Skip to main content
Log in

Palm taxonomy in Brazilian Amazônia: The state of systematic collections in regional herbaria

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite their economic and ecological importance, Amazonian palms have been largely neglected by contemporary taxonomists. The resulting confusion at the specific level is a serious impediment to research efforts by specialists in other fields. To assess the state of systematic collections presently available in Amazônia, we conducted a survey of the palm specimens in three Brazilian herbaria (MG, IAN and INPA). Twelve criteria were utilized to measure the quality of the specimens. We found that most of the 897 specimens are reasonably complete in a physical sense, but a large proportion lack crucial information on their labels. Curating facilities are in serious need of improvement, as is evident from the significant (26%) percentage of specimens found to be in an unreasonable state of preservation. A checklist of the 232 currently recognized palm species in Brazilian Amazônia shows that 145 (62.5%) are not represented by identified specimens, and that the representation which does exist lacks depth. To improve the quality and representativeness of collections in regional herbaria, we suggest procedures for collecting and storing palms as well as policies designed to intensify collecting efforts in Amazônia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, A. B. 1978. The names and uses of palms among a tribe of Yanomama Indians. Principes 22: 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balick, M. J. 1979. Economic botany of the Guahibo. I. Palmae. Econ. Bot. 33: 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1980. The biology and economics of theOenocarpus-Jessenia (Palmae) complex. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa Rodrigues, J. 1898a. Palmae Mattogrossenses novae vel minus cognitae. Rio de Janeiro.

  • Barbosa Rodrigues, J. 1898b. Sertum palmarum Brasiliensium. 2 vols. Brussels.

  • Bradford, D. F. & C. C. Smith. 1977. Seed predation and seed number inScheelea palm fruits. Ecology 58: 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa Lima, A. M. 1967–68. Quarto catálogo dos insectos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil, seus parasitos e predadores. Pts. 1 & 2. D'Araujo e Silva et al., ed., Dept. Def. Insp. Agro., Minist. Agric., Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, B. E. 1936. Index of American palms. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 14: 1–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drude, O. 1882. Palmae.In: C. F. P. von Martius, Flora Brasiliensis 3: 253–584. Munich.

  • Drude, O. 1887. Palmae.In: A. Engler & K. Prantl. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2(3): 1–93. Leipzig.

  • Fosberg, F. R. & M. H. Sachet. 1965. Manual for tropical herbaria. Regnum Veg. 39.

  • Furley, P. A. 1975. The significance of the cohune palm,Orgignya cohune (Mart.) Dahlgren, on the nature and development of the soil profile. Biotropica 7: 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, S. F. 1970. A synopsis of the palm genusSyagrus Mart. Fieldiana, Bot. 32: 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. A revision of B. E. Dahlgren's index of American palms. 294 pp. J. Cramer, Lehre.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977a. Preliminary taxonomic studies in the palm genusAttalea H.B.K. Fieldiana, Bot. 38: 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977b. Preliminary taxonomic studies in the palm genusOrbignya Mart. Phytologia 36: 89–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1977c. Preliminary taxonomic studies in the palm genusScheelea Karsten. Phytologia 37: 219–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978a. Preliminary taxonomic studies in the palm genusMaximiliana Mart. Phytologia 38: 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978b. Corrections and changes in recent articles published in Phytologia. Phytologia 40: 313–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, M. 1980. The fishes and the forest. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, A. D. 1952. Studies in Brazilian palms. Arq. Bot. Estado de São Paulo 2: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. H. 1971. The fate ofScheelea rostrata fruits beneath the parent tree: predispersal attack by bruchids. Principes 15: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. Association of a rain forest palm and seed-eating beetles in Puerto Rico. Ecology 53: 258–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiltie, R. A. 1981. Distribution of palm fruits on a rain forest floor: why white-lipped peccaries forage near objects. Biotropica 13: 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martius, C. F. P. von. 1823–50. Historia Naturalis Palmarum. 3 vols. Munich.

  • Moore, H. E. 1969. [Review of J. G. Wessels Boer's]The Geonomoid Palms. Taxon 18: 230–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1972.Chelyocarpus and its alliesCrysophilia andItaya (Palmae). Principes 16: 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1973. Palms in the tropical forest ecosystems of Africa and South America, pp. 63–88.In: B. J. Meggers, E. S. Ayensu & W. D. Duckworth, eds. Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: a comparative review. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T. 1972. An index of plant collectors in Brazilian Amazônia. Acta Amazônica 1: 25–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R. W. 1975. The genusThrinax (Palmae: Coryphoideae). Smithsonian Contr. Bot. 19: 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, de C. 1953. Limites meridionais e orientais da área de ocorrência da floresta Amazônica em território Brasileiro. Revista Brasil. Geogr. (Rio de Janeiro) 15: 3–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruce, R. 1871. Palmae Amazonicae, sive enumeratio palmarum in itinere suo per regiones Americae a equatoriales lectarum. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 11: 65–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. B. 1961. Essays on the morphology of palms. III. Seedling leaves and juvenile foliage. Principes 5: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, N. W. & H. E. Moore, Jr. 1977. Correlations of inflorescence, flower structure, and floral anatomy with pollination in some palms. Biotropica 9: 170–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. H., J. Stout & S. Risch. 1979. Seed dispersal of a common Costa Rican rain forest palm. Trop. Ecol. 20: 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R. 1853. Palm trees of the amazon and their uses. John van Voorst, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels Boer, J. G. 1968. The geonomoid palms, N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, F. 1952. Die Nahrpflanzen der Samenkafer. Zeitschr. ange. Entom. 33: 210–217, 460–480.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In accordance with the agreement made with the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico & Tecnológico-CNPq.” covering scientific research in Brazil, a report of this research, in Portuguese, will be published inActa Amazonica.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balick, M.J., Anderson, A.B. & Freitas da Silva, M. Palm taxonomy in Brazilian Amazônia: The state of systematic collections in regional herbaria. Brittonia 34, 463–477 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/2806503

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2806503

Navigation