Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of English Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

2 MA in English Literature, Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Using Du Bois’s “Double Consciousness” and Fanon’s “Colonized Intellectual”, we contend that Borges’s essay “The Nothingness of Personality” can be deemed postcolonial. Our study turns to the postcolonial world of Latin America, with a special focus on Buenos Aires, addressing the alienation, hybridity, “two-ness”, and the othered state of Borges as an immigrant to Latin America after the World War I. “Double Consciousness” is arguably central to the analysis of Borges’s sense of duality in a newly adapted culture with the dilemma whether to behave in accordance with his previously adopted cultural identity, or with a new self in a new culture. Many studies have signified Borges’s attempt to establish the foundation of true Argentinean literature and a revival of cultural heritageک however, there ceases to be a significant study to encompass that Borges is like a “colonized intellectual” who talked back to the center through using the colonizer’s ideology.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [Persian]

بورخس پسا استعماری: «روشنفکر استعمارشده» و «هوشیاری دوگانه» در مقالۀ«هیچ چیز از شخصیت»

Authors [Persian]

  • دکتر احد مهروند 1
  • طیبه رستگار نادری 2

1 دانشیار ادبیات انگلیسی، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد ادبیات انگلیسی، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شهید مدنی آذربایجان،

Abstract [Persian]

با استفاده از دو اصطلاح »هوشیاری دوگانۀ«ویلیام ادوارد برگهارت دوبوآ و» روشنفکر استعمارشدۀ«  فرانتس فانون، در این مقاله نشان میدهیم که مقالۀ»هیچ چیز از شخصیت«خورخه لوئیس بورخس رامی توان پسا استعماری دانست. مطالعۀ ما به دنیای پس از استعمار آمریکای لاتین، با تمرکز ویژه بر بوینوس آیرس، پرداختن به بیگانگی، ترکیبی، »دوتایی« و وضعیت دیگری بورخس به عنوان مهاجر به آمریکای لاتین پس از جنگ جهانی اول می­پردازد.مسلماً در تحلیل حس دوگانگی بورخس در یک فرهنگ تازه اتخاذ شده، این بحث محوری مطرح  است که  آیا»هوشیاری دوگانۀ«بورخس باید مطابق با هویت فرهنگی اتخاذ شدۀقبلییا با خود جدید او در یک فرهنگ جدید باشد؟ بسیاری از مطالعات حاکی از تلاش بورخس برای ایجاد پایه و اساس ادبیات واقعی آرژانتین و احیای میراث فرهنگیآن است؛ با این حال، این مطالعات از این بررسی باز ماندند که  بورخس مانند»روشنفکر استعمارشده ای«بود که با استفاده از ایدئولوژی استعمارگر به مرکز آنها وامی نوشت.

Keywords [Persian]

  • بورخس پسا استعماری
  • «روشنفکر استعمارشده»
  • «هوشیاری دوگانه»
  • ذهنیت خود
  • مقالۀ «هیچ چیز از شخصیت»
Aizenberg, E. (1992). Borges, postcolonial precursor.World Literature Today,66(1),21-26.
Black, M. E. (2007). Fanon and DuBoisian double consciousness.Journal of Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 5(3), 393-404.
Black, M. E. (2012). Meanings and Typologies of DuBoisian Double Consciousness within 20th Century United States Racial Dynamics.University of Massachusetts Boston.Graduate Masters Theses.pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6085/a245d1e3d0bf7dc5824c85 4405f71cd41620.pdf.
Boldy, S. (2009).A companion to Jorge Luis Borges.Great Britain: Tamesis, Woodbridge Press.
Brühwiler, I., &Gardin, M. (2016). Fabricating national unity in torn contexts: World war I in the multilingual countries of Switzerland and Luxembourg. In G. Barry, E. D. Lago, & R. Healy.Small nations and colonial peripheries in world war I. Boston: Leiden-Brill Press.
Castro-Klaren, S. (2008).A companion to Latin American literature and culture. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Cook, B. (2013). Double consciousness.McNair Scholars Journal, 15(1),1-18.
Dennison, S. (2013). Debunking neo-imperialism or reaffirming neo-colonialism? The representation of Latin America in recent co-productions.Transnational Cinemas, 4(2), 185-95.
DuBois, W. E. B. (1903).The souls of black folk. Chicago: A. C. McClurg& Co. Press.
Fanon, F. (2005).The wretched of the earth.Translated by Richard Philcox, New York: Grove Press.
Fiddian, R. (2017). Postcolonial Borges: Argument and artistry. UK: OUP.
Fitzgerald, D. (2006). Borges, woman, and postcolonial history.Romance Studies, 24(3), 227-239.
Gollnick, B. (2005).The regional novel and beyond. In E. Kristal (Ed.),The Cambridge companion to the Latin American novel. UK: Cambridge UP.
Harriford, D., &Thompson, B. (2010).Condoleezza Rice, W. E. B. Du Bois, and Double Consciousness.InD. Harriford& B. Thompson (Eds.).When the center is on fire: Passionate social theory for our times.US: University of Texas Press.
Hart, S. (2009). A companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Great Britain: Tamesis, Woodbridge Press.
Hoppen, K. (2008). The (double) consciousness in African American crime fiction-popular literature as platform for social criticism.GRIN Publishing.
Isham, D. (2012). The neocolonial dependence model and the diverging economic paths of Chile and Argentine.Indian Journal of Economics andBusiness,11(2), 302-21.
Kristal, E. (2009). A companion to Jorge Luis Borges. Great Britain: Tamesis, Woodbridge Press.
Lobban, G. (2013). The immigrant analyst: A journey from double consciousness toward hybridity.Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23(5), 554-67.
Mehrvand, A. (2010). Richard Wright’s response to Garveyism and ‘Double consciousness’ in Lawd today!Contemporary Discourse, 1(1), 83-8.
Mehrvand, A. (2012). Thomas Bigger’s reaction to ‘Anonymous collectivity’ in Richard Wright’s Native Son.In K. V. Dominic (Ed.).African and Afro-American literature: Insights and interpretations. New Delhi: Authors Press.
Mehrvand, A. (2016). A postcolonial reading of Amiri Baraka’s 21st century political poem on America.International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(4), 21-29.
Mehrvand, A., & Khorsandi, J. (2018). ‘Anonymous collectivity’ and ‘Sly civility’: Postcolonial defiance in a satirical short story by Aziz Nesin. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(2), 31-45.
Mehrvand, A., &TalebiAshtiyani, S. (2020). Postcolonial reading of Joseph Conrad’s Lingard Trilogy.The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 8(1), 175-198.
Moore, T. O.(2005). A Fanonian perspective on double consciousness.Journal of BlackStudies,35(6),751-762.
Petersen, K. H., &Rutherford, A. (1986).A double colonization: Colonial and post-colonial women’s writing. University of Michigan, Mundelstrup, Denmark: Dangaroo Press.
Popova, M. (2017).The Nothingness of Personality: Young Borges on the Self. Retrieved from www.brainpickings.org/2017/04/03/the-nothingness-of-personality-borges/.
Rabaka, R. (2011). Revolutionary Fanonism: On Frantz Fanon’s modification of Marxism and decolonization of democratic Socialism. Socialism and Democracy,25(1), 126-45.
Ramanan, V. (2016).Jorge Luis Borges and the nothingness of the self.Literature & Aesthetics,26, 105-26.
Rincon, C. (1993). The peripheral center of postmodernism: On Borges, Garcia Marquez, and Alterity. Boundary 2, 20(3), 162-79.
Salvatore, R. D. (2008). The unsettling location of a settler nation: Argentina, from settler economy to failed developing nation.South Atlantic Quarterly,107(4),757-91.
Toro, A.D. (1995).Post-coloniality and post-modernity: Jorge Luis Borges: The periphery in the centre, the periphery as the centre, the centre of the periphery. In A. D. Toro & F. D. Toro (Eds.),Borders and margins: Post-colonialism and post-modernism (pp. 11-43). Frankfurt am Main: VervuertVerlag.
Toro, A. D. (2002). The foundation of Western thought in twenty and twenty-first centuries: The postmodern and postcolonial discourse in J. L. Borges.Semiotica, 140, 67-94.
Vadney, T. E. (1999). “A neo-colonial world: Latin America.” In T. E. Vadney (Ed.).The World since 1945. USA: Penguin Books Press.
Warnes, C. (2009). Magic Realism and the postcolonial novel: Between faith and irreverence. UK: Palgrave MacMillan Press.
Weinberger, E. (1999). The total library: Non-fiction 1922-1986. London: Allen Lane, the Penguin Press.
Xi, W. (2008). CHUS: An unfinished journey of transnationalism.The Chinese Historical Review, 15, 159-68.