Abstract
-
▴ Intranasal metoclopramide is a new formulation of an established and effective antiemetic drug.
-
▴ Absorption after intranasal administration was lower than after oral or intravenous administration; otherwise the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of the intranasal and parenteral formulations were similar.
-
▴ Intranasal and intramuscular metoclopramide showed similar efficacy in the control of acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in 12 patients. Intranasal metoclopramide 80mg significantly reduced the frequency of acute vomiting in 43 patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
-
▴ A pilot study suggested that intranasal metoclopramide, with or without dexamethasone, may reduce cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. In a randomised crossover trial in 40 patients, intranasal metoclopramide or oral metoclopramide, both with dexamethasone, were equally effective in the control of delayed emesis induced by moderately-emetogenic chemotherapy.
-
▴ One 30 patient study suggests that intranasal metoclopramide has similar efficacy to oral metoclopramide in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.
-
▴ A non-significant trend to reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting has been seen in two trials of intra-nasal metoclopramide.
-
▴ Intranasal metoclopramide caused minor irritation of the nasal membrane and unpleasant taste in some patients, but was otherwise well tolerated. None of the more serious extrapyramidal effects sometimes associated with metoclopramide were reported.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Italian Group for Antiemetic Research. Ondansetron versus metoclopramide, both combined with dexamethasone, in the prevention of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(1): 124–30
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP therapeutic guidelines on the pharmacologic management of nausea and vomiting in adult and pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy or undergoing surgery. Am J Health System Pharm 1999; 56: 729–64
Roila F, Ballatori E. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of various antiemetic regimens. Curr Opin Oncol 1998 Jul; 10: 310–5
Grunberg SM. Cost-effective use of antiemetics. Oncology Huntingt 1998 Mar; 12(3) Suppl. 4: 38–42
Citron ML, Reynolds JR, Kalra J, et al. Pharmacokinetic comparison of intranasal, oral, and intramuscular metoclopramide in healthy volunteers. Cancer Treat Rep 1987; 71(3): 317–9
Ward MJ, Buss DC, Ellershaw J, et al. Bioavailability of intranasal metoclopramide. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989 Nov; 28: 616–8
Scaglione F, Scanni A, Tomirotti M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of metoclopramide nasal spray versus metoclopramide intravenous in healthy volunteers and cancer patients. Arzneimittel Forschung 1993 Sep; 43(11): 986–8
Harrington RA, Hamilton CW, Brogden JA, et al. Metoclopramide. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use. Drugs 1983; 25(5): 451–94
Mitchelson F. Pharmacologic agents affecting emesis: a review (part I). Drugs 1992; 43(3): 295–315
Fozard JR, Mobarok Ali AT. Blockade of neuronal tryptamine receptors by metoclopramide. EurJPharmacol 1978; 49: 109–12
Ettinger DS. Preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: an update and a review of emesis. Semin Oncol 1995 Aug; 22 Suppl. 10: 6–18
Gralla RJ. A double-blind multiple dose study of the efficacy and safety of 20mg, 40mg and 80mg of intranasal metoclopramide compared to placebo in cancer patients treated with emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents. Crinos Industria Farmacobiologica S.p.A., Como, Italy, 1993, Report no. U-90-01. (Data on file)
Weber W, Pabst G, Dilger C, et al. Pharmacokinetics/Bioavailability evaluation of four metoclopramide preparations in 28 health volunteers. Naska Pharmacal Inc./RiboGene Inc.,Hayward CA, USA, 1991, Protocol no. 90762. (Data on file)
Kris MG, Gralla RJ, Clark RA, et al. Incidence, course and severity of delayed nausea and vomiting following the administration of high-dose cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3(10): 1379–84
Tavorath R, Hesketh PJ. Drug treatment of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis. Drugs 1996 Nov; 52(5): 639–48
DeMulder PHM, Seynaeve C, Vermorken JB, et al. Ondansetron compared with high-dose metoclopramide in prophylaxis of acute and delayed cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 834–40
Tomirotti M, Dimaiuta M, Confalonieri M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of nasally administered compared to parenterally administered metoclopramide in the symptomatic treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in cancer outpatients: a controlled clinical study. Support Care Cancer 1994 Nov; 2: 389–92
Eckhardt S, Ady N, Baki M, et al. A double-blind multiple dose parallel arm comparison of the antiemetic and antinausea efficacy and safety of 20mg and 40mg intranasal metoclopramide compared to placebo in cancer patients treated with emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents, a phase III clinical trial. Crinos Industria Farmacobiologica S.p.A., Como, Italy, 1991. Report no. U-90-02/A. (Data on file)
Bodrogi I, Baki M, Horti J, et al. A double-blind multiple dose parallel arm study of the antiemetic and antinausea efficay and safety of 20mg and 40mg intranasal metoclopramide compared to placebo in cancer patients treated with emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents. Crinos Industria Farmacobilogica S.p.A., Como, Italy, 1992. Report no. U-91-02BH. (Data on file)
Chiara S, Campora E, Rosso R. Controllo dell’emesi tardiva: studio randomizzato di confronta metoclopramide spray nasale + desametasone versus metoclopramide compresse + desametasone in pazienti riceventi chemioterapia a moderato potere emetizzante. Crinos Industria Farmacobiologica S.p.A., Como Italy, 1994. Protocol no. MCP 02/92. (Data on file)
Chiara S, Campora E, Simoni C, et al. Prevention of delayed emesis with metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic cytotoxic treatment. Anti-cancer Res 1995; 15: 1597–600
Locatelli MC, Pessi A, D’Antona A, et al. Tolerability and safety of nasally administered metoclopramide for the prevention of cis-platinum (CDDP)induced delayed emesis [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1995 Mar; 14: 533
Locatelli C, D’Antona A. Metoclopramide nasal spray in the prevention of delayed hyperemsis in neoplastic patients under cisplatin chemotherapy: uncontrolled pilot study. Crinos Industria Farmacobiologica S.p.A, Como, Italy, 1997. Protocol no. MCP 01/92. (Data on file)
Lin DM, Furst SR, Rodarte A. A double-blind comparison of metoclopramide and droperidol for prevention of emesis following strabismus surgery. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 357–61
Wagner BKJ, Berman SL, Devitt PA, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of intranasal metoclopramide in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Pharmacotherapy 1996 Nov–Dec; 16(6): 1063–9
Battito M, Khairallah P, Conroy J, et al. A double-blind, dose-finding study to assess the safety and efficacy of intranasal metoclopramide vs placebo in the treatment of postoperative nausea or vomiting. Crinos Industria Farmacobiologica S.p.A., Como, Italy, 1992. Protocol no. U-90-04A. (Data on file)
Bortoli A, Prada A, Confalonieri M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of metoclopramide nasal spray in the symptomatic therapy of functional dyspepsia. Curr Ther Res 1994; 55: 1192–200
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ormrod, D., Goa, K.L. Intranasal Metoclopramide. Drugs 58, 315–322 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199958020-00012
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199958020-00012