Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards an Ideal Rowing Technique for Performance

The Contributions from Biomechanics

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At international standard, sculling (two oars) and rowing (one oar) are competed on-water over 2000m. Race time is the critical measure of performance and is determined from mean skiff velocity during a race. Although a high proportion of race training is completed on-water, rowing ergometers are commonly used for performance testing, technique coaching, crew selection or for training during poor weather. Rowing biomechanics research has aimed to identify characteristics of successful sculling and sweep rowing strokes; however, biomechanical predictors of 2000m rowing performance are indistinct in the literature. If specific biomechanical parameters distinguish between ability levels and successful or unsuccessful techniques, these attributes can be considered when modifying technique or predicting future rowing performance. The kinematics and kinetics of the sculling and rowing movements have been described on ergometers, on-water and for novice and elite male and female rowers, but there is limited research on the ideal technique or how a rower’s anthropometry or boat set-up could help improve/optimise their rowing performance. Currently viewing the technique and providing verbal feedback is the primary tool used by a coach to help improve a rower’s technique and performance. The greater use of customised telemetered sensors on the rowing skiff can assist the coach and biomechanist with judging when performance (skiff velocity) improves with some form of intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schabort EJ, Hawley JA, Hopkins W, et al. High reliability of performance of well-trained rowers on a rowing ergometer. J Sports Sci 1999; 17(8): 627–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin TP, Bernfield YS. Effect of stroke rate on velocity of a rowing shell. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980; 12(4): 250–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McBride ME. The role of individual and crew technique in the optimisation of boat velocity in rowing. Perth: University of Western Australia, Department of Human Movement, 1998: 180

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott BC, Lyttle A, Birkett O. The RowPerfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. Sports Biomech 2002; 1(2): 123–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buck DP, Smith RM, Sinclair PJ. Peak ergometer handle and foot stretcher force on concept II and RowPerfect rowing ergometers. 18th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sport; 2000 Jun 25; Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hartmann U, Mader A, Wasser K, et al. Peak force, velocity, and power during five and ten maximal rowing ergometer strokes by world class female and male rowers. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14Suppl. 1: S42–S5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith RM, Spinks WL. Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers. J Sports Sci 1995; 13(5): 377–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Korndle H, Lippens V. Do rowers have a particular ‘footwriting’? In: Biomechanics in sport. London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1988: 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith R, Draper C. Quantitative characteristic of coxless pairoar rowing. XXth International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 2002 Jul 1; Caceres. Caceres: Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jurimae J, Jurimae T, Maestu J, et al. Prediction of 2000 metre rowing performance in single scullers using indices of aerobic and anaerobic power. IOC World Congress on Sport Sciences; 1999 Oct 31; Sydney. Fifth IOC World Congress on Sport Sciences: book of abstracts. Canberra: Sports Medicine Australia, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hagerman FC. Applied physiology of rowing. Sports Med 1984; 1(4): 303–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hollings S, Robson G, Hadfield L, et al. Lactic acid and power output: a comparison between New Zealand elite and colt rowers. N Z J Sports Med 1989; 17(1): 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klusiewicz A, Zdanowicz R, Borkowski L, et al. Sport-specific performance capacity of male and female junior rowers. Biol Sport 1992; 9(4): 159–68

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mickelson TC, Hagerman FC. Anaerobic threshold measurements of elite oarsmen. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14(6): 440–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Russell AP, Le-Rossignol PF, Sparrow WA. Prediction of elite schoolboy 2000m rowing ergometer performance from metabolic, anthropometric and strength variables. J Sports Sci 1998; 16(8): 749–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourgois J, Claessens AL, Vrijens J, et al. Anthropometric characteristics of elite male junior rowers. Br J Sports Med 2000; 34(3): 213–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn A. Identification and selection of talent in Australian rowing. Excel 1990; 6(3): 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maestu J, Jurimae J. Anthropometrical and physiological factors of rowing performance: a review. Acta Kinesiol Univ Tartuensis 2000; 5: 130–50

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hay JG. Rowing: an analysis of the New Zealand Olympic selection tests. N Z J Health Phys Educ Recreation 1968; 1: 83–90

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cosgrove MJ, Wilson J, Watt D, et al. The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2000m ergometer test. J Sports Sci 1999; 17(11): 845–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jurimae J, Maestu J, Jurimae T. Prediction of rowing performance on single sculls from metabolic and anthropometric variables. J Hum Move Stud 2000; 38(3): 123–36

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maestu J, Jurimae J. Physiological determinants of rowing performance. Acta Kinesiol Univ Tartuensis 2001; 6 Suppl.: 164–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bourgois J, Claessens AL, Janssens M, et al. Anthropometric characteristics of elite female junior rowers. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 195–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dal Monte A, Komor A. Rowing and sculling mechanics. In: Vaughan CL, editor. Biomechanics of sport. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, 1989: 53–119

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nolte V. Introduction to the biomechanics of rowing. FISA Coach 1991; 2(1): 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bompa TO. Technique and muscle force. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1980; 5(4): 245–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lamb DH. A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17(3): 367–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleshnev V, Kleshnev I. Dependence of rowing performance and efficiency on motor coordination of the main body segments. J Sports Sci 1998; 16(5): 418–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson WN, Widule CJ. Kinematic analysis and efficiency estimate of intercollegiate female rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15(6): 535–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hume PA, Soper C. Segmental sequencing reports. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, 2001: 2

    Google Scholar 

  31. Torres-Moreno R, Tanaka C, Penney KL. Joint excursion, handle velocity, and applied force: a biomechanical analysis of ergonometric rowing. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21(1): 41–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Loschner C, Smith R. The relationship between pin forces and individual feet forces applied during sculling. Third Australasian Biomechanics Conference (ABC3); 2000 Jan 31; Southport. Southport (QLD): Griffith University School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schneider E, Angst F, Brandt JD. Biomechanics in rowing. In: Asmussen E, Jorgensen K, editors. Biomechanics VI-B. Copenhagen: University Park Press, 1978: 115–9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zatsiorsky VM, Yakunin N. Mechanics and biomechanics of rowing: a review. Int J Sport Biomech 1991; 7: 229–81

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fukunaga T. Biomechanical approach of rowing in Japan. Proceedings of the 13th FISA Coaches Conference; 1984; Cologne, 186–208

  36. Ackland TR, Kerr D, Hume PA, et al. Anthropometric normative data for Olympic rowers and paddlers. In: 2001: a sports medicine Odyssey: challenges, controversies and change. Perth: Australian Conference of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hume PA, Soper C, Joe GM, et al. Effects of foot-stretcher angle on the drive phase in ergometer rowing. 2000 Pre-Olympic Congress; 2000 Sep 7; Brisbane

  38. Smith R, Loschner C. Biomechanics feedback for rowing. J Sports Sci 2002; 20(10): 783–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McBride ME, Elliott BC. Use of real-time telemetry to monitor instantaneous seat and boat velocity in pair oared rowing. XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1999 Jun 30–Jul 6; Perth. Perth: Edith Cowan University, School of Biomedical and Sports Science, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spinks WL. Force angle profile analysis in rowing. J Hum Move Stud 1996; 31(5): 211–33

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baird D, Soroka WW. Measurement of force-time relations in racing skills. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1951: 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cameron A. Some mechanical aspects of rowing. In: Williams JGP, Scott AC, editors. Rowing: a scientific approach. London: Kaye and Ward, 1967: 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  43. Doyle M, Lyttle AD, Elliott BC, et al. Quantifying the hand-curve and oarlock force for determining the difference between experienced and elite male sweep rowers. XXth International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 2002 Feb 1; Caceres. Caceres: Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shakespear P. Identification and selection of talent in rowing. Sports Coach 1980; 4(4): 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wing AM, Woodburn C. The coordination and consistency of rowers in a racing eight. J Sports Sci 1995; 13(3): 187–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Christov R, Christov R, Zdravkov N. Selection and testing system based on biomechanical studies in racing boats and on rowing ergometer. FISA Coaches Conference; 1988; Limerick

  47. Mason BR, Shakespear PB, Doherty P. The use of biomechanical analysis in rowing to monitor the effect of training. Excel 1988; 4(4): 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  48. Martindale WO, Robertson DGE. Mechanical energy in sculling an in rowing an ergometer. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1984; 9: 153–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schneider E, Hauser M. Biomechanical analysis of performances in rowing. International Congress of Biomechanics; 1979 Sep; Warsaw. Baltimore (MD): Polen University Park Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  50. Struble KR, Erdman AG, Stoner LJ. Kinematic analysis of rowing and rowing simulators. International Conference on Medical Devices and Sports Equipment; 1980 Aug 18; San Francisco

  51. Henry JC, Clark RR, McCabe RP, et al. An evaluation of instrumented tank rowing for objective assessment of rowing performance. J Sports Sci 1995; 13(3): 199–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Cumming GR, Alexander WD. The calibration of bicycle ergometers. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1968; 46: 917–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hahn A, Tumilty D, Shakespear PB, et al. Physiological testing of oarswomen on Gjessing and Concept II rowing ergometers. Excel 1988; 5(1): 19–22

    Google Scholar 

  54. Colloud F, Champely S, Bahuaud P, et al. Kinematic symmetry in rowing: comparison of fixed stretcher versus free-floating ergometer. XXth International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 2002 Feb 1; Caceres. Caceres: Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mahony N, Donne B, O’Brien M. A comparison of physiological responses to rowing on friction-loaded and air-braked ergometers. J Sports Sci 1999; 17(2): 143–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Bell GJ, Syrotiuk DG, Attwood K, et al. Maintenance of strength gains while performing endurance training in oarswomen. Can J Appl Physiol 1993; 18(1): 104–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lormes W, Buckwitz R, Rehbein H, et al. Performance and blood lactate on Gjessing and Concept II rowing ergometer. Int J Sport Med 1993; 14Suppl. 1: S29–31

    Google Scholar 

  58. McKenzie DC, Rhodes EC. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses to exercise on a rowing ergometer. Aust J Sports Med 1982; 14(1): 21–3

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tumilty D, Hahn A, Telford R. Effect of test protocol, ergometer type and state of training on peak oxygen uptake or rowers. Excel 1987; 3(3): 12–4

    Google Scholar 

  60. Peltonen J, Rusko H. Interrelations between power, force production and energy metabolism in maximal leg work using a modified rowing ergometer. J Sports Sci 1993; 11(3): 233–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Soper C, Hume PA. Reliability of power output changes with ergometer type and race distance. Sports Biomechanics 2004; 3(2): 237–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ryan-Tanner R, Hahn A, Lawton E, et al. A comparison of ‘performance’ during on-water racing and ergometer rowing [abstract]. 5th IOC World Congress on Sport Sciences; 1999 Oct 31; Sydney. Sydney: Sports Medicine Australia, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rekers CJN. Verification of the ROWPERFECT ergometer. A.R. A Senior Rowing Conference; 1993 Oct 2; London

  64. Herberger E. Equipment. In: Klavora P, editor. Rowing: the GDR text of oarsmanship. 4th ed. Toronto (ON): Sport Book Publisher, 1990: 235

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pope DL. On the dynamics of men and boats and oars. In: Mechanics and sport. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1973: 113–30

    Google Scholar 

  66. Affeld K, Schichl K, Ziemann A. Assessment of rowing efficiency. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14Suppl. 1: S39–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Aujouannet Y, Rouard A. Kinetic study of cycle phases in rowing. Proceedings from the International Society of Biomechanics Conference; 2001 Jul 8; Zurich. Zurich: Interrepro AG, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  68. Celentano F, Cortili G, di-Prampero PE, et al. Mechanical aspects of rowing. J Appl Physiol 1974; 36(6): 642–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Simeoni RJ, Barrett R, Manning JM. A coxless pair rowing velocity profile calculated for a reduced catch angle. Third Australasian Biomechanics Conference (ABC3); 2000 Oct 31; Southport. Southport (QLD): Griffith University School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  70. Loschner C, Smith R, Galloway M. Boat orientation and skill level in sculling boats. XVIII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 2000 Jun 25; Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sanderson B, Martindale W. Towards optimizing rowing technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986; 18(4): 454–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Kyröläinen H, Smith R. Mechanical power output and muscle activities during maximal rowing with different stroke rates. J Hum Move Stud 1999; 36: 75–94

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hawkins D. A new instrumentation system for training rowers. J Biomech 2000; 33: 241–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Halliday SE, Zavatsky AB, Andrews BJ, et al. Kinematics of the upper and lower extremities in three-dimensions during ergometer rowing. Proceedings from the International Society of Biomechanics Conference; 2001 Jul 8; Zurich. Zurich: Interrepro AG, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  75. Struble KR, Erdman AG, Stoner LJ. Computer-aided kinematic analysis of rowing. International Congress of Biomechanics; 1979 Sep; Warsaw. Baltimore (MD): Polen University Park Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  76. Munro CL. The force on the lower back during rowing performance. Dunedin: University of Otago, School of Physical Education, 2001: 129

    Google Scholar 

  77. Smith RM, Spinks WL. A system for the biomechanical assessment of rowing performance (Rowsys). J Hum Move Stud 1998; 34: 141–57

    Google Scholar 

  78. Manning JM. A method of presenting segmental interaction of the rowing stroke. Third Australasian Biomechanics Conference (ABC3); 2000 Jan 31; Southport. Southport (QLD): Griffith University School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  79. Boland A, Hosea T. Rowing and sculling of the older athlete. Clin Sports Med 1991; 10(1): 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hosea T, Boland A, McCarthy K, et al. Rowing injuries: postgraduate advances in sports medicine. Philadelphia (PA): Forum Medicum Inc., 1989

    Google Scholar 

  81. Howell DW. Musculoskeletal profile and incidence of musculoskeletal injuries in lightweight women rowers. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12(4): 278–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Reid D, McNair P. Factors contributing to low back pain in rowers. Br J Sports Med 2000; 34: 321–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Roy B. Temporal and dynamic factors of long distance running. Seventh International Congress of Biomechanics; 1981; Warsaw. Baltimore (MD): University Park Press, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stallard M. The challenge of rowers backache. Sport Med Today 1999; 1(2): 53–5

    Google Scholar 

  85. Williams JGP. Some biomechanical aspects of rowing. In: Williams JGP, Scott AC, editors. Rowing: a scientific approach. London: Kaye & Ward Ltd, 1967: 81–109

    Google Scholar 

  86. Redgrave S. Complete book of rowing. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. London: Partridge Press, 1995: 298

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dawson RG, Lockwook RJ, Wilson JD, et al. The rowing cycle: sources of variance and invariance in ergometer and on-the-water performance. J Mot Behav 1998; 33(1): 33–43

    Google Scholar 

  88. Herzog W. Muscle. In: Nigg BM, Herzog W, editors. Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1994: 154–90

    Google Scholar 

  89. Millward A. A study of the forces exerted by an oarsman and the effect on boat speed. J Sports Sci 1987; 5(2): 93–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Roth W, Schwanitz P, Pas P, et al. Force-time characteristics of the rowing stroke and corresponding physiological muscle adaptations. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14Suppl. 1: S32–S4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Ishiko T, Ito S. Kinesiological study rowing. Tokyo: International Congress of Sports Science, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  92. Smith R, Galloway M, Patton R. Analysing on-water rowing performance. Sports Coach 1994 Jul–Sep: 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  93. Loschner C, Smith R, Mattes K. The influence of transverse pin forces on boat acceleration in rowing. Proceedings from the International Society of Biomechanics Conference; 2001 Jul 8; Zurich. Zurich: Interrepro AG, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ishiko T. Biomechanics of rowing. Med Sport 1971; 6: 249–52

    Google Scholar 

  95. MacFarlane DJ, Edmond IM, Walmsley A. Instrumentation of an ergometer to monitor the reliability of rowing performance. J Sports Sci 1997; 15(2): 167–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Klavora B. Effect of various leg positions at the catch on the force of the rowing strokes. Thunder Bay (ON): Lakehead University, 1978: 69

    Google Scholar 

  97. Korner T. Force patterns on the oarlock: part 2. Catch 1983: 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  98. Dwyer JM. Hydrodynamics of rowing. Catch 1983: 28–9

    Google Scholar 

  99. Smith R, Spinks WL. Biomechanical factors in the analysis of rowing capacity and skill. Australian Sports Medicine Federation National Scientific Conference; 1988; Sydney, 77–86

  100. Turner D, Sacco P. Force and electromyographic (EMG) relationships of leg extensors during. XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1999 Jun 30–Jul 6; Perth. Perth: School of Biomedical and Sports Science, Edith Cowan University, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  101. Wilson JMJ, Robertson DGE, Stothart JP. Analysis of lower limb muscle function in ergometer rowing. Int J Sport Biomech 1988; 4: 315–25

    Google Scholar 

  102. Rodriguez RJ, Rogriguez RP, Cook SD, et al. Electromyographic analysis of rowing stroke biomechanics. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1990; 30(1): 103–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Jaszczak M. Class of rower and strength potential utilisation during rowing on ergometer. Proceedings from the International Society of Biomechanics Conference; 2001 Jul 8; Zurich. Zurich: Interrepro AG, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  104. Gregor RJ, Broker JP, Ryan MM. Biomechanics of cycling. Exerc Sports Sci Rev 1991; 19: 127–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Carter JEL, editor. Somatotypes of Olympic athletes from 1948 to 1976. Physical structure of Olympic athletes, part II: kinanthropometry of Olympic athletes. Basel: Karger, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  106. Jurimae J, Jurimae T. A comparison of selected anthropometric, metabolic and hormone parameters in lightweight and open-class rowers. Biol Sport 2002; 19(2): 149–61

    Google Scholar 

  107. Hollings SC, Robson GJ. A profile of New Zealand elite rowers. N Z J Sports Med 1992; 20(4): 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  108. International Rowing Federation. FISA. Statutes and by-laws. Lausanne: FISA, 2001: 173

    Google Scholar 

  109. Croker Oars Pty Ltd [online]. Available from URL: http://www.crokeroars.com [Accessed 2002 Oct 21]

  110. Peach JP, Pelham TW, Carter AGW, et al. Analysis of selected kinematic variables in sculling rowing using macon and hatchet oars. International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports; 1995 Jul 18; Thunder Bay (ON)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are given to Dick Tonks (New Zealand National Rowing Coach), Karoline Cheung and Peggy McBride for their editorial views on this paper. Auckland University of Technology and Sport and Exercise Science New Zealand (SESNZ) provided funding for this project. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NZ Institute of Sport and Recreation, Division of Sport and Recreation, Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, New Zealand

    Clara Soper & Patria Anne Hume

Authors
  1. Clara Soper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patria Anne Hume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clara Soper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soper, C., Hume, P.A. Towards an Ideal Rowing Technique for Performance. Sports Med 34, 825–848 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200434120-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200434120-00003

Keywords

Search

Navigation