skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Performance testing of multi-metal continuous emissions monitors

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/587875· OSTI ID:587875
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]; ;  [5];  [6];  [7]
  1. Ames Lab., IA (United States)
  2. Sky+, Inc. (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (United States)
  4. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken, SC (United States)
  5. National Risk Management Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC (United States)
  6. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Lab., Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
  7. Acurex Environmental Corp. (United States)

Three prototype multi-metals continuous emissions monitors (CEMs) were tested in April 1996 at the Rotary Kiln Incinerator Simulator facility at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The CEM instruments were: Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES); Laser Induced Breakdown Spectrometry-Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (LIBS); and Laser Spark Spectrometry, another LIBS instrument. The three CEMs were tested simultaneously during test periods in which low, medium, and high concentration levels of seven toxic metals -- antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, and mercury -- were maintained under carefully controlled conditions. Two methods were used to introduce the test metals into the flue gas: (1) solution atomization, introducing metal-containing aerosol directly into the secondary combustion burner, and (2) injection of fly ash particulates. The testing addressed four measures of CEM performance: relative accuracy (RA), calibration drift, zero drift, and response time. These were accomplished by comparing the toxic metal analyte concentrations reported by the CEMs to the concentrations measured using the EPA reference method (RM) for the same analytes. Overall, the test results showed the prototype nature of the test CEMs and the clear need for further development. None of the CEMs tested consistently achieved RA values of 20% or less as required by the EPA draft performance specification. Instrument size reduction and automation will also likely need additional attention before multi-metal CEMs systems become commercially available for service as envisioned by regulators and citizens.

Research Organization:
Ames Lab., Ames, IA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington, DC (United States); Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (United States)
DOE Contract Number:
W-7405-ENG-82
OSTI ID:
587875
Report Number(s):
IS-5128; ON: DE98004610; TRN: AHC29809%%4
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: 17 Nov 1997
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English