Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Jun 13, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 17, 2019 - Jul 20, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 19, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Content and Feature Preferences for a Physical Activity App for Adults With Physical Disabilities: Focus Group Study

Olsen SH, Saperstein SL, Gold RS

Content and Feature Preferences for a Physical Activity App for Adults With Physical Disabilities: Focus Group Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(10):e15019

DOI: 10.2196/15019

PMID: 31605518

PMCID: 6913716

Content and Feature Preferences for a Physical Activity App for Adults with Physical Disabilities: Focus Group Findings

  • Sara H. Olsen; 
  • Sandra L. Saperstein; 
  • Robert S. Gold

ABSTRACT

Background:

Hundreds of thousands of mobile phone applications intended to improve health and fitness are available for download across platforms and operating systems; however few have been designed with people with physical disabilities (PwD) in mind, ignoring a large population that may benefit from an effective tool to increase physical activity.

Objective:

This study represents the first phase in the development process of a fitness tracking app for PwD interested in nontraditional sport. The aim of this research was to explore user preferences for content, appearance, and operational features of a proposed physical activity app for PwD to inform the design of a mobile phone app for increasing physical activity.

Methods:

Four focus groups were conducted with 15 adults with physical disabilities who currently participate in nontraditional, non-Paralympic sport. Data collected from the focus group sessions centered on content, functionality, and appearance of apps currently used by participants as well as preferences for a future app.

Results:

Participants (mean age 35.7, SD 9.2, years) were mostly white (13/15, 87%), and all were currently participating in CrossFit and at least one other sport. Five main themes were identified. Themes included preferences for (1) workout-specific features that were tailored or searchable by disability, (2) user experience that was intuitive and accessible, (3) profile personalization options, (4) gamification features that allowed for competition with self and other users, and (5) social features that allowed increased interaction among users. Participants expressed a primary interest in having a fitness app that was designed for PwD such that the features present in other fitness tracking apps were relevant to them and their community of adaptive athletes.

Conclusions:

The results showed that features related to user experience, social engagement, and gamification are considered important to PwD. Features highlighted by participants as most desired, from a consumer perspective, were in line with research identifying attributes of quality apps that use behavior change techniques to influence positive physical activity behavior change. Such insights should inform the development of any fitness app designed to integrate users with disabilities as a primary user base.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Olsen SH, Saperstein SL, Gold RS

Content and Feature Preferences for a Physical Activity App for Adults With Physical Disabilities: Focus Group Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(10):e15019

DOI: 10.2196/15019

PMID: 31605518

PMCID: 6913716

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.

Advertisement