Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 22, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 4, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Study

Foster B, Krasowski MD

The Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Study

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(6):e13791

DOI: 10.2196/13791

PMID: 31254335

PMCID: 6625217

Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center

  • Brody Foster; 
  • Matthew David Krasowski

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health record (EHR) patient portals provide a means by which patients can access their health information, including diagnostic test results. Little is known about portal usage by emergency department (ED) patients.

Objective:

Patient portal utilization by ED patients at an academic medical center was assessed by account activation rates along with rates of access of diagnostic test results (laboratory results and radiology reports), analyzing the impact of age, gender, and self-reported patient race.

Methods:

This institutional review board-approved retrospective study was performed at a 60,000 visit per year university-based ED. We utilized EHR data reporting tools to examine EHR portal activation and utilization for all patients who had at least one ED encounter with one or more diagnostic tests performed between October 1, 2016 and October 1, 2017. The total dataset for laboratory testing included 208,635 laboratory tests on 25,361 unique patients, of which 9,482 (37.4%) had active portal accounts. The total dataset for radiologic imaging included 23,504 radiology studies on 14,455 unique patients, of which 5,439 (37.6%) had an active portal account.

Results:

Overall, 8.9% (18,573/208,635) of laboratory tests and 9.0% (2,019/22,504) of radiology reports ordered in the ED were viewed in the patient portal. Highest rates of viewing of laboratory and radiology results were seen for females, 0-11 years (parent/guardian viewing by proxy), 18-60 years, and patients who self-reported their race as Caucasian and Asian. Lowest rates were for teenagers, 81+ years, African-American/Black, and Hispanic/Latino. Infectious disease, urinalysis, and pregnancy testing comprised the highest viewed laboratory tests. Magnetic resonance imaging reports were viewed at higher rates than computed tomography or x-ray studies (P < 0.001). Approximately half of all diagnostic test results accessed by patients were reviewed within 72 hours of availability in the patient portal (laboratory results: 9,904/18,573, 53.3%; radiology reports: 971/2,099, 46.3%). On the other extreme, 19.9% (3,701/18,573) of laboratory results and 30.4% (639/2,099) of radiology reports were viewed more than 2 weeks after availability in the portal.

Conclusions:

The data highlight relatively low use of a patient portal by ED patients and existing disparities between patient groups. There can be wide lag time (months) between result/report availability and access by patients. Opportunities for improvement exist for both activation and more robust utilization of patient portals by ED patients.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Foster B, Krasowski MD

The Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Study

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(6):e13791

DOI: 10.2196/13791

PMID: 31254335

PMCID: 6625217

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.