Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of gonadal biopsy technique in striped bass based on tagged fish returns

  • Published:
Chesapeake Science

Abstract

Returns from 2503 tagged striped bass releaed, into the Chesapeake Bay during 1964 and 1965 were analyzed statistically and qualitatively to evaluate the effects of a gonadal biopsy technique designed for use on living fish. The results prove that the added gonadal biopsy technique does not significantly alter the survival rate of tagged striped bass.

Five hundred twelve returns from 1250 tagged and biopsied (TB) fish and 445 returns from 1253 tagged only (TO) fish were grouped into 22 samples to enable the chi-square 2×2 contingency test of association to be calculated by both the standard and Yates corrected methods. Twenty-one of 22 samples yielded chi-square values whose probabilities (p) were non-significant, i.e., 0.50<p<0.75 and 0.75<p c <0.90. One had ap-value of 0.05, denoting lack of similarity between the TB fish and the TO fish. Further, those chi-values were utilized to test the standardized normal deviate (τ) to determine if they were normally distributed. The values were τ=0.92,p=0.64 and τc,p c =0.74. Thus, the survival rate as indicated by the recapture rates of TO fish was not significantly greater than TB fish.

Qualitative comparisons of the reported recapture data for both categories indicate similarities with regard to frequency distribution of days of freedom, maximum days of freedom, and mean days of freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • MANSUETI, R. J. 1961. Age, growth, and movements of the striped bass,Roccus saxatilis, taken in size selective fishing gear in Maryland.Chesapeake Sci. 2(1–2):9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MERRIMAN, D. 1941. Studies on the striped bass (Roccus saxatilis) of the Atlantic Coast.U. S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Fish. Bull. 50(35):1–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • RANEY, E. C. 1952. The life history of striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum).Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 14(1):5–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • RITCHIE, D. E. 1965. Sex determination of live striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum), by biopsy technique.Chesapeake Sci. 6(3):141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIMPSON, G. G., ANNE ROE, and R. C. LEWONTIN. 1960. Quantitative Zoology. Harcourt, Brace and Company. New York, N. Y. vii+440 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • SYKES, J. E. 1958. A method of determining the sex of the striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum).Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 87:104–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VLADYKOV, V. D., and D. H. WALLACE. 1952. Studies of the striped bass,Roccus saxatilis (Walbaum), with special reference to the Chesapeake Bay region during 1936–1939.Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll. 14(1):132–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 430, Natural Resources Institute, University of Maryland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritchie, D.E. Evaluation of gonadal biopsy technique in striped bass based on tagged fish returns. Chesapeake Science 11, 210–215 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351096

Keywords

Navigation