, edited by Rahtz, S. and Richards, J., pp. 193–204. BAR International Series 548, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Doran, J. E., and Hodson, F. R. 1975 Mathematics and Computers in Archaeology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1970 Seriation Method and Its Evaluation. American Antiquity 35: 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifi, A. 1990 Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Greenacre, M. J. 1984 Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. 1974 Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method. Applied Statistics 23: 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, F. R., and Tyers, P. A. 1988 Data Analysis for Archaeologists: The Institute of Archaeology Packages. In Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1988, edited by Rahtz, S. P. Q., pp. 31–41. BAR International Series 446(i). British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ihm, P. 1987 Seriation and Application of Correspondence Analysis to the Ordering of Type Frequency Tables. In P.A.C.T. 16, Data Processing and Mathematics Applied to Archaeology, edited by Djindjian, F. and Ducasse, H., pp. 363–377. Council of Europe, Ravello, Italy.Google Scholar
Johnson, L., Jr. 1972 Introduction to Imaginary Models for Archaeological Scaling and Clustering. In Models in Archaeology, edited by Clarke, D., pp. 309–379. Methuen and Company, London.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. 1971 Seriation from Abundance Matrices. In Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, edited by Hodson, F. R., Kendall, D. G., and Tautu, P., pp. 215–152. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. W. 1985a Settlement, Subsistence, and Society in Late Zuni Prehistory. Anthropological Papers No. 44. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. W. 1985b Social Structure, the Structure of Style, and Stylistic Patterns in Cibola Pottery. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B. A., pp. 35–71. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. W., and Ammerman, A. 1982 Heuristic Approaches to Spatial Analysis in Archaeology. American Antiquity 47: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laxton, R. R., and Restorick, J. 1989 Seriation, Similarity, and Consistency. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1989, edited by Rahtz, S. and Richards, J., pp. 215–225. BAR International Series 548, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S. A. 1975 Micro-Seriation: A Method for Fine Chronological Differentiation. American Antiquity 40: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBlanc, S. A. 1978 Settlement Patterns in the El Morro Valley, New Mexico. In Investigations of the Southwestern Anthropological Research Group: An Experiment in Archaeological Cooperation, edited by Euler, R. C. and Gumerman, G.J. pp. 45–51. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S. A. 1989 Cibola: Shifting Cultural Boundaries. In Dynamics of Southwest Prehistory, edited by Cordell, L. S. and Gumerman, G.J. pp. 337–369. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Leredde, H. 1985 Typology and Seriation of Merovingian Buckle- Plates. In P.A.C.T. 11, To Pattern the Past, edited by Voorrips, A. and Loving, S.H. pp. 353–361. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1988 Multivariate Statistics and Archaeology. In Multivariate Archaeology, Numerical Approaches to Scandinavian Archaeology, edited by Madsen, T., pp. 7–27. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXI. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. 1989 Seriation and Multivariate Statistics. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, edited by Rahtz, S. and Richards, J., pp. 205–214. BAR International Series 548, British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Madsen, T. (editor) 1988 Multivariate Archaeology, Numerical Approaches to Scandinavian Archaeology. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXI. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
Marquardt, W. H. 1974 A Temporal Perspective on Late Prehistoric Societies in the Eastern Cibola Area: Factor Analytic Approaches to Short-Term Chronological Investigation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Marquardt, W. H. 1978 Advances in Archaeological Seriation. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, edited by SchifFer, M. B., pp. 257–314. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, R. G., and True, D. L. 1974 Site Relationships at Quebrada Tarapaca, Chile: A Comparison of Clustering and Scaling Techniques. American Antiquity 39: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plog, S. 1978 Social Interaction and Stylistic Similarity: A Reanalysis. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 263–274. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Plog, S. 1983 Analysis of Style in Artifacts. Annual Review of Anthropology 12: 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1977 The “Analytical Individual” and Prehistoric Style Variability. In The Individual in Prehistory, edited by Hill, J. N. and Gunn, J., pp. 41–53. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1978 Multivariate Artifact Analysis: A Basis for Multidimensional Interpretations. In Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating, edited by Redman, C. L., Langhorne, W. T., Berman, M. J., Versaggi, N. M., Curtin, E. V and Wanser, J. C., pp. 159–192. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Redman, C. L. 1987 Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective. American Antiquity 52: 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringrose, T. J. 1992 Bootstrapping and Correspondence Analysis in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, I. 1967 Seriation in Archaeology. In American Historical Anthropology, Essays in Honor of Leslie Spier, edited by Riley, C. L. and W W Taylor, pp. 153–195. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville Skinner, E. J. Google Scholar
Rouse, I. 1981 A Systematic Analysis of Chipped Stone Industries from the El Morro Valley, New Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Slachmuylder, J. L. 1985 Seriation by Correspondence Analysis for Mesolithic Assemblages. In P.A.C.T. 11, To Pattern the Past, edited by Voorrips, A. and Loving, S.H. pp. 137–148. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
South, S. 1978 Research Strategies for Archaeological Pattern Recognition on Historic Sites. World Archaeology 10: 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaulding, A. C. 1978 Artifact Classes, Association, and Seriation. In Archaeological Essays in Honor of Irving B. Rouse, edited by Dunnell, R. C. and Hall, E.S. Jr., pp. 27-10. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V. P., and Kintigh, K. W. 1992 Estimating Site Occupation Spans from Dated Artifact Types: Some New Approaches. In Archaeology of Eastern North America: Papers in Honor of Stephen Williams, edited by Stoltman, J. B., pp. 349–361. Mississippi Department of Archives and History Archaeological Report 25, Jackson, Mississippi.Google Scholar
Stone, T. 1992 The Process of Aggregation in the American Southwest: A Case Study from Zuni, New Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
True, D. L., and Matson, R. G. 1970 Cluster Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling of Archaeological Sites in Northern Chile. Science 169: 1201–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Geer, J. P. 1993a Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Data: Theory. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences. Series 2. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Van de Geer, J. P. 1993b Multivariate Analysis of Categorical Data: Applications. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series 3. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Van Rijckevorsel, J. 1987 The Application of Fuzzy Coding and Horseshoes in Multiple Correspondence Analysis. DWSO Press, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Washburn, D. K. 1983 Symmetry Analysis of Ceramic Design: Two Tests of the Method on Neolithic Material from Greece and the Aegean. In Structure and Cognition in Art, edited by Washburn, D. K., pp. 138–164. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Washburn, D. K. 1985 Use of Multidimensional Scaling to Display Sensitivity of Symmetry Analysis of Patterned Design to Spatial and Chronological Change: Examples from Anasazi Prehistory. In Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics, edited by Nelson, B. A., pp. 75–101. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J. 1977 Design Analysis of Painted Pottery. American Antiquity 42: 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., and Redman, C. L. 1980 Aspects of Zuni Prehistory: Preliminary Report on Excavations and Survey in the El Morro Valley of New Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 7: 201–218.Google Scholar
Weller, S. C, and Romney, A. K. 1990 Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-075. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar