Skip to main content
Log in

Combined, Reduced-Antigen Content Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Boostrix®)

A Review of its Use as a Single-Dose Booster Immunization in Individuals Aged 10–64 Years in the US

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Abstract

Boostrix® is a three-pertussis component, combined, reduced-antigen content tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccine administered as a single intramuscular dose in adolescents or adults aged 10–64 years. Large, well designed trials conducted in the US in adolescents aged 10–18 years and in adults aged 19–64 years showed that serum concentrations of anti-pertussis antibodies ≈1 month after Boostrix® administration were noninferior to those previously shown to have a protective effect in infants following a primary regimen of combined diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine. Protective serum concentrations of anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibodies were achieved in essentially all (≥99.9%) adolescents randomized to receive Boostrix® or tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine, and Boostrix® was noninferior to Td vaccine for these endpoints. Similarly high seroprotection rates against diphtheria and tetanus were demonstrated with Boostrix® and a five-pertussis component Tdap booster vaccine (Adacel®) in a large, randomized study in adults; Boostrix® was noninferior to Adacel® for these outcomes. Reactogenicity data indicate that the vaccine is generally well tolerated in terms of solicited local and general symptoms in both adults and adolescents. Moreover, the importance of single-dose booster vaccination with a Tdap vaccine (such as Boostrix®) in these populations is highlighted in current immunization guidelines. Therefore, as a single-dose booster vaccine, Boostrix® provides a useful option to reduce pertussis morbidity and maintain the standard of care for tetanus and diphtheria protection in individuals aged 10–64 years.

Immunogenicity

The immunogenicity of a single intramuscular booster dose of Boostrix® was demonstrated in two large, randomized, observer-blind studies, one comparing Boostrix® and Td vaccine in 4114 adolescents aged 10–18 years, and the other comparing Boostrix® and Adacel® in 2284 adults aged 19–64 years. In both trials, analysis of immunogenicity was conducted in the according-to-protocol cohort, which comprised ≈90–95% of the vaccinated cohort.

In both adolescents and adults, administration of Boostrix® was associated with marked increases in concentrations of anti-pertussis antibodies (anti-pertussis [anti-PT], anti-filamentous hemagglutinin [anti-FHA], and anti-pertactin [anti-PRN]) from pre-vaccination levels to those ≈1 month after vaccination. In adolescents, predefined criteria for booster responses ≈1 month after Boostrix® were met for all three antipertussis antibodies; in adults, criteria were met for anti-FHA and anti-PRN. Post-vaccination concentrations of anti-pertussis antibodies in adolescents and adults were noninferior to concentrations previously shown to have a protective effect in infants who had received a three-dose primary vaccination regimen of DTaP as part of a household contact study. This comparison was necessary because of the lack of serologic correlates of protection against pertussis.

Protective serum concentrations of anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibodies (≥0.1IU/mL) were achieved in ≥99.9% of adolescents randomized to receive Boostrix® or Td vaccine, and the predefined criterion for noninferiority of Boostrix® to Td vaccine was met. Boostrix® was also noninferior to Td vaccine with respect to booster response rates for anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibodies in adolescents. Boostrix® was similarly immunogenic in adults. When Boostrix® was compared with Adacel®, noninferiority was demonstrated for seroprotection against diphtheria and tetanus, as well as for the proportion of individuals with anti-tetanus antibody concentrations ≥1.0 IU/mL.

Additional studies suggest that concomitant administration of Boostrix® with other recommended vaccines may provide an effective strategy with practical advantages, such as convenience and improved compliance, although there was a diminution in some antibody responses. The immunogenicity of the pertussis components was decreased when Boostrix® and influenza vaccine were administered together (at different injection sites) in adults, similar to previous observations with co-administered Adacel® and influenza vaccine. In addition, there was some interference with pertussis antigen immunogenicity (anti-PRN concentrations) in the meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) co-administration study in adolescents.

Reactogenicity

Data on local and general adverse events were solicited using standardized diaries for the 15-day period after study vaccination in the large, randomized, observer-blind trial comparing Boostrix® and Td vaccine in adolescents, and in the similarly designed study comparing Boostrix® and Adacel® in adults. In adolescents, the incidence of any pain, and grade 2 or 3 pain, at the injection site was significantly higher with Boostrix® than with Td vaccine, although there was no significant between-group difference for grade 3 pain. There were no significant differences in the incidences of other local symptoms, such as redness and swelling, in adolescents. There were also no between-group differences in the incidences of general symptoms, such as headache, fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and fever, although Boostrix® was associated with a significantly higher incidence of grade 2 or 3 headache than Td vaccine.

Boostrix® was generally associated with a lower incidence of local solicited symptoms than Adacel® in adults over the 15-day post-vaccination period. Significantly greater percentages of Adacel® than Boostrix® recipients reported pain, redness or swelling (of any grade), as well as grade 3 (≥50 mm) redness and swelling, at the injection site. The incidence of general solicited symptoms was broadly similar between the two treatment groups, although Boostrix® was associated with a significantly lower incidence of fever (≥37.5°1C) and a significantly higher incidence of grade 3 fatigue.

Boostrix® was also generally well tolerated when administered concomitantly with influenza vaccine in adults and with MCV4 vaccine in adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Table V
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis: recommendations for vaccine use and other preventive measures: recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACI). MMWR Recomm Rep 1991; 40 (RR-10): 1-28

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broder KR, Cortese MM, Skender JK, et al. Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2006 Mar 24; 55(RR-3): 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kretsinger K, Broder KR, Cortese MM, et al. Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adults: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and recommendation of ACIP, supported by the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), for use of Tdap among health-care personnel. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006 Dec 15; 55(RR-17): 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cherry JD. The epidemiology of pertussis: a comparison of the epidemiology of the disease pertussis with the epidemiology of Bordetella pertussis infection. Pediatrics 2005 May; 115(5): 1422–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control. Final 2007 reports of nationally notifiable infectious diseases. MMWR 2008 Aug 22; 57(33): 901, 903–13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control. Pertussis Surveillance Report - 10/6/08: weeks 1-52, 2007 (final data) [CDC/NCIRD/DBD/MVPD]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control. Summary of notifiable diseases — United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006 Jun 16; 53(53): 1–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cortese MM, Baughman AL, Brown K, et al. A ‘new age’ in pertussis prevention new opportunities through adult vaccination. Am J Prev Med 2007 Mar; 32(3): 177–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan T, Trindade E, Skowronski D. Epidemiology of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005 May; 24(5): S10–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McNabb SJ, Jajosky RA, Hall-Baker PA, et al. Summary of notifiable diseases — United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008 Mar 21; 55(53): 1–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards KM. Overview of pertussis: focus on epidemiology, sources of infection, and long term protection after infant vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005 Jun; 24(6): S104–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases. Prevention of pertussis among adolescents; recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 965–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee GM, Lett S, Schauer S, et al. Societal costs and morbidity of pertussis in adolescents and adults. Clin Infect Dis 2004 Dec 1; 39(11): 1572–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee GM, Murphy TV, Lett S, et al. Cost effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in adults. Am J Prev Med 2007 Mar; 32(3): 186–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caro JJ, Getsios D, El-Hadi W, et al. Pertussis immunization of adolescents in the United States: an economic evaluation. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005 May; 24 Suppl. 5: S75–82

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hay JW, Ward JI. Economic considerations for pertussis booster vaccination in adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005 Jun; 24(6 Suppl.): S127–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Purdy KW, Hay JW, Botteman MF, et al. Evaluation of strategies for use of acellular pertussis vaccine in adolescents and adults: a cost-benefit analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2004 Jul 1; 39(1): 20–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee GM, LeBaron C, Murphy TV, et al. Pertussis in adolescents and adults: should we vaccinate? Pediatrics 2005 Jun; 115(6): 1675–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Halperin SA. Pertussis: a disease and vaccine for all ages. N Engl J Med 2005 Oct 13; 353(15): 1615–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeh SH, Mink CM. Shift in the epidemiology of pertussis infection: an indication for pertussis vaccine boosters for adults? Drugs 2006; 66(6): 731–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bisgard KM, Pascual FB, Ehresmann KR, et al. Infant pertussis: who was the source? Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004 Nov; 23(11): 985–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of diphtheria toxoid-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis vaccine as a five-dose series: supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2000; 49(RR-13): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rennels MB. Extensive swelling reactions occurring after booster doses of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis 2003; 14: 196–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rennels MB, Black S, Woo EJ, et al. Safety of a fifth dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine in children experiencing extensive, local reactions to the fourth dose. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008 May; 27(5): 464–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Casey JR, Pichichero ME. Acellular pertussis vaccine safety and efficacy in children, adolescents and adults. Drugs 2005; 65(10): 1367–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26. GlaxoSmithKline. Boostrix® (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed) US prescribing information. Research Triangle Park (NC): GlaxoSmithKline, 2009 Jan

    Google Scholar 

  27. Frampton JE, Keating GM. Reduced-antigen, combined diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Boostrix): a review of its use as a single-dose booster immunization. Biodrugs 2006; 20(6): 371–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. GlaxoSmithKline. Infanrix® (diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed) US prescribing information. Research Triangle Park (NC): GlaxoSmithKline, 2009 Mar

  29. Sanofi Pasteur. Adacel® (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine adsorbed) US prescribing information. Swiftwater (PA): Sanofi Pasteur, 2009 Jan

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frampton JE, Keam SJ. Reduced-antigen, combined diphtheria-tetanusacellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed (Boostrix® US formulation): use as a single-dose booster immunization in adolescents aged 10-18 years. Paediatr Drugs 2006; 8(3): 189–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pichichero ME, Blatter MM, Kennedy WA, et al. Acellular pertussis vaccine booster combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids for adolescents. Pediatrics 2006 Apr; 117: 1084–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Blatter M, Friedland LR, Weston WM, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and three-component acellular pertussis vaccine in adults 19-64 years of age. Vaccine 2009 Jan 29; 27(5): 765–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmitt H-J, Wirsing von König CH, Neiss A, et al. Efficacy of acellular pertussis vaccine in early childhood after household exposure. JAMA 1996 Jan 3; 275(1): 37–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmitt HJ, Schulnd A, Knuf M, et al. Clinical experience of a tricomponent acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids for primary vaccination in 22,505 infants. J Pediatr 1996 Nov; 129(5): 695–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Friedland L, Weston W, Howe B. Immunogenicity of coadministered Tdap and MCV4 vaccines compared to separately administered vaccines [poster no. G-1699]. 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2007 Sep 17-20; Chicago (IL)

  36. GlaxoSmithKline. Study no.: 105753 (Tdap 0.3-006). A phase IV, randomized, partially blinded multicenter study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a booster vaccination with GlaxoSmithKline's tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed [Tdap Boostrix®] co-administered intramuscularly with Aventis-Pasteur's meningococcal (erogroups A, C, Y and W-135) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (Menactra™) as compared to the administration of either vaccine alone in healthy adolescents 11-18 years of age [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com [Accessed 2009 Jun 9]

  37. GlaxoSmithKline. Study no.: 106323 (Tdap 0.3-0.008). A phase IIIb, randomized, controlled, open-labelled, multicenter study of GSK Biologicals' tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine adsorbed, vaccine (Boostrix®) when co-administered with GSK Biologicals' influenza vaccine (Fluarix®) in subjects 19 years of age and older [online]. Available from URL:http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com/files/pdf/20087.pdf[Accessed 2009 Apr 14]

  38. Pichichero ME, Casey JR, Francis AB, et al. Acellular pertussis vaccine boosters combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid boosters for adolescents: safety and immunogenicity assessment when preceded by different 5-dose DTaP/DTwP schedules. Clin Pediatr 2006 Sep; 45(7): 613–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. GlaxoSmithKline. Study no.: 110080 (Tdap 0.3-009 ext: 007 year 1). A phase IIIb, controlled, multicenter study to evaluate antibody persistence at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years following administration of a single dose of Tdap vaccine to healthy subjects, 19 years of age and older in the study 106316 (Tdap 0.3-007) [online]. Available from URL:http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com/files/pdf/20233.pdf[Accessed 2009 Apr 14]

  40. McNeil SA, Noya F, Dionne M, et al. Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of concomitant and sequential administration of an adult formulation tetanus and diphtheria toxoids adsorbed combined with acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adults. Vaccine 2007 Apr 30; 25(17): 3464–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Klein NP, Hansen J, Lewis N, et al. Post-marketing safety evaluation of a tetanus toxoid, reduced diptheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine administered to a cohort of adolescents in a U.S. health maintenance organization [abstract no. G-2085 plus poster]. 48th Annual Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and 46th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2008 Oct 25-28; Washington, DC

  42. Weston W, Friedland L, Howe B. Reactogenicity of concomitant and separately administered Tdap and MCV4 vaccines [poster no. G-1700]. 47th Interscience Conference of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 2007 Sep 17-20; Chicago (IL)

  43. GlaxoSmithKline. Study no.: 104154 (Tdap 0.3-005). Phase IV, open, prospective study of the safety of GSK Biologicals' Boostrix® (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoide and acellular pertussis vaccine, adsorbed) administered to a cohort of adolescents in a US health maintenance organization (HMO) (Post-Marketing Boostrix Safety Study) [online]. Available from URL:http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com[Accessed 2009 Jun 9]

  44. Centers for Disease Control. Prevention of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria among pregnant and postpartum women and their infants recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2008 May 30; 57(RR-4): 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  45. McIntyre PB, Burgess MA, Egan A, et al. Booster vaccination of adults with reduced-antigen-content diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine: immunogenicity 5 years post-vaccination. Vaccine 2009 Feb 11; 27(7): 1062–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Edelman K, He Q, Mäkinen J, et al. Immunity to pertussis 5 years after booster immunization during adolescence. Clin Infect Dis 2007 May 15; 44(10): 1271–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mitka M. Age range widens for pertussis vaccine: boosters advised for adolescents and adults. JAMA 2006 Feb 22; 295(8): 871–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Centers for Disease Control. Vaccination coverage among U.S. adults national immunization survery — adult, 2007 [online]. Available from URL:http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/stats-surv/nis/downloads/nis-adult-summer-2007.pdf[Accessed 2009 Apr 14]

  49. Centers for Disease Control. Vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years — United States, 2007 [published erratum appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009 Jan 16; 58 (1): 10]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008 Oct 10; 57(40): 1100–3

    Google Scholar 

  50. Centers for Disease Control. Recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0 through 18 years United States, 2009 [published erratum appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009 Jan 9; 57 (53): 1419]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009 Jan 2; 57(51 and 52): Q1–4

    Google Scholar 

  51. Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of co-administered HPV vaccine with other vaccines in healthy female subjects [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00369824]. US National Institutes of Health, ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available from URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov[Accessed 2009 Aug 6]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg L. Plosker.

Additional information

The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plosker, G.L. Combined, Reduced-Antigen Content Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine (Boostrix®). BioDrugs 23, 253–267 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2165/11202770-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11202770-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation