Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in the Management of Hypertension

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypertension is highly prevalent in developed and developing countries (more than 30% of the adult population when a threshold value of 140/90mm Hg is selected). It constitutes one of the major cardiovascular risk factors and accounts for more than 5% of total deaths worldwide.

The economic impact of hypertension is enormous, representing $US23.74 billion in the US in 1995 and approximately $US1685 million in Spain in 1994. Direct costs amount to more than 50% of the total costs of hypertension, and almost 70% of these are attributable to drug treatment. Furthermore, hypertensive patients use medical services 50% more than normotensive individuals, and hypertension represents one of the 3 leading causes of visits to primary healthcare centres.

When considering the cost effectiveness of hypertension treatment, there is no doubt that it is cost effective in comparison with other interventions, although some controversies exist, mainly with respect to mild-to-moderate hypertension and to the long term versus short term benefits. The controversy about the absolute risk of hypertension influences the cost-effectiveness analysis.

Because of the limitations of the available cost-effectiveness analyses, it is currently impossible to recommend the use of any particular antihypertensive drug for all patients with hypertension. Consequently, the choice of antihypertensive in any patient should be guided by clinical experience and the recommendations of the present international guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray CJL, López AD, editors. The global burden of disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gross CP, Anderson GF, Powe NR. The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. N EnglJ Med 1999; 340: 1881–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Brien E, Staessen JA. What is ‘hypertension’? Lancet 1999; 353: 1541–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hypertension Control. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 862. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pardell H, Armario P, Hernández R, et al. Hypertension. Epidemiology and cost of illness. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 1997; 1: 135–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension. 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines for the management of hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 151–83

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kannel WB. Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor. Prevention and treatment. JAMA 1996; 275: 1571–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Merrill RM, Kessler LG, Udler JM, et al. Comparison of risk estimates for selected diseases and causes of death. Prev Med 1999; 28: 179–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stamler J, Stamler R, Neaton JD. Blood pressure, systolic and disatolic, and cardiovascular risks: US population data. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 598–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thorn T. The economic costs of cardiovascular diseases in the United States, 1990. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dustan HP, Roccella EJ, Garrison HH. Controlling hypertension. A research success story. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 1926–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schauffer H, D’ Agostino R, Kannel WB. Risk for cardiovascular disease in the elderly and associated Medicare costs: The Framingham Study. Am J Prev Med 1993; 9: 146–54

    Google Scholar 

  13. Badia X, Rovira J, Tresserras R, et al. The cost of arterial hypertension in Spain. Med Clin (Barc) 1992; 99: 769–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pardell H, editor. Phannacoeconomics of arterial hypertension. Madrid: Spanish Society of Hypertension/Spanish League against Arterial Hypertension, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johannesson M, Jönsson B. Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment. A review of methodological issues. Health Policy 1991; 19: 55–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moser M. The cost of treating hypertension. Can we keep it under control without compromising the level of care? Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 120S–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johannesson M, Borgquist L, Jönsson B. The costs of treating hypertension in Sweden: an empirical investigation in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 1991; 9(3): 155–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawachi I, Malcolm LA. Treating mild to moderate hypertension. Cost-effectiveness and policy implications. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1990; 16 Suppl. 7: S126–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stason WB, Weinstein MC. Allocation of resources to manage hypertension. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 732–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Johannesson M. The cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Sweden. Phannacoeconomics 1995; 7: 242–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mosterd A, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, et al. Trends in the prevalence of hypertension, antihypertensive therapy, and left ventricular hypertrophy from 1950 to 1989. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1221–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. National Health Survey, 1995. Madrid: Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, 1996

  23. Christiansen T, Pedersen KM, Harvald B, et al. A health economic investigation of the effect of treatment for hypertension. Odense: Odense University Research Report 6, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ménard J, Cornu PH, Day M. Cost of hypertension treatment and the price of health. J Hum Hypertens 1992; 6: 447–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ambrosioni E, Costa FV. Cost-effectiveness calculations from trials. J Hypertens 1996; 14 Suppl. 2: S47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prieto M, de Abajo FJ, Montero D, et al. Antihypertensive drugs use in Spain, 1985–1995. Med Clin (Barc) 1998; 110: 247–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien B. Patterns of European diagnosis and prescribing. London: Office of Health Economics, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  28. OECD Health Data. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1997

  29. The National High Blood Pressure Education program. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1988

  30. Pardell H, Bohigas L. Economic perspective of the health problem of hypertension. In: Consulta SA, editor. International Society of Hypertension. 1988 Hypertension Yearbook. Barcelona: 1989 [Spanish edition]: 1–13

  31. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FFH. A practical guide for calculating indirect costs of disease. Phannacoeconomics 1996; 10: 460–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Russell LB. Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment. General considerations. Hypertension 1989; 13 (5 Suppl.): 1141–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MacMahon SW, Cutler JA, Furberg CD, et al. The effects of drug treatment for hypertension on morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease: a review of randomized controlled trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1986; 29 Suppl. 1: S99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Collins R, Peto R, MacMahon SW, et al. Blood pressure, stroke and coronary heart disease. Pt 2. Effects of short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 1990; 335: 827–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mancia G, Cattaneo BM, Omboni S, et al. Clinical benefits of a consistent reduction in blood pressure. J Hypertens 1998; 16 Suppl. 6: S35–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sytkowski PA, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, et al. Secular trends in long-term sustained hypertension, long-tenn treatment, and cardiovascular mortality. The Framingham Heart Study 1950 to 1990. Circulation 1996; 93: 697–703

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. MacMahon S, Cutler JA, Stamler J. Antihypertensive drug treatment. Potential, expected, and observed effects on stroke and on coronary heart disease. Hypertension 1989; 13 (5 Suppl.): 145–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsevat J, Weinstein MC, Williams LW, et al. Expected gains in life expectancy from various coronary heart disease risk factor modifications. Circulation 1991; 83: 1194–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Haapanen-Niemi N, Vuori I, Pasanen M. Public health burden of coronary heart disease risk factors among middle-aged and elderly men. Prev Med 1999; 28: 343–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zanchetti A, Mancia G. Editors’ corner: strategies for antihy-pertensive treatment decisions: how to assess benefits? J Hypertens 1997; 15: 215–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Madhavan S, Alderman MH. The potential effect of blood pressure reduction on cardiovascular disease. A cautionary note. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141: 1583–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ménard J, Chatellier G. Mild hypertension: the mysterious viability of a faulty concept. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1071–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Simpson FO. Guidelines for antihypertensive therapy: problems with a strategy based on absolute cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 683–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. MacMahon S. Guidelines for antihypertensive therapy. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 691–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zanchetti A, Mancia G. Editors’ corner: benefits and cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy. The actuarial versus the intervention trial approach. J Hypertens 1996; 14: 809–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Robson J. Information needed to decide about cardiovascular treatment in primary care. BMJ 1997; 314: 277–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Grover SA, Paquet S, Levinton C, et al. Estimating the benefits of modifying risk factors of cardiovascular disease. A comparison of primary prevention vs secondary prevention. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 655–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Alderman MH. Blood pressure management: individualized treatment based on absolute risk and the potential for benefit. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 329–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ambrosioni E, Costa FV. Cost-effectiveness calculations from trials. J Hypertens 1996; 14 Suppl. 2: S47–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zanchetti A. Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy: what message to patients and health services? J Hypertens 1998; 16 Suppl. 9: S21–3

    Google Scholar 

  51. Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Hypertension. A policy perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  52. Johannesson M, Jönsson B. A review of cost-effectiveness analyses of hypertension treatment. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 1: 250–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Johannesson M, Borgquist L, Jönsson B, et al. The costs of treating hypertension an analysis of different cut-off points. Health Policy 1991; 18: 141–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Maynard A. The economics of hypertension control: some basic issues. J Hum Hypertens 1992; 6: 417–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Field K, Thorogood M, Silagy C, et al. Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most costeffective? BMJ 1995; 310: 1109–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Cost-effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 40. BMJ 1998; 317: 720–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stason WB. Cost and quality trade-offs in the treatment of hypertension. Hypertension 1989; 13 (5 Suppl.): I145–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hilleman DE, Mohiuddin SM, Lucas D, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate essential diastolic hypertension. Clin Ther 1994; 16: 88–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Stason WB. Opportunities for improving the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy. Am J Med 1986; 81 Suppl. 6C: S45–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kawachi I, Malcolm LA. The cost-effectiveness of treating mild-to-moderate hypertension: a reappraisal. J Hypertens 1991; 9: 199–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Dickerson JEC, Hingorani A, Ashby MJ, et al. Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes. Lancet 1999; 353: 2008–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ramsay LE, ul Haq I, Yeo WW, et al. Interpretation of prospective trials in hypertension: do treatment guidelines accurately reflect current evidence? J Hypertens Suppl. 1996; 14(5): S187–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pardell, H., Tresserras, R., Armario, P. et al. Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in the Management of Hypertension. Drugs 59 (Suppl 2), 13–20 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200059002-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200059002-00002

Keywords

Navigation