Abstract
Background and objectives:
Several studies have shown that treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD) does not meet the goals set in recommendations. The aim of this study was to investigate the adequacy of CHD drug treatment and secondary prevention measures, particularly with respect to age and gender biases, in a Finnish university hospital setting.
Methods:
The participant pool consisted of patients in FINCAVAS (Finnish Cardiovascular Study), which is a cohort study recruiting consecutive patients performing a clinical exercise test at Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 802 patients (581 men, 221 women) with a prior diagnosis of CHD recruited between October 2001 and December 2004 were included in the analysis.
Results:
Only roughly 12% of both men and women had an optimal risk factor profile. High blood pressure and hypercholesterolaemia were more common in women than in men, whereas smoking was more frequent among men. Men used ACE inhibitors (32.9% vs 20.4%, respectively), β-adrenoceptor antagonists (80.8% vs 68.3%, respectively) and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) [69.7% vs 58.8%, respectively] more frequently than women, but the frequency of use of these medications was also not at the recommended levels in men. Risk factor control is poorer in older than younger age groups.
Conclusions:
CHD patients, particularly women, who performed an exercise stress test in a university hospital are suboptimally treated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pyörälä K, De Backer G, Graham I, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension. Eur Heart J 1994 Oct; 15(10): 1300–31
Wood D, De Backer G, Faergeman O, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: summary of recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. J Hypertens 1998 Oct; 16(10): 1407–14
De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2003 Sep; 24(17): 1601–10
Finnish Current Care Guidelines [online]. Available from URL: http://www.kaypahoito.fi [Accessed 2007 Aug 15]
SmithJr SC, Blair SN, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACC Scientific Statement: AHA/ACC guidelines for preventing heart attack and death in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: 2001 update. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2001 Sep 25; 104(13): 1577–9
Smith Jr SC, Allen J, Blair SN, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation 2006 May 16; 113(19): 2363–72
Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Agostoni P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50,279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2006 Nov; 27(22): 2667–74
Dornbrook-Lavender KA, Roth MT, Pieper JA. Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in the elderly. Ann Pharmacother 2003 Dec; 37(12): 1867–76
9. EUROASPIRE II Study Group. Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries: principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J 2001 Apr; 22(7): 554–72
Bowker TJ, Clayton TC, Ingham J, et al. A British Cardiac Society survey of the potential for the secondary prevention of coronary disease: ASPIRE (Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events). Heart 1996 Apr; 75(4): 334–42
Magnani B, Dal Palu C, Zanchetti A. Current standard of care in patients affected by coronary heart disease in Italy: the MC’95 study. Ital Heart J 2002 Feb; 3(2): 86–95
Sigurdsson EL, Jonsson JS, Thorgeirsson G. Medical treatment and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in general practice in Iceland. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002 Mar; 20(1): 10–5
Boersma E, Keil U, De Bacquer D, et al. Blood pressure is insufficiently controlled in European patients with established coronary heart disease. J Hypertens 2003 Oct; 21(10): 1831–40
Wood D. The treatment potential in preventive cardiology. Atherosclerosis 2001 Feb; 2Suppl. 1: 3–8
15. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Lancet 2001 Mar 31; 357(9261): 995–1001
Kattainen A, Salomaa V, Jula A, et al. Gender differences in the treatment and secondary prevention of CHD at population level. Scand Cardiovasc J 2005 Dec; 39(6): 327–33
Nieminen T, Lehtinen R, Viik J, et al. The Finnish Cardiovascular Study (FINCAVAS): characterising patients with high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2006; Mar 3: 6
Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P, et al. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement investigators. N Engl J Med 1991 Jul 25; 325(4): 226–30
Wenger NK. Clinical characteristics of coronary heart disease in women: emphasis on gender differences. Cardiovasc Res 2002 Feb 15; 53(3): 558–67
Kuhn FE, Rackley CE. Coronary artery disease in women: risk factors, evaluation, treatment, and prevention. Arch Intern Med 1993 Dec 13; 153(23): 2626–36
Jousilahti P, Vartiainen E, Tuomilehto J, et al. Sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary heart disease: a prospective follow-up study of 14 786 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Circulation 1999 Mar 9; 99(9): 1165–72
Antikainen R, Jousilahti P, Tuomilehto J. Systolic blood pressure, isolated systolic hypertension and risk of coronary heart disease, strokes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in the middle-aged population. J Hypertens 1998 May; 16(5): 577–83
Quan A, Kerlikowske K, Gueyffier F, et al. Efficacy of treating hypertension in women. J Gen Intern Med 1999 Dec; 14(12): 718–29
Kattainen A, Salomaa V, Härkänen T, et al. Coronary heart disease: from a disease of middle-aged men in the late 1970s to a disease of elderly women in the 2000s. Eur Heart J 2006 Feb; 27(3): 296–301
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this study was received from the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, the Academy of Finland (grant no. 104821), the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Finland and the Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation.
The authors wish to thank the staff of the Department of Clinical Physiology for collecting the data used in the present study. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michou, SM., Kähönen, M., Lehtimäki, T. et al. Age and Gender Biases in Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in a Finnish University Hospital Setting. Clin. Drug Investig. 27, 673–681 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200727100-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200727100-00002