نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشکدۀ علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه رازی
2 دانشجوی دکتری آینده پژوهی مطالعات سیاسی انقلاب اسلامی دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه شاهد
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Although there has been a significant growth in requirements and infrastructures for political development in Iran after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, (such as the growth of literacy, the expansion of the middle class, the quantitative and qualitative development of higher education, the growth of audiovisual and media, and the emergence of new technologies, the legal elite circulation, etc.), but there is still a great way to reach the ultimate goals of political development, both as a qualitative governance model and as a quality model of citizenship. The present research seeks to answer this question, which factors are the most important inhibitors of political development in the aftermath of the victory of the Islamic Revolution? Therefore, in order to address the problem, it has been attempted to answer the question in a straightforward manner by using the method of Causal Layered Analysis (CLA), which is one of the most common methods of futures studies. Research findings indicate that in order to reduce the impact of political development inhibitors on the development process, it is necessary to strengthen the proponents who institutionalize the development process in Iranian society. Also, attention to parameters such as education at all stages, as the cornerstone of the comprehensive development of the country, and the identification of topics related to political development in the development planning and the efforts of the state and the nation to them, can solve the problems facing the country's political development an speed up the process of reaching it.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
الف) فارسی
ب) لاتین
1. Backhaus, J.G. (2004). “Schumpeter’s Contributions in the Area of Fiscal Sociology First Approximation”, Journal of Evolutionary Economy, Vol.14. No. 2. pp. 143-51.
2. Crawford ,N.C. (1999). How Sanctions Work: Lessons From South Africa, London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
3. Inayatullah, Sohail, (1998). “Causal Layered Analysis: Poststructuralism as Method”, Futures, Vol. 30, No. 8, 1998, pp .815–829
4. ───. (Ed.), (2004). The Causal Layered Analysis Reader, Tamkang University Press, Tamsui.
5. ───. (2008). The Causal Layered Analysis: An Integrative and Transformative Theory and Method, in Theodore J. Gordon and Jerome C. Glenn, Futures Research Methodology Version
6. Lucain, Pye & Sindney, Verba (1965). Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
7. Matsuoka, Y. (2006). Lectures on Scenario/Backcasting Approaches and Aim Models
8. Quist, J. (2007). Backcasting for a Sustainable Future: the Impact After 10 Years. EburonUitgeverij BV
9. Rogers, E. (1966). Modernization Among Peasants. NY: Holt.
10. Skocpol, T. (1994). Social Revolutions in the Modern World, Cambridge, Cambridge University press.
)