ابعاد فرهنگی و اجتماعی ناباروری و روش‌های اهدایی کمک باروری: یک مطالعه مروری

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 الف. دانشجوی دکترای بهداشت باروری، کمیته تحقیقات دانشجویی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران ب. مربی، گروه مامایی، دانشکده پرستاری و مامایی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تربت حیدریه، تربت حیدریه، ایران

2 الف.استاد، مرکز تحقیقات عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر سلامت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران ب.استاد، گروه اپیدمیولوژی، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه زنان و مامایی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

4 الف.استاد، مرکز تحقیقات مراقبت‌های پرستاری و مامایی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران ب. استاد گروه مامایی، دانشکده پرستاری و مامایی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: استفاده از روش‌های اهدایی کمک باروری، امید به حاملگی را در زوجین نابارور افزایش می‌دهد. با این وجود، بخش وسیعی از جمعیت جهان این روش‌ها را به دلیل مسائل فرهنگی و اجتماعی نمی‌پذیرند. در این راستا، شناسایی ابعاد مختلف فرهنگی- اجتماعی می‌تواند راه‌گشا باشد. با توجه به مطالب بیان شده، مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین ابعاد فرهنگی و اجتماعی ناباروری و روش‌های اهدایی کمک باروری انجام شد.
مواد و روش‌ها: در این مطالعه مروری، مقالات فارسی و انگلیسی نمایه شده در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی معتبر شامل:Google Scholar ، Scopus، PubMed و SID بدون محدودیت زمانی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. مقالات مرتبط حاصل از تحقیقات کمی و کیفی در این زمینه بررسی شدند. شایان ذکر است که منابع و مطالعات انجام شده به زبان انگلیسی و فارسی موجود در این پایگاه‌ها مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. واژگان کلیدی مورد جستجو عبارت بودند از: Reproductive donation techniques، Socio-cultural aspects، Infertility و معادل فارسی آن‌ها.
یافته‌ها: براساس بررسی 49 مطالعه انجام شده، 16 مؤلفه مرتبط با مسائل فرهنگی- اجتماعی ناباروری و روش‌های اهدایی کمک باروری استخراج شدند که شامل: پنج مؤلفه روش‌های فرزندآوری (همسرگزینی و روش‌های سنتی)، پذیرش اجتماعی (انزوا، استیگما و پذیرش خانواده)، هویت اجتماعی (نقش مادری یا پدری، بقای نسل و تعصب)، پذیرش دینی (شریعت، توکل، تقدیر و مشیت) و حمایت اجتماعی (حمایت قانونی، حمایت مالی، حمایت مددکاری، حمایت شغلی و حمایت رسانه‌ای) بودند.
نتیجه‌گیری: افراد نابارور در زمینه استفاده از روش‌های اهدایی کمک باروری با چالش‌های فرهنگی و اجتماعی متعددی مواجه هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  1. Mohammadi M, Khalaj A.F F. Emotional and psychological problems of infertility and strategies to overcome them. Medical Journal Of Reproduction & Infertility. 2001;2(8):33-9  [Persian].
  2. Vayena E,Rowe PJ, Griffin PD.Current Practices and Contoversies in Assisted Reproduction.Geneva:World Health Organization.2002.
  3. Milanifar A, Akhondi MA, Behjati Ardekani Z, Abdolahzadeh A. Issuing Birth Certificates and ID Cards for Newborns Following a Surrogate Birth and the Legal and Ethical Responsibilities of the Medical Team. J Reprod Infertil. 2008;9(1):82-88 [Persian].
  4. Direkvand Moghadam, A., Delpisheh, A., Sayehmiri, K. The Prevalence of Infertility in Iran, A Systematic Review. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2013; 16(81): 1-7.
  5. Direkvand Moghaddam A, Delpisheh A, Sayehmiri K. An Investigation of the worldwide prevalence of infertility as a systematic review. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2016;10(1):76-87.
  6. M.Isikoglu, YS,  KO,  LD,  AS-A. Public opinion regarding oocyte donation in Turkey: first data from a secular population among the Islamic world. Human Reproduction. 2006;21(1):318-23.
  7. Mohler-Kuo M, UZ, AD, Hohl MK, FG, Mutsch M. Attitudes of couples towards the destination of surplus embryos: results among couples with cryopreserved embryos in Switzerland. Human Reproduction. 2009;24(8):1930-8.
  8. Declercq E, Luke B, Belanoff C, Cabral H, Diop H, Gopal D, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the massachusetts outcomes study of assisted reproductive technologies (MOSART). Fertil Steril 2015; 103(4):888-95.
  9. Andrijasevic S, Dotlic J, Aksam S, Micic J, Terzic M. Impact of conception method on twin pregnancy course and outcome. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014; 74(10):933–9.
  10. Dunietz GL, Holzman C, McKane P, Li C, Boulet SL, Todem D, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm birth among primiparas. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103(4):974–9.
  11. Zare, O., Soleimani, F. Assisted Reproduction Technology and Perinatal Outcomes: A Review. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2017; 20(supplement): 26-34.
  12. AKondi MM, Behjati.A Z, Arefi S, A HS, Arabi M. Familiarity with natural conception, IVF, and the need to replace the use of gametes in infertility treatment. Paiesh.2007;6(4):307-21[Persian].
  13. Zegers-Hochschild F, Schwarze J-E, Alam V. Infertility. International Encyclopedia of Public Health. 2008:576-87.
  14. Buster, J. The first live birth donation. Society for Reproductive Medicine.2008; 4(4), 23-28.
  15. Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Jan;32(1):140-62.
  16. 16-Jafari H, LatifNejad roudsari R, Taghipour A, Khadem Ghaebi N, EbrahimZadeh S. Comparison of knowledge and attitude towards reproductive donation procedures between recipient and non-recipient infertile couples at Mashhad Infertility Center. Journal of Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences. 2015; 3 (2) :25-16
  17. Papaharitou S. Reproductive health and midwives: Does occupational status differentiate their attitudes on assisted reproduction technologies from those of the general population? . Human Reproduction. 2007;.22(7) : 2033–2039
  18. Latifnejad Roudsari R, Allan H.T,Smith P.A.lookiing at infertility through the lens of religion and spiritualiyu:a review of the literature.Human fertility. 2007;10(3):141-149.  
  19. Roudsari R L, Jafari H, Taghipour A. The relationship of sociocultural beliefs and infertile couples’ attitude toward reproductive donation: A descriptive-correlational study. IJRM. 2019; 17 (5).
  20. Purewal, S., & van den Akker, O. British women’s attitudes towards oocyte donation: Ethnic differences and altruism. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 64 (1-3), 43-49.
  21. Liu Y1, Cai L. Ethical issues of oocyte donation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2017;
    34(1):124-127.
  22. Covington SN, Hammer Burns L. Infertility counseling: a comprehensive hand book for clinicians. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p.1-17, 175-180, 493-506
  23. Jafarzadeh MG. Assisted human reproduction techniques: necessities, achievements and the need. J Reprod Infertil. 2001;2(1):4-16[Persian].
  24. Mazaheri MA, Kayghobadi F, Faghihi Imani Z, Ghashang N, Pato M. Problem solving strategies and marital adjustment in infertile and fertile couples. J Reprod Infertil. 2001;2(4):22-32 [Persian].
  25. Janelle L,  DAG, Emre S. Third party reproduction and the aging couple. Maturitas. 2010;66:389–96.
  26. Abbasi Sh MJ,Asgari Kh. Asghar; Razeghi Nasrabad HB. Infertility and Female Infertility 's Lived Experiences:Case study in Tehran. Journal Of Female Research.2006;3(4):91-113[Persian].
  27. Mollaiy nezhad M, Jahanfar S, Jamshidi R. Infertility related stress and marital life in Iranian infertile women who referred to Isfahan infertility treatment clinic. Medical Journal Of Reproduction & Infertility. 2001;2(5):26-39 [Persian].
  28. Khodakarami N, Hashemi S, Seddigh S, Hamdiyeh M, Taheripanah R. Life Experience with Infertility;
    a Phenomenological Study Medical Journal of Reproduction & Infertility 2009;10(4):287-29 [Persian].
  29. Gerrits T. Social and cultural aspects of infertility in Mozambique. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;31(1):39-48.
  30. RazeghiT H.B.Socio-cultural aspect of infertility in Iran T MA Thesis in Demography , UT2005[Persian].
  31. Manoochehr M. Medical Sociology. 7 ed. Tehran: Tahouri; 1382 [Persian].
  32. Seybold D, A M. Choosing Therapies: A Senegalese woman's experience with infertility. Health Care for women International. 2002;23:540-9.
  33. Dhont N. Clinical, epidemiological and socio-cultural aspects of infertility in resource-poor settings. Evidence from Rwanda. Facts, views & vision in ObGyn. 2011;3(2):77.
  34. Enayat H, Dastranj M, Salmani F. A Survey of the factors associated with domestic discordances. J Sociol Women. 2011; 2(5):1-19.
  35. Karimi, F., Taghipour, A., Latifnejad Roudsari, R., Kimiaee, S., Mazloum, S., Amirian, M. Psycho - social effects of male infertility in Iranian women: a qualitative study. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, 2016; 19(10): 20-32.
  36. Schmidt L. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial conse-quences. Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417.
  37. Wiersema NJ, Drukker AJ, Dung MBT, Nhu GH, Nhu NT, et al. Consequences of infertility in developing countries: results of a questionnaire and interview survey in the South of Vietnam. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2006;4(54):1-8.
  38. Balen Fv, Bos Hmw. The social and cultural consequences of being childless in poor-resource areas. F, V & V IN OBGYN. 2010:1-16.
  39. Latifnejad Rousari R, Allan H, Smith P. Discovering a stronger sense of sele:The influence of relogion and spirituality  on emotional well-being of infertilile women. In: Religion and Psychology. Evans M, Walker E, editors. Guildford, UK: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2009: 171-205.
  40. 40-Younesi S. Stigma and infertility in Iran: Coping skills Medical Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2002;3(12):73-86 [Persian].
  41. Marcia C. Inhorn.Global infertility and the globalization of newreproduct ive technologies: illustrations from Egypt. Social Science & Medicine 56 (2003). 1837–1851.
  42. Latifnejad Rousari R, Allan H, Smith P. Navigating The Joupney Of Infertility: Muslim Christian Infertile Momen's Experiences. In: Religion and Psychology. Evans M, Walker E, editors. Guildford, UK: Nova Science Publishers, Inc; 2009: 208-241.
  43. A L. Peronace, BOIVIN J, SCHMIDT L. Patterns of suffering and social interactions in infertile men: 12 months after unsuccessful treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 6 April 2007;28(2):105-14
  44. Ghazi Tabatabaie M, Vedadhir AA. Surrogacy: Medicalization of Motherhood. J Reprod Infertil. 2008;9(2):144-164.
  45. Latifnejad Roudsari R, Hadizadeh Talasaz F, Simbar S, Khadem Ghaebi N. Challenges of donor selection: the experiences of Iranian infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive donation procedures. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2014; 16(88):1-13. (Persain).
  46. Zanjani KH, Mohammad MS, Mehriar A. Culture, development,Reproductive Health. 14 ed. Tehran: Boshra; 1389 [Persian].
  47. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins J, Nygren K. International estimates of infertility  prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007 march; 22(6): 1506-1512
  48. Hatami h, Razavi M, Majlesi F,Seied.N M . Public Health.Vol 3; 2 ed. Tehran: Arjmand; 1387 [Persian].
  49. Seifi Gh. Third Party Rights in Surrogate Mother Contracts. J Reprod Infertil. 2008;9(1):65-81 [Persian].
  50. Balen FV, Bos HMW. The social and cultural consequences of being childless in poor-resource areas. F, V & V IN OBGYN. 2010:1-16.
  51. Bagheri M. Factors that affected the infertile couplas acception of adoption. A Thesis presented for the Master Of Sciences Degree in Midwifery: School of Nursing& Midwifery of Mashhal; 2008.
  52. Sundby J. Infertility in the ۀambia: traditional and modern health care. Patient Education and Counseling. 1997;31:29-37.
  53. Shavazi, Razeghi Nasrabad HB ,Ardakani  bZ, Akhondi MM. [Attitudes of infertile women towards gamete donation: a case study in Tehran]. J Reprod Infertil. 2006;7(2):139-148 [Persian].
  54. Chliaoutakis JE, Koukouli S, Papadakaki M. Using attitudinal indicators to explain the public's intention to have recourse to gamete donation and surrogacy. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(11):2995-3002.
  55. Soini S, all a. The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2006;14(588-645)
  56. Ghasemi N, Khalili M,Tayyebi N. Knowledge and Attitudes of Infertile Couples towards Embryo Donation Program: A Preliminary Report from Iran. Ethics in Science and Technology.2007;5(1):89-96 [Persian].
  57. Zandi M, Vanaki Z, Shiva M, Mohammadi E. Experiences of commissioning mothers in selection of surrogate mother. Evid Based Care 2012; 2(3):7-21. (Persian).
  58. Taghiazad A. Sociology culture. 1, editor. Tehran: Amin; 1387 [Persian].
  59. Fahami F, Quchani SH, Ehsanpour S, Zargham A. Women's Lived Experiences of Female Infertility. The Iranian Journal of Obtetrics,Gynecology and Infertility. 2010;13(4):45-53 [Persian].
  60. Latifnejad R, Allan HT, Smith PA. Infertile women's Responses to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in a Religious Context: Voices of a Multi-Faith Population.  10th Congress on Reproductive Biomedicine; Tehran. Yakhteh; 2009.
  61. KhodayariFard M, Naghi Faghihi A, Ghobari-Bonab B, Shokoohi-Yekta M, Beh-Pajooh A, et al. Preparation and Standardization of the Religious Attitude Scale for University Students2006 March 20th 2009]: Available from: http://edupsy.ut.ac.ir/home.htm[Persian].
  62. Araoye MO. Epidemiology of infertility: social problems of the infertile couples. West Afr J Med. 2003;22(2):190-6.
  63. Yebei VN. Unmet needs'beliefs and treatment-seeking for infertility among migrant Ghanaian women in the Netherland. Reproductive Health Matters. 2000;
    8(16):135-41.
  64. Alizadeh L, Merghati T, Samani RA. Combined donation of gametes and ُSurrogacy and parent – child’ rights. Medical Ethics and History Special Issue. 1388:12-20 [Persian].
  65. Jafari H. The association of religious and socio-cultural beliefs with infertile couples’ attitudes towards donation procedures and its selection as a therapeutic approach to infertility. [Msc Thesis]. Iran. Nursing and Midwifery School of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; 2006. (Persian).
  66. Martins MV, Peterson BD, Costa P, Costa ME, Lund R, Schmidt L. Interactive effects of social support and disclosure on fertility-related stress. J Soci Personal Relation. 2013; 30(4):371-88.
  67. Latifnejad Roudsari, R., Jafari, H., Taghipour, A., Khadem, N., Ebrahimzdeh, S. The Association of Religious Beliefs in Infertile Couples’ Attitude towards Donation Procedures and Its Selection as a Therapeutic Approach to Infertility. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility.2013; 16(44): 1-10.
  68. Ezzati A, Nouri R, Hasani J. Structural relationship model between social support, coping strategies, stigma and depression in infertile Women in Tehran, Iran, 2010. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2013; 16(45):20-8. [Persian].
  69. Van den Akker OB. The complete guide to infertility:Diagnosis, treatment, options. Free association books, UK. 2002:92-101.
  70. Jahani Shourab, N., Latifnejad Roudsari, R. A review of human rights, legal, ethical and religious aspects of Surrogacy in Iran with an emphasis on its counseling issues. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2017; 19(40): 33-44.
نوید نو
دوره 23، شماره 76
اسفند 1399
صفحه 84-101

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار