Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction to the Pharmacoeconomics of Herbal Medicines

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the need to perform pharmacoeconomic evaluations of herbal medicines and assesses the extent to which this approach has been applied so far to these products. There seems to be no compelling need for pharmacoeconomic analyses of herbal over-the-counter medicines, but such analyses are certainly warranted for herbal prescription medicines that have a high level of reimbursement. Such preparations are used in Germany, in particular, where physicians prescribed ginkgo, hawthorn, St John’s wort, horse-chestnut and saw palmetto to a value of more than DM50 million each in 1996.

In our survey, only a single pharmacoeconomic study, of uncertain quality, was found on these 5 herbs, whereas several pharmacoeconomic reports on synthetic competitors were retrieved. The time has come to submit highly reimbursed herbal prescription medicines to the same rigorous pharmacoeconomic evaluations as their synthetic competitors. At present, such studies are particularly important for Germany, but in the future they may also become relevant for other countries, inside as well as outside Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Table VI
Table VII

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to a follow-up survey on the use of alternative medicine in the US in 1997, the percentage of respondents who had used a herbal medicine in the past 12 months had increased to asmuch as 12%, and 15%of these users had seen an alternative medicine practitioner.[8]

References

  1. Sheehan MP, Rustin MH, Atherton DJ, et al. Efficacy of traditional Chinese herbal therapy in adult atopic dermatitis. Lancet 1992; 340: 13–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De Smet PAGM. The role of plant-derived drugs and herbal medicines in health care. Drugs 1997; 54: 801–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Smet PAGM, Brouwers JRBJ. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of herbal remedies: basic introduction, applicability, current status and regulatory needs. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997; 32 (6): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Smet PAGM. Health risks of herbal remedies. Drug Saf 1995; 13: 81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Smet PAGM. Adverse effects of herbal remedies. Adv Drug React Bull 1997; 183: 695–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Smet PAGM, Stricker BH, Nijman JJ. Indirecte risico’s van alternatieve middelen: een oproep tot het rapporteren van concrete gevallen. Med Contact 1994; 49: 1593–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, et al. Unconventional medicine in the United States: prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 246–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA 1998; 280: 1569–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW. Prevalence and cost of alternative medicine in Australia. Lancet 1996; 347: 569–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. World herbal medicine market estimates. Scrip 1993 May 21; 1822: 22

    Google Scholar 

  11. Who’s doing what in herbal medicines. Marketletter 1992 Aug 24: 24–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. Traditional medicine. Fact Sheet N 134. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996 Sep. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/inf-fs/en/fact134.html [Accessed 2000 Jan 19]

  13. Germany leads in branded phytomedicines. OTC Bulletin 1996 Jun 14: 15

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlsten A, Wennberg M, Bergendal L. The influence of Rx-to-OTC changes on drug sales: experiences from Sweden 1980- 1994. J Clin Pharm Ther 1996; 21: 423–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spence JD, Huff MW, Heidenheim P, et al. Combination therapy with colestipol and psyllium mucilloid in patients with hyperlipidemia. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 493–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwabe U, red. Arzneiverordnungs-Report ’97. Aktuelle Daten, Kosten, Trends und Kommentare. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wimo A, Karlsson G, Nordberg A, et al. Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with tacrine: a cost-analysis model. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997; 11: 191–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Henke CJ, Burchmore MJ. The economic impact of the tacrine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Ther 1997; 19: 330–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gillings DB. Pentoxifylline and intermittent claudication: review of clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1995; 25 Suppl. 2: S44–50

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsevat J, Duke D, Goldman L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of captopril therapy after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 914–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McMurray JJ, McGuire A, Davie AP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of different ACE inhibitor treatment scenarios post-myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1411–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Szucs TD. Pharmacoeconomics of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 272–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sclar DA, Robison LM, Skaer TL, et al. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy: economic outcomes in a health maintenance organization. Clin Ther 1994; 16: 715–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Simon GE, VonKorff M, Heiligenstein JH, et al. Initial antidepressant choice in primary care: effectiveness and cost of fluoxetine vs tricyclic antidepressants. JAMA 1996; 275: 1897–902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Revicki DA, Brown RE, Keller MB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of newer antidepressants compared with tricyclic antidepressants in managed care settings. J Clin Psychiatry 1997; 58: 47–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lowe FC, McDaniel RL, Chmiel JJ, et al. Economic modeling to assess the costs of treatment with finasteride, terazosin, and transurethral resection of the prostate for men with moderate to severe symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1995; 46: 477–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ilker Y, Tarcan T, Akdas A. Economics of different treatment options of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Turkey. Int Urol Nephrol 1996; 28: 525–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hillman AL, Schwartz JS, Willian MK, et al. The cost-effectiveness of terazosin and placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1996; 47: 169–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rychlik R, Marshall M, Bachinger A, et al. Ökonomische Aspekte der Therapie der chronisch venösen Insuffizienz. Gesundh ökon. Qual Manag 1997; 2: 86–91

    Google Scholar 

  30. Diehm C, Trampisch HJ, Lange S, et al. Comparison of leg compression stocking and oral horse-chestnut seed extract therapy in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Lancet 1996; 347: 292–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Switzerland reimburses St John’s wort. Scrip 1998 Jan 23; 2303: 4

    Google Scholar 

  32. World self-medication sales up 2%. Scrip 1998 Apr 10; 2325: 16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. G. M. De Smet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Smet, P.A.G.M., Bonsel, G., Van der Kuy, A. et al. Introduction to the Pharmacoeconomics of Herbal Medicines. Pharmacoeconomics 18, 1–7 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200018010-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200018010-00001

Keywords

Navigation