Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Vegetable Research Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
2 Plant Pathology Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
3 Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
Abstract
Keywords
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil during the two seasons of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016.
A. Physical properties |
||||||||||||||
Season |
Sand (%) |
Clay (%) |
Silt (%) |
Soil texture |
||||||||||
2014/2015 |
91.20 |
5.10 |
3.70 |
Sandy |
||||||||||
2015/2016 |
92.33 |
4.78 |
2.95 |
Sandy |
||||||||||
B. Chemical properties |
||||||||||||||
Season |
E.C. (mmohs/cm3) |
pH |
OM (%) |
CaCo3 (%) |
Cations ( Meq./L ) |
Anions ( Meq./L ) |
||||||||
Ca++ |
Mg++ |
Na+ |
K + |
CO3-- |
HCO3- |
Cl - |
SO4 -- |
|||||||
2014/2015 |
0.30 |
7.80 |
0.30 |
10.2 |
1.00 |
0.20 |
0.80 |
0.39 |
Nil |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.39 |
||
2015/2016 |
0.50 |
7.88 |
0.50 |
10.8 |
1.20 |
0.26 |
0.82 |
0.43 |
Nil |
1.10 |
1.20 |
0.41 |
||
Table 2. Chemical analysis of compost manure used in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016.
(2015/2016) |
(2014/2015) |
Mineral content |
2.46 |
2.20 |
N % |
1.80 |
0.91 |
P % |
2.37 |
1.40 |
K % |
7.40 |
4.29 |
C/N ratio |
46.5 |
28.1 |
D.M % |
27.00 |
16.3 |
O.C % |
0.90 |
1.10 |
Cd ppm |
0.92 |
0.89 |
F ppm |
17.48 |
17.20 |
Humidity |
1. |
Plant length (cm). |
2. |
Leaves number per plant. |
3. |
Branches numbers/ plant. |
4. |
Fresh weight of leaves, stems, pods and seeds (g/ plant). |
5. |
Dry weight of leaves, stems, pods and seeds (g/ plant). |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 3. Effect of cultivars on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans of pea plants during two seasons 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. |
|||||||||
Post-emergence damping off (%) |
Root rot disease incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
||||||
Cultivars |
Infection (%) |
After |
After |
|
|||||
30 day |
60 day |
|
|
||||||
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||
Little Marvel |
11.56 9.91 |
|
14.38 |
15.04 |
59.29 |
|
|
||
Master B |
|
11.91 |
9.47 |
63.38 |
|
|
|||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.02 |
|
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
|
|
||
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||||
Little Marvel |
14.14 |
|
14.80 |
15.01 |
56.10 |
|
|
||
Master B |
11.56 |
|
11.89 |
10.80 |
64.72 |
|
|
||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.02 |
|
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
|
|
||
Table 4. Effect of cultivars on vegetative growth and total fresh pods yield of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Cultivars |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
|||||
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
Little Marvel |
63.94 |
22.56 |
2.17 |
18.14 |
7.41 |
43.73 |
21.96 |
7.94 |
3.15 |
4.98 |
6.20 |
4.414 |
Master B |
64.90 |
25.88 |
2.71 |
24.02 |
6.99 |
63.13 |
37.00 |
9.32 |
3.37 |
5.98 |
11.08 |
6.728 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
N.S. |
0.94 |
N.S. |
0.28 |
N.S. |
1.06 |
0.92 |
0.32 |
N.S. |
0.13 |
0.11 |
0.090 |
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||||||
Little Marvel |
61.67 |
19.04 |
1.98 |
17.87 |
7.21 |
43.93 |
22.17 |
6.46 |
1.96 |
4.13 |
5.30 |
4.442 |
Master B |
62.06 |
21.94 |
2.38 |
20.47 |
7.44 |
53.40 |
31.97 |
7.85 |
2.06 |
4.94 |
7.53 |
5.737 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
N.S. |
0.68 |
N.S. |
0.85 |
N.S. |
0.41 |
0.69 |
0.16 |
N.S. |
0.07 |
0.10 |
0.041 |
Table 5. Effect of phosphorus levels on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans of pea plants during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 6. Effect of phosphorus levels on vegetative growth and total fresh pods yield of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
P levels |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
|||||
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
0 |
52.02 |
18.60 |
1.58 |
14.19 |
4.29 |
37.14 |
21.72 |
5.95 |
2.23 |
3.99 |
6.48 |
3.956 |
25 |
55.94 |
22.58 |
2.02 |
19.75 |
5.00 |
48.34 |
26.08 |
7.41 |
2.88 |
4.62 |
8.35 |
5.001 |
50 |
61.33 |
25.10 |
2.77 |
25.64 |
9.11 |
63.40 |
32.74 |
9.65 |
3.07 |
6.08 |
9.61 |
6.461 |
75 |
59.77 |
23.27 |
2.63 |
19.11 |
8.58 |
49.01 |
27.61 |
9.49 |
4.09 |
5.95 |
7.65 |
5.149 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
1.06 |
1.08 |
0.18 |
0.83 |
0.40 |
1.15 |
0.54 |
0.37 |
0.19 |
0.26 |
0.20 |
0.097 |
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||||||
0 |
51.38 |
15.10 |
1.71 |
15.52 |
5.79 |
36.21 |
20.35 |
5.33 |
1.32 |
3.45 |
4.73 |
3.80 |
25 |
55.85 |
18.19 |
1.79 |
17.59 |
6.64 |
43.53 |
23.84 |
6.15 |
1.84 |
3.95 |
6.27 |
4.53 |
50 |
58.27 |
21.13 |
2.46 |
19.86 |
7.43 |
49.43 |
28.26 |
7.40 |
2.07 |
4.29 |
7.10 |
5.22 |
75 |
54.04 |
19.29 |
2.06 |
17.25 |
6.76 |
46.08 |
24.97 |
6.85 |
2.05 |
4.58 |
5.41 |
4.77 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.50 |
0.37 |
0.16 |
1.41 |
0.18 |
1.06 |
0.71 |
0.13 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.23 |
0.094 |
Table 7. Effect of seed treatments on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans of pea plants during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Seed treatments
|
Post-emergence damping off (%) |
Root rot disease incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
|
|||||||
Infection (%) |
|
After 30 day |
After 60 day |
|
|
|
||||||
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|
||||||||||
Control |
17.19 |
|
19.42 |
18.40 |
40.40 |
|
|
|||||
Bio-priming |
3.63 |
|
6.09 |
5.00 |
86.13 |
|
|
|||||
Priming |
14.56 |
|
17.67 |
17.13 |
47.00 |
|
|
|||||
Seed coating |
7.56 |
|
9.40 |
8.50 |
71.81 |
|
|
|||||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.24 |
|
0.15 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
|
|
|||||
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|
||||||||||
Control |
19.02 |
|
20.10 |
19.21 |
41.29 |
|
|
|
||||
Bio-priming |
5.75 |
|
5.94 |
5.31 |
82.48 |
|
|
|
||||
Priming |
17.00 |
|
17.02 |
16.35 |
49.06 |
|
|
|
||||
Seed coating |
9.63 |
|
10.31 |
10.75 |
68.81 |
|
|
|
||||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.02 |
|
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
|
|
|
||||
Table 8. Effect of seed treatments on vegetative growth and total pods yield of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Seed treatments |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./plant |
Branches No./plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
|||||
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
Control |
57.21 |
14.63 |
1.50 |
11.24 |
3.63 |
31.63 |
19.52 |
4.03 |
1.55 |
2.54 |
4.97 |
3.438 |
Bio-priming |
70.83 |
35.00 |
3.46 |
31.26 |
11.40 |
80.64 |
40.08 |
12.82 |
5.51 |
8.35 |
12.37 |
8.112 |
Priming |
63.04 |
19.21 |
2.17 |
16.42 |
5.49 |
45.16 |
27.74 |
7.00 |
2.27 |
4.80 |
7.72 |
4.899 |
Seed coating |
66.58 |
28.04 |
2.63 |
25.39 |
8.28 |
56.28 |
30.58 |
10.66 |
3.71 |
6.22 |
9.52 |
5.837 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
1.09 |
1.21 |
0.22 |
1.26 |
0.41 |
1.57 |
0.79 |
0.38 |
0.28 |
0.43 |
0.24 |
0.113 |
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||||||
Control |
55.83 |
16.50 |
1.38 |
12.92 |
5.37 |
38.84 |
21.72 |
5.76 |
1.52 |
3.70 |
4.29 |
4.069 |
Bio-priming |
68.17 |
25.08 |
2.96 |
24.90 |
9.10 |
58.77 |
34.68 |
8.25 |
2.38 |
5.30 |
9.74 |
6.280 |
Priming |
59.96 |
19.25 |
2.00 |
17.95 |
6.43 |
45.48 |
24.60 |
6.90 |
2.00 |
4.45 |
5.14 |
4.709 |
Seed coating |
63.50 |
21.13 |
2.38 |
20.91 |
8.41 |
51.59 |
27.28 |
7.69 |
2.13 |
4.69 |
6.49 |
5.300 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.74 |
0.50 |
0.21 |
1.90 |
0.22 |
1.16 |
1.05 |
0.21 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.22 |
0.107 |
Table 9. Effect of the interaction between cultivars and phosphors levels on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plan percentage of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Cultivars |
Phosphors levels |
Post-emergence damping off (%) |
Root rot disease incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
|||
Infection (%) |
|
After 30 day |
After 60 day |
|
|
|||
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||
Little Marvel |
0 |
13.50 |
|
16.44 |
16.92 |
53.42 |
|
|
25 |
12.00 |
|
15.13 |
15.50 |
57.75 |
|
|
|
50 |
10.88 |
|
13.71 |
14.50 |
61.00 |
|
|
|
75 |
9.88 |
|
12.25 |
13.25 |
65.00 |
|
|
|
Master B |
0 |
11.88 |
|
13.63 |
11.00 |
57.50 |
|
|
25 |
10.88 |
|
12.25 |
10.13 |
60.63 |
|
|
|
50 |
9.00 |
|
11.50 |
8.75 |
65.38 |
|
|
|
75 |
7.88 |
|
10.25 |
8.00 |
70.00 |
|
|
|
L.S.D at 0.05 |
N.S. |
|
N.S. |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||
Little Marvel |
0 |
16.42 |
|
17.83 |
17.29 |
48.71 |
|
|
25 |
15.13 |
|
15.75 |
16.25 |
52.88 |
|
|
|
50 |
12.88 |
|
13.13 |
13.63 |
60.33 |
|
|
|
75 |
12.13 |
|
12.50 |
12.88 |
62.50 |
|
|
|
Master B |
0 |
13.50 |
|
14.38 |
13.00 |
58.13 |
|
|
25 |
12.00 |
|
12.38 |
11.63 |
63.00 |
|
|
|
50 |
10.88 |
|
10.75 |
9.75 |
67.63 |
|
|
|
75 |
9.88 |
|
10.04 |
8.83 |
70.13 |
|
|
|
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.03 |
|
0.09 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
|
|
Table 10. Effect of the interaction between cultivars with phosphorus levels on vegetative growth and total fresh pods yield of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Cultivars
|
P levels |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
|||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
|||||||
|
|
First season (2014/2015) |
||||||||||||
|
0 |
56.42 |
14.75 |
1.50 |
11.48 |
3.58 |
30.41 |
16.24 |
4.58 |
1.84 |
3.05 |
4.87 |
3.135 |
|
Little |
25 |
61.33 |
17.83 |
1.67 |
15.81 |
4.44 |
34.75 |
16.39 |
5.70 |
2.00 |
3.75 |
6.06 |
3.437 |
|
Marvel |
50 |
68.83 |
30.08 |
2.83 |
24.96 |
11.37 |
60.72 |
23.61 |
10.54 |
3.31 |
6.42 |
6.48 |
5.667 |
|
|
75 |
69.17 |
27.58 |
2.67 |
20.32 |
10.26 |
49.05 |
31.60 |
10.92 |
5.47 |
6.69 |
7.40 |
5.419 |
|
|
0 |
59.92 |
25.17 |
1.92 |
18.51 |
5.66 |
48.38 |
30.42 |
7.83 |
2.92 |
5.49 |
9.19 |
5.296 |
|
Master |
25 |
64.08 |
31.17 |
2.75 |
26.26 |
6.24 |
68.31 |
40.09 |
10.26 |
4.16 |
5.92 |
11.80 |
7.284 |
|
B |
50 |
69.92 |
24.50 |
3.17 |
30.42 |
7.93 |
78.26 |
47.97 |
10.10 |
3.27 |
6.47 |
13.99 |
8.482 |
|
|
75 |
65.67 |
22.67 |
3.00 |
20.86 |
8.11 |
57.55 |
29.51 |
9.11 |
3.12 |
6.03 |
9.36 |
5.850 |
|
L.S.D at 0.05 |
1.83 |
1.87 |
N.S. |
1.43 |
0.70 |
2.00 |
0.93 |
0.63 |
0.32 |
0.45 |
0.34 |
0.167 |
||
|
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
||||||||||||
|
0 |
56.33 |
15.25 |
1.75 |
15.48 |
6.48 |
34.58 |
16.90 |
4.58 |
1.51 |
3.46 |
3.62 |
3.460 |
|
Little |
25 |
63.50 |
19.83 |
1.83 |
19.29 |
6.96 |
44.50 |
22.80 |
6.67 |
2.06 |
3.88 |
5.38 |
4.523 |
|
Marvel |
50 |
65.25 |
21.75 |
2.25 |
19.20 |
8.13 |
49.33 |
24.56 |
7.19 |
2.15 |
4.43 |
6.20 |
4.966 |
|
|
75 |
61.58 |
19.33 |
2.08 |
17.52 |
7.27 |
47.32 |
24.41 |
7.38 |
2.13 |
4.75 |
6.01 |
4.820 |
|
|
0 |
58.58 |
18.17 |
1.92 |
17.93 |
6.08 |
43.80 |
27.66 |
6.83 |
1.42 |
4.08 |
6.62 |
4.802 |
|
Master |
25 |
62.83 |
20.92 |
2.08 |
19.44 |
7.78 |
52.90 |
29.91 |
7.15 |
1.99 |
4.90 |
8.20 |
5.565 |
|
B |
50 |
66.50 |
25.33 |
3.08 |
23.96 |
8.22 |
60.35 |
38.79 |
9.43 |
2.49 |
5.20 |
9.45 |
6.663 |
|
|
75 |
60.33 |
23.33 |
2.42 |
20.54 |
7.68 |
56.56 |
31.52 |
7.98 |
2.33 |
5.57 |
5.83 |
5.919 |
|
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.86 |
0.64 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
1.23 |
0.23 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.40 |
0.162 |
||
Table 11. Effect of interaction between phosphorus levels and seed treatments on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans percentage of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
P levels
|
Seed Treat.
|
Post-emergence damping off (%) |
Root rot disease incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
|||||
Infection (%) |
After 40 day |
After 60 day |
|
|
||||||
|
|
First season (2014/2015) |
||||||||
|
Control |
19.25 |
|
21.17 |
20.08 |
35.33 |
|
|
||
0 |
Bio-priming |
5.25 |
|
7.71 |
7.00 |
80.00 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
17.25 |
|
20.08 |
18.25 |
41.50 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
9.00 |
|
11.17 |
10.50 |
65.00 |
|
|
||
|
Control |
17.50 |
|
20.00 |
19.00 |
37.75 |
|
|
||
25 |
Bio-priming |
4.25 |
|
6.75 |
5.50 |
84.00 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
15.75 |
|
17.92 |
17.50 |
45.50 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
8.25 |
|
10.08 |
9.25 |
69.50 |
|
|
||
|
Control |
16.50 |
|
19.00 |
18.00 |
42.25 |
|
|
||
50 |
Bio-priming |
2.75 |
|
5.50 |
4.00 |
88.25 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
13.50 |
|
17.00 |
16.75 |
48.75 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
7.00 |
|
8.92 |
7.75 |
73.50 |
|
|
||
|
Control |
15.50 |
|
17.50 |
16.50 |
46.25 |
|
|
||
75 |
Bio-priming |
2.25 |
|
4.42 |
3.50 |
92.25 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
11.75 |
|
15.67 |
16.00 |
52.25 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
6.00 |
|
7.42 |
6.50 |
79.25 |
|
|
||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.58 |
|
0.36 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
|
|
|||
|
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
||||||||
|
Control |
21.58 |
|
22.67 |
21.08 |
34.67 |
|
|
||
0 |
Bio-priming |
7.50 |
|
8.25 |
7.00 |
76.75 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
19.75 |
|
20.25 |
19.00 |
40.50 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
11.00 |
|
13.25 |
13.50 |
61.75 |
|
|
||
|
Control |
19.00 |
|
21.25 |
19.75 |
39.50 |
|
|
||
25 |
Bio-priming |
6.75 |
|
6.25 |
6.00 |
80.50 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
18.25 |
|
18.00 |
18.00 |
45.25 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
10.25 |
|
10.75 |
12.00 |
66.50 |
|
|
||
|
Control |
18.00 |
|
18.75 |
18.00 |
44.75 |
|
|
||
50 |
Bio-priming |
4.75 |
|
4.50 |
4.00 |
86.15 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
15.50 |
|
15.50 |
15.25 |
53.25 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
9.25 |
|
9.00 |
9.50 |
71.75 |
|
|
||
|
Control |
17.50 |
|
17.75 |
18.00 |
46.25 |
|
|
||
75 |
Bio-priming |
4.00 |
|
4.75 |
4.25 |
86.50 |
|
|
||
|
Priming |
14.50 |
|
14.33 |
13.15 |
57.25 |
|
|
||
|
Seed coating |
8.00 |
|
8.25 |
8.00 |
75.25 |
|
|
||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.05 |
|
0.14 |
0.05 |
0.10 |
|
|
|||
Table 12. Effect of the interaction between phosphorus levels and seed treatments on vegetative growth and total pods yield of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
P levels |
Seed treatments |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
||||||
|
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
|
Control |
49.17 |
10.83 |
1.00 |
6.43 |
2.60 |
18.04 |
12.87 |
2.03 |
1.22 |
2.21 |
4.37 |
2.077 |
0 |
Bio-priming |
65.50 |
32.83 |
2.67 |
24.75 |
7.70 |
60.26 |
32.33 |
9.17 |
3.52 |
6.12 |
9.89 |
6.222 |
|
Priming |
56.67 |
13.33 |
1.33 |
10.60 |
3.44 |
33.89 |
23.60 |
5.09 |
1.93 |
4.16 |
6.39 |
3.863 |
|
Seed coating |
61.33 |
22.83 |
1.83 |
18.19 |
4.74 |
45.40 |
24.53 |
8.54 |
2.87 |
4.60 |
7.47 |
4.699 |
|
Control |
54.17 |
15.33 |
1.50 |
10.27 |
2.76 |
25.48 |
17.26 |
4.55 |
1.65 |
1.72 |
4.67 |
2.872 |
25 |
Bio-priming |
70.33 |
37.50 |
3.00 |
32.42 |
8.19 |
80.30 |
37.85 |
11.44 |
5.04 |
8.28 |
11.74 |
7.940 |
|
Priming |
60.17 |
17.83 |
1.83 |
15.27 |
4.11 |
44.24 |
26.50 |
6.13 |
2.05 |
4.38 |
8.96 |
4.753 |
|
Seed coating |
66.17 |
27.33 |
2.50 |
26.19 |
6.31 |
56.10 |
31.34 |
9.80 |
3.59 |
4.95 |
10.37 |
5.876 |
|
Control |
64.33 |
17.50 |
1.83 |
16.36 |
4.31 |
48.72 |
24.41 |
5.35 |
1.72 |
2.92 |
5.03 |
4.914 |
50 |
Bio-priming |
73.33 |
33.67 |
4.00 |
37.73 |
16.37 |
97.91 |
47.16 |
15.97 |
5.52 |
9.81 |
16.35 |
9.748 |
|
Priming |
68.50 |
26.50 |
3.00 |
26.07 |
8.52 |
57.56 |
34.25 |
9.68 |
2.61 |
5.51 |
7.83 |
6.169 |
|
Seed coating |
71.33 |
31.50 |
3.17 |
30.60 |
9.39 |
73.78 |
37.36 |
10.28 |
3.30 |
7.54 |
11.73 |
7.468 |
|
Control |
61.17 |
14.83 |
1.67 |
11.90 |
4.84 |
34.29 |
23.55 |
4.22 |
1.62 |
3.30 |
5.82 |
3.887 |
75 |
Bio-priming |
74.17 |
36.00 |
4.17 |
30.14 |
13.32 |
84.08 |
42.96 |
14.73 |
7.98 |
9.19 |
11.50 |
8.537 |
|
Priming |
66.83 |
19.17 |
2.50 |
13.76 |
5.90 |
44.96 |
26.61 |
7.08 |
2.51 |
5.16 |
7.69 |
4.810 |
|
Seed coating |
67.50 |
30.50 |
3.00 |
26.58 |
12.68 |
49.86 |
29.08 |
14.04 |
5.08 |
7.78 |
8.51 |
5.305 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
2.66 |
2.96 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
1.00 |
3.85 |
1.92 |
0.94 |
0.68 |
1.04 |
0.58 |
0.277 |
|
|
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||||||
|
Control |
48.67 |
12.83 |
1.00 |
9.43 |
3.88 |
23.87 |
15.49 |
3.03 |
1.22 |
2.55 |
3.12 |
2.645 |
0 |
Bio-priming |
64.17 |
20.50 |
2.83 |
23.59 |
8.82 |
51.93 |
29.13 |
7.69 |
1.77 |
4.78 |
8.14 |
5.447 |
|
Priming |
56.17 |
15.33 |
1.50 |
13.60 |
4.89 |
35.11 |
20.24 |
5.07 |
1.37 |
3.83 |
3.89 |
3.719 |
|
Seed coating |
60.83 |
18.17 |
2.00 |
20.19 |
7.52 |
45.85 |
24.28 |
7.04 |
1.51 |
3.93 |
5.33 |
4.713 |
|
Control |
58.50 |
17.50 |
1.33 |
14.23 |
5.81 |
41.37 |
20.13 |
6.10 |
1.46 |
3.48 |
4.12 |
4.133 |
25 |
Bio-priming |
70.17 |
24.00 |
2.67 |
24.62 |
9.03 |
59.34 |
37.21 |
8.01 |
2.45 |
5.28 |
10.14 |
6.488 |
|
Priming |
61.00 |
19.33 |
1.83 |
18.45 |
6.49 |
42.97 |
22.29 |
6.62 |
2.05 |
4.29 |
5.22 |
4.385 |
|
Seed coating |
63.00 |
20.67 |
2.00 |
20.17 |
8.16 |
51.12 |
25.80 |
6.92 |
2.13 |
4.50 |
7.67 |
5.169 |
|
Control |
60.83 |
19.33 |
1.67 |
13.77 |
6.01 |
43.29 |
27.30 |
7.28 |
2.00 |
4.15 |
5.80 |
4.743 |
50 |
Bio-priming |
72.50 |
28.17 |
3.33 |
27.35 |
9.63 |
68.15 |
40.46 |
8.99 |
2.61 |
5.62 |
12.18 |
7.298 |
|
Priming |
62.67 |
22.17 |
2.50 |
21.14 |
7.15 |
51.84 |
29.06 |
8.21 |
2.27 |
4.48 |
6.45 |
5.436 |
|
Seed coating |
67.50 |
24.50 |
3.17 |
24.06 |
9.93 |
56.10 |
29.89 |
8.74 |
2.39 |
5.00 |
6.89 |
5.778 |
|
Control |
55.33 |
16.33 |
1.50 |
14.25 |
5.76 |
46.81 |
23.96 |
6.63 |
1.43 |
4.62 |
4.11 |
4.756 |
75 |
Bio-priming |
65.83 |
27.67 |
3.00 |
24.04 |
8.93 |
55.66 |
31.93 |
8.33 |
2.67 |
5.50 |
8.50 |
5.885 |
|
Priming |
60.00 |
20.17 |
2.17 |
18.61 |
7.19 |
52.00 |
26.80 |
7.71 |
2.31 |
5.18 |
5.00 |
5.295 |
|
Seed coating |
62.67 |
21.17 |
2.33 |
19.24 |
8.03 |
53.28 |
29.17 |
8.05 |
2.50 |
5.33 |
6.08 |
5.540 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
1.82 |
1.22 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.53 |
2.84 |
2.56 |
0.51 |
N.S. |
0.34 |
0.55 |
0.261 |
Table 13. Effect of the interaction between cultivars and different seed treatments on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans percentage of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Cultivars |
Seed treatments |
Post-emergence damping-off (%) |
Root rot incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
|||
Infection (%) |
After 30 day |
After 60 day |
|
|
||||
|
|
First Season 2014/2015 |
||||||
Little Marvel |
Control |
17.63 |
|
20.71 |
22.42 |
39.04 |
|
|
Bio-Priming |
4.38 |
|
7.31 |
6.63 |
81.88 |
|
|
|
Priming |
15.50 |
|
18.71 |
20.63 |
45.50 |
|
|
|
Seed Coating |
8.75 |
|
10.79 |
10.50 |
70.75 |
|
|
|
Master B |
Control |
16.75 |
|
18.13 |
14.38 |
41.75 |
|
|
Bio-Priming |
2.88 |
|
4.88 |
3.38 |
90.38 |
|
|
|
Priming |
13.63 |
|
16.63 |
13.63 |
48.50 |
|
|
|
Seed Coating |
6.38 |
|
8.00 |
6.50 |
72.88 |
|
|
|
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.33 |
|
0.21 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Season 2014/2015 |
||||||
Little Marvel |
Control |
20.42 |
|
21.83 |
21.29 |
36.71 |
|
|
Bio-priming |
7.13 |
|
7.13 |
6.25 |
79.45 |
|
|
|
Priming |
18.50 |
|
18.50 |
19.00 |
44.00 |
|
|
|
Seed Coating |
10.50 |
|
11.75 |
13.50 |
64.25 |
|
|
|
Master B |
Control |
17.63 |
|
18.38 |
17.13 |
45.88 |
|
|
Bio-priming |
4.38 |
|
4.75 |
4.38 |
85.50 |
|
|
|
Priming |
15.50 |
|
15.54 |
13.70 |
54.13 |
|
|
|
Seed Coating |
8.75 |
|
8.88 |
8.00 |
73.38 |
|
|
|
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.03 |
|
0.08 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
|
|
Table 14. Effect of the interaction between cultivars and seed treatments on vegetative growth and total pods yield of pea during two seasons (2014/2015 and 2015/2016).
Cultivars
|
Seed treatments |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
||||||
|
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
|
Control |
56.50 |
12.58 |
1.25 |
9.85 |
3.72 |
24.68 |
11.04 |
3.73 |
1.45 |
2.40 |
2.39 |
2.400 |
Little |
Bio-priming |
71.17 |
32.50 |
2.92 |
27.32 |
11.88 |
64.03 |
32.97 |
12.05 |
5.68 |
7.16 |
9.93 |
6.518 |
Marvel |
Priming |
61.25 |
20.08 |
2.08 |
14.81 |
5.99 |
35.71 |
20.84 |
6.10 |
2.06 |
4.41 |
5.79 |
3.800 |
|
Seed coating |
66.83 |
25.08 |
2.42 |
20.59 |
8.05 |
50.51 |
22.99 |
9.86 |
3.44 |
5.93 |
6.71 |
4.939 |
|
Control |
57.92 |
16.67 |
1.75 |
12.63 |
3.53 |
38.59 |
28.01 |
4.34 |
1.66 |
2.67 |
7.55 |
4.475 |
Master |
Bio-priming |
70.50 |
37.50 |
4.00 |
35.20 |
10.91 |
97.24 |
47.18 |
13.60 |
5.35 |
9.54 |
14.81 |
9.705 |
B |
Priming |
64.83 |
18.33 |
2.25 |
18.04 |
5.00 |
54.62 |
34.64 |
7.89 |
2.49 |
5.20 |
9.65 |
5.998 |
|
Seed coating |
66.33 |
31.00 |
2.83 |
30.19 |
8.51 |
62.06 |
38.17 |
11.46 |
3.98 |
6.50 |
12.32 |
6.735 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
1.54 |
1.71 |
0.30 |
1.78 |
N.S. |
2.22 |
1.11 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.60 |
0.34 |
0.160 |
|
|
|
Second season (2015/2016) |
|||||||||||
|
Control |
55.00 |
15.75 |
1.08 |
11.05 |
5.40 |
32.33 |
16.30 |
4.95 |
1.36 |
3.11 |
3.00 |
3.268 |
Little |
Bio-priming |
70.00 |
23.50 |
2.67 |
23.98 |
8.64 |
57.47 |
33.37 |
7.59 |
2.42 |
5.05 |
8.26 |
6.105 |
Marvel |
Priming |
58.42 |
18.08 |
1.92 |
17.23 |
6.52 |
37.51 |
18.50 |
6.17 |
1.93 |
4.07 |
4.17 |
3.763 |
|
Seed coating |
63.25 |
18.83 |
2.25 |
19.24 |
8.28 |
48.42 |
20.51 |
7.12 |
2.13 |
4.29 |
5.79 |
4.632 |
|
Control |
56.67 |
17.25 |
1.67 |
14.79 |
5.33 |
45.34 |
27.14 |
6.57 |
1.69 |
4.29 |
5.58 |
4.871 |
Master |
Bio-priming |
66.33 |
26.67 |
3.25 |
25.82 |
9.56 |
60.06 |
35.99 |
8.92 |
2.33 |
5.55 |
11.22 |
6.455 |
B |
Priming |
61.50 |
20.42 |
2.08 |
18.68 |
6.34 |
53.45 |
30.69 |
7.64 |
2.07 |
4.82 |
6.11 |
5.655 |
|
Seed coating |
63.75 |
23.42 |
2.50 |
22.59 |
8.54 |
54.76 |
34.06 |
8.25 |
2.14 |
5.09 |
7.20 |
5.968 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
1.05 |
0.70 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.31 |
1.64 |
1.48 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.20 |
0.32 |
0.151 |
Table 15. Effect of the integration between Cultivars, phosphors level and seed treatment on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease Incidence percentage and survival plans percentage of pea during the first season 2014/2015.
Cultivars |
Phosphors Level |
Seed treatments |
Post-emergence damping-off (%) |
Root rot incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
|||
Infection (%) |
|
After 40 day |
After 60 day |
|
|
||||
Little Marvel |
0 |
Control |
20.00 |
|
22.33 |
24.17 |
34.17 |
|
|
Bio-Priming |
6.00 |
|
8.92 |
9.00 |
75.50 |
|
|
||
Priming |
18.00 |
|
22.17 |
22.00 |
40.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
10.00 |
|
12.33 |
12.50 |
64.00 |
|
|
||
25 |
Control |
17.50 |
|
21.00 |
23.00 |
37.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
5.00 |
|
8.50 |
7.50 |
80.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
16.50 |
|
19.33 |
20.50 |
45.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
9.00 |
|
11.67 |
11.00 |
69.00 |
|
|
||
50 |
Control |
17.00 |
|
20.50 |
22.00 |
40.50 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
3.50 |
|
6.50 |
5.50 |
84.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
14.50 |
|
17.50 |
20.50 |
46.50 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
8.50 |
|
10.33 |
10.00 |
73.00 |
|
|
||
75 |
Control |
16.00 |
|
19.00 |
20.50 |
44.50 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
3.00 |
|
5.33 |
4.50 |
88.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
13.00 |
|
15.83 |
19.50 |
50.50 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
7.50 |
|
8.83 |
8.50 |
77.00 |
|
|
||
Master B |
0 |
Control |
18.50 |
|
20.00 |
16.00 |
36.50 |
|
|
Bio-Priming |
4.50 |
|
6.50 |
5.00 |
84.50 |
|
|
||
Priming |
16.50 |
|
18.00 |
14.50 |
43.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
8.00 |
|
10.00 |
8.50 |
66.00 |
|
|
||
25 |
Control |
17.50 |
|
19.00 |
15.00 |
38.50 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
3.50 |
|
5.00 |
3.50 |
88.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
15.00 |
|
16.50 |
14.50 |
46.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
7.50 |
|
8.50 |
7.50 |
70.00 |
|
|
||
50
|
Control |
16.00 |
|
17.50 |
14.00 |
44.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
2.00 |
|
4.50 |
2.50 |
92.50 |
|
|
||
Priming |
12.50 |
|
16.50 |
13.00 |
51.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
5.50 |
|
7.50 |
5.50 |
74.00 |
|
|
||
75 |
Control |
15.00 |
|
16.00 |
12.50 |
48.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
1.50 |
|
3.50 |
2.50 |
96.50 |
|
|
||
Priming |
10.50 |
|
15.50 |
12.50 |
54.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
4.50 |
|
6.00 |
4.50 |
81.50 |
|
|
||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
N.S. |
|
0.51 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
|
|
Table 16. Effect of the integration between Cultivars, phosphors level and seed treatment on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans percentage of pea during the second season 2015/2016.
Cultivars |
Phosphors Level |
Seed treatments |
Post-emergence damping-off (%) |
Root rot incidence (%) |
Survival Plant (%) |
|
|||
Infection (%) |
|
After 40 day |
After 60 day |
|
|
||||
Little Marvel |
0 |
Control |
23.17 |
|
24.83 |
23.17 |
29.83 |
|
|
Bio-Priming |
9.00 |
|
9.50 |
8.00 |
73.50 |
|
|
||
Priming |
21.50 |
|
22.00 |
21.50 |
35.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
12.00 |
|
15.00 |
16.50 |
56.50 |
|
|
||
25 |
Control |
20.50 |
|
23.50 |
22.00 |
34.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
8.50 |
|
7.50 |
7.00 |
77.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
20.00 |
|
20.00 |
21.00 |
39.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
11.50 |
|
12.00 |
15.00 |
61.50 |
|
|
||
50 |
Control |
19.00 |
|
20.00 |
20.00 |
41.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
6.00 |
|
5.50 |
5.00 |
83.30 |
|
|
||
Priming |
16.50 |
|
17.00 |
17.50 |
49.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
10.00 |
|
10.00 |
12.00 |
68.00 |
|
|
||
75 |
Control |
19.00 |
|
19.00 |
20.00 |
42.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
5.00 |
|
6.00 |
5.00 |
84.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
16.00 |
|
15.00 |
16.00 |
53.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
8.50 |
|
10.00 |
10.50 |
71.00 |
|
|
||
Master B |
0 |
Control |
20.00 |
|
20.50 |
19.00 |
39.50 |
|
|
Bio-Priming |
6.00 |
|
7.00 |
6.00 |
80.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
18.00 |
|
18.50 |
16.50 |
46.00 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
10.00 |
|
11.50 |
10.50 |
67.00 |
|
|
||
25 |
Control |
17.50 |
|
19.00 |
17.50 |
45.00 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
5.00 |
|
5.00 |
5.00 |
84.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
16.50 |
|
16.00 |
15.00 |
51.50 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
9.00 |
|
9.50 |
9.00 |
71.50 |
|
|
||
50
|
Control |
17.00 |
|
17.50 |
16.00 |
48.50 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
3.50 |
|
3.50 |
3.00 |
89.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
14.50 |
|
14.00 |
13.00 |
57.50 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
8.50 |
|
8.00 |
7.00 |
75.50 |
|
|
||
75 |
Control |
16.00 |
|
16.50 |
16.00 |
50.50 |
|
|
|
Bio-Priming |
3.00 |
|
3.50 |
3.50 |
89.00 |
|
|
||
Priming |
13.00 |
|
13.67 |
10.30 |
61.50 |
|
|
||
Seed Coating |
7.50 |
|
6.50 |
5.50 |
79.50 |
|
|
||
L.S.D at 0.05 |
0.07 |
|
0.20 |
0.07 |
0.14 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 17. Effect of the interaction between cultivars, phosphorus levels and seed treatments on post-emergence damping off incidence percentage, root rot disease incidence percentage and survival plans percentage of pea during the first season (2014/2015).
Cultivars
|
P levels |
Seed treatments |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ Plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/ fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
|||||||
|
|
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
|
|
Control |
46.33 |
8.33 |
1.00 |
5.04 |
2.57 |
6.39 |
4.18 |
2.07 |
1.23 |
1.73 |
1.73 |
0.710 |
|
0 |
Bio-priming |
63.67 |
23.33 |
2.00 |
19.28 |
5.14 |
50.13 |
23.14 |
6.68 |
2.59 |
3.83 |
8.40 |
4.924 |
|
|
Priming |
53.33 |
13.00 |
1.33 |
7.85 |
2.93 |
22.27 |
18.26 |
3.48 |
1.56 |
3.14 |
3.92 |
2.724 |
|
|
Seed coating |
62.23 |
14.33 |
1.67 |
13.73 |
3.66 |
42.86 |
19.37 |
6.10 |
1.99 |
3.49 |
5.44 |
4.182 |
|
|
Control |
51.33 |
11.33 |
1.00 |
9.70 |
2.44 |
11.72 |
6.80 |
3.27 |
1.43 |
1.59 |
1.83 |
1.245 |
Little |
25 |
Bio-priming |
68.33 |
26.67 |
2.33 |
22.61 |
6.34 |
55.47 |
26.14 |
7.55 |
2.79 |
5.69 |
9.40 |
5.484 |
Marvel |
|
Priming |
58.33 |
16.00 |
1.33 |
14.19 |
4.13 |
27.27 |
15.70 |
5.01 |
1.59 |
3.34 |
6.11 |
2.888 |
|
|
Seed coating |
67.33 |
17.33 |
2.00 |
16.73 |
4.86 |
44.53 |
16.93 |
6.97 |
2.19 |
4.37 |
6.92 |
4.130 |
|
|
Control |
63.00 |
15.00 |
1.33 |
10.74 |
4.03 |
46.71 |
7.30 |
4.32 |
1.30 |
2.59 |
2.37 |
3.629 |
|
50 |
Bio-priming |
74.33 |
39.00 |
3.67 |
39.71 |
21.42 |
74.42 |
38.21 |
17.36 |
6.03 |
9.33 |
10.31 |
7.568 |
|
|
Priming |
67.00 |
30.00 |
3.33 |
22.99 |
10.24 |
53.86 |
22.53 |
9.65 |
2.54 |
6.21 |
6.24 |
5.133 |
|
|
Seed coating |
71.00 |
36.33 |
3.00 |
26.40 |
9.77 |
67.89 |
26.43 |
10.81 |
3.35 |
7.55 |
7.00 |
6.338 |
|
|
Control |
65.33 |
15.67 |
1.67 |
13.93 |
5.85 |
33.90 |
25.87 |
5.24 |
1.83 |
3.71 |
3.62 |
4.017 |
|
75 |
Bio-priming |
78.33 |
41.00 |
3.67 |
27.67 |
14.63 |
76.09 |
44.41 |
16.60 |
11.30 |
9.79 |
11.61 |
8.098 |
|
|
Priming |
66.33 |
21.33 |
2.33 |
14.21 |
6.64 |
39.42 |
26.87 |
6.27 |
2.53 |
4.94 |
6.89 |
4.455 |
|
|
Seed coating |
66.67 |
32.33 |
3.00 |
25.49 |
13.90 |
46.78 |
29.23 |
15.57 |
6.20 |
8.32 |
7.49 |
5.108 |
|
|
Control |
52.00 |
13.33 |
1.00 |
7.83 |
2.62 |
29.69 |
21.56 |
1.99 |
1.21 |
2.70 |
7.01 |
3.444 |
|
0 |
Bio-priming |
67.33 |
42.33 |
3.33 |
30.23 |
10.26 |
70.39 |
41.51 |
11.65 |
4.45 |
8.40 |
11.39 |
7.520 |
|
|
Priming |
60.00 |
13.67 |
1.33 |
13.35 |
3.95 |
45.51 |
28.93 |
6.69 |
2.29 |
5.18 |
8.86 |
5.002 |
|
|
Seed coating |
60.33 |
31.33 |
2.00 |
22.65 |
5.82 |
47.94 |
29.69 |
10.97 |
3.75 |
5.70 |
9.50 |
5.217 |
|
|
Control |
57.00 |
19.33 |
2.00 |
10.83 |
3.08 |
39.25 |
27.72 |
5.82 |
1.87 |
1.84 |
7.51 |
4.500 |
Master |
25 |
Bio-priming |
72.33 |
48.33 |
3.67 |
42.23 |
10.04 |
105.14 |
49.57 |
15.32 |
7.28 |
10.87 |
14.08 |
10.396 |
B |
|
Priming |
62.00 |
19.67 |
2.33 |
16.35 |
4.08 |
61.20 |
37.30 |
7.25 |
2.50 |
5.42 |
11.80 |
6.619 |
|
|
Seed coating |
65.00 |
37.33 |
3.00 |
35.65 |
7.75 |
67.67 |
45.76 |
12.63 |
4.99 |
5.53 |
13.81 |
7.622 |
|
|
Control |
65.67 |
20.00 |
2.33 |
21.98 |
4.59 |
50.72 |
41.51 |
6.37 |
2.14 |
3.25 |
7.68 |
6.198 |
|
50 |
Bio-priming |
72.33 |
28.33 |
4.33 |
35.74 |
11.33 |
121.39 |
56.11 |
14.58 |
5.00 |
10.29 |
22.39 |
11.928 |
|
|
Priming |
70.00 |
23.00 |
2.67 |
29.15 |
6.80 |
61.26 |
45.96 |
9.71 |
2.67 |
4.81 |
9.43 |
7.206 |
|
|
Seed coating |
71.67 |
26.67 |
3.33 |
34.80 |
9.01 |
79.66 |
48.28 |
9.74 |
3.25 |
7.52 |
16.45 |
8.598 |
|
|
Control |
57.00 |
14.00 |
1.67 |
9.87 |
3.82 |
34.69 |
21.23 |
3.19 |
1.41 |
2.90 |
8.01 |
3.758 |
|
75 |
Bio-priming |
70.00 |
31.00 |
4.67 |
32.61 |
12.02 |
92.06 |
41.51 |
12.85 |
4.65 |
8.60 |
11.39 |
8.976 |
|
|
Priming |
67.33 |
17.00 |
2.67 |
13.32 |
5.15 |
50.51 |
26.35 |
7.89 |
2.49 |
5.38 |
8.50 |
5.165 |
|
|
Seed coating |
68.33 |
28.67 |
3.00 |
27.67 |
11.46 |
52.94 |
28.93 |
12.51 |
3.95 |
7.24 |
9.53 |
5.502 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
3.76 |
4.18 |
N.S. |
4.37 |
1.41 |
5.44 |
2.72 |
1.33 |
0.96 |
1.48 |
0.83 |
0.392 |
Table 18. Effect of the interaction between cultivars, phosphorus levels and seed treatments on vegetative growth and total pods yield of pea during the second season (2015/2016).
Cultivars
|
P levels |
Seed treatments |
Plant Length (cm) |
Leaves No./ plant |
Branches No./ Plant |
Fresh weight (g/ plant) |
Dry weight (g/ plant) |
Total pods yield (ton/fed.) |
||||||
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
Leaves |
Stems |
Pods |
Seeds |
|||||||
|
|
|
First season (2014/2015) |
|||||||||||
|
|
Control |
46.33 |
10.33 |
1.00 |
9.04 |
5.14 |
16.39 |
8.70 |
2.07 |
1.23 |
2.23 |
1.29 |
1.686 |
|
0 |
Bio-priming |
63.33 |
19.33 |
2.33 |
23.28 |
8.04 |
50.13 |
25.80 |
6.68 |
1.92 |
4.33 |
6.65 |
5.103 |
|
|
Priming |
53.33 |
15.00 |
1.67 |
11.85 |
5.83 |
25.61 |
15.18 |
3.48 |
1.33 |
3.64 |
2.57 |
2.741 |
|
|
Seed coating |
62.23 |
16.33 |
2.00 |
17.73 |
6.89 |
46.20 |
17.93 |
6.10 |
1.56 |
3.65 |
3.97 |
4.309 |
|
|
Control |
57.33 |
18.33 |
1.00 |
12.79 |
5.25 |
33.83 |
15.99 |
5.69 |
2.86 |
2.86 |
2.29 |
3.348 |
Little |
25 |
Bio-priming |
73.67 |
23.61 |
2.67 |
23.61 |
8.04 |
59.06 |
2.52 |
7.62 |
5.14 |
5.14 |
7.65 |
6.655 |
Marvel |
|
Priming |
59.67 |
18.33 |
1.67 |
20.09 |
6.38 |
16.28 |
16.28 |
6.51 |
3.70 |
3.70 |
3.91 |
3.511 |
|
|
Seed coating |
63.33 |
19.00 |
2.00 |
20.68 |
7.81 |
49.15 |
18.97 |
6.86 |
3.81 |
3.81 |
7.65 |
4.577 |
|
|
Control |
60.33 |
19.00 |
1.33 |
9.67 |
5.62 |
34.00 |
17.99 |
5.60 |
1.36 |
3.58 |
3.79 |
3.494 |
|
50 |
Bio-priming |
74.33 |
25.33 |
3.00 |
24.48 |
9.55 |
70.08 |
40.64 |
8.18 |
2.73 |
5.50 |
11.72 |
7.440 |
|
|
Priming |
61.67 |
21.00 |
2.00 |
20.85 |
6.48 |
42.70 |
19.26 |
7.06 |
2.17 |
4.05 |
4.51 |
4.163 |
|
|
Seed coating |
64.67 |
21.67 |
2.67 |
21.79 |
10.88 |
50.56 |
20.35 |
7.90 |
2.34 |
4.58 |
4.78 |
4.765 |
|
|
Control |
56.00 |
15.33 |
1.00 |
12.72 |
5.60 |
45.12 |
22.51 |
6.43 |
1.50 |
3.78 |
4.60 |
4.545 |
|
75 |
Bio-priming |
68.67 |
25.67 |
2.67 |
24.53 |
8.57 |
50.62 |
27.06 |
7.88 |
2.51 |
5.21 |
7.00 |
5.221 |
|
|
Priming |
59.00 |
18.00 |
2.33 |
16.11 |
7.37 |
45.76 |
23.28 |
7.61 |
2.12 |
4.88 |
5.68 |
4.639 |
|
|
Seed coating |
62.67 |
18.33 |
2.33 |
16.74 |
7.53 |
47.76 |
24.79 |
7.62 |
2.38 |
5.11 |
6.75 |
4.875 |
|
|
Control |
51.00 |
15.33 |
1.00 |
15.67 |
2.62 |
31.36 |
22.27 |
3.99 |
1.21 |
2.88 |
4.95 |
3.604 |
|
0 |
Bio-priming |
65.00 |
21.67 |
3.33 |
25.62 |
9.59 |
53.72 |
32.45 |
8.69 |
1.62 |
5.23 |
9.62 |
5.791 |
|
|
Priming |
59.00 |
15.67 |
1.33 |
16.81 |
3.95 |
44.61 |
25.29 |
6.65 |
1.41 |
4.01 |
5.20 |
4.698 |
|
|
Seed coating |
59.33 |
20.00 |
2.00 |
19.65 |
8.15 |
45.51 |
30.63 |
7.97 |
1.45 |
4.20 |
6.69 |
5.116 |
|
|
Control |
59.67 |
16.67 |
1.67 |
15.67 |
6.37 |
48.91 |
24.27 |
6.52 |
1.56 |
4.10 |
5.95 |
4.918 |
Master |
25 |
Bio-priming |
66.67 |
24.33 |
2.67 |
9.65 |
9.65 |
59.62 |
34.45 |
8.40 |
2.38 |
5.42 |
12.62 |
6.321 |
B |
|
Priming |
62.33 |
20.33 |
2.00 |
6.60 |
6.60 |
49.99 |
28.29 |
6.72 |
2.00 |
4.88 |
6.54 |
5.260 |
|
|
Seed coating |
62.67 |
22.33 |
2.00 |
19.65 |
8.50 |
53.09 |
32.63 |
6.98 |
2.01 |
5.20 |
7.69 |
5.760 |
|
|
Control |
61.33 |
19.67 |
2.00 |
17.88 |
6.40 |
52.59 |
36.60 |
8.96 |
2.63 |
4.73 |
7.81 |
5.993 |
|
50 |
Bio-priming |
70.67 |
31.00 |
3.67 |
30.21 |
9.70 |
66.22 |
40.29 |
9.81 |
2.49 |
5.74 |
12.64 |
7.157 |
|
|
Priming |
63.67 |
23.33 |
3.00 |
21.43 |
7.82 |
60.97 |
38.86 |
9.36 |
2.38 |
4.92 |
8.38 |
6.709 |
|
|
Seed coating |
70.33 |
27.33 |
3.67 |
26.33 |
8.97 |
61.64 |
39.43 |
9.57 |
2.45 |
5.41 |
8.99 |
6.791 |
|
|
Control |
54.67 |
17.33 |
2.00 |
15.78 |
5.93 |
48.50 |
25.41 |
6.83 |
1.36 |
5.46 |
3.61 |
4.967 |
|
75 |
Bio-priming |
63.00 |
29.67 |
3.33 |
23.54 |
9.28 |
60.69 |
36.79 |
8.78 |
2.83 |
5.79 |
9.99 |
6.550 |
|
|
Priming |
61.00 |
22.33 |
2.00 |
21.12 |
7.00 |
58.24 |
30.32 |
7.81 |
2.49 |
5.48 |
4.31 |
5.952 |
|
|
Seed coating |
62.67 |
24.00 |
2.33 |
21.74 |
8.53 |
58.79 |
33.55 |
8.48 |
2.63 |
5.56 |
5.41 |
6.205 |
L.S.D at 0.05 |
2.58 |
1.73 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.75 |
4.01 |
3.62 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
0.77 |
0.369 |
REFERENCES
Abd El-Kareem, F., 2002. Integrated treatments between bio-agents and chitosan for controlling pea root rot disease under field conditions. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci. 17, 257-279.
Abda, K.A., Ali, H.Y., Mansour, M.S., 1992. Phytopathological studies on damping-off and root rot diseases of pea in A.R.E. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci. 7 (9), 242-261.
Agegnehu, G., 2009. Phosphate fertilizer and weed control effects on growth and yield of field pea on Nitisols of highland, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiop. J. Sci. 32 (2), 1-8.
Badr, A., Ahmed, H.S., Hamouda, M., Badr, S.F., 2015. Genetic diversity among varieties and hybrid lines of pea (Pisum sativum L.) as Revealed by morphological traits and SSR markers. Egypt. J. Bot. 55 (1), 17- 29.
Barnett, H.L., Hunter, B.B., 1972. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi. 3rd ed., Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota, P-273.
Begum, M.M., Sariah, M., Puteh, A.B., Siddiqui, y., 2011. Field performance of bio primed seeds to suppress Colletotrichum truncotum causing damping off and seedling stand of soybean. Biol. Control. 53 (1), 18-23.
Benhamou, N., Kloepper, J.W., Tuzun. S., 1996. Induction of defense related ultra-structural modifications in pea tissue inoculated with entophytic bacteria. Plant Physiol. 112, 919-929.
Callan, N.W., Mathre, D.E., Miller, J.B., 1991. Field performance of sweet corn seed bio-primed and coated with Pseudomonas fluorescens AB254. Hort. Sci. 26, 1163-1165.
Contreras-Cornejo, H.A., Macías-Rodríguez, L., AlfaroCuevas, R., López-Bucio, J., 2014 b. Trichoderma spp. improves growth of Arabidopsis seedlings under salt stress through enhanced root development, osmolite production, and Na+ elimination through root exudates. Mol. Plant Microbe In. 27, 503-514.
Contreras-Cornejo, H.A., Macías-Rodríguez, L., CortésPenagos, C., López-Bucio, J., 2009. Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 149, 1579-1592.
Contreras-Cornejo, H.A., Macías-Rodríguez, L., HerreraEstrella, A., López-Bucio, J., 2014 a. The 4-phosphopantetheinyl transferase of Trichoderma virens plays a role in plant protection against Botrytis cinerea through volatile organic compound emission. Plant Soil. 379, 261-274.
Dass, A., Patnaik, U.S., Sudhishri, S., 2005. Response of vegetable pea (Pisum sativum) to sowing date and phosphorus under on farm condition. Ind. J. Agron. 50 (1), 64- 66.
Demir, I., 2003. Effect of controlled hydration treatment on quality of aubergine (eggplant) seeds following storage. Phyton-Ann. Bot. A. 43, 307-317.
El-abd, S.O., Zaki, M.F., El-Mohamedy, R.S.R., Riad, G.S., 2013. Improving growth, fresh pod yield and quality, and controlling root rot and damping off of pea grown in sandy soil by integration effect of phosphorus fertilizer with biological seed treatments. Mid. East J. Agric. Res. 2 (1), 8-15.
El-Mohamedy R.S.R., AbdAlla, M.A., 2013. Bio-priming seed treatment for biological control of soil borne fungi causing root rot of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Agric. Technol. 9 (3), 589-599.
EL-Mohamedy, R.S.R., 2004. Bio-priming of okra seed to control damping-off and root rot diseases. Ann. Agric. Sci. Ain Shams Univ. 49 (11):339-356.
El-Mohamedy, R.S.R., Abd-El-Baky, M.M.H., 2008. Effects of seed treatment on control of root rot disease and improvement growth and yield of pea plants. Mid. East. Rus. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2 (1-2), 84-90.
El-Mohamedy, R.S.R., Abd–Alla, M.A., Badiaa, R.I., 2006. Soil amendment and bio- priming treatments as alternative fungicides for controlling root rot diseases on cowpea plants in Nobria province. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2 (6), 391-398.
El-Mohamedy, R.S.R., Jabnoun-Khiareddine, H., Daami-Remadi, M., 2014. Control of root rot diseases of tomato plants caused by Fusarium solani, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii using different chemical plant resistance inducers. Tunis. J. Plant Prot. 9, 45-55.
Evanari, M., 1984. Seed Physiology: Its history from antiquity to the beginning of the 20th century. Bot. Rev. 50, 119-142.
Gilman, J.C., 1957. A Manual of Soil Fungi Revised 2nd Edition, Oxford and IBH publishing Company, Shahpur Jat, Delhi, P-220.
Giri, G.S., Schillinger, W.F., 2003. Seed priming winter wheat for germination, emergence and yield. Crop Sci. 43, 2135-2141.
Gubbels, G.H., 1992. Effect of phosphorus rate and placement on the yield and cooking quality of field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci., 72 (1), 251-255.
Harman, G.E., Taylor, A.G., 1988. Improved seedling performance by integration of biological control agents at favorable pH levels with solid matrix priming. Phytopathology. 78, 520-525.
Harman, G.E., Howell, C.R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., Lorito, M., 2004. Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 43-56.
Heydecker, W., Higgins, J., Gulliver, R.L., 1973. Accelerated germination by osmotic seed treatment. Nature. 246, 42-44.
Hwang, S., Chang, K. Howard, R., Deneka, B., Turnball, G., 1996. Decrease in incidence of Pythuim damping-off of field peas by seed treatments with Bacillus spp. and metalaxyl. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 103, 31-41.
Jain, A., Singh, S., Kumar Sarma, B., Singh, H.B., 2012. Microbial consortium–mediated reprogramming of defence network in pea to enhance tolerance against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112, 537-550.
Jensen, B., Knudsen, I.M., Madsen, M., Jensen, D.F., 2004. Bio-priming of infected carrot seed with an antagonist, Clonostachys rosea, selected for control of seed borne Alternaria spp. Phytopathology. 94, 551-560.
Jones, J.P., Engelhard, A.W., Woltz, S.S., 1989. Management of Fusarium wilt of vegetables and ornamentals by macro- and micro element nutrition, in: Engelhard, A.W., (Eds.). Soilborne Plant Pathogens: Management of Diseases with Macro- and Microelements. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN. P. 18-32.
Kalpana, M.H., Khan, A., Singh, A.K., Maurya, K.N., Sarwar, M., Yadava, R.K., Singh, U., Gautam, A.R. 2015. Effect of different seed priming treatments on germination, growth, biochemical changes and yield of wheat varieties under sodic soil. Int. J. Sci. Res. 4 (7), 306-3010.
Karamanos, R.E., Flore, N.A., Harapiak, J.T., 2002. Response of field peas to phosphate fertilization. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83, 283-289.
Kaur, S., Gupta, A.K., Kaur, N., 2002. Effect of osmo- and hydro-priming of chickpea seeds on seedling growth and carbohydrate metabolism under water deficit stress. Plant Growth Regul. 37, 17-22.
Khan, A.A., 1992. Pre plant physiological seed conditioning. Hort. Rev. 14, 131-181.
Klute, A., 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, lnc. Publisher Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 500.
Kobriger, K.M., Hagedorn, D.J., 1983. Determination of bean root rot potential in vegetable production fields of Wisconsin's central sands. Plant Dis. 67 (2), 177-178.
Lacicowa, B., Pjeta, D., 1994. Protective effect of microbiological dressing of pea seeds (Pisum sativum) against pathogenic fungi living in soil. Ann. Univ. Maria Curie Sklodowska. 2, 165- 171.
Lovatt, C.J., Mikkelsen, R.L., 2006. Phosphite fertilizers: what are they? Can you use them? Better Crops. 90 (4), 11-13.
Malakooti, M.J., Nafisi, M., 1995. Fertilizer Utilization in Agricultural Lands “Irrigated and Dry Land Systems”. 2nd ed. Tarbiate Modaress University Publications, Iran. pp. 90.
Manore, D., Altaye, T., 2018. Effects of different level of phosphorous fertilizer on yield and yield component of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties in Hadiya zone, Duna area, Southren Ethiopia. Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 8 (2), 8-14.
Meena, S.K., Rakshit, A., Meena, V.S., 2016. Effect of seed bio-priming and N doses under varied soil type on nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 6, 68-75.
Murat, E., Yildirim, B., Togay, N., Cig, F., 2009. Effect of phosphorus application and Rhizobium inoculation on the yield, nodulation and nutrient uptake in field pea (Pisum sativum sp. Arvense L.). J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 89 (2), 301-304.
Nadeem, A., Amjad, M., Anjum, M.A., 2003. Growth and yield response of pea (Pisum sativum L.) crop to phosphorus and potassium application. Pak. J. Sci. 40, 3-4.
Nayaka, S.C., Nironjana, S.R., Shankar, A.C., Mortensen, C.N., 2008. Seed bio priming with novel strain of Trichoderma harzianum for the control of toxigenic Fusarium verticillioides and fumonisin in maiza. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 43 (3), 264-282.
Nelson, P.E., Tousun, T.A., Marasan, W.F.O., 1983. Fusarium spp. An Illustrated Manual for Identification, The Pennsylvania University Press, Pennsylvania, PP. 218.
Osborn, R.M., Scharoth, M.N., 1989. Effect of osmopriming beet seed on germination rate and incidence of Pythium ultimum damping-off. Plant Dis. 73, 21-24.
Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd ed. Am. Soc. Agron. Inc. Soil Sci. Publ., Madis., Wisc., pp. 411-422.
Parsad, R.N., Multhoo, A.K., Mauryo, A.N., 1989. A note on the effect of phosphate fertilization on growth, nodulation and green pod yield of pea. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 16, 142-144.
Persson, L., Bodker, L., Larsson-Wikstrom, M., 1997. Prevalence and pathogenicity of foot and root-rot pathogens of pea in Southern Scandinavia. Plant Dis. 81, 171-174.
Pill, W.G., Collins, C.M., Goldberger, B., Gregory, N., 2009. Responses of non-primed or primed seeds of ‘Market more 76’cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) slurry coated with Trichoderma species to planting in growth media infested with Pythium aphanidermatum. Sci. Hort. 121, 54-62.
Ragab, M.M., Aly, M.D.H., Ragab, M.M., El-Mougy, Nehal, S., 1999. Effects of fungicides, biocides and bio-agents on controlling pea root rot diseases. Egypt. J. Phytopathol. 27, 65-81.
Rakshit, A., Pal, S., Meena, S., Manjhee, B., Rai, S., Rai, A., Bhowmick, M.K., Singh, H.B., 2014. Seed bio-priming: a potential tool in integrated resource management. SATSA Mukh. Ann. Tech. Iss. 18, 94-103.
Rakshit, A., Pal, S., Rai, S., Rai, A., Bhowmick, M.K., Singh, H.B., 2013. Micronutrient seed priming: a potential tool in integrated nutrient management. SATSA Mukh. Ann. Tech. Iss. 17, 77-89.
Rakshit, A., Sunita, K., Pal, S., Singh, A., Singh, H.B., 2015. Bio-priming mediated nutrient use efficiency of crop species. in: Rakshit, A., Singh, H.B., Sen, A., (Eds.), Nutrient Use Efficiency: from Basics to Advances, Springer India, pp-181-191.
Rauf, B.A., 2000. Seed borne disease problems of legume crops in Pakistan. Paki. J. Sci. Indust. Res. 43, 249-254.
Saxena, A., Raghuwanshi, R., Singh, H.B., 2015. Trichoderma species mediated differential tolerance against biotic stress of phytopathogens in Cicer arietinum L. J. Basic Microbiol. 55, 195-206.
Sharma, D.K., Yadav, A., Sharma, R., 1997. Effect of dates of sowing and phosphorus fertilization on growth, pod yield and disease incidence in (Pisum sativum L.). Ann. Agric. Res. 18, 546-566.
Singh, A., Jain, A., Sarma, B.K., Upadhyay, R.S., Singh, H.B., 2013 a. Rhizosphere microbes facilitate redox homeostasis in Cicer arietinum against biotic stress. Ann. Appl. Biol. 163, 33-46.
Singh, A., Sarma, B.K., Upadhyay, R.S., Singh, H.B., 2013 b. Compatible rhizosphere microbes mediated alleviation of biotic stress in chickpea through enhanced antioxidant and phenylpropanoid activities. Microbiol. Res. 168, 33-40.
Snedecore, W.C., Cochran, W.G., 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, p- 95.
Srivastava, T.K., Ahlawat, I.P.S., Panwar, J.D.S., 1998. Effect of phosphorus, molybdenum and bio-fertilizers on productivity of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 3 (3), 237-239.
Taylor, A.G., Hadar, Y., Norton, J.M., Harman, A.A., 1985. Influence of pre sowing seed treatments of table beet on the susceptibility to damping – off caused by Pythium spp. Phytopathology. 73, 631-637.
Taylor, A.G., Klein, D.E., Whitlow, T.H., 1988. Solid matrix priming of seeds, Sci. Hort. 37, 1-11.
Togay, Y., Togay, N., Dogan, Y., 2008. Research on the effect of phosphorus and molybdenum applications on the yield and yield parameters in lentil (Lens culinaris medic.) Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7 (9), 1256-1260.
Tu, J.C., 1992. Management of root rot diseases of peas, beans and tomatoes. Can. J. Pant Pathol. 14, 92-99.
Verma, M.L., Bhandari, A.R., Raina, J.N., 1997. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus application on the yield and macro-nutrient concentrations of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Int. J. Trop. Agric. 15, 195-198.
Vivek, S., Upadhyay, R.S., Sarma, B.K., Singh, H.B., 2016. Seed bio-priming with Trichoderma asperellum effectively modulate plant growth promotion in pea. Int. J. Agric. Enviro. Biotechnol. 9 (3), 361-365.
Warren, J.E., Bennett, M.A., 1999. Bio-osmopriming tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seeds for improved stand establishment. Seed Sci. Technol. 27 (2), 489-499.
We, L., 2000. Development of solid matrix priming to enhance loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seed germination and analysis of its physiological mechanisms. Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci. 80, 33-37.
Xue, A.G., 2003. Biological control of pathogens causing root rot complex in field pea using Clonostachys rosea strain ACM 941. Phytopathology. 93, 329-335.