Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Post Graduated student, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad. Iran.

3 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad. Iran

4 Immunology Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

5 Dentist, Private Practice, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: The aim of study was the biological assessment of cultured RAW264 macrophage exposed to nano amorphous calcium phosphate particles by analyzing of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity tests.
Methods: Nanoamorphus Calcium Phosphate particles were produced by sol-gel method, then particle size and hemogenicity was analyzed by XRD (X ray Diffraction). Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles was determinated with mouse RAW264 macrophage. The cells cultured in 37°c in DMEM medium 96 parts plates with concentration of 10000 cells in each part for 72 hours, then the medium removed and the second medium added to cells containing different concentrations of Nano particle (0, 200 and 400µg/ml). After 24 hours of incubation, MTT assay and Annexin V were used for assessing cell viability and apoptosis.
Results: The apoptosis insignificantly increased in macrophages with 200 and 400µg/ml NACP and for cytotoxicity, cell viability for control, 200µg and 400µg groups were 100,107,103 percent.
Discussion: NACP has no cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, so it can be used as non-toxic and beneficial material for clinical use.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Elsaka SE, Hamouda IM, Swain MV. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles addition to a conventional glass-ionomer restorative: influence on physical and antibacterial properties. J Dent. 2001; 39: 589-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.05.006.
  2. Cheng L, Weir MD, Zhang K, Wu EJ, Xu SM, Zhou X, et al. Dental plaque microcosm biofilm behavior on calcium phosphate Nano composite with quaternary ammonium. Dent Mater. 2012 Aug; 28(8):853-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.024.
  3. Poosti, Maryam & Ramezanzadeh, Baratali & Zebarjad, Seyed & Javadzadeh, Parisa & Naderinasab, Mahboubeh & Shakeri, Mohsen. (2012). Shear bond strength and antibacterial effects of orthodontic composite containing TiO. European journal of orthodontics. 35. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs073.
  4. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evaluation of flowable resin composite surfaces eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks. Dent Mater J. 2008 May; 27(3):455-65. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.455.
  5. Takahashi MK, Vieira S, Rached RN, de Almeida JB, Aguiar M, de Souza EM. Fluorescence intensity of resin composites and dental tissues before and after accelerated aging: a comparative study. Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr; 33(2):189-95. doi: 10.2341/07-74.
  6. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19(5):265-73; 274-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x.
  7. Radziun E, Wilczyńska JD, Książek I, Nowak K, Anuszewska EL, Kunicki A, Olszyna A, Ząbkowski T. Assessment of the cytotoxicity of aluminum oxide nanoparticles on selected mammalian cells. Toxicology in vitro. 2011 Dec; 25(8):1694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2011.07.010.
  8. Doyle A, Griffiths J. Cell and tissue culture: laboratory procedures in Biotechnology. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley and Son; 1998. P 10-244. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0844(199912)17:4<289::AID-CBF845>3.0.CO;2-B.
  9. Jahanbin A, Shahabi M, Ahrari F, Bozorgnia Y. Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of fiber reinforced composite bonded retainers and flexible spiral wires retainers in simulated high and low cariogenic environments. J Orthod Sci. 2015 Jan-Mar; 4(1):8-13. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.149610.
  10. Cheryl D, Helgason, Cindy L, Miller. Basic Cell Culture Protocols. 4th ed. Mumbai: Humana Press; 2013. p. 39-60
  11. Sjogren G, Sletten G, Dahl J E. Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by Millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests. J prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 229-236. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107227.
  12. Hashimoto M, Imazato S. Cytotoxic and genotoxic characterization of aluminum and silicon oxide nanoparticles in macrophages. Dental Materials. 2015 May; 31(5):556-64. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.009.
  13. Di Virgilio AL, Reigosa M, Arnal PM, De Mele MF. Comparative study of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of titanium oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010 May; 177(1):711-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.089.
  14. Heravi F, Ramezani M, Poosti M. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assessment of an Orthodontic Composite Containing Titanium-dioxide Nano-particles. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. 2013; 7(4): 192-198. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2013.031.
  15. Pandurangan M, Kim DH. ZnO nanoparticles augment ALT, AST, ALP and LDH expressions in C2C12 cells. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2015 Nov; 22(6):679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.03.013.
  16. G. Simon, J M. Antonucci, D. W. Lui. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Composites. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers. 2005 May; 20(3): 2. doi: 10.1177/0883911505051854.