Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T00:11:40.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aristippus in and out of Athens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Stephen Taylor Holmes
Stephen Taylor Holmes*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article has two purposes. The first is to show how some of the central principles of classical Greek political theory became anachronistic as a result of massive transformations in the underlying structure of European society. These principles, it is argued, were originally dependent on an empirical premise that the polity is a “whole” encompassing individual “parts,” or (stated differently) that the polity is identical with total society. This whole/part schematization of the polity seemed plausible in the ancient city since most sectors of polis life had political connotations or overtones. The same schema, however, became an archaism in modern Europe, chiefly because of the emphatic emergence of a distinction between state and society–one aspect of a more general increase in the structural differentiation of society. The second and closely related purpose is to explore the feasibility of a claim once advanced by Benjamin Constant: that the organizational transformations involved in the modernization of European society have created a novel rhetorical opportunity, the possibility of defending tyranny in the name of freedom and democracy.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 113 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Donald J. (1965). “Individual and State in the Ethics and Politics.” In Stark, Rudolfet al. (1965). La “Politique” d'Aristote. Geneva: Foundation Hardt.Google Scholar
Aquinas, (1964). Summa Theologica, Vol. 13. London: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958a). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958b). The Origins of Totalitarianism, 2nd ed. New York: World.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. (1958c). Between Past and Future. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1962). Nicomachaean Ethics. Translated by Ostwald, Martin. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1946). Politics. Edited and translated by Barker, Ernest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1972). Concerning the City of God Against the Pagans. Translated by Bettenson, Henry. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest (1918). Greek Political Theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin (1957, first published 1814). De l'esprit de conquête et de l'usurpation. In Oeuvres. Paris: Pléiade.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin (1861; first published 1819). “De la liberté des anciens comparée a celle des modernes.” In Laboulaye, E. (ed.), Cours de politique constitutionelle, Vol. 2. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. (1975). Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1957). From Religion to Philosophy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes (1972). Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Hicks, R. D.. London: Loeb.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1933). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1951). Suicide. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Victor (1964). The Greek State. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses (1973a). The Ancient Economy. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses (1973b). Democracy Ancient and Modern. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses and Pleket, H. W. (1976). The Olympic Games: The First Thousand Years. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Fustel de, Coulanges, Denis, Numa (1956). The Ancient City. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Havelock, Eric (1957). The Liberal Temper in Greek Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1955; first published 1821). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1952). The Philosophy of Right. Translated by Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. (1957). Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1922; first published 1797). Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Edited by Vorländer, Karl. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1965; first published 1797). The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon, rev, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan (1975). “Totalitarianism and Authoritarian Regimes.” In Greenstein, and Polsby, (1975). Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 3. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1965). Funktion und Folgen formaler Organizationen. Berlin: Duncker und Humbolt.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1972). Soziologische Aufklärung 1, 3rd ed. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1975). Soziologische Aufklärung 2, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Mulgan, R. C. (1977). Aristotle's Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Franz (1957). The Democratic and Authoritarian State. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1966, first published 1881). Morgenröte. In Schlecta, Karl (ed.), Werke. Munich: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1971). The System of Modem Societies. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, Max (1966). Freedom in Greek Life and Thought. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1966). The Open Society and Its Enemies, rev. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred (1975). Metaphysik und Metapolitik: Studien zu Aristoteles und zur politischen Sprache der neuzeitlichen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schlatter, R. (1951). Private Property. The History of an Idea. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1955). Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1971). Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1953). Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1964). The City and Man. New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1968a). On Tyranny. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1968b). Liberalism Ancient and Modern. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1972). Xenophon's Socrates. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides, (1954). The Peloponnesian War. Translated by Warner, Rex. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista (1968; first published 1744). The New Science. Translated by Bergin, T. and Fisch, M.. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1954). On Law in Economy and Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1958). The City. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Webster, T. B. L. (1969). Everyday Life in Classical Athens. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Xenophon, (1918). Hellenica. Translated by Brownson, C. L.. London: Loeb.Google Scholar
Xenophon, (1923). Memorabilia. In Marchant, E. C. (ed.), Memorabilia and Oeconomicus. London: Loeb.Google Scholar