Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T04:51:32.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“The Benevolent Leviathan”: Political Consciousness among Urban Workers under State Corporatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Youssef Cohen
Youssef Cohen*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From the onset of industrial capitalism in Latin America, urban workers have been dependent on the state. This is particularly true in Brazil, where urban workers are still in a situation of extreme dependence on the state. Thus, the Brazilian setting provides an ideal opportunity for the study of the consciousness of dependent workers as well as an important point of reference for comparative study of working-class consciousness. This paper outlines the general characteristics of the situation of state-dependent workers in Latin America, with special attention to the Brazilian worker, in order to show how their dependence is reflected in their consciousness. The evidence for our interpretation is based on the attitudes of 617 urban workers who are part of a larger probability sample of the population in central and southeast Brazil.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 46 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Robert (1962). Labor Relations in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Alexander, Robert (1965). Organized Labor in Latin America. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Brown, Brian R. (1981). “Capitalism, Conflict and Working-Class Contention in Lancashire.” In Tilly, C. (ed.), Class Conflict and Collective Action. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campello de Souza, Maria do Carmo (1976). Estado e Partidos Politicos no Brasil (1930 a 1964). Sao Paulo: Alfa-Omega.Google Scholar
Cohen, Youssef (1979). Popular Support for Authoritarian Governments. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Cohen, Youssef, Converse, Philip E., Souza, Amaury G. de, and McDonough, Peter J. (1980). Representation and Development in Brazil. Data file number 7712. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Collier, David, ed. (1979). The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, David, and Collier, Ruth B. (1979). “Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating ‘Corporatism.’” The American Political Science Review 73: 967–86.10.2307/1953982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Apter, David E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
de Souza, Amaury (1978). The Nature of Corporative Representation: Leaders and Membership of Organized Labor in Brazil. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
dos Santos, Wanderley Guilherme (1979). Cidadania e Justiça. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus.Google Scholar
Erickson, Kenneth P. (1972). “Corporatism and Labor in Development.” In Rosenbaum, H. J. and Tyler, W. G. (eds.), Contemporary Brazil: Issues in Economic and Political Development. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Erickson, Kenneth P. (1977). The Brazilian Corporative State and Working Class Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gouveia, A. J. (1965). “Desenvolvimento Econômico e Prestígio de Certas Ocupaçoes,” America Latina 8: 66–79.Google Scholar
Hall, Michael (1969). The Origins of Mass Immigration in Brazil, 1871–1914. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Harding, Timothy F. (1973). A Political History of Organized Labor in Brazil. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, B., Bori, Carolina, Lopez, Juarez, and Castaldi, Carlo (1960). Mobilidade e Trabalho. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Educacionais.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans D. (1979). “Measuring Ideological Conceptualization.” In Barnes, Samuel H. and Kaase, Max (eds.), Political Action. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar (1980). “Formaçao de um Pensamento Politico Autoritário na Primeira República: uma interpretaçao.” Mimeographed. Sao Paolo.Google Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar, and Cardoso, Fernando H., eds. (1976). Os Partidos e as Eleiçoes no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Landsberger, Henry A. (1966). “The Labor Elite: Is It Revolutionary?” In Lipset, S. M. and Solari, Aldo (eds.), Elites in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leff, N. H. (1968). Economic Policy-Making and Development in Brazil, 1947–1964. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Malloy, James M., ed. (1977). Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
McDonough, Peter J. (1981). Power and Ideology in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400854530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mericle, Kenneth S. (1974). Conflict Regulation in the Brazilian Industrial Relations System. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Nelson, Joan M. (1979). Access to Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400885978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. (1973). Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Politics of Modernization Series, No. 9. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Pike, Fredrick B., and Stritch, Thomas, eds. (1974). The New Corporatism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio (1975). Politica e Trabalho no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Albertino (1968). Sindicato e Desenvolvimento no Brasil. Sao Paulo: Difusao Européia do Livro.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Leôncio Martins (1966). Conflito Industrial e Sindicalismo no Brasil. Sao Paulo: Difusao Européia do Livro.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Leôncio Martins (1970). Industrializaçao e Atitudes Operárias. Sao Paulo: Editoria Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Leôncio Martins (1974). Trabelhadores, Sindicatos e Industriali zaçao. Sao Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Reis, F. W. (1978). Os Partidos e o Regime. Sao Paulo: Ediçoes Simbolo.Google Scholar
Sanders, Thomas G. (1980). Human Rights and Political Process in Brazil. American Universities Field Staff Reports, No. 11. Hanover, N.H.: American Universities Field Staff, Inc.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. (1971). Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. (1974). “Still the Century of Corporatism?” In Pike, Fredrich B. and Stritch, Thomas (eds.), The New Corporatism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ronald M. (1971). The Political System of Brazil. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Nelson do Valle (1974). Posiçao Social das Ocupaçoes. Rio de Janeiro: Fundaçao I. B. G. E., Instituto Brasileiro de Informática.Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E. (1967). Politics in Brazil. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, Hobart A. Jr. (1977). Organized Labor in Latin America. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Stepán, Alfred (1971). The Military in Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepán, Alfred (1973). Authoritarian Brazil. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stepán, Alfred (1978). The State and Society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tourraine, Alain (1961). “Industrialisation et Conscience ouvière à Sao Paulo.” Sociologie du Travail 4: 77–95.10.3406/sotra.1961.1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Véliz, Claudio (1980). The Centralist Tradition in Latin America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400857302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weffort, Francisco C. (1965). “Raizes Sociais do Populismo em Sao Paulo.” Revista Civilizaçao Brasileira 1: 39–60.Google Scholar
Weffort, Francisco C. (1971). “State and Mass in Brazil.” In Horowitz, Irving L. (ed.), Masses in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weffort, Francisco C. (1972). Participaçao e Confitto Industrial: Contagem e Osasco 1968. Cadernos Cebrap, No. 5. Sao Paulo: Cebrap.Google Scholar
Weffort, Francisco C. (1973). “Origens do Sindicalismo Populista no Brasil: A Conjuntura do Pósguerra.” Estudo Cebrap 4: 67–105.Google Scholar
Wesolowski, W. (1979). Classes, Strata and Power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar