Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIRx Med

Date Submitted: Jun 30, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 30, 2021 - Aug 25, 2021
Date Accepted: Oct 19, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Sep 19, 2023
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Continuous User Experience Monitoring of a Patient-Completed Preoperative Assessment System in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Study

Maramba ID, Chatterjee A

Continuous User Experience Monitoring of a Patient-Completed Preoperative Assessment System in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Study

JMIRx Med 2022;3(1):e31679

DOI: 10.2196/31679

PMID: 37725545

PMCID: 10414281

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Continuous user experience monitoring of a patient-completed preoperative assessment system: Usability evaluation and impact on completion times

  • Inocencio Daniel Maramba; 
  • Arunangsu Chatterjee

ABSTRACT

Background:

Preoperative assessment reduces the risk of poor perioperative outcome and reduces cost of a specific group of perioperative candidates. The implementation of a preoperative digital tool may help to improve guideline adherence. MyPreOp®(Ultramed Ltd, Penryn, UK) is a web-based questionnaire designed to replace paper-based preoperative assessments.

Objective:

The study aimed to assess the user experience of MyPreOp®, investigate the factors affecting completion times, and devise a method of administering a validated usability scale without negatively affecting completion times.

Methods:

Anonymised datasets were extracted from the MyPreOp® system. The data collected included age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology physical classification status, and time taken to complete the assessment. Two user experience evaluations were used: In Phase 1, two questions asking about overall experience and ease of use; and in Phase 2, a previously validated usability questionnaire, with its 20 questions equally distributed among five succeeding patient cohorts. There were 2593 respondents in total (Phase 1: n=1193; Phase 2: n=1400).

Results:

MyPreOp®scored well in both phases. In Phase 1, 80% of respondents had a good or better experience and 90% found it easy to use. The usability rating in Phase 2 was 4.13 (out of a maximum of 5) indicating high usability. Average completion time was 46.95 minutes (sd=25.83). The implementation of the longer usability evaluation scale in Phase 2 did not negatively impact completion times. Age and physical status were found to influence completion times but strength of the correlation was only moderate.

Conclusions:

MyPreOp® rates high in both user experience and usability. The method of dividing the questionnaire into five blocks is both valid and does not negatively affect completion times. Further research into the factors affecting completion time is recommended.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Maramba ID, Chatterjee A

Continuous User Experience Monitoring of a Patient-Completed Preoperative Assessment System in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Study

JMIRx Med 2022;3(1):e31679

DOI: 10.2196/31679

PMID: 37725545

PMCID: 10414281

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement